improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...
improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...
improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Forest Products Research Division<br />
Royal Forest Department<br />
Ministry of Agriculture and Coo~perativt's<br />
IMPROVED BIOMASS<br />
COOKING STOVE<br />
FOR HOUSEHOLD USE<br />
Submitted to the<br />
National Energy Administration<br />
Ministry of Science, Technology and Energy<br />
Under the<br />
Renewable Nonconventional Enu.rgy Protect<br />
Royal Thai Government<br />
U.S. Agen~cy (or International Development<br />
\~
"Ho<strong>use</strong>hold development in any soc-ety<br />
can only be achieved when the most iLaportant<br />
part of the kitchen, the ciok<strong>stove</strong>, has also<br />
been <strong>improved</strong>."
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
I wish to express my appreciaticn to USAID/Thailand, to the Natio:lal<br />
Energy Administration and Department of Technical and Economic Cooperation<br />
<strong>for</strong> their support and <strong>for</strong> providing a timely opportunity to prove the wood<br />
energy conservation case In rural application. The Royal Forest Department<br />
responded eagerly to the request <strong>for</strong> project personnel and facilities needed<br />
<strong>for</strong> implementation.<br />
I am obliged to Mr. Suthi Harnsongkram, the Director of Forest Products<br />
Research, who had kindly helped in the execution of the project plan in his<br />
capacity as the Department's Director General.<br />
Acknowledgements are due Miss Pojanee Jongjitirat of KMIT <strong>for</strong> the<br />
preparation of the main part of this final report and <strong>for</strong> helping with the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>'s promotional training; Mr. Banyat Srisom <strong>for</strong> the final <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />
technical drawings, development of produztion technique and quality control<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> designs, and helping with the <strong>stove</strong>'s promotional training;<br />
Mr. Piroj Uttarapong of Kasetsart University <strong>for</strong> assisting in test data<br />
compilation, <strong>stove</strong> cataloguing, and promotional training.<br />
Mr. Arkom Vejsupasook. the component assistant, Mr. Songdham Jaikwang,<br />
and Miss Malee Rungsrisawadth, project officers, were indispensable <strong>for</strong> the<br />
day-to-day project operation, by conducting the experiment and collection of<br />
data, commissioning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s production, and organizing of<br />
promotional training programs.<br />
Personally, I wish to extend my special thanks to Mr. Sompongse Chantavorapap,<br />
the project manager, and Mr. Minta a Silawatshananai, the USAID<br />
project officer, <strong>for</strong> their unfailing assistance whenever problems arose.<br />
I am also grateful to my research colleaques whose names are all listed<br />
in the Annex <strong>for</strong> their invaluable contribution to the success of this project.<br />
Finally, credit is given to secretarial and the editorial staff of the<br />
Office of Project Support who patiently strived <strong>for</strong> a quality final report.<br />
Aroon Chomcharn<br />
Component Leader<br />
Stove Improvement Component<br />
Royal Forest Department
CONTENTS<br />
Page<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................... 11<br />
List of Tables .......................................................... 17<br />
List of Figures ......................................... :.............. 21<br />
Terms and Abbreviations ............................................... 25<br />
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION<br />
A. The Project ........................................... 31<br />
B. Historical Background ................................. 32<br />
C, Statement of the Problem ............................... 34<br />
D. Objectives of the Study ............................... 36<br />
E. Potential Benefits <strong>for</strong> Rural Development .............. 37<br />
F. Scope of Work ......................................... 37<br />
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
A. Stove Construction and Design ......................... 43<br />
B. Standard Methods of Testing Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ......... 48<br />
C. Factors Affecting Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ................... 51<br />
D. Conclusion ............................................ 53<br />
C1APTER 3 PLAN AND DESIGN OF THE PROJECT<br />
A. Laboratory and Facility Set Up ........................ 57<br />
3. Collection of Existing Local Stoves ................ 57<br />
C. Investigation of Existing Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ........... 58<br />
D. Analysis of Stove Physical Factors ..................... 58<br />
E. Development of Improved Prototype ..................... 58<br />
F. Testing of Prototype and Remodif.cation ............... 58<br />
G. Production of Developed Stoves ........................ 59<br />
H. Field Promotion of Developed Stoves ................... 59<br />
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES<br />
A. Fuel Type and Preparation .............................. 63<br />
B. Tests of Existing Thai Cooking Stoves ................. 64
CONTENTS (continued)<br />
C. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variable on<br />
the Charcoal Bucket Stove ............................<br />
D. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of External Variables on<br />
the Charcoal Bucket Stove ............................<br />
E. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Variables on the<br />
'Non-chimneyed Wood Stove .............................<br />
F. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of External Variables on<br />
the Non-chimneyed Wood Stove .........................<br />
G. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />
CIimneyed Wood Stove .................................<br />
H. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />
Chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ............................<br />
I. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />
Non-chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ........................<br />
Page<br />
J. Development of Improved Stove Prototype ......... 04... 75<br />
CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
A. Physical Structure of Commercial Stoves .............. 79<br />
B. Terminology ..........................................<br />
C. Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Commercial Stoves Tested ............... 85<br />
D.<br />
The Effect of Internal and External Variables ........ 99<br />
CHAPTER 6 THEORETICAL,ANALYSIS OF CHARCOAL STOVE<br />
A. Mathematical Model of the Bucket Stoves<br />
66<br />
68<br />
70<br />
71<br />
72<br />
73<br />
73<br />
85<br />
............. 135<br />
B. Evaluation of Parameters ............................. 143<br />
C. Model Application .................................... 144<br />
D. Discussion and Evaluation ............................ 162<br />
CHAPTER 7 STOVE MODELS DEVELOPED<br />
A. Improved Stove's Terminology ......................... 167<br />
B. Improved Charcoal Stove Model "RFD-1"................ 173<br />
C. Improved Non-chimneyed Wood Stove Model "RFD-2 " ........ 175<br />
D. Improved Chimney Wood Stov . .......................... 180<br />
E. Improved Non-chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ............... 186<br />
F. Improved Chimneyed Rice Husk Stove Model "RFD-3"....... 187
CONTENTS (continued)<br />
CHAPTER 8 IMPROVED STOVE DESIGNS AND PRODUCTION<br />
Page<br />
A. Technical Drawings of Improved Stove .................. 197<br />
B. Construction Instructions ............................ 197<br />
C. A Mass Production Scheme to Make Charcoal and<br />
Wood Stoves Using the Hydraulic Press ................ 209<br />
CHAPTER 9 IMPROVED STOVE PROMOTION<br />
A. Overall Target of Stove Promotion .................... 213<br />
B. Creation of Public Awareness ......................... 215<br />
C. Introduction/Training on Efficient Stoves ............ 216<br />
D. Introduction and Distribution of Sample Stove<br />
to Hn<strong>use</strong>hold Users ................................... 229<br />
E. Organization of Stove Manufacturers to Produce 229<br />
Improved Design Stoves ..............................<br />
CHAPTER 10 CONCLUSIONS.......................................237<br />
CHAPTER 11 RECOMMENDATIONS . ................................... 241<br />
ANNEXES<br />
I.<br />
Commercial Charcoal Bucket Stove Investigated ......... 245<br />
II. Commercial and User Built Wood Stove Without<br />
Chiminey Investigated ................................. 285<br />
III. Commercial Wood Stove With Chimney Investigated ...... 303<br />
IV. Commercial Rice Husk Stove With Chimney<br />
Investigated ......................................... 309<br />
V. List of Staff and Personnel <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement<br />
Component ............................................ 317<br />
REFERENCES .........................................................321
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
Energy <strong>for</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> in Thailand depends largely on <strong>biomass</strong><br />
mainly in the <strong>for</strong>m of wood and charcoal. The annual consumption of both<br />
fuels in terms of solid wood is approximately 40 million cubic meters, with<br />
in estimated value of well over 7.5 billion baht. If this quantity of<br />
wood fuel were to be provided by commercial fuels such as kerosen LPG and<br />
LNG, the national spending on such imports would be at least three times<br />
higher. Furthermore, many problems would exist both with effectively<br />
distributing these <strong>for</strong>ms of energy to rural areas, as well as with its prohibitive<br />
cost.<br />
Statistics on wood consumption of the country reveal that the <strong>use</strong> of<br />
wood <strong>for</strong> fuel is approximately 75-80% of all <strong>use</strong>s (with such purposes as<br />
construction and industrial applications comprising the remainder). This<br />
consumption ratic indicates that the country's dependence on wood fuel is<br />
likely to persist <strong>for</strong> a long time to come.<br />
The present scarcity of fuelwood has already appeared in many areas<br />
of the country. This will occur more frequently as the natural <strong>for</strong>est<br />
diminishes and the population increases. In order to correct this problem,<br />
in addition to planting morc fast-growing species of trees, conservation<br />
through the improvement of inefficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is necessary. As<br />
a cnnsequeD-e the Cooking Stove Improvement <strong>for</strong> Ho<strong>use</strong>hold Use Project was<br />
launched.<br />
The objectives of the project were:<br />
a) to investigate the per<strong>for</strong>mance of existing <strong>stove</strong>s currently<br />
<strong>use</strong>d in Thailand,<br />
b) to make necessary improvements on each type of <strong>stove</strong> (charcoal,<br />
wood, and agriresidue) <strong>for</strong> better fuel efficiency and ease of<br />
operation,<br />
c) to establish <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production techniques suitable<br />
<strong>for</strong> small-scale rural industries,<br />
d) to disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation, technology and/or <strong>improved</strong><br />
hardware to <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs, manufacturers, and the general<br />
public, and<br />
e) to increase the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of trained personnel and institutional<br />
research facilities <strong>for</strong> future campaigns investigating<br />
efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
This project component was operated by the Forent Products Research<br />
Division of the Royal Forestry Department. The operation phase was<br />
started in March 1982 and ended in Septe<strong>mb</strong>er 1984. Activities undertaken<br />
included collection and selection of commercial <strong>stove</strong>s, <strong>stove</strong> development<br />
to yield better design, prototype testing, <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production and<br />
fabrication, and promotion of the <strong>improved</strong> final models.<br />
11
Accomplishments can be summarized as follows:<br />
1) The per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand<br />
(both commercial and <strong>use</strong>r-built models) was investigated.<br />
2) Based on the heat utilization efficiency (HU) rating under<br />
the same test standard, it was found that the average HU's<br />
<strong>for</strong> LPG, pressurized kerosene, charcoal bucket, nonchimneyed<br />
wood, chimneyed wood, nonchimneyed rice husk, and chimneyed<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were 46, 48, 27, 20, 12, 16, and 5% respectively.<br />
3) The improvements on the five generic types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
mentioned above have resulted in HU increases of 26% <strong>for</strong><br />
chqrcoal, 35% <strong>for</strong> nonchimneyed wood, 58% <strong>for</strong> chimneyed wood,<br />
20% <strong>for</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk, and 100% <strong>for</strong> chimneyed rice<br />
husk <strong>stove</strong>s as compared with the average existing models.<br />
4) In addition to the HU increase (indicating the net increase<br />
in work output per unit fuel input), certain <strong>stove</strong> featurewere<br />
also <strong>improved</strong> -- particularly the <strong>stove</strong> rim design to<br />
accommodate various sizes of pots and pans, fire-resistant<br />
characteristics of pottery liners <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, and increases of their service lives.<br />
5) A better clay raw material <strong>for</strong> pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s was<br />
identified and a production technique suitable <strong>for</strong> rural<br />
industries developed. A trial production by village <strong>stove</strong><br />
makers employing this technique was successful. 2000 charcoal<br />
and 1200 wood <strong>stove</strong>s of acceptable quality were obtained<br />
with good production precision.<br />
6) The component conducted nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> training courses<br />
<strong>for</strong> concerned rural government officials and rural <strong>stove</strong><br />
<strong>use</strong>rs. The reception <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong> models (particularly<br />
charcoal and nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s) was very encouraging.<br />
The reception <strong>for</strong> rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s was also enthusiastic,<br />
but was restricted to a few rural areas only.<br />
7) During the trial promotion, approximately 1500 charcoal,<br />
800 nonchimneyed wood, 150 nonchimneyed rice husk, and 50<br />
chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were distributed to trainees,<br />
to interested government and private organizations, and<br />
to individual <strong>use</strong>rs upon request.<br />
8) As a result of the project implementation, a modest <strong>stove</strong><br />
laboratory, adequately equipped with basic facilities <strong>for</strong><br />
future work, was established at RFD.<br />
12
CONCLUSIONS<br />
As a result of the implementation of the Improved Biomass Cooking Stove<br />
Component, many activities and achievements took place. Accomplishments can<br />
be described as follows:<br />
1. As a part of institution strengthening, the component has succeeded in<br />
establishing a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> testing laboratory at the Forest Products<br />
Research Division, Royal Forest Department. Thrcugh project funding, the<br />
laboratory was equipped with invaluable, basic test instruments and<br />
facilities--including a microcomputer system <strong>for</strong> future applications.<br />
2. Long-term training of project personnel to increase their fLcure<br />
capabilities was minimum bcca<strong>use</strong> time was short (30 months) and they were<br />
needed on site to carry out project tasks. There<strong>for</strong>e, all technical personnel<br />
were indispensable <strong>for</strong> project implementation. They could not be spared <strong>for</strong><br />
long term training.<br />
3. The component has produced five generic types of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />
namely, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys, and<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys. The absolute heat utilization <strong>for</strong><br />
charcoal and both types of wood <strong>stove</strong>s increased up to 7% over that of the<br />
average commercial models. Further, an increase of 5 and 3% was achieved<br />
with rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys respectively. In terms of<br />
comparative efficiency increases, the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> reached a 26% increase<br />
over the average commercial models, while <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without<br />
chimneys they were 58 and 35% respectively. The increase <strong>for</strong> the rice husk<br />
<strong>stove</strong> with chimney was 100%, or double the efficiency of the average<br />
commercial models. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney had the least<br />
increase, 15 - 16%.<br />
4. The investigation conducted on existing commercial <strong>stove</strong>s revealed that<br />
fuel efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> charcoal, wood, or rice husk are rare. The<br />
laboratory tests have led to the identification ot the <strong>stove</strong>s' critical<br />
physical parameters. They consist of <strong>stove</strong> weight; exhausted gap/area;<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity; rim design <strong>for</strong> proper fit of variously-sized<br />
pots and pans; grate-to-pot distance; grate parameters such as hole area, hole<br />
size and distribution, and thickness; height of chimney, and flue gas baffle<br />
(<strong>for</strong> chimneyed stov;es). Other strong factors also influencing <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance are external variables--fuel load or fuel feeding rate, amount of<br />
water to be boiled, and the wind factor. The in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained was later<br />
<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> redesigning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models.<br />
5. Good quality clay material suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing has been<br />
identified and a production technique has also been developed <strong>for</strong> small-scale<br />
and home industries. Local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in one district of Roi-et<br />
Province were trained without any difficulty in this technique of <strong>stove</strong><br />
production. <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, particularly charcoal and nonchimney wood models,<br />
are heat refractory and can withstand thermal shock much better than present<br />
13
commercial ones. In addition, the application of the internal mold has<br />
greatly <strong>improved</strong> the precision necessary to control the critical internal<br />
dimensions. This method was found to be superior'to the traditional one<br />
using an external mold which hardly conLrolled the internal dimensions.<br />
6. The production cost of the <strong>improved</strong> models as described in (2) above<br />
presently is approximately 2.5 times more than the cost of he poorer quality<br />
commercial models. Howevdr, when compared with top quality charcoal bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the market, the <strong>improved</strong> models' cost is 25 - 30% lower.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, in long-term commercial production, the <strong>improved</strong> models will be<br />
competitive when production increases and more <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s reach the<br />
market.<br />
7. So far, nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion and training programs have been<br />
carried out among villagers at various places around the country. The<br />
reception <strong>for</strong> the charcoal bucket and the non-chimney wood <strong>stove</strong>s was very<br />
gdod, while the good reception of the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong> was limited<br />
to a few localities where only rice husk is available. The chimneyed wood<br />
and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> are of less interest to rural <strong>use</strong>rs than the<br />
charcoal bucket and the non-chimneyed wood and the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
It is believed that with good follow-up and promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t, some of the<br />
<strong>improved</strong> developed models will withstand harsh <strong>use</strong> and serve <strong>use</strong>rs well in<br />
rural kitchens. However, these long-term results are yet to be seen.<br />
8. Beca<strong>use</strong> of time constraints, the project had a limited time to approach<br />
manufacturers on a large scale. However, among a few large manufacturers in<br />
the Central area, the response to the idea of mass production of the<br />
developed models was not enthusiastic. This lack of enthusiasm is perhaps<br />
a result of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers being accustomed to the production of their<br />
rough products and being reluctant to manufacture <strong>stove</strong>s with which they have<br />
little or no experience. Moreover, they probably want to see the market <strong>for</strong><br />
high quality, efficient <strong>stove</strong>s develop first be<strong>for</strong>e committing their resources<br />
to their production. There<strong>for</strong>e, more time and more education are needed <strong>for</strong><br />
them to change their attitude and adapt their production techniques.<br />
14
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
On the basis of the overall work of this project, some recommendations<br />
are presented below:<br />
1. Beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion involve the social customs and<br />
habits of millions of people in Thailand and around the world, it is highly<br />
recommended that <strong>stove</strong> research and development be carried on to furtner<br />
improve present designs and find more alternatives <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
2. Stove development should emphasize each generic type of <strong>stove</strong>; namely,<br />
charcoal, wood with and without chimney, and agrirenidue <strong>stove</strong>s with and<br />
without chimney so that <strong>use</strong>rs have choices.<br />
3. Stove research and development must not only emphasize the good<br />
conversion efficiency, but it most also facilitate ease of <strong>use</strong> and other<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> functions, without causing undue change in people's <strong>cooking</strong> habits.<br />
4. Stove promotion i.sa most difficult activity. It will take a great<br />
deal of time and resources. There<strong>for</strong>e, continuous ef<strong>for</strong>t must be made <strong>for</strong><br />
at least five years with reasonable financial and human resource support in<br />
order to see a real impact among 6 million rural <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
5. In Thailand there are quite a few researchers and interest groups working<br />
on <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, all lack guidelines and<br />
coordination. For national <strong>stove</strong> programs to be directed toward this common<br />
goal, leading government agencies are needed to provide close coordination.<br />
6. During the course of <strong>stove</strong> development, many contacts were made with<br />
experienced <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. It was found that, regardless of their<br />
long experience, their basic understanding of good <strong>stove</strong> configuration, design<br />
and its per<strong>for</strong>mance was very much lacking. This problem was also manifested<br />
in the presence of a large majority of poor quality and less efficient<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in the market. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is strcngly recommended that<br />
concerned government agencies take an initiative toward arranging <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
training programs <strong>for</strong> the promotion of the essential, scientific knowledge<br />
required among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. Incentives or approaches such as offering<br />
a certificate and/or reward to manufacturers of efficient stolres would be<br />
a highly motivating factor.<br />
7. The lack of understanding among <strong>use</strong>rs on the criteria <strong>for</strong> selection and<br />
<strong>use</strong> of efficiett <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s was also evident. There<strong>for</strong>e, the concerned<br />
government agency should establish a long--range,adequately funded educational<br />
campaign program <strong>for</strong> efficient <strong>stove</strong>s--particularly through primary and<br />
secondary school systems.<br />
8. The cost of <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong> production is still high. If simple<br />
hydraulic molding can be developed and employed at the village level,<br />
production costs can be greatly reduced. Under these conditions <strong>stove</strong><br />
dimensions will be more precise and the production rate will be increased<br />
significantly.<br />
15
9. Selection of clay raw material and improvement of the clay mixture and<br />
firing to attain a product with fire resistant characteristics (particularly,<br />
the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> body) are essential to a <strong>stove</strong>'s long service life. The<br />
weight of the <strong>stove</strong> also needs further reduction (to achieve peak per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
with even lower charcoal loads).<br />
10. The <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> is quite efficient <strong>for</strong> the present<br />
developed model. It can conveniently be <strong>use</strong>d to replace three-rock <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
However, the same problems exist in its mass production techniques as ex.st<br />
<strong>for</strong> the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
11. Smoke in the kitchen is a problem inherent in non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
including the three-stone and open fire. Research should be carried out in<br />
Thailand to determine whether smoke from undeveloped and even developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
(which noticeably gives less smoke over the undeveloped ones), has any<br />
significant effect on long-term health of <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
12. Up to the present time, the one hole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has attained<br />
an efficiency up to only 18-19%. In addition, there are problems fitting<br />
pots and pans to this <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is recommended that development<br />
on this type of <strong>stove</strong> be continued in order to improve both heat utilization<br />
efficiency and compatability with various pots and pans. Moreover, the <strong>stove</strong><br />
material (as in the case of the non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s and the charcoal<br />
<strong>stove</strong>) shoul] also be investigated.<br />
13. Even though, at present, the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> is still not<br />
popularly <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand, the chance <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> to become popular in<br />
certain regions is high. This is beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> granulated fuels other<br />
than rice husk (such as sawdust, peanut shell, seed waste, <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>biomass</strong><br />
scraps, etc). There are several further improvements that need consideration.<br />
These include the improvement of the <strong>stove</strong>'s configuration to fit various<br />
pots and pans and reduction of its weight so that sometimes it can be moved<br />
around the ho<strong>use</strong> (yard) when needed. For two people to carry the <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />
weight should not exceed 50 kg.<br />
14. The experience gained from the <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaigns among rural<br />
<strong>use</strong>rs, even in its short duration, strongly indicated that there is a good<br />
chance of success in replacing relatively inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s among 6 million<br />
rural Thai families with efficient <strong>stove</strong>s. It is, there<strong>for</strong>e, recommended that<br />
the government support a nationwide efficient <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaign <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers as soon as possible.<br />
15. Since better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, in part, mean better living<br />
<strong>for</strong> millions of rural families around the world, the idea of<br />
continuous development to attain even better per<strong>for</strong>mance than the present<br />
developed models should be the challenging subject among applied research<br />
scientists and concerned institutions.<br />
16
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table Title Page<br />
4.1 -.Characteristics of Biomass fuel <strong>use</strong> in the experiment ooo........ 64<br />
5.1 Physical dimensions of tested charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s .......... ... 80<br />
5.2 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimneys ...... 82<br />
5.3 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys ......... 84<br />
5.4 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney ......... 86<br />
5.5 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney ............ 87<br />
5.6 Average testing results of commercial charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s ........... 88<br />
5.7 Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney .......... 96<br />
5.8 Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney ............. 97<br />
5.9 Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney .........98<br />
5.10 Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney ..... 100<br />
5.11 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhausted area<br />
on HU and time to bo>i ........................................... 103<br />
5.12 Test results of the effect of grate hole area on HU and<br />
time to boil .............................................. 104<br />
5.13 Test re;ult of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on HU<br />
and time to boil ............................................... 107<br />
5.14 Test result of the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on<br />
HU and time to boil ............................................. 108<br />
5.15 Test result of the effect of air inlet door on HU and<br />
time to boil ....................................................110<br />
5.16 Test result of the effect of grate thickness on <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance ..................................................... 113<br />
5.17 Test result of the effect of insulation on HU and time to boil ...113<br />
5.18 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> weight on the HU<br />
and time to boil ................................................ 115<br />
5.19 Test result of the effect of initial weight of charcoal<br />
on <strong>stove</strong> HU and time to boil ................................... 116<br />
17
LIST OF TABLES (continued)<br />
Table Title Page<br />
5.20 Test result of the effect of initial weight of water<br />
on HU and time to boil ..........................................<br />
5.21 Test result of the effect of pot size on HU and time to boil .... 119<br />
5.22 Test result of the effect of charcoal size on HU and time<br />
to boil ......................................................... 120<br />
5.23 Test result of the effect of wind on HU and time to boil ........ 121<br />
5.24 Test result of the effect of air relative humidity on<br />
HU and time to boil ............................................. 122<br />
5.25 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap on HU and time<br />
to boil of the wood <strong>stove</strong> ....................................... 123<br />
5.26 Test result of the effect of grate on HU and time to<br />
boil of wood <strong>stove</strong> .............................................. 124<br />
5.27 Test result of the effect of grate hole area on wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 126<br />
5.28 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on<br />
<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 127<br />
5.29 Test result of the effect of wind on wood <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ..... 128<br />
5.30 Test result of the effect of firewood feeding rate on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 130<br />
6.1 Group of <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar behavior and show good<br />
correlation in regression analysis .............................. 150<br />
7.1 Physical characteristics of RFD-1 charcoal <strong>stove</strong> relating<br />
to external variablec ........................................... 174<br />
7.2 Average test results of RFD-I charcoal <strong>stove</strong> under<br />
different <strong>use</strong> conditions ........................................ 174<br />
7.3 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model<br />
RFD-2 with bucket ............................................... 179<br />
7.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of the prototype <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> ...... 185<br />
7.5 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-3 .. 191<br />
8.1 Compositions and fired resistant property of some local<br />
clay materials <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery productions ........... 199<br />
18<br />
117
LIST OF TABLES (continued)<br />
Table Title Page<br />
941 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency.between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm ............................... 217<br />
9.2 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 219<br />
9.3 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Sakolnakorn ................................ 221<br />
9.4 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Pitsanulok ................................. 225<br />
9.5 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 226<br />
9.6 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Chachoengsoa ............................... 227<br />
9.7 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm ............................... 228<br />
9.8 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 230<br />
9.9 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Nan ........................................ 231<br />
19
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure Title Page<br />
5.0 Time-temperature characteristic curves of charcoal<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ......................................... ..... ... 90<br />
5.1 Pe,-t rmance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />
(HU) of commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ........................ 91<br />
5.2 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of commercial<br />
charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s .......................................... 92<br />
5.3 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />
(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s .................. 94<br />
5.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of nonchimneyed<br />
and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s ....................................... 95<br />
5.5 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />
(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s ............. <strong>101</strong><br />
5.6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boll of nonchimneyed<br />
and chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s .................................. 102<br />
5.7 The effect of exhausted gap on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency and<br />
time to boil ...................................................105<br />
5.8 The effect of the grate hole area on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil ...... ............ ............................. 106<br />
5.9 The effect of grate--to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency and time to boil .................................... 109<br />
5.10 The effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency and time to boil of three different <strong>stove</strong>s tested .... 11<br />
5.11 The effect of air inlet door on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil ................................................ 112<br />
5.12 The effect of grate thickness on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil ......................<br />
5.13 The effect of the initial weight of charcoal on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency and time to boil ............................... 118<br />
5.14 The effect of exhausted gap on efficiency of various<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong>s ...................................................<br />
5.15 The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the heat utilization<br />
efficiency (HU) of wood <strong>stove</strong>s .................................. 129<br />
6.1 Structure of the ideal Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> ................. 137<br />
P-,. 21<br />
114<br />
125
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)<br />
Figure Title Page<br />
6.2 Geometry of the ideal <strong>stove</strong> ..................................... 145<br />
6.3 Relationship between the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> inlet<br />
air and the grate hole area ..................................... 147<br />
6.4 Relationship between exhaust area and gap height ................ 148<br />
6.5 Relationship between variable X, defined in equation (49),<br />
and time to boil ................................................ 151<br />
6.6 Model prediction of the effect of grate-to-pot distance<br />
on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ............ 153<br />
6.7 Model prediction of the effect of wall thickness on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 154<br />
6.8 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong><br />
at the bottom on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time<br />
to boil ......................................................... 156<br />
6.9 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong><br />
at the pot stand on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and<br />
time to boil ................................................... 157<br />
6.10 Model prediction of the effect of gap height on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ......................... 158<br />
6.11 Model prediction of the effect of grate diameter on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 160<br />
6.12 Model prediction of the effect of grate hole area on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 161<br />
7.1 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> showing various<br />
parts of the construction and terminology ....................... 168<br />
7.2 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> showing parts<br />
of the construction and terminology ............................. 169<br />
7.3 Drawing of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype<br />
showing the construction and terminology ........................ 170<br />
7.4 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />
the construction and terminology ......................... ...... 171<br />
7.5 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> showing the<br />
construction and terminology ............................ .. . 172<br />
7.6 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-I" ...... ...... .177<br />
22
LIST OF FIGURES (continued)<br />
Figure Title Page<br />
7.7 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-I" .......................... 178<br />
7.8 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-2"................... 181<br />
7.9 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-2" ................. 182<br />
7.10 Prototype of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />
different parts of construction ................................ 183<br />
7.11 Nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, the "Improved Meechai" model ..... 189<br />
7.12 Improved rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, the "RFD-3" model ....... 193<br />
8.1 Technical Drawing of the Improved Charcoal Stove ............... 201<br />
8.2 Technical Drawing of the Improved Wood Stove ................... 202<br />
8.3 Technical Drawing of the Improved Rice Husk Nonchimneyed Stove . 203<br />
8.4 Technical Drawing of the Improved Rice Husk Stove with<br />
Chimney ........................................................ 204<br />
8.5 Preparation of biscuits and firing to be <strong>use</strong>d later <strong>for</strong><br />
clay mixture ................................................... 205<br />
8.6 Production of charcoal <strong>stove</strong> on the potter's wheel<br />
using the internal mold ........................................ 205<br />
8.7 Disasse<strong>mb</strong>ling of the internal mold from a newly made<br />
charcoal <strong>stove</strong> ................................................. 206<br />
8.8 Improved charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong> after finished firing<br />
and ready <strong>for</strong> further fabrication .............................. 206<br />
8.9 Grate hole design <strong>for</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s .......................... 208<br />
8.10 100-ton hydraulic automatic press machine <strong>for</strong> charcoal<br />
and wood <strong>stove</strong> ................................................. 210<br />
9.1 Introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to participants ............... 233<br />
9.2 Stove contest <strong>for</strong> efficiency comparison between commercial<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s and developed models .................................... 233<br />
9.3 Trainee participation in installing stov's parts .............. 234<br />
9.4 Distribution of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to all participants ........... 234<br />
23
A total surface area, sq cm<br />
A e<br />
A g<br />
A i<br />
c pw<br />
gap area, sq cm<br />
TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS<br />
grate hole area, sq cm<br />
area of opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air, sq cm<br />
heat capacity of wLter, J/gm C<br />
D wall thickness, cm<br />
D b<br />
D g<br />
Dt db outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, cm<br />
outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the grate position, cm<br />
outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand, cm<br />
inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, Cm<br />
d inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the grate position, cm<br />
g<br />
d t<br />
E c<br />
inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand, cm<br />
heating value of charcoal, 26340 J/gm<br />
Ef heating value of fuel, J/gm<br />
Ek heating value of wood kindling, 17890 J/gm<br />
F12 view factor from surface 1 to surface 2<br />
G gap height, cm<br />
Gr Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
AH heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, J/gm<br />
H grate-to-pot distance, cm<br />
Hba distance between the base and the apex of the outside cone, cm<br />
Hg b<br />
distance between the grate and the base of the outside truvcated<br />
cone, cm<br />
25
Htg distance between the grate and the potstand of the outside cone,<br />
cm<br />
HU heat utilization efficiency, %<br />
h heat transfer coefficient, W/sw cm C<br />
hba distance between the base and the apex of the inside cone, cm<br />
hfg latent heat of vaporization, J/gm<br />
hg b<br />
distance between the grate and the base of the inside truncated<br />
cone, cm<br />
htg distance between the grate and the pot stand of the inside cone,<br />
cm<br />
k thermal conductivity, J/cm s'C<br />
L heat of vaporization of water at lO0C, 2256 J/gm<br />
mc mass oZ charcoal, gm<br />
m <strong>stove</strong> weight, kg<br />
I rate of evaporatcd water, gm/s<br />
V<br />
m initial weight of water, gm<br />
Qabs rate of heat absorption, J/s<br />
Qh rate of heat supplied to water, J/s<br />
QI rate of heat loss, J/s<br />
Qsens sensible heat of water, J<br />
&w rate of heat absorbed by water, J/s<br />
qcond heat flux by conduction, J/s sq cm<br />
c dd heat flux by radiation, J/s sq cm<br />
S specific heat of water, 4.18 J/gm<br />
surface area of pot, sq cm<br />
T temperature, 0 C<br />
Ta<strong>mb</strong> a<strong>mb</strong>ient room temperature, 0 C<br />
Tboil boiling water temperature, 'C<br />
T water temperature, 'C<br />
26
T temperature of water at start of test, OC<br />
T 2<br />
temperature of water at boiliDg point, *C<br />
TTB time to boil, min<br />
t time, min<br />
vc velocity of buoyant gas, cm/s<br />
W weight of water in pot at start of test, gm<br />
W c<br />
W e<br />
weight of charcoal remaining at end of each test, gm<br />
weight of water evaporated at end of each test, gm<br />
Wf weight of fuel <strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />
Wk weight of kindling, gm<br />
p density, g/cu cm<br />
a Stefan-Boltzmann consta.t<br />
efficiency of <strong>stove</strong>, %<br />
27
Chapter 1<br />
Introduction
INTRODUCTION<br />
This publication presents th3 major findings on the testing and<br />
development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand--<strong>stove</strong>s that <strong>use</strong> wood,<br />
chtrcoal and agricultural residues. The Stove Improvement Project has four<br />
major parts responsible <strong>for</strong> different project functions;<br />
1. Stove Testing: Selection of available commercial <strong>stove</strong>s to be tested;<br />
2. Stove Development: Measurement and analysis of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance to<br />
yield designs of new models;<br />
3. Stove Construction and Fabrication: Production of engineering drawings<br />
of the newly developed designs as well as construction and fabrication<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong>s; and<br />
4. Stove Promotion: Carrying out field promotion <strong>for</strong> the newly developed,<br />
highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
A. THE PROJECT<br />
Stove Improvement is one component of 14 separate components involved in<br />
the Renewable Nonconventional Energy Project #493-0304. Projects carried out<br />
include:<br />
Industrial Biogas<br />
Biomass Gasification<br />
Charcoal Improvement<br />
Energy Master Plan Support<br />
Micro-Hydro Project<br />
National Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Center<br />
Pyrolysis of Rice Husks<br />
Regional Energy Centers<br />
Solar Thermal Processes<br />
Solar/Wind Assessment<br />
Stove Improvement<br />
Village Survey<br />
Village Woodlots<br />
Water Lifting Technology<br />
This Project is jointly funded by the United States Agency <strong>for</strong><br />
International Development (USAID) and the Royal Thai Government through the<br />
National Energy Administration (NEA) and Royal Forest Department. The Stove<br />
Improvement program is operated by the Forest Products Research Division of<br />
the Royal Forest Department.<br />
31
B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND<br />
This section briefly discusses the evolution of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in the<br />
world (and Thai cocking <strong>stove</strong>s in particular) in terms of popular types of<br />
hardware and cultural and social habits associated with various models.<br />
Evolution of Cooking Stoves in the World<br />
Evidence of the <strong>use</strong> of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel, particularly wood, has been found<br />
within the caves of Peking man as early as 400,000 years ago (Bronowski,1973).<br />
At that time, <strong>biomass</strong> was presumably <strong>use</strong>d as fuel <strong>for</strong> weather conditioning<br />
(warmth). Its application to <strong>cooking</strong> developed later. While styles and<br />
methods of <strong>cooking</strong> have developed into a variety of artistic and elaborate<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms, the <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s which are the hardwar-e supporting this<br />
activity (as holders <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> utensils and as fuel co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>ers)<br />
have changed very littlu in structure and per<strong>for</strong>mance from their ancient<br />
predecessors.<br />
When compared with modern <strong>stove</strong>s such as oil, gas, and electric, the<br />
<strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are far less efficient. The efficiency of kerosene or<br />
LPG fuelled <strong>stove</strong>s can be as high as 45-48%, while that of a wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
averages only 15-20%. Even though the -ap in efficiency is partially explained<br />
by the lower calorific value of the wood fuel, the main problem still rests<br />
heavily on the hardware design of the <strong>stove</strong> itself.<br />
The development of <strong>stove</strong>s can be seen as eccurring over two periods of<br />
time. The first period began with the birth of the three stone <strong>stove</strong> and<br />
continued until the discovery and application of electricity. The second<br />
period has lasted from that time until the present. While the latter period<br />
amounts to only about 100 years, the first period lasted many thousands of<br />
years.<br />
The slow development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in the early period can<br />
be explained by the abundant supply of wood and the consequent lack of any<br />
demand <strong>for</strong> higher efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s. Most of the ef<strong>for</strong>t toward <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
design in the second period of time has been in the area of the electric, gas,<br />
and oil <strong>stove</strong>s popular in western countries. The application of scientific<br />
principles and knowledge to the design of better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s has<br />
been neglected. However, as the world population has increased tremendously<br />
in the last 100 years, particularly in poor and less developed countries Lhat<br />
are dependent on <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, the demand <strong>for</strong> wood fuel has risen<br />
sharply. The increase in demand coupled with the rapid loss of <strong>for</strong>est land<br />
to agriculture has made the procurement of wood <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> both difficult<br />
and expensive. With the current situation, the time has come <strong>for</strong> humankind<br />
to start applying modern engineering principles to the design of <strong>biomass</strong><br />
<strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in order to improve this long neglected but widely and daily<br />
<strong>use</strong>d appliance.<br />
32
History of Thai Cooking Stoves<br />
In Thailand, as in many developing countries, a large majority of people<br />
cook meals with <strong>biomass</strong> fuels. The largest proportio.. of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel<br />
consumption consists mainly of wood (59.8%) and charcoal (29.9%) (Pounoum,<br />
Wongopalert, and Arnold 1982). Other types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>use</strong>d as <strong>cooking</strong> fuel<br />
make a considerably smaller contribution. These include rice husk (8.0%),<br />
rice straw (1.7%), and coconut shell (0.6%). The wood and charcoal consumption<br />
in terms of solid wood are reported to be 40 million cubic meters annually.<br />
The quantity of solid fuel <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> is certainly going to increase in<br />
the near future beca<strong>use</strong> of the increase in population. Substitution with other<br />
fuels will be limited. This increasing trend of fuelwood consumption cannot<br />
be ignored beca<strong>use</strong> it results in a greater demand on the fuelwood supply. In<br />
fact, a fuelwood scarcity has already occurred in many areas of the country.<br />
Cooking in Thailand relies heavily on wood beca<strong>use</strong> of its ideal nature<br />
as a fuel. However, most of the <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d by Thai families are still<br />
inefficient. If the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> could be <strong>improved</strong> by only 5-10%<br />
(in fact 50% improvement can be achieved over the average commercial models),<br />
the quantity of wood and charcoal consumed by 6 million rural families in<br />
Thailand can be greatly reduced.<br />
A survey of popular types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is very essential<br />
beca<strong>use</strong> it can be <strong>use</strong>d as a guideline <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> improving strategies. Many<br />
new designs of highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s have failed to gain popular acceptance<br />
beca<strong>use</strong> the new models require changes in family <strong>cooking</strong> habits and social<br />
traditions. In addition, the operation of newly introduced designs is often<br />
more difficult. Hence, some important factors influencing the acceptance of<br />
highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s by rural families are considered in the following<br />
discussion of hardware and cultural and social habits.<br />
PopuZar types of hardware<br />
A survey of <strong>cooking</strong> hardware <strong>use</strong>d by Thai rural families (Pounoum,<br />
Wongopalert, and Arnold 1982) reported that the most popular type was a<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong> which accounted <strong>for</strong> 71% of rural families. Eighteen percent of<br />
rural families <strong>use</strong> the three-stone <strong>stove</strong> and 11% <strong>use</strong> other types of <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
that <strong>use</strong> fuel such as rice husk, sawdust, biogas, etc. The bucket <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
commercially sold in the markets are primarily designed <strong>for</strong> charcoal. However,<br />
some bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are designed <strong>for</strong> dual purposes where either charcoal or<br />
wood can be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> fuel. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, these dual features have<br />
significantly compromised the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (to be discussed later in this<br />
report). Prices vary from 20 baht to 300 baht depending on design, workmanship<br />
and bucket materials. For example, a stainless steel bucket <strong>stove</strong> may<br />
cost 150 baht a piece: it is the most expensive <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
The bucket <strong>stove</strong> is believed to have originated in China as it is known<br />
by Chinese name, "Ang-lo", which means "red color" (the color of low<br />
temperature fired clay). The period in which the bucket <strong>stove</strong> was brought<br />
to Thailand is not known. It possibly could have been brought here as long<br />
as 1,000 years ago during the earliest trade between Thailand and China during<br />
the Sukhothai Period. Or, on the other hand, the bucket <strong>stove</strong> may have come<br />
33
with Chinese migration during the Chinese civil war beca<strong>use</strong> the word "Ang-<br />
Lo" is from the dialect of one Chinese ethnic group that migrated to Thailand<br />
in large nu<strong>mb</strong>ers during that time. If this is true, then the time of its<br />
appearance in Thailand would be only about 100 years ago.<br />
The three-stone is really an ancient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>d throughout the<br />
world that may have originated hundreds of thousands of years ago. It still<br />
exists today, and in Thailand is <strong>use</strong>d only with wood. For other oiomass,<br />
such as rice husk, sawdust, and peanut shells, the other <strong>stove</strong> is <strong>use</strong>d,<br />
particularly in central areas where fuelwood is scarce. Rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
normally include chimneys beca<strong>use</strong> burning husks requires an induced draught<br />
to facilitate continuous co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Recently, non-chimney rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
have been found being <strong>use</strong>d by some Kampuchean refugee families at Kao-I-Dang,<br />
Refugee Camp in eastern Thailand. Both types of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, chimney and<br />
non-chimney, have not been widely <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand so far.<br />
Cutlturci and .ociaZ habits<br />
The size of a Thai family averages 6 persons. To cook food <strong>for</strong> this<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of people usually takes about 45 minutes to 1 hour. Most of the<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> is of rice (boiling or steaming), with an average <strong>cooking</strong> time of<br />
about 15-30 minutes. Meat and vegetable dishes are usually cooked rapidly<br />
thereafter and, hence, the <strong>cooking</strong> time is less than 10 minutes/dish. This<br />
kind of <strong>cooking</strong> always requires high heat intensity, and there<strong>for</strong>e, a onehole<br />
<strong>stove</strong> is preferred over multiple ones. Furthermore, in Thai culture,<br />
me<strong>mb</strong>ers of the family do not gather around the fireplace after the meal,<br />
drinking tea or coffee. Hence, the second pot hole (<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> warming a hot<br />
drink) is not needed. Neither hot water <strong>for</strong> bathing nor room heating is<br />
required.<br />
For these characteristics and <strong>cooking</strong> practices of Thai families, the<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong> is considered the most suitable and, there<strong>for</strong>e, has become the<br />
most popular type of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> throughout the country. It is believed<br />
that at least 4 million bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are being employed in Thailand at<br />
present.<br />
C. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM<br />
The problems associated with <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are discussed in the<br />
following section.<br />
Use of Inefficient Cooking Stoves<br />
Rough efficiency tests have been per<strong>for</strong>med on commercial charcoal, wood<br />
as well as three-stone <strong>stove</strong>s at the <strong>use</strong>r end (Pounoum, Wongopalert, and<br />
Arnold 1982). It was found that most <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are inefficient. For<br />
example, the average efficiency of wood burning <strong>stove</strong>s is 13.6%, and charcoal<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong>s 21.6%. The low efficiency per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is due<br />
mainly to poor design. For instance, the bucket <strong>stove</strong>s available on the<br />
market usually have an overly large exhaust gap through which a large<br />
34
quantity of sensible heat escapes. The <strong>stove</strong> rim is also poorly designed<br />
and can accommodate only a few pots and pans. Some wood <strong>stove</strong>s do not have<br />
grates and hence air <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is distributed pQorly, resulting in<br />
poor co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of the fuel.<br />
Lack of Knowledge and Awareness in Selecting Good Stoves<br />
Almost all people who <strong>use</strong> <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s daily seem to be<br />
unconcerned about the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. This may be due to the lack of<br />
awareness and knowledge of how a good <strong>stove</strong> could per<strong>for</strong>m and the inability<br />
to recognize higher efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s. The selection of the appropriate type<br />
of <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> specific <strong>biomass</strong> fuel is also very important. For example, if<br />
charcoal is uced in a bucket <strong>stove</strong> designed <strong>for</strong> wood, the efficiency of that<br />
<strong>stove</strong> will be reduced at least oy 5-10%.<br />
Lack of Interest and Knowledge axnong Manufacturers in the<br />
Production of Good Stoves<br />
Even though there exist some large bucket <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in Thailand.<br />
the majority of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are generally produced within family<br />
industries where me<strong>mb</strong>ers of the family do the work. Stove manufacturing<br />
knowledge (or poor knowledge) and skill has usually been passed down through<br />
new me<strong>mb</strong>ers over time. However, after conversing with many manufacturers, it<br />
was found that most of them still lack the interest and knowledge to recogPize<br />
the essential features of good <strong>stove</strong>s. The idea of competing <strong>for</strong> cheaper<br />
products among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers without concern <strong>for</strong> quality is quite<br />
prominent. This has brought about poor efficiency and durability of <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
on the market.<br />
Lack of Knowledge of Stove Maintenance<br />
Commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are made of a low temperature fired clay material.<br />
Their durability when exposed to very high temperatures, such as the hot<br />
glowing charcoal bed in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, is such that it will last<br />
only about 3-6 months at the most without an outside restraining device. If<br />
this fired clay <strong>stove</strong> is bucketted and prorerly filled with insulating<br />
materials and lined around the inside wall with an inexpensive refractory<br />
mixture, the service life of the <strong>stove</strong> can be prolonged to approximately 1<br />
year. Good care of <strong>stove</strong>s such as the repairing or the replacing of the<br />
grate, refractory lining, and rim sealing can greatly help to extend the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s life expectancy. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, most <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> tenders also lack<br />
this knowledge. In addition, it has been found that quite often the <strong>stove</strong><br />
is overloaded with charcoal above the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and hence, the<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> pot that rests on the charcoal bed will directly assert its own<br />
weight on to the grate. This will daanage the grate and ca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
degradation. Hot liquid splashing on to the <strong>stove</strong> rim and inside the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er due to severe boiling also affects the <strong>stove</strong>'s life<br />
expectancy beca<strong>use</strong> it will ca<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong>'s rim and body to crack.<br />
35
Lack of Understanding of Fuel Preparation<br />
Wet fuel burns less effectively than dry fuel beca<strong>use</strong> part of the heat<br />
of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is consumed to evaporate the water. Fresh wood generally<br />
contains about 50% moisture; there<strong>for</strong>e, wood should be ideally dried down to<br />
a moistura content of approximately 15%-12% be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>use</strong>. This can be done<br />
easily by placing it under the grate during <strong>cooking</strong>, or by letting it air dry<br />
<strong>for</strong> several days after splitting. It was found that many ho<strong>use</strong>hola cooks do<br />
not practice fuelwood preparation and drying. Another factor that<br />
contributes to the inefficient consumption of fuel is the lack of understanding<br />
of fuel <strong>use</strong>. For example, some <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> cooks insert a large piece of log<br />
into the <strong>stove</strong>. This kind of practice not only prolongs <strong>cooking</strong> time but also<br />
requires more firewood. In addition, the heavy wood piece can damage the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> structure easily. Smaller sized wood burns more effectively than fuel<br />
of a larger size, since a smaller size has a larger surface area of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
with air. There<strong>for</strong>e, large pieces of wood should be split or chopped into<br />
smaller ones <strong>for</strong> more efficient <strong>use</strong> of fuel.<br />
High Cost, Limited Production and Distribution of Good Stoves<br />
Since the main energy sources <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> in Thailand are wood and<br />
charcoal, the degradation of natural <strong>for</strong>est has become evident in many areas<br />
of the country. The rate of de<strong>for</strong>estation has increased tremendously during<br />
the last decade. For example, the <strong>for</strong>est areas of the country have been<br />
reduced from 273,628 sq.km. in 1961 to 156,600 sq.km. in 1982 (Forestry<br />
Statistics 1982). Even though the depletion of the <strong>for</strong>est is not only ca<strong>use</strong>d<br />
by the consumption of fuelwood <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> but also by slash and burn<br />
agriculture, road construction, etc., 40 million cu.m./yr of wood fuel is<br />
<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> alone. This will contribute significantly to the wood<br />
scarcity problem in the near future.<br />
Fortunately, commercial, fast-growing tree plantations that produce fuel<br />
(such as the mangrove, Eucalyptus, and Casuarina) can somewhat reduce the<br />
depletion of wood. However, if the commercial wood plantations are not<br />
expanded on a large scale, or are developed without the attempt to reduce<br />
heavy woodfuel consumption by initiation of efficient <strong>stove</strong>s, or by encouraging<br />
the people to grow more wood <strong>for</strong> their own <strong>use</strong>, Thailand's natural <strong>for</strong>ests<br />
can become exha<strong>use</strong>d within a very short time.<br />
D. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY<br />
The following are the five major objectives of the study:<br />
1. Tu established a model <strong>stove</strong> testing and evaluation center to<br />
accommodate the national need <strong>for</strong> present and future research and<br />
development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
2. To conduct a systematic investigation on present per<strong>for</strong>mance of existing<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s being <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand.<br />
36
3. To make necessary improvements in terms of heat conversion efficiency,<br />
ease of operation and durability <strong>for</strong> three generic types of <strong>stove</strong>;<br />
namely, charcoal, wood, and rice husk/agriresidue.<br />
4. To develop an <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production technique suitable <strong>for</strong> present<br />
small scale and medium scale rural industries.<br />
5. To disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>improved</strong> hardware and/or technology generated<br />
by this study to <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs, manufacturers, and the general public.<br />
E. POTENTIAL BENEFITS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
The potential benefits expected to be gained by the people who live in<br />
rural areas of Thailand are:<br />
1. Decrease in national overall fuelwood consumption, and hence, an indirect<br />
decrease in the rate of de<strong>for</strong>estation.<br />
2. Helping stimulate the establishment of indigenous renewable sources of<br />
energy in community, village and private woodlots through the popular<br />
employment of efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
3. Retarding the rate of increase of imported petroleum derived <strong>cooking</strong><br />
fuels.<br />
4. Reduction of <strong>cooking</strong> time as well as ease of <strong>cooking</strong> through the <strong>use</strong> of<br />
highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s and also a plausible reduction in kitchen air<br />
pollutants due to mre complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of the fuel.<br />
5. Individual savings on <strong>stove</strong> costs and woodfuel costs due<br />
life and better efficiency.<br />
to longer service<br />
6. The improvement of material and technology <strong>for</strong> constructing the developed<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s co<strong>mb</strong>ined with the better understanding of <strong>stove</strong> operation, care,<br />
and maintenance will altogether help the economy of <strong>stove</strong> producers and<br />
<strong>use</strong>rs in the long run.<br />
F. SCOPE OF WORK<br />
The <strong>stove</strong> improvement component project was designed to invertigate types<br />
of <strong>biomass</strong> fuels and types of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. Charcoal, wood, and rice husk<br />
are the prominent <strong>biomass</strong> fuels <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand and, hence, were to be<br />
selected <strong>for</strong> this study. The popular types of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s among <strong>use</strong>rs and<br />
those which are strictly <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> were to be chosen <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
development. A detailed scope of work which includes laboratory set up, <strong>stove</strong><br />
testing, analyses of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, designs of developed models,<br />
construction and fabrication, and <strong>stove</strong> promotion follows. These lists<br />
present the steps that were to be taken <strong>for</strong> all aspects of the project.<br />
37
Laboratory Set Up<br />
1. Selection of the site and laboratory construction at the Royal Forest<br />
Department.<br />
2. Acquisition of test instruments and facilities.<br />
3. Acquisition of technical consultants and researchers.<br />
Stove Testing Program<br />
1. Collect from the field various models of <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d in different parts<br />
of Thailand.<br />
2. Select fuels to be <strong>use</strong>d in tests and determine standard fuel preparatior<br />
methods.<br />
3. Select appropriate <strong>cooking</strong> and water boiling experiments and techniques.<br />
4. Test the <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s according to the selected testing experiment.<br />
Analyses of Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance Yield Design of Improved Model<br />
1. For each model tested, determine the design parameters to be modified.<br />
2. Measure the per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>stove</strong> models and the effects of changas in<br />
design parameters; per<strong>for</strong>mance measures include fuel consumption, rate<br />
of heat generation, <strong>cooking</strong> and boiling times, and efficiency<br />
determination.<br />
3. Select <strong>stove</strong> designs which have good per<strong>for</strong>mance characteristics.<br />
4. Design the prototype of developed models.<br />
Stove Construction and Fabrication<br />
1. Discuss with village craftsmen the methods of fabrication, the materials<br />
available <strong>for</strong> fabrication and the cost of constructing the units.<br />
.2. Select and improve clay materials <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production.<br />
3. Improve technique of <strong>stove</strong> production.<br />
4. Trial production of developed <strong>stove</strong>s in actual small scale rural <strong>stove</strong><br />
manufacturing factories.<br />
5. Prepare <strong>stove</strong> guideline <strong>for</strong> fabrication, <strong>use</strong>, and maintenance.<br />
6. Prepare technical drawings of developed <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
38
Stove Promotion<br />
1. Introduce developed <strong>stove</strong>s through gwernment agencies and villagers<br />
via training courses, and in<strong>for</strong>matioh!brochure distribution.<br />
2. Organize <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers to produce <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
3. Distribute <strong>stove</strong> sampleb to <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs in rural areas via Regional<br />
Energy Center of NEA.<br />
39
Chapter 2<br />
Review of Literature<br />
Par. ., 'Z , ,, " " j.<br />
" ' ' 2- c.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s have been <strong>use</strong>d by human beings <strong>for</strong> a long time<br />
but the knowledge of how various <strong>stove</strong> designs per<strong>for</strong>m under different<br />
conditions is still vague. Most of the work done in the past was directed<br />
at trying to improve <strong>stove</strong> configuration; a few studies attempted to<br />
develop methods of testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In this Chapter, a review of<br />
<strong>stove</strong> construction and design, methods of testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, and<br />
factors affecting <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance will be presented.<br />
A. STOVE CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN<br />
Various <strong>stove</strong> configurations are seen in Thailand and overseas. The<br />
variation comes about as a consequence of <strong>cooking</strong> habits and simplicity.<br />
In some countries people prefer to sit while <strong>cooking</strong>, while in others<br />
standing is preferred. To suit such <strong>cooking</strong> habits, <strong>stove</strong>s are constructed<br />
differently. In this section, construction and design of open fire Thai<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, and overseas <strong>stove</strong>s are reviewed.<br />
Open Fire Stoves<br />
The open fire <strong>stove</strong> is a primitive <strong>stove</strong> which is still widely <strong>use</strong>d in<br />
the developing world. The fire is encircled by more stones, bricks,cement,<br />
or lumps of other inco<strong>mb</strong>ustible material. The open fire <strong>stove</strong>sometimes<br />
called the three-stone <strong>stove</strong> (or fire), has no cost; no special materials<br />
or tools are needed to construct it and it can be located anywhere.<br />
Moreover, the heat output from the fire can be controlled by adding or<br />
withdrawing fuel.<br />
Many different arrangements are found. Many countries <strong>use</strong> metal trivets;<br />
the trivet consists of a horizontal metal ring to which three legs are<br />
attached. in Senagal, 55% of the rural population <strong>use</strong>s trivets (Modon et<br />
al., 1982).<br />
Thai Stoves<br />
A variety of <strong>stove</strong>s can be found in Thailand, both <strong>use</strong>r built and<br />
commercially manufactured. Charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, which can be found almost<br />
everywhere in Thailand, have been studied by Thai investigators (Osuwan and<br />
Boonyakiat, 1982). The structure of this <strong>stove</strong> will be described in a later<br />
chapter, The book by Dunn, et al.(1982) and De Lepeleria.et al.(1981) also<br />
has detailed descriptions. Since the Thai charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> was<br />
investigated in this study, it is appropriate to review the literature and<br />
the various investigations already conducted.<br />
43
Thai Charcoal Bucket Stove<br />
Although there are various kinds of bucket <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand, they<br />
have a common structure. The <strong>stove</strong> is normally made of fired clay in the<br />
shape of an inverse truncated cone, (or cylinder) which is placed in a<br />
metal (generally zinc) bucket-liked container; hence, the name "bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong>." Charcoal is the main fuel <strong>for</strong> this kind of <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
In 1982, Meta Systems Inc. Thai Group, sponsored by USAID, investigated<br />
the per<strong>for</strong>mance of Thai charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s made by different local<br />
manufacturers (Pounoumet al., 1982). The group utilized boiling water tests<br />
and <strong>cooking</strong> tests (described later in this chapter) in their study. Using<br />
the water boiling tests, they found that the ratio between the water and the<br />
fuel affected <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance more than the size of <strong>stove</strong> and <strong>cooking</strong><br />
vessel. Time to boil ranged from 11 to 51 minutes. Pounoum et al.(1982)<br />
also considered the effect of starter fuels on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, since<br />
starter fuels vary among villagers. Using the "<strong>cooking</strong> test," they compared<br />
the quantities of fuel, food and water <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>cooking</strong> rice. The average<br />
amount of released heat from the fuel consumed was found to be 3.2 kilocalories<br />
per gram of food cooked. Further, <strong>stove</strong> efficiency obtained from<br />
"the water boiling test" demonstrated that the average value <strong>use</strong>d by food<br />
in <strong>cooking</strong> was 650 calories per gram of food.<br />
Osuwan and Boonyakiat (1982) applied water boiling tests to examine the<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance of Thai charcoal bucket lLoves. They found that <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
was affected by <strong>stove</strong> size, air inlet area, gap height, grate hole area,<br />
aluminium pot size, quantity of water <strong>use</strong>d in the test, and quantity and mass<br />
of charcoal. Their results showed that <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance improves if <strong>stove</strong><br />
diameter is increased, or the air inlet area is decreased, or the gap height<br />
is reduced. The efficiency of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance varied from 20.86 to 33.95%.<br />
feechai rice husk <strong>stove</strong> (Meechai, undated)<br />
The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> *iscomposed of four structural metal pieces: a cone,<br />
a <strong>stove</strong> body, stands, and an ash receiver. The cone, the <strong>stove</strong> body and<br />
the ash receiver are made from scrap metal or galvanized sheet; the stands<br />
are steel rods. The <strong>stove</strong> body is put into the cone, which itself is set<br />
on the stands; rice husks fill the space between the <strong>stove</strong> body and the cone.<br />
At the apex of the cone, an ash removal service is positioned to let the ash<br />
fall out of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Sooksunt economy <strong>stove</strong> (Sooksunt, 198Z)<br />
The Sooksunt <strong>stove</strong> can be made of bricks, cement, or a mixture of clay<br />
and rice husk. It has a chimney. There are three types. Type 1 can be<br />
<strong>use</strong>d with any kind of fuel except rice husk and sawdust. Type 2 can be<br />
<strong>use</strong>d with any fuel. Type 3 is designed <strong>for</strong> the Hill Tribes in Thailand and<br />
cannot <strong>use</strong> rice husk or sawdust as fuel. Detailed designs can be found in<br />
the article by Sooksunt (1981).<br />
The rice <strong>cooking</strong> test was per<strong>for</strong>med to test <strong>cooking</strong> time. For a<br />
family of 5 people, the Sooksunt <strong>stove</strong> can steam rice in 30 minutes. The<br />
time <strong>use</strong>d as reported was not much different from that required by gas <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
44
The <strong>stove</strong> is recommended <strong>for</strong> a medium income family (Intrapanich, 1981)<br />
beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> any waste materials as fuels.<br />
Swat <strong>stove</strong> (Suwat, undated)<br />
The Suwat 6tove has two pot holes; each pot hole is made from steel and<br />
insulated with sand, ash, clay, and cement. The first pot hole is above the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er; the second is located between the first and a steel<br />
chimney. An efficiency of approximately 23% has been obtained from the <strong>stove</strong><br />
when sawdust is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, ana 17% when rubber wood wastes are <strong>use</strong>d.<br />
Nai La <strong>stove</strong><br />
The Nai La <strong>stove</strong> is made from a cylindrical paint can, 6-7 inches in<br />
diameter and 12 inches high. At the lower part of the can, 2" x 2" air<br />
inlet hole is cut away to be <strong>use</strong>d as the ignition port. Since the <strong>stove</strong> is<br />
made from a can, it is sometimes called a "canned <strong>stove</strong>" (Bumroong, 1981).<br />
Fuels <strong>use</strong>d are normally sawdust and rice husk, The packing of fuel is<br />
achieved by placing a long ba<strong>mb</strong>oo stick or a pipe at the axis of the can.<br />
After the can is filled with fuel and compressed in the bucket, the stick<br />
is pulled out, leaving a hole <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion along the tunnel from the<br />
outway ignition port.<br />
It has been found that <strong>stove</strong> efficiencies are 14-16%, and 12% when<br />
sawdust and rice husk are <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, respectively.<br />
Noi Palipu (1981) has <strong>improved</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> in both construction materials<br />
and size to gain more durability and reliability <strong>for</strong> daily practical <strong>use</strong>.<br />
This <strong>stove</strong> has been recommended <strong>for</strong> the family with low income since<br />
the material <strong>for</strong> construction is inexpensive and easy to find (Intrapanich,<br />
1981).<br />
Economy fixed <strong>stove</strong><br />
The Economy fixed <strong>stove</strong> is made of cement and brick, or clay. There<br />
are two pot seats aligned with a chimney. The <strong>stove</strong> base is tilted such<br />
that the distance between the base and the chimney is lower than that between<br />
the base and the pot seat. Fuel can be wood or rice husk.<br />
Overseas Stoves<br />
Stoves found in developing countries are summarized below.<br />
Traditional <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
The traditional Bangladesh Chula consists of a short, slightly downwardsloping<br />
tunnel dug into the ground, with a pothol, cut in the roof at the<br />
end. The fire is lit beneath the pot and is kept alight by feeding it with<br />
fuel pushed in from the open end of the tunnel. In some cases, the size of<br />
the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er is increased, and two potholes are provided. The depth<br />
45
of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er in these Chula <strong>stove</strong>s is approximately 40-55 cm. (Omar,<br />
undated).<br />
Tungku Muntilan (Joseph et aL, 1980) report that a traditional <strong>stove</strong><br />
constructed in Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia, is constructed from clay<br />
and has approximate dimensions of 65 cm x 33 cm x 22 cm. It weighs<br />
approximately 20 kgs. There are two poL seats, the second acting as a chimney.<br />
The <strong>stove</strong> is sun dried, not fired. It hardens after <strong>use</strong> in the kitchen.<br />
Portable <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
In Kenya and other East African countries, a metal <strong>stove</strong> called a Jiko<br />
(Foley and Moss, 1983) is made from scrap metals in the <strong>for</strong>m of a cylinder<br />
approximately 25 cm in diameter and 15 cm high. It has a per<strong>for</strong>ated metal<br />
grage mid-height. Pot supports are fixed to the top edge and project<br />
inward a few centimeters. Fueling is done by feeding small pieces of<br />
charcoal around and under the pot, or by lifting the pot. Ashes are removed<br />
through a small side door at the base of the <strong>stove</strong>. This door can be <strong>use</strong>d<br />
as a means of controlling the flow of air to the grate.<br />
In India, a <strong>stove</strong> made of light sheet steel is equipped with a carrying<br />
handle, like that on the bucket. In some areas, the <strong>stove</strong> is lined with<br />
mud and cement. This insulates the <strong>stove</strong>, and cuts down on the radiant heat<br />
loss from tne sides (Gupta and Usha, 1980).<br />
A cylindrical <strong>stove</strong> with an outside wall of steel and an inner lining<br />
of cement is also <strong>use</strong>d in Indonesia. The grate consists of iron bars fixed<br />
into the lining (de Lepeleire et aL, 1981).<br />
The Rural Znergy Laboratory of the Central Power Research Institute,<br />
Bangalore (India), has developed a <strong>stove</strong>, called a Priyagni (Cook<strong>stove</strong><br />
Bulletin, 1984). The <strong>stove</strong> is cylindrically shaped with metal stands to<br />
keep it steady and help in moving it. A cylindral co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er closed<br />
both at the top and the bottom has slotted plates of a particular pattern,<br />
A grate is fitted inside the cha<strong>mb</strong>er slightly above the bottom slotted plate.<br />
The dimensions of the slotted plate and the cha<strong>mb</strong>er have been proportioned<br />
to achieve <strong>improved</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. An aluminium sheet lining is also provided<br />
in the cha<strong>mb</strong>er to reflect heat and to reduce wall radiation loss. The <strong>stove</strong><br />
has been produced in 3 different sizes--small, medium and large.<br />
The Keren <strong>stove</strong>, a <strong>stove</strong> widely <strong>use</strong>d in Central Java <strong>for</strong> boiling water<br />
and frying, is made of fired clay. It consists of a spherical firebox over<br />
which a pot is placed. There are 7 holes (1.5 cm in diameter) spaced evenly<br />
around the sides at the base of the firebox. The diameter of the firebox<br />
is 24 cm and the height is 16 cm. The enl:rance cf the firebox is 18 cm widL<br />
and 7 cm high. The <strong>stove</strong> weighs 3 kgs (Joseph eL al, 1980).<br />
The single pot ceramic Chula is found n many Asian countries. It is<br />
called Keren in Indonesia, Kamado cooker in Japan. This <strong>stove</strong> is usually<br />
cylindrical, approximately I cm in diameter and 10 cm in height, weighs<br />
about 5 kg and is easily portable. Fuel is added through a hole in the side<br />
at ground level. Wood, straw, dung, and other materials are burned as fuel.<br />
46
When charcoal is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, a grate is required (Foley and Moss, 1983).<br />
Tunga Sae, <strong>use</strong>d in urban areas of Indonesia, is made from clay by a<br />
potter using either a pottery wheel and/or coiling techniques. It consists<br />
of a firebox, a connecting flue and a second pot seat. The connecting flue<br />
slopes up from the firebox and has a cross-section of 8 cm x 8 cm. The<br />
firebox has a height of 21 cm and a diameter of 24 cm. The second pot seat<br />
Las a height of 25 cm and a diameter of 20 cm. The <strong>stove</strong> weighs 8 kgs.<br />
Wood or wastes can be burned in this <strong>stove</strong>. When the first pot boils, it can<br />
be interchanged with the second pot to achieve faster <strong>cooking</strong> time and lower<br />
wood consumption. The first pot, now on the back hole, will simmer while<br />
the pot on the front is brought to boil (Joseph et al, 1980).<br />
A <strong>stove</strong> especially made <strong>for</strong> burning rice husk is <strong>use</strong>d in Bali. It<br />
simply consists of an open-top oil drum with a hole in the side at ground<br />
level. Be<strong>for</strong>e loading it with rice husk, a thick stick is laid horizontally<br />
across the bottom of the drum from the center outward through the hole in<br />
the side. Another stick is held vertically at the center. The rice husk<br />
is then packed tightly around the two sticks. When a fire is required, the<br />
sticks are removed, leaving passage <strong>for</strong> air through the opeuing in the side,<br />
across the base, and up through the center of the fuel bed. The fire is<br />
kindled at the bottom, and provides approximately two hours burning (Cook<br />
Stoves Handbook, 1982).<br />
Recently, a company in the U.S.A. designed and constructed a portable<br />
<strong>stove</strong>, called the Z Stove (private communication). The <strong>stove</strong> is made of<br />
a pop-riveted, galvanized sheet steel box 7 x 7 inches square, 10 inches<br />
tall and 4 pounds in weight. The <strong>stove</strong> features a cylindrical firebox inside,<br />
with a galvanized screen fire grate at its bottom, an aperture <strong>for</strong> inserting<br />
bits of fuel, a small drawer beneath the grate <strong>for</strong> insertion of kindling, a<br />
draft/damper control, an X-type <strong>cooking</strong> vessel support and a wire bale<br />
handle. The <strong>stove</strong> can burn any solid fuel from wood to animal dung. The<br />
manufacturer claims that the <strong>stove</strong> is highly efficient. However, ITDG testing,<br />
showed that the Zip was 25.4 to 29.7% efficient (from Testing of the Zip Stoves,<br />
Stove Project Technical Notes No. 3).<br />
Fixed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
Fixed <strong>stove</strong>s are usually constructed from mud, mud and clay bricks, or<br />
mud and sand. Collectively, these are often referred to as mud <strong>stove</strong>s, When<br />
constructed, these <strong>stove</strong>s are sometimes coated with a thin paste of cowdung<br />
to prevent them from cracking.<br />
In a simple fixed <strong>stove</strong> design, fire surrounds three sides with an<br />
opening <strong>for</strong> fuel at the front. It is built to take a single pot. The pot<br />
is sometimes seated on three or more small raised mounds around the pot hole.<br />
These permit the hot gases and smoke from the fire to escape upwards around<br />
the sides of the pot. In other cases the pot sits tightly into the pothole.<br />
In some rural areas of India, the opening <strong>for</strong> the fuel is bridged<br />
across to provide a complete surrounding <strong>for</strong> the bottom of the pot (Cook<br />
Stove Handbook, 1982).<br />
47
Many types of mud <strong>stove</strong>s have two or more potholes. Magan Choolah <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
in India are made from mud, dung or straw cuttings and cowdung. This <strong>stove</strong><br />
has three potholes situated at the three corners of a triangle and<br />
interconnected by ducts. The hot gases pass ftom the first pot seat to the<br />
second, and then to the third. One damper is rositioned in the connecting<br />
duct between the first and second pot seat to control the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion.<br />
A chimney is incorporated as a smoke outlet (Tata, 1979). Similar mud <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
are found in the urban areas of Indonesia (de Lapeleire et al, 1981).<br />
A smokeless HERL Choolah <strong>stove</strong> was designed at the Hyderabad Engineering<br />
Research Laboratories in Hyderabad, India (Tata, 1979). It is made from<br />
bricks and mud or only mud. There are 4 pot seats situated on a L-S shaped<br />
duct, the first three are <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>, the fourth is <strong>for</strong> heating water. One<br />
damper is positioned inside the connecting duct between the fourth pot<br />
seat and the chimney to control the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Only the first pot<br />
seat receives the maximum heat. When one or two pot seats are in <strong>use</strong>, the<br />
others are kept closed.<br />
In some mud <strong>stove</strong>s with two or more potholes, these potholes are<br />
positioned more or less symmetrically over the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er and each pot<br />
obtains roughly the same amount of heat. One of these <strong>stove</strong>s is an <strong>improved</strong><br />
HERL Choolah, which has three pot seats (Tata, 1979). A variety of <strong>for</strong>ms<br />
(varying only in detail) are <strong>use</strong>d in different parts of Indonesia (de<br />
Lapeleire et al, 1981; Singer, 1961).<br />
The Lorena mud <strong>stove</strong> which was developed at the Ahagui Experimental<br />
Station, Guatemala has five openings, <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> and a chimney <strong>for</strong> smoke<br />
outlet (Tata, 1979; Kaufman, 1983). The first pct is heated directly by<br />
fuel; the others are heated by the hot gases which pass through a long system<br />
of ducts connecting one pot seat to others. There are three dampers: the<br />
first is in the duct that connects the mouth of the <strong>stove</strong> to the first pot<br />
seat; the second is between the second and the third pot seats; and the<br />
third is between the fourth and the fifth pot seats,<br />
B. STANDARD METHODS OF TESTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />
Although human being have been using <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> a long<br />
time, standard methods of comparing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance evolved only recently.<br />
Joseph and Shanahan (1980) realized the necessity of standardizing testing<br />
methods; they found that improper stacking of wood could produce as much<br />
as a 100% in difference per<strong>for</strong>mance figures.<br />
A few methods of testing have been proposed (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980;<br />
Joseph, 1979). For a <strong>stove</strong> test to be <strong>use</strong>ful, Joseph (1979) recommends that<br />
the test should be simple, reproducible, adaptable to any fuel <strong>stove</strong>, and<br />
reflect local <strong>cooking</strong> practices. It is found that neglecting the last<br />
recommendation can ca<strong>use</strong> a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance when <strong>use</strong>d with different<br />
practices (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />
In addition, Joseph (1979) suggests that the tests should be atle to<br />
determine the amount of energy <strong>use</strong>d to cook a meal or boil water, and the<br />
amount of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel consumed. The reason <strong>for</strong> these two determinations<br />
48
is that the first will give the heat utilization or <strong>cooking</strong> efficiency, and<br />
the second the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion efficiency.<br />
The per<strong>for</strong>mance of a <strong>stove</strong> is usually expressed in terms of heat<br />
utilization. This term is defined as "the ratio of heat absorbed by the<br />
water to heat liberated fL:om the burning <strong>biomass</strong>" (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />
There are two kinds of he.It utilization: one does not include the heat<br />
required in evaporating, the other includes the heat required in evaporating.<br />
Another term that is sometimes <strong>use</strong>d in comparing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />
"burning rate". Burning rate is defined as the amount of wood (<strong>biomass</strong>)<br />
burnt (in the experiment) divided by the duration (of the experiment)<br />
(Joseph and Shanahan, 1980). The burning rates are found to vary with size<br />
of wood.<br />
Two types of tests are commonly cariied out on <strong>stove</strong>s: one is the<br />
"boiling water" test, and the other is the "<strong>cooking</strong> food". Other tests such<br />
as co<strong>mb</strong>ustion tests are also sometimes <strong>use</strong>d (Joseph, 1979).<br />
Boiling water tests<br />
There are 4 tests being <strong>use</strong>d as standard methods:<br />
1. A fixed quanLi'v of water is evaporated, with fuel and time as<br />
variables.<br />
2. Quantities of fuel and water are fixed, with time as a variable.<br />
3. A fixed quantity of fuel is burnt, with the quantity of water<br />
evaporated and time as variables.<br />
4. The quantity of water evaporated within 30 minutes is determined,<br />
with fuel as a variable.<br />
Water boiling tests have been <strong>use</strong>d by the Department of Applied Physics<br />
and Mechanical Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology in the<br />
Netherlands, to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the Family Cooker and the De<br />
Lepeleire/Van Daele <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Ponnoum et al.(1982) have <strong>use</strong>d the boiling water tests in studying the<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and wood <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand. They<br />
found difficulty in identifying the time at which boiling started.<br />
Joseph et al.(1980) have developed another method of testing. They<br />
set the boiling time and vary the time <strong>for</strong> evaporation. For example, a<br />
pot of water takes a certain time, say "t" minutes, to boil. The water is<br />
then allowed to evaporate <strong>for</strong> 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. At the end of<br />
the experiment, the following measurements are recorded:<br />
" Weights of wood <strong>use</strong>d and remaining and<br />
"<br />
The amount of water evaporated at each evaporating time. These<br />
measurements are then <strong>use</strong>d to calculate heat utilization.<br />
49
Cooking food tests<br />
Simulated <strong>cooking</strong> tests measure the amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d and the time<br />
taken to cook a variety of standard meals under controlled conditions. The<br />
principle objective of the <strong>cooking</strong> test is then to determine the influence<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong> design on the amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d and time taken to cook a meal<br />
(Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />
Cooking rice tests have been <strong>use</strong>d by Pennoum et al.(1982) in<br />
investigating the per<strong>for</strong>mance of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and wood <strong>stove</strong>s in<br />
Thailand. They measured the quantities of fuel, food, and water <strong>use</strong>d. All<br />
the tests were per<strong>for</strong>med with metal <strong>cooking</strong> vessels. Regular rice was<br />
placed in a pot and covered with water. The qua;city of rice and the ratio<br />
of water-to-rice was determined based cn <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> practices. The water and<br />
rice were brought to a boil. After a short period of time the excess water<br />
was poured off and the rice dried either over the fire or away from the<br />
fire. The rice <strong>cooking</strong> took from 25 to 40 minutes.<br />
One important point that must be stressed to investigators using this<br />
kind of test is that the tests should involve cookinp loca. dishes and that<br />
it is necessary to prepare the food in the same way <strong>for</strong> each test, using<br />
the same type of food. To obtain such in<strong>for</strong>mation, a survey of the villagers'<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> habits must be per<strong>for</strong>med. This approach has been carried out<br />
carefully by Pennoum et al.(1982) in their investigation of <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance in Thailand. Designers also need to devise their own grading<br />
systems in collaboration with local women, to ascertai,. what the women<br />
regard as "cooked" food--<strong>for</strong> all the types of <strong>cooking</strong> (frying, baking,<br />
stewing, etc.). It is also important to get different village women to<br />
<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong> to cook these same meals and see if there is a change in the<br />
time taken and fuel wood <strong>use</strong>d (Joseph, 1979).<br />
Steaming and open steaming are the two processes frequently <strong>use</strong>d in<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> (Joseph, 1979). Steaming involves bringing water to boil and letting<br />
it evaporate. The steam then passes through the food. Some of the steam<br />
escapes and some condenses on the food and on the lid. If there is no food<br />
in the pot, the amount of heat required to totally evaporate the water is<br />
less than if there is food. Consequently, steaming of food cannot be<br />
simulated using only boiling water. In the case of open steaming, a small<br />
amount of food is placed in a relatively large pot of water, which is<br />
evaporated slowly. Most of the energy involved in the <strong>cooking</strong> process is<br />
<strong>use</strong>d in the boiling and evaporating of water. Thus boiling water can<br />
simulate the process of slow open steaming. The simulation can also be<br />
applied to stewing.<br />
Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion test<br />
In co<strong>mb</strong>ustion tests (Joseph, 1979), gas analysis and measurement of the<br />
stack temperature were obtained. These data gave a measure of how much heat<br />
was being lost due to process co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. According to this test, fuel is<br />
burning efficiently if:<br />
50
" The percentage of CO is less than 0.5%;<br />
" The average amount of oxygen in the flue gas is less than 11%; and<br />
" The average carbon dioxide content in the flue gas is approximately<br />
6-8%.<br />
Measurement of the chimney temperature, in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion test, indicates<br />
how much heat is being transferred to the pots. A high stack temperature<br />
means that the pots cannot absorb the amount of heat being liberated. As<br />
the temperature of gases decreases, the amount of air being drawn into the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er also decreases.<br />
C. FACTORS AFFECTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />
Problems that occur in the <strong>stove</strong> are classified and discussed below.<br />
Convective heat loss<br />
Convection is the mechanism by which gas moves up due to a difference<br />
in temperature. In <strong>stove</strong>s, convection can occur through the exhaust gap.<br />
When gas with a high temperature leaves the <strong>stove</strong>, it carries thermal energy<br />
with it. This energy is considered a loss.<br />
Wind promotes this mode of heat loss. An example is the open fire.<br />
Efficiency of an open fire drops in the windy condition since the fire is<br />
not protected. Efficiency can be <strong>improved</strong> by constructing a shield to<br />
protect the fire from the wind. It is found that the efficiency of an<br />
open fire <strong>stove</strong> increases to approximately 17 percent when the fire is moved<br />
into the kitchen (Vita News, 1984),<br />
In bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, it is found that <strong>stove</strong> efficiency can be increased<br />
by reducing the size of the exhaust area (Somzhai and Kanchana, 1983). The<br />
improvement is due to the reduction of convective heat loss through the gap.<br />
In <strong>stove</strong>s with many pot seats such as the Smokeless HERL Choolah.<br />
convection can be reduced by closing t,e seats that are not <strong>use</strong>d (Tata, 1979).<br />
When all the seats are <strong>use</strong>d, the convective loss is low since hot gases have<br />
to pass all the pot holes; hence, a higher proportion of the heat contained<br />
in them is <strong>use</strong>fully absorbed.<br />
Conductive heatloss<br />
Conductive heat loss occurs when the <strong>stove</strong> is not well insulated. Such<br />
loss is seen in the metal <strong>stove</strong>. To reduce this loss, the <strong>stove</strong> has to be<br />
insulated. However, thick insulation can also reduce <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
during one or two hours of <strong>cooking</strong>, since massive walls absorb more heat<br />
than bare walls lose to the outside (Vita News, 1984).<br />
51
Radiative heat loss<br />
Since heat is transferred to the pot mainly by radiation, any loss due<br />
to radiation can affect <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. It is believed that radiative<br />
heat loss can occur through the exhaust gap (Somchai and Kanchana, 1983).<br />
Reducing the gap will decrease the radiative heat loss, and hence, impiove<br />
<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In the case that the pot does not fit the pot seat,<br />
radiative heat loss is high.<br />
Size of fuel<br />
One of the problems affecting the comparison of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance (even<br />
when <strong>stove</strong>s and test conditions are standardized) is the size of the fuel<br />
<strong>use</strong>d. It is found that the efficiency of the bucket <strong>stove</strong> increases when<br />
the size of the charcoal decreases (Somchai and Kauchana, 1983).<br />
Types of <strong>biomass</strong><br />
There are many kinds of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel that can be <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>stove</strong>s. They<br />
include wood, charcoal, and agricultural wastes such as rice husk. These<br />
fuels, when co<strong>mb</strong>usted, supply heat unequally. Chomcharn et al (1981) <strong>use</strong>d<br />
the water boiling test to study the efficiency of a bucket <strong>stove</strong> fuelled by<br />
different types of charcoals, different firewood species, sawdust, rice<br />
husk, and lignite briquets. They found that the efficiency of the bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong> varied with the fuel type <strong>use</strong>d and ranged from 18.5 to 33.1%.<br />
Air supply<br />
Since the energy obtained in the <strong>stove</strong> is the energy from co<strong>mb</strong>ustion,<br />
the degree of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion strongly limits <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. There is no<br />
doubt that wood, which has a high heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, will poorly render<br />
heat under the conditions of insufficient supply or undersupply of air. On<br />
the other hand, if air is oversupplied, a certain amount of heat will be<br />
<strong>use</strong>d in raising the temperature of excess air. This air then leaves the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> together with the exhaust gas. In this latter case, <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
also decreases.<br />
Internal variables<br />
The initial project study that appeared in the interim report (Sherman<br />
and Bunyat, 1983) revealed that the internal variables of the charcoal<br />
<strong>stove</strong>(such as <strong>stove</strong> weight, grate hole area, exhaust area, air inlet area,<br />
and slope of the inner wall) strongly affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Stove material<br />
As a <strong>stove</strong> caiibe made from either clay, cement, or metal, its<br />
efficiency varies. Openshaw (undated) compared metal and clay <strong>cooking</strong><br />
<strong>stove</strong>s. He found that 40% of charcoal <strong>use</strong>d could be saved by the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong><br />
if the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>use</strong>d a clay <strong>stove</strong> instead of metal <strong>stove</strong>. In addition, the<br />
material chosen more or less reflects the long term service ability.<br />
52
D. CONCLUSION<br />
In the above review of the literature, it is apparent that there are<br />
many problems associated with <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> research,<br />
development and <strong>use</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, be<strong>for</strong>e researchers e<strong>mb</strong>ark on a <strong>stove</strong><br />
development program they must first accommodate the mult4-faceted complex<br />
of problems of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. Precognition of and distinctions between<br />
should be made regarding the following:<br />
" Stove types and kinds: chimneyed or non-chimneyed, single pot or<br />
multille pot holes, appropriate size to suit the need <strong>for</strong> individual<br />
or family in the working area.<br />
* Social nature or tradition of <strong>cooking</strong>: size of the family, normal<br />
duration of <strong>cooking</strong> time, low heat vs intense heat requirement,<br />
cuisine, extra services required from the <strong>stove</strong> besides <strong>cooking</strong>, etc.<br />
" Special requirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs: speediness in cookiaig, ease<br />
of operation, reliability and consistency of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, and<br />
the accommodation of various sizes and shapcs of pots, pans, and<br />
woks.<br />
" Materials and techniques <strong>for</strong> construction: inexpensive, locally<br />
available material vs expensive exotic material, simple construction<br />
vs complicated construction, and the <strong>stove</strong>'s durability.<br />
" Fuel types and physical characteristics: charcoal, wood or agriresidues,<br />
fuel's <strong>for</strong>ms in lump, long stick, chip, granule, dust,<br />
briquette and etc., fuel's moisture content, density, specific heat<br />
of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, soundness of the fuel, i.e. fresh or biodegradable.<br />
" Methods <strong>for</strong> testings and per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluations of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />
water boiling vs simulated food <strong>cooking</strong> tests, duration of tests,<br />
assignments of dependent and independent measuring criteria such as<br />
time, fuel load, water evaporated, etc.<br />
53
Chapter 3<br />
Plan and Design of the Project<br />
prwIaa
PLAN AND DESIGN OF THE PROJECT<br />
The project design aimed at:<br />
* Establishing a laboratory and facility to per<strong>for</strong>m project tasks as<br />
well as <strong>for</strong> long-term <strong>stove</strong> improvement research and development;<br />
" Collecting existing local <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> testing and evaluation;<br />
* Investigating existing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance;<br />
" Analyzing the physical factors of <strong>stove</strong>s that inhibit per<strong>for</strong>mance;<br />
" Developing an <strong>improved</strong> prototype;<br />
" Testing the prototype and its remodification;<br />
" Producing developed <strong>stove</strong>s; and<br />
" Promoting developed <strong>stove</strong>s in the field.<br />
A. LABORATORY AND FACILITY SET UP<br />
The project required an experimenting room <strong>for</strong> testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
An area of approximately 80 sq.m. was located behind the Forest Research<br />
Institute at the Royal Forest Department in Bangkok. The room consisted<br />
of space <strong>for</strong> storing the <strong>stove</strong>s, two large cement top counters <strong>for</strong> handling<br />
hot <strong>stove</strong>s during the testii.g, a sink with tap water <strong>for</strong> cleaning purposes,<br />
and an exhaust hood with ventilation fans fpr outletting the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
smoke. All tests were conducted in this natural environment.<br />
The instruments applied to accompany the tests included: 3 weighing<br />
scales of different ranges from 500 gm, 7 kg, and 20 kg. 3 cromel/alumel<br />
thermo-couple and digital thermometers with a range of 0-800 °C <strong>for</strong><br />
temperature measurement; bulk thermometer with a range of 0-100 'C; hygrometer<br />
<strong>for</strong> humidity measurement; electric oven <strong>for</strong> fuel drying; a series of<br />
aluminum <strong>cooking</strong> pots with sizes ranging from 16 cm to 32 cm; measuring<br />
tapes and calipers <strong>for</strong> dimensional measurements; and workshop tools.<br />
B. COLLECTION OF EXISTING LOCAL STOVES<br />
As previously mentioned, the three generic types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong><br />
<strong>stove</strong>s (which consist of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>, and rice husk<br />
<strong>stove</strong>) were the main concern of the project <strong>for</strong> further development. The<br />
task of this phase was to collect as many of the various kinds (with various<br />
features) of these three types of <strong>stove</strong>s. Since <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
57
were widely distributed throughout the country, a <strong>stove</strong> collecting team was<br />
sent out to various locations to collect the <strong>stove</strong> samples and bring them<br />
back to the laboratory <strong>for</strong> testing.<br />
C. INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />
Efficiencies of all collected <strong>stove</strong>s were evaluated using the same<br />
standard testing conditions which is described in the next chapter. All<br />
calculations based on data received from the <strong>stove</strong> testing were done on<br />
an IBM main frame computer at Kasetsart University. The results were<br />
analyzed closely <strong>for</strong> relevant relationships between the efficiency and the<br />
physical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>s. This in<strong>for</strong>mation was critical <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
development.<br />
D. ANALYSES OF STOVE PHYSICAL FACTORS<br />
The <strong>stove</strong>s physical factors (such as section <strong>for</strong> air inlet, area <strong>for</strong><br />
exhaust gas outlet, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate, <strong>stove</strong> body, etc.) were<br />
analyzed. If one of these factors was changed so was the geometry of the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>. Such an effect was classified as an internal variable. There was<br />
another group of variables that had no effect on the geometry of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
when their values changed (wind velocity, humidity, air temperature, pot<br />
size, etc.). This group made up the external variables. The effects of<br />
both the internal and external variables on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>stove</strong>s were<br />
studied. The understanding of their effects on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
would be crucial in designing <strong>stove</strong>s with high efficiency.<br />
E. DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED PROTOTYPE<br />
When the order of most important variables chat affected the efficiency<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong> was determined from the test analysis, design of high<br />
efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s corresponding to the prominent variables was then<br />
accomplished. Technical drawings of thu <strong>stove</strong> prototype were made.<br />
After achieving the dusign of the <strong>stove</strong> prototype, the next step<br />
involved the selection of suitable quality <strong>stove</strong> materials, and, finally,<br />
construction of the <strong>stove</strong> prototype. Stove asse<strong>mb</strong>ly closely followed the<br />
guidelines of the technical drawing.<br />
F. TESTING OF PROTOTYPE AND REMODIFICATION<br />
The finished <strong>stove</strong> sample was then subjected to the same efficiency<br />
tests. The results were compared with the existing <strong>stove</strong>s. This step<br />
might be carried out several times to assure that the developed <strong>stove</strong>s had<br />
reliable per<strong>for</strong>mance and high efficiency.<br />
58
G. PRODUCTION OF DEVELOPED STOVES<br />
Several manufacturers were selected <strong>for</strong> the production of the developed<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s. Guidelines and in<strong>for</strong>mation were provided to the manufacturers to<br />
enoure consistency of the products made in large quantities.<br />
H. FTELD PROMOTION OF DEVELOPED STOVES<br />
The developed <strong>stove</strong>s were introduced to the public via mass media,<br />
schools, rural development organizations--both private and governmental.<br />
Relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion was distributed in the <strong>for</strong>m of<br />
pamphlets, manuals, brochures. Short term instruction on how to make, to<br />
select, and to properly operate various types of cook<strong>stove</strong>s that conserve<br />
wood and other <strong>biomass</strong> resources were also provided. Training of villagers,<br />
village leaders and rural development officers on the fabrication and<br />
selection of good <strong>stove</strong>s was also undertaken.<br />
59
Chapter 4<br />
Experimental Techniques and Procedures<br />
)<br />
• ,' (Q\
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES<br />
This chapter will discuss the experimental techniques and ?rocedures<br />
involved in selecting and preparing fuels (firewood, charcoal, and rice husk),<br />
testing local existing <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, standard testing conditions, definition<br />
of heat utilization efficiency, and testing <strong>for</strong> the effects of the internal<br />
and external variables of charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
A. FUEL TYPE AND PREPARATION<br />
Besides having appropriate kinds of fuels <strong>for</strong> the three generic types<br />
of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (namely, firewood, charcoal, and rice husk) preparation of<br />
the fuels was necessary to ready them <strong>for</strong> testing. Using fuels with varying<br />
characteristics can lead to inaccurate <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance measurements. The<br />
following sections discuss the method of preparing the fuel by *ype of fuel.<br />
Firewood<br />
Firewood selected <strong>for</strong> the experiment was approximately 4 year old<br />
plantation grown Casuarinajunghuniana. The diameter was between<br />
2.5 - 7.5 cm. Each piece was then split laterally into 2 - 4 smaller pieces<br />
and sun-dried <strong>for</strong> several days.<br />
Charcoal<br />
In urban areas, charcoal is the most popular fuel <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>. It<br />
burns withcut 6moke or smell and is thus suitable <strong>for</strong> indoor <strong>use</strong>. The<br />
charcoal <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment wa.3 produced from plantation grown Rhizophora<br />
apiculata, a premium mangrove species <strong>for</strong> charcoal making. The selected<br />
species was approximately 10 - 12 years old and of a diameter of about<br />
2.5 - 5 cm, The process of firing the wood into charcoal occurred in standard<br />
commercial brick beehive kilns.<br />
Rice husk<br />
In the central area of Thailand, rice husk is often <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>.<br />
It is usually <strong>use</strong>d in a rice husk <strong>stove</strong>. The cost of this fuel is very low.<br />
The rice husk <strong>use</strong>d in the laboratory was obtained fresh from a<br />
commercial rice mill near Bangkok. It was dried later under laboratory<br />
conditions.<br />
The important characteristics of firewood, charcoal, and rice husk <strong>use</strong>d<br />
in the experiment are summarized in Table 4.1.<br />
Fuels <strong>use</strong>d in all of the experiments were acquired in large quantity and<br />
stored inside the test building under the same conditions.<br />
63
Table 4.1 Characteristics of Biomass Fuel Used in the Experiment<br />
Fuel Density Moisture content Heating value<br />
(gm/cm) (%) (MJ/kg) (Kcal/kg)<br />
Charcoal 0.78 3.5 - 5.0 26.34 6,300<br />
Wood 0.75 - 0.85 10.0 - 13.0 17.89 4,230<br />
(ave. 0.79)<br />
Rice husk 0.11 10.0 - 13.0 13.79 3,300<br />
B. TESTS OF EXISTING THAI COOKING STOVES<br />
Approximately 36 different types of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 39 wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, and 5 rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were brought back to the laboratory <strong>for</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation. The physical dimensions of every <strong>stove</strong> were measured<br />
and recorded. These physical values were very important variables, and were<br />
<strong>use</strong>d later in the analyses. All tests were per<strong>for</strong>med by the Royal Forest<br />
Department staff. During each test run, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion characteristics and <strong>stove</strong><br />
behavior were observed clo-sely. The numerical, measured values of required<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation on water, a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature, humidity, fuel weight, water<br />
weight, etc. were recorded on a data sheet. Efficiency <strong>for</strong> each test run<br />
was then evaluated, and the calculations were per<strong>for</strong>med by an IBM mainframe<br />
computer at Kasetsart University.<br />
In order to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance and efficiency of various types of<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, standard testing conditions need be followed. The procedure <strong>use</strong>d<br />
in these experiments is summarized in the following section.<br />
64
Standard Testing Conditions<br />
All the tests were conducted under the following standard conditions:<br />
" Pot diameter: 24 cm (pot no. 24). (This pot size is commonly found<br />
in rural kitchens);<br />
* Wood kindling weight: 50 gm <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>, 30 gm <strong>for</strong> charcoal and<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s;<br />
" Fuel weight: <strong>for</strong> charcoal, <strong>use</strong> 400 gm, <strong>for</strong> wood and rice husk,<br />
feed in at normal rate as needed;<br />
" water weight: 3,700 gm.<br />
The pot is weighed and filled with 3,700 gm of water. The initial<br />
temperature of the water is controlled at 28 ± 10C, 50 gm of kindling is<br />
placed into the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and ignited. About 30 seconds of lighting<br />
time should be sufficient to ensure that the kindling is ignited. The<br />
charcoal is then loaded onto the burning kindling. The pot is covered with<br />
a lid and is placed on the <strong>stove</strong> and the time is immediately recorded. The<br />
temperature of the water in the pot is measured every few minutes until the<br />
water starts to boil. Time required to bring the water from its initial<br />
state to the state of boiling is noted; the noted time is called "time to<br />
boil". Time to boil is one of the important variables which determine<br />
the characteristic per<strong>for</strong>mance of a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
When the water starts to boil, the lid is removed and boiling is<br />
continued <strong>for</strong> 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, any water remaining in the pot<br />
is reweighed as is any remaining fuel. The amount of water evaporated<br />
and the weight of the charcoal consumed in the test are then calculated.<br />
For wood and rice husk stcves, the test proccdures are carried out in the<br />
same manner.<br />
Stove efficiency is calculated from the data gathered in the procedure<br />
discussed above. The term "efficiency" will be <strong>use</strong>d interchangeably with<br />
"heat utilization efficiency" in order to con<strong>for</strong>m with the <strong>use</strong> of this word<br />
in other publications.<br />
Heat Utilization Efficiency (HU)<br />
The heat utilization efficiency (HU) is the percentage of actual energy<br />
transferred from potential energy stored in the fuel to the water in the pot.<br />
The equation <strong>for</strong> determining the HU value is adapted from Joseph (Joseph,<br />
1979).<br />
65
SX W (Tf - T) + (L x W)<br />
U, Z2 X 100<br />
x<br />
[(EfX Wf) + (EX W] (E W<br />
Where, S = Specific heat of water, 4.18 J/gm<br />
WM Weight of water in pot at start of test, 3,700 gm<br />
m<br />
Tf 2 Temperature of water at boiling point, 1000 C<br />
T a Temperature of water at start of test, 0 C<br />
L Latent heat of water at 1000 C, 2,256 J/gm<br />
W - Weight of water evaporated at end of each test, gm<br />
e<br />
Efm = heat value of fuel, J/gm<br />
Wf - Weight of fuel <strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />
E - Heat value of wood kindling, J/gm<br />
Wk Weight of kindling, gm<br />
E - Heat value of charcoal, J/gm<br />
Co<br />
W = Weight of caarcoal remaining at end of each test, gm<br />
c<br />
C. TEST FOR ':HE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLE<br />
ON THE CHARCOAL BUCKET STOVE<br />
Most Thai bucket <strong>stove</strong>s have the following important physical features:<br />
* Stove gap/exhaust area;<br />
* Grate hole area;<br />
* Grate-to-pot distance;<br />
* Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size;<br />
* Air inlet door; and<br />
* Crate thickness.<br />
66
The variation of one of the above characteristics is expected to have<br />
an impact on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. These variables, moreover, are properties<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong> itself. Hence, they can be called the internal variables.<br />
To study the effect of one of the internal variables, it is necessary<br />
that the others are kept unchanged, or constant. The variable that is tested<br />
is varied in the range of its physical limit. Additional tests on a few<br />
more <strong>stove</strong>s may be required to confirm the effect of that variable on <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance. This experimental technique was <strong>use</strong>d in all project experiments.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variables Study<br />
Stove gap/exhaust area<br />
The <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d in this study were <strong>stove</strong> nos. 1/5 and 1/31; their<br />
respective gap areas were 98.4 and 98.6 cm. For these two <strong>stove</strong>s, the time<br />
to boil and the charcoal consumption were experimentally determined; the HU<br />
values were subsequently calculatad. The gap areas of each <strong>stove</strong> was then<br />
reduced three times by adjusting the pot rest. The gap area tested on <strong>stove</strong><br />
no. 1/5 was 86.1, 65.6, and 20.5 cm. The gap areas tested on <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/31<br />
were 86.0, 65.6 and 40.2. The <strong>stove</strong>s were retested <strong>for</strong> time to boil and<br />
charcoal consumption.<br />
Although the exhaust area did not appear in the equation <strong>for</strong> finding the<br />
HU value, it can indirectly affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The exhaust area<br />
regulates the flow rate of the exhaust gas from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As<br />
a consequence, the loss of heat, due to natural convection of gas through<br />
the gap, varies accordingly. For this reason, the exhaust area of the gap<br />
had to be considered as one factor that influenced <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In<br />
this study, the gap area was reduced by adding clay to its width; this means<br />
that after the addition of clay, the length of the exhaust area is virtually<br />
unchanged. The variation of exhaust area, then, can be represented by the<br />
change in gap height.<br />
Total grate hole area<br />
Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The diameter of the grate<br />
was 15 cm, and the total grate area was 176.5 cm. The total grate hole area<br />
was 80.0 cm,<br />
To study the effect of grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, the grate<br />
hole area had to be varied by reducing the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes. The hole<br />
reduction was carried out by plugging the chosen holes with a rice husk<br />
ash and clay mixture. However, it should be kept in mind that the holes<br />
chosen to be filled up were distributed properly so that the inlet air, after<br />
reducing the grate hole area, was still distributed uni<strong>for</strong>mly.<br />
Two tests using gap height as a parameter were per<strong>for</strong>med to study the<br />
effect of the grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance; both tests <strong>use</strong>d <strong>stove</strong><br />
no.1/5. The grate hole areas, with the above procedure, were set at 80.0,<br />
52.8 and 26.4 cm. The gap height of the <strong>stove</strong> was changed, using the method<br />
67
described in the above section on <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhaust area. It was 0°5 cm in<br />
the first test and 2.5 cm in the second.<br />
Grate-to-pot distance<br />
Grate-to-pot distance is defined as the distance measured from the<br />
surface of the grate to the pot bottom. This internal variable has a direct<br />
effect on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance; if the distance is small, the pot is iear the<br />
flame and <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is good--as would be expected. On the contrary,<br />
a large distance would render a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. However, too small<br />
a distance will restrict charcoal loading and charcoal capacity.<br />
Stove no. 1/4 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The grate-to-pot distance<br />
was varied from 7.5 cm to 9.3 cm and then to 11.0 cm. A distance of less<br />
than 7.5 is not recommended since the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er becomes too small<br />
to hold enough charcoal to cook a meal. Time to boil, the amount of water<br />
evaporated and the amount of charcoal consumed were all recorded.<br />
Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion chcanber size<br />
The test <strong>for</strong> the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
<strong>use</strong>d three charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s: <strong>stove</strong> nos. 1/28, l/A3, and l/Dl. The<br />
respective volumes of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er were 4,216, 2,460, and 2.946 cm.<br />
After the first series of tests was completed, the volume of each <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er was reduced by increasing the lining thickness to<br />
3,414 cm (<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/28), 1,787 cm (<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/A3), and 1,510 cm<br />
(<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. I/Dl). All <strong>stove</strong>s were then subjected to the same test.<br />
Air inZet door<br />
Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the air inlet door area<br />
on its per<strong>for</strong>mance. The <strong>stove</strong> had a gap height of 1 cm and an air inlet<br />
door area of 66 cm. The area was later reduced to 49.5, 33.0, and 16.5 cm,<br />
which corresponded to 75, 50 and 25% of the initial area. The <strong>stove</strong> (as<br />
each door area was reduced) was tested <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Grate thickness<br />
Stove nos. l/E3 and I/E4 were tested <strong>for</strong> grate thickness. The grate<br />
thickness <strong>for</strong> both <strong>stove</strong>s was initially 2.0 cm and was later changed to<br />
3.6 cm. At these two grate thicknesses, the test <strong>for</strong> the efficiency was<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />
D. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL VARIABLES OF THE<br />
CHARCOAL BUCKET STOVE<br />
In the previous section, the internal variables--the properties of the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>--were discussed. There is another group of variables that can affect<br />
the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>, but they are not the properties of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
itself. The variables in this group are called the external variables.<br />
Examples of them are;<br />
68
* Initial weight of charcoal;<br />
e Initial weight of water;<br />
* Pot size;<br />
e Charcoal size;<br />
e Wind effect; and<br />
* Humidity effect.<br />
To study the effects of the external variables (pot size, charcoal size,<br />
wind and humidity) a laboratory test was conducted, using the same testing<br />
procedure described in this chapter in the section on Standard Testing<br />
Conditions. For the initial weight of charcoal and the initial weight of<br />
water, the other two external variables, one of them is varied at a time.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the External Variable Study<br />
The external variable experiments tested the initial weight of charcoal,<br />
the initial weight of water, the pot size, the charcoal size, the wind effect,<br />
and the humidity effect. Procedures are discussed below.<br />
Initial weight of charcoal<br />
Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The first test <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance was per<strong>for</strong>med with the initial weight of charcoal at 300 kg and<br />
the initial weight of water at 2,300 kg.<br />
The experiments were then repeated, keeping the same initial weight of<br />
water, but changing the initial weight of the charcoal to 350 and 450 gm.<br />
The above procedure was repeated with the initial weights of water set<br />
at 3,000 and 3,700 gm. The results obtained from the experiments were <strong>use</strong>d<br />
in calculating the HU values of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Initial weight of water<br />
The experimental technique <strong>for</strong> this study was described in the<br />
last section. The data is analyzed to obtain effect of initial weight of<br />
water on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Pot size<br />
Stove nos. 1/4 and l/E3 were <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. Three different<br />
pots with diameters of 24, 28, and 32 cm were <strong>use</strong>d. The test was carried<br />
out under standard conditions.<br />
69
CharcoaZ size<br />
In order to study the effect of charcoal size on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, a<br />
long piece of charcoal (an approximately uni<strong>for</strong>m cross section) was cut<br />
into pieces. These were then <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment. The term "size", in<br />
fact, refers to the length of the charcoal. In this test, two different<br />
lengths of charcoal were <strong>use</strong>d: 2.54, and 10.16 cm. Stove nos. 1/5, 1/12,<br />
1/14 and 1/20 were <strong>use</strong>d in the test.<br />
Wind effect<br />
Stove nos. 1/2, 1/5, 1/17, and 1/20 were <strong>use</strong>d to test the effect of<br />
wind. Wind was induced by an electric fan; the speed was measured by an<br />
anemometer. The tests were first per<strong>for</strong>med without turning on the fan; this<br />
represents the condition without wind effect--the reference condition.<br />
Later, the tests were repeated with the fan on. The wind speed <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
nos. 1/2, 1/5, 1/17 as measured was 80 m/min, and <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/20 was<br />
86.7 m/min.<br />
Humidity<br />
Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment. The humidity of the<br />
experimenting room was measured by a psychrometer (wet and dry bulb thermometers).<br />
In order to test the <strong>stove</strong> under an environment of varying<br />
humidity the test was per<strong>for</strong>med at various times of day and in different<br />
seasons. The percentages of humidity recorded on six experimental days were<br />
68, 74, 76, 78, 80, and 92.<br />
E. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF VARIABLES ON THE<br />
NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />
Similar to the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the internal variables being<br />
studied include:<br />
9 Stove gap/exhaust area;<br />
9 Grate hole area;<br />
e Grate-to-pot distance;<br />
* Air inlet door; and<br />
e Ratio of exhaust area to grate hole area.<br />
The variation of one of the above characteristics is expected to<br />
affect the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> in a manner similar to that of the<br />
charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
70
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variables Study<br />
Stove gap/exhaust area<br />
Twenty-two wood <strong>stove</strong>s, having different gap areas and being made by<br />
different manufacturers, were tested <strong>for</strong> the effect of the gap on <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance. The gap heights ranged from 1 to 3.0 cm. Each <strong>stove</strong> was tested<br />
at least three times. Time to boil was recorded, and the HU values were<br />
calculated from the difference between the amounts of wood initially put into<br />
and left in the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Total grate hole area<br />
To investigate the impact of the grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong>s from various sources were <strong>use</strong>d. The <strong>stove</strong>s were divided into<br />
3 gro:tps according to the nu<strong>mb</strong>er and the size of the grate holes. Group A<br />
had 37 grate holes with a diameter of 2.5 cm; in group B, the hole was<br />
1.5 cm in diameter, ard the total nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes was 90; group C had 61<br />
holes, each of which was 1.23 cm in diameter. Every <strong>stove</strong> in the test had<br />
the same grate-to-pot distance of 12 cm.<br />
Grate-to-pot distance<br />
More than twenty wood <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of grate-topot<br />
distance on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The distance ranged from 9 to 17.5 cm.<br />
The <strong>stove</strong>s were again obtained from different manufacturers. Each <strong>stove</strong><br />
was tested at least three times.<br />
Air inlet door<br />
The impact of the air inlet door on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied with<br />
the wood <strong>stove</strong>s having door open at first and closed later. Each <strong>stove</strong> was<br />
tested at least three times. Time to boil and HU value were then calculated.<br />
F. TEST FOR THE EF}'ECT OF EXTERNAL VARIABLES OF THE<br />
NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVES<br />
Only the effect of wind velocity and fuel feeding rate were studied.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the External Variables Study<br />
Wind effect<br />
The effect of wind on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied. Three <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
were <strong>use</strong>d in this investigation; each was run at least three times under<br />
two conditions--with and without wind. Wind was induced by an electric<br />
fan. The wood <strong>stove</strong>s came from differen. manufacturers. Time to boil<br />
was noted and the HU values were calculated.<br />
71
Fuel feeding rate<br />
In this Lest, the wood was fed into the <strong>stove</strong> at different rates. The<br />
rate was measured along with the weight of wood, since wood was put into<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> at regular intervals Three rates were studied, labelled low,<br />
medium and high. The tests were per<strong>for</strong>med using two wood <strong>stove</strong>s, one with<br />
a grate height of 12 cm and the other with a grate height of 15 cm. The<br />
weights of wood <strong>for</strong> the low, medium and high rates were 0.84 kg, 1.00 kg,<br />
and 1.21 kg, respectively, <strong>for</strong> the first <strong>stove</strong>. The weights of wood <strong>for</strong><br />
the second <strong>stove</strong> were 1.31, 1.53, 1.75 kg, which reflect the low, medium,<br />
and high rates of fuel feeding, respectively.<br />
G. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />
CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />
Stove per<strong>for</strong>mance tests were conducted on three wood <strong>stove</strong>s with a<br />
chimney. They wer <strong>use</strong>d to test the effect of chimney materials, metal ring<br />
around the pot hole and the baffle. No external variables were investigated.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />
Metal ring around pot hole<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance of wood <strong>stove</strong> no. 2/11 was measured <strong>for</strong> the effect of the<br />
metal ring around the pothole. The <strong>stove</strong> initially had a metal ring. After<br />
it had been tested, the ring was then removed. The <strong>stove</strong> was then retested.<br />
All the necessary data <strong>for</strong> comparing efficiency were recorded.<br />
Chimney material<br />
To study the effect of chimney material on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, <strong>stove</strong><br />
no. 2/12 was <strong>use</strong>d. The <strong>stove</strong> was first tested as initially constructed.<br />
Later, the chimney material was changed to iron, and the <strong>stove</strong> was then<br />
retested. The material was changed again to cement and another test was<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med. Data were recorded under each condition.<br />
Baffle<br />
Stove no. 2/12 (the same <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>d to investigate the effect of chimney<br />
material) has no baffle between the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er and the chimney; there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
it was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of a baffle on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Two<br />
kinds of baftles were examined: one made of fire clay and the other made of<br />
iron. The iron baffle was tested first. The standard test was then applied<br />
to estimate <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. The iron baffle was then replaced by a fire<br />
clay baffle and the te-st was repeated.<br />
72
H. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />
CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />
Four internal variables were investigated <strong>for</strong> their effects on the<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance of the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>. They were the fuel gas outlet<br />
area, base-to-pot distance, firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, and chimney height.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />
Fuel gas outlet area<br />
A chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the fuel gas<br />
outlet area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The initial outlet area of the <strong>stove</strong> was<br />
95.0 sq cm. This area was reduced by adding clay to the outlet in the<br />
second and the third runs; the areas were 47.0 and 38.0 sq cm, respectively.<br />
In each case, time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were recorded.<br />
Base-to-pot distance<br />
To study the effect of base-to-pot distance on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the<br />
chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, <strong>stove</strong>s with different distances were <strong>use</strong>d, In the<br />
test, the distances were varied from 18.0 to 36.0 cm. Each <strong>stove</strong> was tested<br />
at least 3 times. Data on time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were collected.<br />
Firingcha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
The effect of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied by<br />
varying the size of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er. This was done by adding clay to the<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er to reduce its volume. The initial size of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er was<br />
16,600 cu cm; it was then reduced 3 times. The volume became 16,400,<br />
12,600, and 12,400 cu cm, respectively. Data were collected <strong>for</strong> time to<br />
boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d.<br />
Chimney height<br />
The chimney height is another parameter that affects the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong>, since height ca<strong>use</strong>s change in the rate of exhaust outflow.<br />
To study this effect, the chimney of a <strong>stove</strong> was decreased from 230 to 200 cm.<br />
Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d be<strong>for</strong>e and after reducing chimney height<br />
were recorded.<br />
I. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />
NON-CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />
Since there are many kinds of non-chimneyed rice husk st'ves, testing<br />
all the <strong>stove</strong>s marketed would have been tedious. Only one <strong>stove</strong> design was<br />
chosen as the representative of non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s. This <strong>stove</strong><br />
was designed by Mr. Meechai.<br />
73
The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> consists of 2 parts -- the outer cone and the<br />
inner cylinder. For the outer cone, the following parameters were<br />
studied: height, upper diameter, lower diameter, slope angle of cone,<br />
and nu<strong>mb</strong>er of air inlet holes. For the inner cylinder, the effects of<br />
height, exhaust area, and fuel flow area were investigated. The dimensions<br />
of the reference Meechai <strong>stove</strong> are as follows:<br />
Outer cone<br />
Inner cylinder<br />
Height 37.0 cm.<br />
Upper diameter 46.0 cm.<br />
Lower diameter 8.0 cm.<br />
Slope angle of cone 63.0 deg.<br />
Nu<strong>mb</strong>er of air inlet holes 329<br />
Diameter 16.0 cm.<br />
Exhaust area 184.0 sq cm.<br />
Fuel flow area 163 sq cm.<br />
Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />
Height of the outer cone<br />
Four Meechai <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the height of the<br />
outer cone on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The heights were 30.5, 33, 37.0, and<br />
47.0 cm. Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were recorded.<br />
Upper diameter of the outer cone<br />
To investigate the impact of the upper diameter of the outer cone on<br />
Meechai <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, three <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d. The diameters of the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s were 46.0, 43.0, and 41.0 cm.<br />
Lower diameter of outer cone<br />
Three <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the lower diameter of the<br />
outer cpne on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. These <strong>stove</strong>s had diameters of 8.0, 9.0,<br />
10.9 cm, respectively. The water bciling test was <strong>use</strong>d to compare <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency. Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were noted.<br />
74
Nwnber of air inlet holes<br />
The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> is similar to other types of <strong>stove</strong>s in that air inlet<br />
holes control the supply of fresh air to co<strong>mb</strong>ustion.<br />
air inlet holes has some impact on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
<strong>use</strong>d <strong>stove</strong>s with the following nu<strong>mb</strong>ers of holes: 331<br />
was tested at least 4 times.<br />
Height of inner cylinder<br />
Indeed, the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of<br />
The investigation<br />
and 274. Each <strong>stove</strong><br />
The inner cylinder contains the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As a consequence, the<br />
height of the cylinder was expected to affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Only three<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d in the study. Each was tested at least 5 times. The<br />
heights of these three <strong>stove</strong>s were 16.0, 19.0, 20.0 cm.<br />
Exhaust area<br />
To investigate the effect of the exhaust area, four <strong>stove</strong>s were subjected<br />
to the test. The exhausc areas were 184, 165, 129, 123 sq cm, respectively.<br />
Fuel flow area<br />
Rice husk in Meechai <strong>stove</strong> has two roles--it is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, and it<br />
insulates the <strong>stove</strong>. The insulating rice husk, which is situated in the<br />
space between the inner cylinder and the outer cone, sooner or later becomes<br />
fuel <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Thus, the fuel flow area should control the fuel<br />
supply to the <strong>stove</strong>. To verify this hypothesis, four <strong>stove</strong>s with the fuel<br />
flow areas of 163 and 184 sq cm were tested. Each <strong>stove</strong> was run at least<br />
two times. Data on time to boil and amount of fuel consumed were recorded.<br />
J. DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED STOVE PROTOTYPE<br />
Using the techniques outlined in the previous sections, the effects of<br />
both internal and external variables on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance were studied. The<br />
results were then <strong>use</strong>d to design a high per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>stove</strong>. To achieve this<br />
end, all the internal variables had to be analysed carefully. The analysis<br />
indicated which factors contributed significantly to <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Five prototypes of different <strong>stove</strong>s were developed; they were prototypes<br />
of a charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, a wood <strong>stove</strong> with and without chimney, and a rice husk<br />
<strong>stove</strong> with and witbout a chimney. These prototypes were then tested to<br />
ensure high per<strong>for</strong>mance prior to commissioning persons to produce the <strong>stove</strong><br />
in quantity fo- trial promotion.<br />
75
Chapter 5<br />
Analysis of Results and Discussion
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
This chapter analyzes the measured values of the physical structure of<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s. Per<strong>for</strong>mance and characteristics of tested commercial<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s are evaluated and discussed. An intensive analysis of the internal<br />
and external variables affecting commercial charcoal and non-chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>mance is presented in the chapter.<br />
A. PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF COMMERCIAL STOVES<br />
Of the five types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> stves already mentioned, the<br />
commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> and the wood bucket <strong>stove</strong> without chimney<br />
are the most popular in Bangkok and urban areas. Their structure consists<br />
of an inverted truncated cone made of fired clay placed inside the metal<br />
sheet bucket. The prominent component parts of both charcoal and wood bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s that may influence the <strong>stove</strong>'s behavior are: pothole diameter,<br />
size of fuel firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate diameter, grate hole area, grate thickness,<br />
grate-to-pot distance, exhausted gap, <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness, and air inlet<br />
area. Most bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are insulated with a mixture of rice husk ash and<br />
clay. Since the fuel feeding method of a wood <strong>stove</strong> differs from that of<br />
a charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the wood <strong>stove</strong> includes a small removable feeding port<br />
above the air inlet door. In practice, this bucket wood <strong>stove</strong> is often<br />
<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> charcoal fuel also.<br />
While the structures of the bucket <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood <strong>use</strong> in<br />
urban areas are similar, the physical appearance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> in rural<br />
areas may vary from place to place. Some wood <strong>stove</strong>s are shaped like a dome,<br />
some like a horseshoe, an enclosed horse shoe, a pit in the ground and three<br />
stones; almost none have any insulation or grates.<br />
The measured physical dimensions of charcoal and non-chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 5.1 and Table 5.2. Since their shapes are so<br />
diverse, the appearance of each iidividual <strong>stove</strong> is fully displayed by the<br />
photographs in Annex I and II at the end of this report.<br />
For wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys, there are three distinct models, namely<br />
Saeng Pen, Samrong, and Banpong. Their physical configurations can be seen<br />
in Annex III. The main structural components cf this <strong>stove</strong> are much the<br />
same as those of the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, except <strong>for</strong> a fuel gas outlet<br />
port with connected chimney located at the opposite side of the fuel feeding<br />
port. The dimensions of the fuel gas outlet area and the chimney as well<br />
as other important structures are listed in Table 5.3.<br />
For the rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, the only practical type found<br />
is <strong>use</strong>d by the Kampuchean refugees in Khao-I-Dang camp and is called the<br />
"Meechai Stove". (See the photograph in Chapter 7). This kind of rice<br />
husk <strong>stove</strong> was constructed from a rough drawing at the RFD workshop and was<br />
tested <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Its main features consist of an outside fuel<br />
receptacle cone and an inner co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cylinder. Between these two parts
Table 5.1 Physical dimensions of tested charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
Code Name/source Stove Pot hole Firinq Grate Grate Exhaust Ave.wall Air inlet<br />
no. -t -diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole thickness to pot oap area thickness area<br />
(cm) (cm) (cm ) (cm) dia hole area (cm) (cm) (c=) (cm 2<br />
, (cm) (cm 2<br />
)<br />
(cm) (cm 2<br />
)<br />
1/2 Rangsit 12.2 19.0 2426 17.5 1 .3 85 112.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 96.0 5.8 70.0<br />
1/3 Rangsit 8.7* 19.0 2426 17.7 1.3 85 112.0 3.5 12.0 1.8 97.0 4.1 70.0<br />
1/4 Ranosit 12.8 19.0 2426 17.5 1.3 85 112.0 4.0 1Z.? 1.5 76.0 5.9 70.0<br />
I/5 Rangsit(atainless case) 9.3 16.0 1575 11.0 1.3 61 80.0 3.5 12.0 1.0 41.0 5.7 66.0<br />
1/6 Rangsait 8.6 20.0 2065 !5.5 1.2 61 69.0 3.5 12.0 1 .0 41.0 5.8 66.0<br />
1/7 Ayudthava 6.4 21.0 1931 19.0 2.1 19 66.0 3.5 12.0 1.0 41.0 5.8 66.0<br />
1/8 Unknown 8.1 18.0 1831 17.5 1.8 19 48.0 1.8 6.5 2.0 68.0 3.8 60.0<br />
1/9 Chachoenosao 8.1 18.0 1832 15.7 1.8 19 48.0 2.0 9.0 1.5 70.0 5.4 55.0<br />
CD 1/10 Unknow 6.6 21.0 2475 18.5 2.4 19 86.0 1.8 8.0 1.0 90.0 3.4 66.0<br />
1 /11 Unknown 4.3 20.0 2176 18.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.6 10.0 2.0 80.0 2.2 58.0<br />
1/12 Booopararm 7.2 21. 2856 19.5 1.5 37 65.0 1.6 10.0 2.0 80.0 2.2 58.0<br />
1/13 Samvakohichal 10.7 22.0 2390 18.5 1.9 27 96.0 1.8 10.0 1.6 74.0 6.2 48.0<br />
1/14 Booopararm 19.0 20.0 3464 19.0 1.5 37 65.0 2.0 11.0 2.5 113.0 6.1 60.0<br />
l.'.- Banolane 10.0 20.0 2865 19.0 1.5 36 65.0 1.2 9.0 2.0 108.0 6.0 76.0<br />
1 16 Ayudtha.ya 6.7 21.0 2618 14.5 2.0 19 59.0 2.0 7.5 1.0 45.0 3.4 66.0<br />
1/17 Cholburi 5.9 17.0 2013 15.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.5 10.4 1 .2 50.0 4.7 60.0
Table 5.1 (continued)<br />
Code Name/source Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate Exhaust AveWall Air inlet<br />
no. wt<br />
(cm)<br />
diameter<br />
(cm)<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
(cm 3<br />
)<br />
die<br />
(cm)<br />
hole<br />
die<br />
no.of<br />
hole<br />
hole<br />
area<br />
2<br />
(cm) (cm )<br />
thickness<br />
(cm)<br />
to pot<br />
(cm,<br />
oap<br />
(cml<br />
area<br />
(cm 2<br />
)<br />
thickness<br />
1/18 Cholburi 7.2 21.0 3202 18.5 1 .8 27 68.0 1.9 11.0 2.0 96.0 3.9 70.0<br />
1/19 Samrono 10.5 18.0 3042 15.5 1 .8 37 94.0 1.8 11.0 2.5 <strong>101</strong>.0 6.3 70.0<br />
1/20 Cholburi 10.2 23.0 2516 20.0 ( .8 37 94.0 1.9 7.0 2.0 102.0 5.3 70.0<br />
I-, Darnkvian 11.1 22.5 2414 20.0 1.8 27 68.0 (.8 9.0 3.0 107;.0 4.5 80.0<br />
1/22 anpong 9.5 20.0 3155 18.5 1.5 48 85.0 2.5 11.0 0.8 38 3.4 80.0<br />
1/23 Raegsit 7.2 16.0 1575 15.0 1.3 61 80.0 3.9 12.0 1.0 41.0 4.2 66.0<br />
1/24 Cholburi 13.8 22.0 3815 10.5 1.9 27 77.0 2.2 11 .0 2.2 112 6.1 108.0<br />
1/25 Rangsit 13.2 19.0 2426 27.0 1.3 85 112.0 4.0 9.0 2.0 96.0 6.2 70.0<br />
1/26 Darnkwian 6.6' 23.0 2700 20.0 (.8 30 75.0 1.6 9.5 1.5 90.0 2.9 86.0<br />
1/28 Sa-Sua 12.2 23.0 4216 20.0 1.6 37 74.0 2.2 10.0 2.3 131.0 4.5 124.0<br />
1/29 Sa-Sua 13.3 19.0 3414 17.0 1.6 37 74.0 2.0 11.5 2.0 85.0 4.8 124.0<br />
1/30 Nakornchaisri 18.0 20.0 2992 19.0 1 .5 73 131 3.5 12.0 2.0 102 3.7 127.0<br />
1/31 Nekornchaisri 11.8 17.0 2250 16.5 1.4 61 94.0 3.0 12.0 0.5 20.0 -6.2 88.0<br />
1/32 Nakorncheisri 8.2 20.0 2992 19.0 1.5 73 131 3.5 12.0 2.0 102.0 3.7 127.0<br />
1/33 Nakornchaisri 6 7. 17.0 2550 17.0 1.4 61 94.0 3.0 12.0 0.5 20.0 3.8 88.0<br />
1/34 Bangsue 10.0 20.0 2829 18.0 1.8 27 68.0 1.5 9.0 .8 103.0 6.3 105.0<br />
1/35 Ban.sue 8.0 17.0 2176 16.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.6 11.0 1.7 82.0 5.6 81.0<br />
1/26 Bangsue 6.5 15.0 1568 13.5 1.7 19 44.0 * .6 9.5 1.9 56.0 6.2 75.0<br />
1/37 BooPpararm 6.5 15.0 1130 13.0 1.3 19 25.0 1.6 -9.0 0.7 60.0 4.6 38.0<br />
1/38 Unknown 10.0 19.0 2000 16.0 1.0 89 70.0 1.9 10.0 1.9 122.0 4.2 66.0<br />
fNaked <strong>stove</strong> without insulation and bucket.<br />
(cm)<br />
area<br />
(cm 2
Table 5.2 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />
Code Name/ourte Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate/bese txnaust Wall Pri -ary Feedin<br />
no. -t ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole to pot oac area thicxness air tor: port<br />
(cm) (cm) (qa) (cm3 (cm) dia hole area (cm Ic.; (c 2<br />
2<br />
(cm) (cm )<br />
) (cml (cm ( 2<br />
)<br />
1/2 Rangsit 12.2 27.0 19.0 2426 17.5 1 .3 35 112.0 12.0 2.0 36.0 6.0 70.0 54.0<br />
1/8 Unknown 8.1 18.5 18.0 1832 17.5 1 .8 19 48.0 9.0 1 .5 70.0 5.4 75.0 55.0<br />
1/9 Chachoenc-ao e.7 2-.0 23.0 3232 20.5 1 .8 37 94.0 6.5 2-.0 62.0 4.8 90.0 57.9<br />
1/12 Ecoooararm 7.2 22.5 21.0 2851 19.5 1 .5 37 65.0 9.0 2.0 80.0 4.6 118.0 60.0<br />
1/13 Samakohichai 10.9 18.0 22.0 2390 18.5 1 .9 27 76.0 10.0 1 .6 74.0 6.2 48.0 44.0<br />
1/19 Samronge 18.0 16.5 18.0 3040 15.5 1 .8 27 94.0 11.0 2.5 <strong>101</strong>.0 6.3 70.0 56.3<br />
1:20 -holburi 10.2 24.0 22.0 2516 20.0 1 .8 37 94.0 7.0 2.0 102.0 5.3 70.0 13.7<br />
1/21 Darnkwian 11.4 30.0 22.5 2414 20.0 1.8 27 68.0 9.0 2,.0 107.0 4.5 34.5 80.0<br />
1/24 :holbur- 13.8 27.0 22.0 3815 20.5 1.9 27 77.0 11.0 2.: 112.0 6.1 10E.0 224.0<br />
1,'25 Rangsit 12.2 30.0 19.0 2426 27.0 1 .3 85 112.0 9.0 2.0 96.0 6.0 78.0 81.3<br />
2 11 Roi-et (oricinall 5.9 21.C 22.0 7600. no grate 20.9 1 .3 25.3 2.0 - 296.4<br />
2/2 Thick dome, tIay 11.8 14.8 22.0 5800 14.3 2.1 162.0 7.0 - 181.5<br />
2.:3 Thick horse shce. clay 18.2 15.3 25.0 £870 1. .4 8S.3 6.0 - 225.0<br />
2'4 morn PaKred, mt ,ied 2.5 12.0 27.0 7440 24.5 1.5 90 160.9 12.0 2.5 90.7 1.7 20.0 243.0<br />
2'5 .rn Pa5e, s.ca: I<br />
2.6 12.0 18.0 3600 - no grate - 14.0 5.0 210.0 2.0 - 280.0
Table 5.2 (continued)<br />
Code Name/source Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate/base Exhaust wall Primary Feeding<br />
no. wt ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole to pot qap area thickness air port port<br />
(cm) (cM) (cm) (cm ) (cm) dia hole area (cm) (c--) (cm 2<br />
) [ c2 (. 2 )<br />
(cm) (cm 2<br />
)<br />
2/6 Tripod 0.9 14.0 2C.0 4080 no grate 14.0 - - - - 82.0<br />
2/7 Morn Pakrad, larae 3.3 14.0 27.0 7440 - 14.0 5.4 222.6 2.0 - 332.0<br />
2/8 Modified Ro±-et, clay 6.6 15.0 22.0 4560 14.8 1.0 55.5 3.8 - 204.3<br />
2/9 Norse shoe, clay 8.1 13.4 25.0 6380 - 11.5 2.5 197.1 5.5 - 208.0<br />
2/10 Thin horse shoe, clay 7.4 14.0 22.0 4560 12.0 3.6 77.6 3.8 - 325.0<br />
2/13 Dome, clay 9.3 15.0 24.0 5400 24.5 1.5 9:.O 160.9 14.5 1.3 62.4 4.0 60.0 175.0<br />
2/16 Pot shaoed, clay 10.3 18.5 22.0 7030 1 no grate 18.0 1.8 86.4 5.0 - 157.5<br />
2/22 Dome with cap, clay 11.3 18.7 22.0 6840 24.5 1.5 91.0 160.9 17.2 1.5 73.1 3.3 76.0 202.0<br />
2/23 odified Roi-It. clay 14.0 19.0 24.5 4950 24.5 1.5 910 160.9 12.2 1.8 86.6 3.5 115.0 114.0<br />
2/24 Cylinder, steel 3.7 17.0 17.0 2040 23.4 1.2 89.0 99.6 13.0 0.6 32.2 1.8 42.0 94.5<br />
Note <strong>stove</strong> 1/2 -1/25 are nf the bucket type asid 2/1 - 2/24 are the non-bucket
Table 5.3 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />
Code flaei Source StD'e st-Ve Pot hcle Firin. Grate Grate Flue cas A.e.'all n.ir- - i.-no Chimney<br />
no. "t nt diameter thamner die hole no.of hole to pot out'et thicktness air port Dart hr<br />
(-) (cm) (Cm, (crn ) (cm) Icm) hole area cm)<br />
[c 2)<br />
c.-; (c<br />
2<br />
c" (CM)<br />
2/11 Saenq Pen 24.S 235 19.0 5190 22.0 2.0 22 72.2 17.0 75.2 4.3 34.0 20.3 71.0<br />
2/12 Sarc'onq 24-3 3:-5 20.9 4400 20.5 0.5 3. 65.4 1".0 22.5 4.2 185.7 11! .r 80.0<br />
2/15 BarDonq -5 25.3 29.0 5890 24.5 2.0 30.3 44.3 12.0 22.A ".0 216.0 24:.) 230.0
there is a gap through which the rice husk flows. The slope of the outside<br />
cone plays an important role in facilitating the rice husk's slide to the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion zone. The co<strong>mb</strong>ustion air is drawn in through the punched holes<br />
evenly distributed oilthe lower part of the outer cone wall. A list of the<br />
physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimneys is shown in Table<br />
5.4.<br />
For rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys, five recognizable makes are found,<br />
namely Ngo Gew Ha of Lamlooka, Thai Charoen of Rangsit, Takeseng of<br />
Banglane, Sayun of Samrong, and Sooksunt of Dhonburi. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
are made of either cement or fired clay. They are quite heavy, a factor<br />
decreasing their popularity. The prominent features of this type of <strong>stove</strong><br />
include a pothole, firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate, air inlet port, fuel gas outlet<br />
port, chimney, ash removed port, and <strong>stove</strong> high mass body. The physical<br />
dimensions of the five <strong>stove</strong>s described above are measured and presented<br />
in Table 5.5. Photographs of these <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Annex IV.<br />
B. TERMINOLOGY<br />
For clarity, the terminology <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> describing the features of each<br />
type of <strong>stove</strong> is presented in Fig. 7.1 to 7.5 in Chapter 7.<br />
C. PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL STOVES TESTED<br />
The per<strong>for</strong>mance of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong> with and without<br />
chimneys and rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys is discussed as<br />
follows:<br />
Charcoal Stove<br />
The results of 34 commercial <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance tests shown in Table 5.6<br />
indicate that their efficiencies vary from 23% - 32%. The time to bring<br />
water from the iiritial controlled temperature to the boiling point varies<br />
from approximately 17 minutes - 32 minutes. The rate of fuel consumption or<br />
burning rate varies from about 6 gm/min to nearly 8 gm/min Fig. 5.1 and<br />
Fig. 5.2 show the plotted values between the individual <strong>stove</strong> and its<br />
efficiency and the <strong>stove</strong> and its time to boil.<br />
The <strong>stove</strong>s with high efficiency (such as <strong>stove</strong> no. 31, 17, 36, 5 and<br />
33) have shown a prominent effect on the rate of bringing water temperature<br />
to boiling. That is, the time to boil of a group of high efficiency or good<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s is shorter than a group of low effieicney or poor <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Time-temperature characteristic curves of poor and good charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
are shown in Fig. 5.0.<br />
85
Table 5.4 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />
Code<br />
no.<br />
Outer cone<br />
Upper Lower<br />
diameter diameter<br />
(cm.) (cm.)<br />
height<br />
(cm.)<br />
Air inlet<br />
No. 6, cm.<br />
Insulation<br />
Inner cylinder<br />
PExhaus,-d<br />
Iame ter tIeight area<br />
(cm.) (cm.) (cm)<br />
Fuel flow gap<br />
area<br />
cm)<br />
A 46.0 8.0 37.0 329 0.6 no 21.0 16.0 184.0 163.0<br />
B 46.0 8.0 37.0 329 0.6 yes 21,0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />
C 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yes 21.0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />
D 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yes 21.0 20.0 129.0 184.0<br />
£ 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yea 21.0 16.0 184.0 163.0<br />
F 43.0 9.0 30.5 274 0.9 yes 21.0 19.0 123.0 163.0<br />
0 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 yes 21.0 19.0 123.0 163.0<br />
F) 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 no 21.0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />
1 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 no 21.0 20.0 129.0 184.0<br />
86
Table 5.5 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />
Code Name/scure Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Air inlet Flue gas Chi.mtney Base to pot<br />
I". ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er slooe area outle- area ht distan=e<br />
( . (cm) (cm) (cm3 (cm2 (cm2) (cm) (cm)<br />
3/2 Nc Ge, Ia e5.o 38.0 32.0 19,000 45 490.0 78.0 240.0 29.0<br />
3/3 Thai tnaroen 96.0 39.0 21.0 17,100 47 420.0 78.0 240.0 29.0<br />
3/4 Thai :aroen 96.0 29.0 32.0 16,600 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />
3/4A1 Thai Charven 96.7 39.0 33.0 16,400 44 442.0 47.0 240.0 26.0<br />
3/4A3 Thai Charoen 96.7 39.0 33.0 16.400 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />
3/480 Thai Charo-n 94 .0 39.0 '3.0 12,600 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />
0o<br />
4 3/482 Thal Charven 96.0 39.0 33.0 12.400 44 442.0 38.0 240.0 26.0<br />
3/5 Banolane 95.5 59.0 30.0 19,100 40 723.0 113.0 230.0 36.0<br />
3/5A Sanolane 95-5 S.u 30.0 19,100 40 703.0 113.0 200.0 36.0<br />
3/5I Banalane 95-5 59.0 30.0 19,100 40 703.0 4C.0 230.0 36.0<br />
3/5A2 5anolane 95.5 59.0 30.0 18,100 40 703 116.0 230.0 36.0<br />
3/6 Sayun 65.0 28.0 27.0 6,200 41 362.5 28.0 240.0 23.0<br />
3/8 Sooksunt 62.0 22.5 28.0 10.600 47 270.0 71.0 160.0 18.0<br />
3/8C2 Sooksunt 62.0 22.5 28.0 10,600 30 210.0 71.0 160.0 18.0<br />
Stnv- nu<strong>mb</strong>ers which followed by latter codes such as A, AI,82, and C2 indicate that modificatiors have been made to the<br />
oriqinal models to observe the per<strong>for</strong>mance responses.
Table 5.6<br />
Average testing results of commercial charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate<br />
no. test (gm) (gm/min)<br />
1/2 6 337.0 6.57<br />
1/3 6 332.0 6.17<br />
1/4 6 340.0 7.01<br />
1/5 18 330.0 6.47<br />
1/6 3 316.0 5.45<br />
1/7 6 316.0 5.45<br />
1/8 3 323.0 5.65<br />
1/9 3 313.0 5.9i<br />
1/10 3 295.0(min) 4.81(min)<br />
1/11 3 312.0 5.96<br />
1/12 7 316.0 6.01<br />
1/13 11 325.0 6.05<br />
1/14 6 327.0 5.73<br />
1/15 9 323.0 5.92<br />
1/16 6 301.0 5.29<br />
1/17 6 320.0 6.42<br />
1/18 7 325.0 6.17<br />
1/19 8 344.0 6.45<br />
1/20 6 315.0 5.10<br />
1/21 3 313.0 5.47<br />
1/22 3 317.0 5.96<br />
1/23 6 322.0 6.27<br />
1/24 6 327.0 6.23<br />
1/26 3 325.0 6.07<br />
1/28 9 342.0 6.82<br />
1/29 4 343.0 6.86<br />
88<br />
Time to boil<br />
(min)<br />
21.7<br />
22.3<br />
18.8<br />
21.1<br />
18.0<br />
28.0<br />
27.3<br />
23.0<br />
31.7<br />
22.3<br />
22.6<br />
23.9<br />
27.2<br />
24.6<br />
27.2<br />
20.0<br />
23.6<br />
23.8<br />
32.0(max)<br />
27.3<br />
23.3<br />
21.5<br />
22.7<br />
23.7<br />
20.1<br />
20.0<br />
Heat conversion<br />
efficiency(%)<br />
24.96<br />
25.70<br />
28.19<br />
30.53<br />
28.53<br />
25.61<br />
24.07<br />
28.42<br />
26.54<br />
26.41<br />
29.02<br />
26.12<br />
23.53(min)<br />
27.21<br />
27.45<br />
32.30<br />
26.85<br />
23.89<br />
24.94<br />
24.73<br />
28.11<br />
29.17<br />
25.60<br />
24.36<br />
25.60<br />
25.85
Table 5.6<br />
(continued)<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />
no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />
1/30 7 3 6 4.0(max) 7.77(max) 16.9 24.25<br />
1/31 6 334.0 7.17 16.7(min) 32.43(max)<br />
1/32 8 360.0 7.57 17.6 24.61<br />
1/33 3 340.0 7.04 18.3 30.51<br />
1/34 5 336.0 6.58 21.2 26.07<br />
1/35 6 340.0 6.83 19.8 27.35<br />
1/36 5 322.0 6.34 20.8 30.67<br />
1/37 3 322.0 5.75 26.0 28.07<br />
Average 327.0 6.21 22.8 27.00<br />
89
90 /<br />
so<br />
U<br />
70<br />
Figure 5.0 Time-Temperature characteristic curves of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
31175 AiN 14 20<br />
/ '<br />
.20<br />
.*"<br />
4 "Good <strong>stove</strong> Poor <strong>stove</strong><br />
(60 Stove No. 31 17 .5 AN 19 14 20<br />
' HU % 32.4 32.3 30.5 34.4<br />
$4s-o<br />
a)4)<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10'<br />
0<br />
/ /' "<br />
"<br />
Time to boil (min.) 17 18 19 20 24 26 29<br />
Boiling duration (min.) 30 30 30 30 9 10 11<br />
Last temperature (C) 97 96 96 97 88 87 89<br />
Total operation time (min.) 47 48 49 50 54 56 59<br />
10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Time of operation, min.<br />
14
dP<br />
33<br />
32<br />
31<br />
30<br />
29<br />
28<br />
27<br />
26<br />
25<br />
24<br />
23<br />
22<br />
21<br />
20<br />
19<br />
Figure 5.1<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization<br />
efficiency (lU) of cormnercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
1<br />
STOVE NUMBER
34<br />
33<br />
32<br />
31<br />
30<br />
29<br />
28<br />
27<br />
28<br />
25<br />
24<br />
r,23<br />
H22<br />
.0<br />
0<br />
4 J 2 1<br />
Is<br />
17<br />
17<br />
16<br />
14<br />
13<br />
12<br />
11<br />
L<br />
Figure 5.2<br />
N<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of<br />
commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
M H M '1 1-1 r-1 4.-H M J N N C1 N'J 'M H4<br />
92<br />
STOVE NUMBER
Wood Stove without Chimney<br />
25 wood <strong>stove</strong>s were subjected to the per<strong>for</strong>mance tests. The results<br />
show that the efficiency of non-bucket wood <strong>stove</strong>s i.e., <strong>stove</strong> No. 2/1 to<br />
2 /24,varies from 14% - 23%. For bucket-type wood <strong>stove</strong>, (<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/2 to<br />
1/25), the efficiency varies from 18 - 25%. (See Fig. 5.3 - 5.4 and Table<br />
5.7). The time to boil <strong>for</strong> both types of <strong>stove</strong>s ranges from 17 - 19 min.<br />
and fuel burning rates range from 22 - 35 gm/min. The wood <strong>stove</strong>s with<br />
buckets have much the same level of effective per<strong>for</strong>mance as these nonbucket<br />
counterparts (that is around 21%).<br />
Wood Stove with Chimney<br />
Table 5.8 and Fig. 5.3 and 5.4 show that the efficiency of <strong>stove</strong> No.<br />
2/11, 2/12 and 2/15 is 13.88, 16.30 and 11.0, respectively. T,.z time to<br />
boil is in the range of 17 - 19 minutes.<br />
These chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>m at a considerably low level when<br />
compared to the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney. Hence, the wood <strong>stove</strong> with<br />
chimney can be regarded as an inefficient type of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>. The low<br />
HU and long time to boil of commercial chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s as compared<br />
with the nonchimneyed are mainly ca<strong>use</strong>d by two factors;<br />
a) Too much heat (and flame) loss has occurred through the flue gas<br />
exit hole which is located just the opposite of the fire feeding<br />
port and no flame restriction or baffle exists.<br />
b) The <strong>stove</strong>s are poorly designed in such a way that only a small<br />
portion of the pot bottom comes into contact with the flame,<br />
thus causing poor heat transfer.<br />
Rice Husk Stove with Chimney<br />
From Table 5.9, the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the six original models tested were<br />
as follows. The heat utilization efficiency ranged from 4.2 to 7.1% and<br />
averaged 5.6%. Time to boil was between 18.5 - 28.2 minutes and averaged<br />
23.4 minutes. The burning rate ranged from 58.5 - 160.7 gm/min and<br />
averaged 99.8. The overall rice husk consumption per test was on the<br />
average 5.2 kg.<br />
After the original designs were modified according to the specifications<br />
in Table 5.5, their per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>improved</strong> considerably. The average HU<br />
increased to 8.3%. Time to boil varied greatly (15.7 - 30 min), but on the<br />
average remained like the unmodified model. The big reduction was in the<br />
fuel <strong>use</strong>d and the average burning rate which were 4.0 kg and 79 gm/mmn<br />
respectively. This is equivalent to approximately a 25% fuel saving. The<br />
very low efficiency value of the original models is due mainly to a great<br />
amount of heat loss through the flue gas exit. For example, <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s 3/4<br />
and 3/4A1, the efficiency of the <strong>for</strong>mer is increased by 100% (from 5.15 to<br />
10.30%) upon reducing the area of the flue gas outlet by one half (from<br />
93
dP<br />
Z<br />
27<br />
26<br />
25 Ficure 5.3<br />
24<br />
23<br />
22<br />
21<br />
20<br />
19<br />
18<br />
17<br />
16<br />
15<br />
14<br />
13<br />
12<br />
Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />
(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed*wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
STOVE NUMBER
o<br />
0<br />
0<br />
E-4<br />
2.<br />
21-<br />
26<br />
19-<br />
15<br />
13<br />
12<br />
.1<br />
10"<br />
RI<br />
W<br />
7,<br />
7-<br />
4"<br />
1--<br />
Figure 5.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil<br />
of nonchimneyed and chimneyed*wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
(N ('TC I1(N(4HHN Cq ( ' .4 (N H H H. C WH<br />
HCJ H CJ' N HN'(N C N HH (N H CN 1- N<br />
H ~ ~ H H' ~ N ~ ~<br />
95<br />
STOVE NUMBER
Table 5.7<br />
Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />
no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />
2/1 6 1483 35.36(max) 12.0 17.59<br />
2/2 3 1308 31.08 14.0 19.25<br />
2/3 4 1251 28.60 13.7 19.08<br />
2/4 3 1134 25.80 14.0 20.96<br />
2/5 4 1078 23.07 17.0 23.57<br />
2/6 4 1394 30.23 16.2 14.20(min)<br />
2/7 3 1372 28.13 18.7(max) 15.39<br />
2/8 4 1236 27.46 15.0 20.92<br />
2/9 4 1266 27.84 15.5 19.48<br />
2/10 3 1303 28.74 15.3 16.77<br />
2/13 3 1192 25.29 17.0 20.20<br />
2/16 3 1468 31.50 16.7 14.37<br />
2/22 6 1258 29.31 13.0 23.80<br />
2/23 6 1143 25.82 14.5 23.20<br />
2/24 5 1034 22.57(min) 16.0 23.47<br />
1/2 3 1337 31.09 13.0 20.80<br />
i/8 3 1253 26.48 17.3 18.30<br />
1/9 3 1625 34.24 17.3 14.48<br />
1/12 3 1265 28.77 14.0 21.01<br />
1/13 3 1202 27.34 14.0 20.99<br />
1/19 3 1330 30.00 14.3 17.75<br />
1/20 3 1415 32.19 14.0 20.60<br />
1/21 3 1367 29.75 16.0 21.63<br />
1/24 8 1059 24.40 13.5 25.90<br />
1/25 10 1054 25.28 ll.8(min) 25.90(max)<br />
Average 1273 28.41 14.3 19.8.<br />
96
Table 5.8<br />
Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />
no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />
2/11 3 1316 27.0 18.7 16.32<br />
2/12 3 1247 26.2 17.70 16.30<br />
2/15 3 2186 46.5 16.7 11.0<br />
Average 1583 33.2 17.7 14.54<br />
97
Table 5.9<br />
Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />
no., test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />
3/2 5 5863 117.30 20.0 5.48<br />
3/3 4 5147 93.30 25.2 4.95<br />
3/4 4 5303 103.59 21.3 5.15<br />
3/5 4 7789 160.70(max) 18.5 4.24(min)<br />
3/6 3 3736 65.56 27.0 7.13<br />
3/8 5 3394 58.49 28.2(nax) 6.57<br />
Original model ave. 5205 99.82 23.4 5.59<br />
3/4 Al 3 4472 84.45 23.0 10.30<br />
3/4 A3 3 3513 68.07 21.7 7.48<br />
3/4 BI 3 3877 70.57 25.0 7.23<br />
3/4 B2 3 2531 42.23 30.0 9.16<br />
3/5 A 4 6686 139.10 18.0 5.15<br />
3/5 Al 3 4280 93.74 15.7(min) 7.05<br />
3/5 A2 3 4436 88.12 20.3 11.14(max)<br />
3/8 C2 3 2498 4 8.46(min) 21.7 9.23<br />
Modified models ave. 4037 79.34 21.9 8.34<br />
* The test condition deviates from normal, using pot 30 cm. diameter.<br />
98
95 to 47 cm 2 ). The same result was also obtained from <strong>stove</strong> Nu<strong>mb</strong>er 3/5 and<br />
3/5Al where the efficiency was increased by 66% with the reduction of the<br />
original flue -as exit by approximately 60%. The chimney height also has<br />
an impact on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency since too high a chimney ca<strong>use</strong>s high<br />
suction of hot gas; too low a chimney hinders the outflow of the gas and<br />
creates a difficulty in initial ignition. In both cases poor heat<br />
utilization efficiency will result. Stove No. 3/5 and 3/5A illustrate this<br />
effect.<br />
These trial modifications were later <strong>use</strong>d as the bases <strong>for</strong> redesigning<br />
the <strong>improved</strong> model.<br />
Block diagrams in Fig. 5.5 and 5.6 show the HU and time to boil of the<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong> plotted against the <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
Rice Husk Stove without Chimney<br />
Test results from Table 5.10 have indicated that the <strong>stove</strong> made<br />
according to the original drawing (that is, <strong>stove</strong> code A but with better<br />
steel material <strong>for</strong> construction) had the HU of 17% and time to boil of<br />
approximately 14 minutes. Various trials of modifications of physical<br />
structures shown in Table 5.4 (<strong>stove</strong> code B to I) took place such as the<br />
insulation of outer cone, changing of cone slope, changing size and nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
of air inlet holes, the inner cylinder height and exhausted gas outlet, and<br />
rice husk flow gap between the outer cone and inner cylinder. These<br />
parameters have, more or less, some influence on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The<br />
reduction of exhausted area seems to increase the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, as<br />
indicated by <strong>stove</strong>s B and D in Table 5.4. Stoves B and C illustrate the<br />
effect of the height of the outer cone: the HU increases from 15.34 to<br />
18.58% when the height decreases from 37.0 to 30.5 cm. However, the best<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ination was obtained from <strong>stove</strong> G where the HU and TTB are 20.3% and<br />
11.4 minutes respectively. This <strong>stove</strong> was <strong>use</strong>d as a basis <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong><br />
model.<br />
The <strong>for</strong>egoing sections summarize the <strong>stove</strong> testing results. A thorough<br />
analysis of the results of <strong>stove</strong> testing needs a knowledge of heat and mass<br />
transfers. To illustrate such a method of analysis, the results of testing<br />
the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> and the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney will be discussed<br />
in detail in the following section.<br />
D. THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VARIABLES<br />
This section studies the effect of various factors on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
The factors are divided into 2 main groups according to their characteristics:<br />
first, properties that are fixed <strong>for</strong> a <strong>stove</strong> such as the <strong>stove</strong> gap and inlet<br />
air area; secondly, properties that can be changed such as wind, humidity,<br />
and charcoal weight. The first group is called internal variables, and<br />
the second the external variables.<br />
99
Table 5.10<br />
Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney<br />
Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />
no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency'(%)<br />
A* 6 1929 44.04 13.8 16.97<br />
B 2 2002 47.12 12.5 15.34<br />
C 4 1628 38.73 12.0 18.58<br />
D 5 1804 42.75 12.2 18.32<br />
E 3 1848 42.69 13.3 16.00<br />
F 5 1736 41.24 12.2 19.52<br />
G 5 1887 45.57 11.4 20.29<br />
H 5 1704 40.36 12.2 17.68<br />
1 5 1755 42.39 11.4 18.87<br />
Average 1810 42.77 12.3 21.70<br />
* The model A is an original design.<br />
100
22<br />
21<br />
20<br />
19<br />
LB<br />
17<br />
16<br />
15<br />
14<br />
13<br />
12<br />
11<br />
10<br />
8<br />
7<br />
5.<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
4 -I<br />
Figure 5.5 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization<br />
0-och'Je ec-<br />
efficiency (HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
JA Ie cI<br />
cl i:xi &<br />
<strong>101</strong><br />
STOVE NUMBER
0<br />
0<br />
*<br />
34<br />
32<br />
30<br />
28<br />
28<br />
24<br />
22<br />
20.<br />
18-<br />
L4.<br />
12<br />
10<br />
4-.<br />
4 -<br />
Figure 5.6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to<br />
boil of nonchimneyed and chimneyed rice<br />
husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
nncn aye i -- -c c l Ie<br />
102<br />
STOVE NUMBER
Internal Variables<br />
The internal variables are the characteristics that come with the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
They include all the geometrical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>., .rtove exhaust gap,<br />
grate-hole area, grate-to-pot distance, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size, air inlet<br />
door, and grate thickness. The results of changing such variables will be<br />
discussed. For all terms <strong>use</strong>d In the following section please refer to the<br />
illustration in Fig 7.1 in Chapr;er 7.<br />
Exhausted gap/exihausted area<br />
Test condition: Charcoal 400 gm.<br />
water 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 gm.<br />
Table 5.11 Test results of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhausted area on HU and<br />
time to boil.<br />
Stove No. of Gap area Gap height Time to boil Unburned HU<br />
No. tests (sq cm) (cm) (min) charcoal (%)<br />
(sm)<br />
1/5 3 20.5 0.5 19.0 92 34.5<br />
4 65.6 1.6 18.0 70 29.7<br />
3 86.1 2.1 18.7 62 28.0<br />
4 98.4 2.4 18.0 54 27.2<br />
1/31 3 40.2 1.1 16.0 60 32.8<br />
3 65.6 1.6 16.3 60 29.3<br />
3 86.0 2.2 16.0 52 28.3<br />
3 98.6 2.6 18.0 48 26.6<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
From Table 5.11, as the exhausted gap increases from 0.5 cm to 2.4 cm<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, and from 1.1 cm to 2.6 cm <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/31, the HU<br />
value decreases from 34.5 to 27.2% and 32.8 to 26.6%, respectively. With<br />
<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, when the exhausted gap is increased by a factor of 4.8, the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency is decreased by the ratio of 21% of the original value.<br />
Similarly, an increase of the gap by a factor of 2.3 in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/31<br />
decreased the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency by the ratio of 19%. Hence, both <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
show an identical trend.<br />
103
The efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>s is inversely proportional to the exhausted<br />
gap or the exhausted area. The larger the exhaust area, the greater a<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion heat energy that is allowed to escape through it. The optimum<br />
gap determined from this experiment is 0.5 cm. From Fig. 5.7, if both lines<br />
are extrapolated, the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>s should be even higher, or<br />
approaching infinity as the gap area approaches zero. However, with the<br />
real physical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>, the exhausted gap of under 0.5 cm is<br />
considered the minimum limit <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion air to flow through, without<br />
disturbing the optimum co<strong>mb</strong>ustion rate, particularly when oper:ating the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> from cold conditions.<br />
Grate hoZe area<br />
Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />
water = 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.12 Test results of the effect of grate hole area on HU and time to<br />
boil.<br />
Stove<br />
No.<br />
No. of<br />
tests<br />
Gap height<br />
(cm) %<br />
Grate hole<br />
(cm 2 )<br />
area<br />
(%)*<br />
Time to boil<br />
(min)<br />
Unburned<br />
charcoal<br />
(gm)<br />
1/5 3 0.5 80.0 45.3 19 S2 34.5<br />
3 52.8 29.9 21 S8 34.1<br />
5 26.4 14.9 26 109 32.3<br />
1/5 4 2.5 80.0 45.3 18 54 27.3<br />
3 52.8 29.9 20 67 27.1<br />
3<br />
* -% of total grate area<br />
26.4 14.9 24 87 27.0<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
From Table 5.12, and Fig. 5.8 the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> increases with<br />
the increase in grate hole area. With a smaller gap of 0.5 cm, the effect<br />
is, however, more prominent than with the larger gap of 2.5 cm. This should<br />
be expected since the gap has proven to be a strong factor controlling the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency as previously discussed.<br />
Grate hole area has a strong influence on time to boil and the amount<br />
of unburned charcoal. At 0.5 cm gap, time to boil increases from 19 to<br />
26 minutes and the amount of unburned charcoal increases from 92 to 109 gm<br />
as its grate hole area decreases from 80 to 26.4 sq cm. Similarly, at<br />
2.5 cm gap, the decrease in the grate hole area by the same amount ca<strong>use</strong>s<br />
time to boil and the amount of unburned charcoal to increase from 18 to 24<br />
minutes and 54 to 87 gm, respectively.<br />
104<br />
HU<br />
(%)
36<br />
34 -. 319<br />
13<br />
1/5<br />
.TTB<br />
32 - 1/31 18<br />
II .0<br />
30 0. 31<br />
00<br />
28 -<br />
-A16<br />
)(1/5<br />
3HU<br />
01/3 1<br />
261<br />
15<br />
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0<br />
gap, cm.<br />
Fig. 5.7 The effect of e,:hausted gap on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency and<br />
time to boil.<br />
105<br />
20<br />
0
36 128<br />
34- 0 HU 26<br />
32 1.,0\'. 3gap.5 cm. 24o 24<br />
\ 0<br />
30 N I 22P<br />
28-. 220<br />
28 gap 2.5 cm. -TTB 20<br />
Y" '" AHU<br />
26 I I I N - . TTB 18<br />
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />
Grate hole area, cm.<br />
Fig. 5.8 The effect of the grate hole area on che <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil.<br />
106
Grate-to-pot distance<br />
Test condition: charcoal = 4O gm.<br />
water = - 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.13 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on HU and time<br />
to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of test Grate-to-pot distance Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (min) (%)<br />
1/4 6 11.0 18.8 28.2<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
5 9.3 15.4 31.1<br />
6 7.5 19.0 28.2<br />
The curve as shown in Fig. 5.9 indicates that the optimum value of<br />
grate-to-pot distance is 9.3 cm. At this point the <strong>stove</strong> yields 31%<br />
efficiency.<br />
The grate distance is one o± the important factors that distinctly<br />
influence the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. A parabolic curve means that either too<br />
short or too long a grate-to-pot distance will lower the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency.<br />
With the shallow grate, the hot charcoal bed is closer to the gap and more<br />
heat will be lost through it by radiation. In addition, the shallow grate<br />
will decrease the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity, causing a packing up of charcoal<br />
up to the pot bottom. Consequently, the draft from the bottom is limited<br />
and poor co<strong>mb</strong>ustion results. On the other hand, if the grate is too far<br />
from the pot, the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency will fall again. This can be explained<br />
in terms of radiative heat flux from surface 1 to surface 2 which is<br />
inversely proportional to the distance. Hence, when the grate-to-pot<br />
distance is past the optimum value the efficiency begins to fall. From this<br />
experiment witl- the medium <strong>stove</strong> size (23.5 cm pot hole diameter) and<br />
400 gm of charcoal load, the cptimum value of grate-to-pot distance is about<br />
9 cm.<br />
Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion ch<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />
water 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
107
Table 5.14 Test result of the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on HU and<br />
time to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of test Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume Time to boil. HU<br />
(cu cm) (min) (%)<br />
1/28 9 4,216 20.1 25.6<br />
4 3,414 20.0 25.9<br />
l/A3 4 2,'.0 15.7 30.8<br />
3 1,787 18.0 33.1<br />
I/D1 4 2,946 19.7 26.9<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
4 1,510 18.0 30.6<br />
It can be seen from Table 5.14 and Fig. 5.10 that the decrease in<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er increases the HU value of the <strong>stove</strong>. For example, the<br />
HU value of <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/A3 increases from 30.8 to 33.1% when the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er decreases from 2,460 to 1,787 cu cm; the HU value of <strong>stove</strong> No. l/Dl<br />
also increases from 26.9 to 30.6% corresponding to the decrease in the<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er from 2,946 to 1,510 cu cm. Not much increase in the HU value of<br />
<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/28 is observed as the result of the reduction of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
beca<strong>use</strong> the percentage of reduction from original design is smallest.<br />
Besides, this <strong>stove</strong> has many features in addition to the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size that<br />
are poorly designed (see Annex I).<br />
The volume of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is reduced by adding a clay-rice<br />
husk ash mixture to the inside wall of the <strong>stove</strong>. By doing so, the wall<br />
thickness increases; consequently, the insulation may improve slightly. But<br />
more importantly, the diameter of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er decreases due to<br />
the enlargement of the <strong>stove</strong> wall. With the same amount of charcoal being<br />
loaded, the distance between the glowing charcoal and the pot bottom gets<br />
nearer as compared with the <strong>stove</strong> without reducing the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
As a consequence, more radiative heat can reach the water as the distance<br />
becomes smaller.<br />
For <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/28, the reduction of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er does not show a<br />
significant effect on the per<strong>for</strong>mance. This is due to the fact that although<br />
its volume is reduced from 4,216 to 3,414 cu cm, the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size is still<br />
quite large to contain 400 gm of charcoal. The distance between the glowing<br />
charcoal and the pot bottom would there<strong>for</strong>e vary slightly when the same<br />
amount of charcoal is loaded. The improvement of the radiative heac transfer<br />
is, hence, insufficient to clearly reflect its effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance. However, a slight increase of the HU value can be noticed<br />
from the experiment.<br />
108
32<br />
31<br />
30<br />
29<br />
28-<br />
27 5<br />
Fig. 5.9<br />
/<br />
/<br />
/<br />
/.<br />
/18<br />
"<br />
TTB<br />
1<br />
6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Grate-to-pot distance, cm.<br />
The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil<br />
109<br />
HU<br />
20<br />
19 .<br />
17<br />
16<br />
15<br />
13<br />
0<br />
.o<br />
0
Ai, inZet door<br />
Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />
water 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.15 Test result of the effect of air inlet door on HU and time to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Exhausted gap Air Inlet opening Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (%) (sq cm) (min) (%)<br />
1/5 18 1 100 66.0 21.0 30.5<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
8 75 49.5 24.9 29.6<br />
7 50 33.0 22.1 29.8<br />
7 25 16.5 22.6 30.9<br />
The effect of air inlet door area is small. The air inlet varies from<br />
100% opening down to 25%, the HU value only differs by 1.3%. See Fig. 5.11.<br />
Since the amount of air flow through the <strong>stove</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is<br />
governed by the temperature gradient Detween the air inlet door and the<br />
exhausted gap, if the inlet opening gets smaller, by the equation of<br />
continuity, i.e., Qair = AVi - A2V2 = constant, the velocity of the<br />
inlet air will be increased. Hence, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion rate will not be affected<br />
by the supply of oxygen in the air. This is why the HU value of Fig. 5.11<br />
is constant. The time to boil, however, shows the tendency of increasing<br />
as the air inlet area is decreased.<br />
Grate thickness<br />
Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />
water = 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
110
# 1/28<br />
34 20<br />
32 - HU 19<br />
/./"A -.- TTB<br />
30 A18 .<br />
g 0<br />
28 /1<br />
/<br />
26 / o-"2/28 16<br />
24<br />
1000 1500<br />
I<br />
2000<br />
I<br />
2500<br />
I<br />
3000<br />
I<br />
3500 4000 4500<br />
15<br />
5000<br />
3<br />
Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume, cm<br />
Fig. 5.10 The effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil of three different <strong>stove</strong>s tested.<br />
111
50 25<br />
45-<br />
HU 24<br />
45--. HUH TTB 2<br />
0<br />
40 23 -0<br />
....... .......... -=W<br />
AA<br />
35 0 0 HU 22 H<br />
30 TTB 21<br />
25 I 20<br />
20 30 40 50 60 79 80 90 100 110<br />
Air inlet door opening, %<br />
Fig. 5.11 The effect of air inlet door on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil.<br />
112
Table 5.16 Test result of the effect of grate thickness on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
Stove No. No. of test Grate thickness Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (min) (%)<br />
1/E3 5 2.0 16.6 31.3<br />
5 3.6 16.0 34.1<br />
1/E4 5 2.0 19.4 30.1<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
5 3.6 16.8 33.6<br />
Only two values of grate thickness, as restricted by the <strong>stove</strong> firing<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er and grate-to-pot distance parameters, were chose- <strong>for</strong> the experiment:<br />
2 cm and 3.6 cm. The tests <strong>for</strong> efficiency were per<strong>for</strong>m, in <strong>stove</strong> No. l/E3<br />
and l/E4. The test results from Table 5.16 and Fig. 5.12 showed that the<br />
thicker grate gives a higher efficiency. The HU values <strong>for</strong> the first <strong>stove</strong><br />
are 31.3 and 34.1% <strong>for</strong> the grate of 2.0 and 3.6 cm thick, and 30.1 and 33.6%<br />
<strong>for</strong> the second <strong>stove</strong>, respectively.<br />
With the thicker grate, the heat lost by conduction is smaller beca<strong>use</strong><br />
the grate is made of clay and rice husk ash which is a considerably good<br />
insulator. There<strong>for</strong>et, the thicker grame seems to be the best (as long as<br />
the thickness incre e has not significantly altered other physical para<br />
meters). Time to boil seems to slightly increase as the result of this<br />
change. However, more experiments should be per<strong>for</strong>med to determine the<br />
optimum value of grate thickness based on different size of <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Stove insulation<br />
Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />
water 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.17 Test result of the effect of insulation on HU and time to boil.<br />
Pair No. Stove No. Insulation Time to boil HU<br />
(min) (%)<br />
1 1/3 no 22.3 25.7<br />
1/4 yes 18.8 28.2<br />
2 1/23 no 21.5 29.2<br />
1/5 yes 21.1 30.5<br />
3 1/33 no 18.3 30.5<br />
1/31 yes 16.7 32.4<br />
113
35 20<br />
A l/E3 - HU<br />
34 -.- TTB 19<br />
l/E4<br />
33 ' 18<br />
32 17<br />
1/E4<br />
31 - 0 1/E3 16<br />
/ /E<br />
30 1<br />
0 1<br />
<br />
3 4<br />
1<br />
5 6 7<br />
- 15<br />
8<br />
Grate thickness, cm<br />
Fig. 5.12 The effect of grate thickness on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
and time to boil<br />
114<br />
0<br />
0
Results and Discussion<br />
The bucket <strong>stove</strong> as the name implies has a bucket to contain the pottery<br />
body inside; between the bucket and the body is found insulation normally<br />
made from rice husk ash-clay light weight material. The function of the<br />
insulation and the bucket are threefold: that is, to minimize heat loss from<br />
the inside wall; to provide the constraint against thermal expansion without<br />
causing <strong>stove</strong> cracking or the <strong>stove</strong> integrity in long term service; and to<br />
facilitate transportability of <strong>use</strong>rs both frow the market and during <strong>use</strong>.<br />
To study the effect of insulation, a matched pair of identical <strong>stove</strong>s were<br />
tested (one with,the other without insulation and bucket); the results are<br />
as shown in Table 5.17. From Table 5.1 it is quite apparent that the<br />
non-insulated <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ms more poorly than the insulated counterparts.<br />
The pair of larger size <strong>stove</strong>s (No. 1/3 and 1/4) showed a stronger effect<br />
than the smaller size pair in both HU% and time to boil. This may be due<br />
to the fact that a larger size <strong>stove</strong> has greater surface area <strong>for</strong> heat loss<br />
than the smaller one.<br />
Stove's weight<br />
Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />
water = 3,700 gm<br />
pot diameter 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.18 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> weight on the HU and time to<br />
boil.<br />
Pair No. Stove No. Stove weight Time to boil HU<br />
(kg) (min) (%)<br />
1 1/2 12.2 21.7 25.0<br />
1/5 9.3 21.1 30.5<br />
2 1/30 18.0 16.9 24.3<br />
1/31 11.8 16.7 32.4<br />
3 1/32 8.2 17.6 24.6<br />
1/33 6.7 18.3 30.5<br />
4 1/35 8.0 19o8 27.2<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
1/36 6.5 20.8 30.7<br />
Heat absorption by the <strong>stove</strong> largely depends on its weight. This is<br />
particularly true <strong>for</strong> the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> where it is normally started<br />
from cold conditions and <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> a short duration (within one hour) with<br />
115
limited charcoal load. Almost all of the <strong>stove</strong>s tested regardless of this<br />
variation in physical parameters show that the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />
varies more or less inversely with its weipht. The <strong>stove</strong> sample pairs in<br />
Table 5.18 come from the same make and debign.<br />
From Table 5.18, it is quite clear that the <strong>stove</strong> weight has a strong<br />
effect on the <strong>stove</strong> heat utilization efficie-cy but almost no effect on the<br />
time to boil. It must be pointed out, however, that the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size of<br />
each <strong>stove</strong> in the pair studied was not the same. It was larger <strong>for</strong> the<br />
heavier <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size must also be co<strong>mb</strong>ined<br />
with the <strong>stove</strong> weight. It is not possible to single out the weight factor<br />
alone.<br />
The Effect of External Variables<br />
The external variables are the environmental factors. These include<br />
the initial weight of charcoal and water, pot size, charcoal size, wind,<br />
and air relative humidity.<br />
Initial weight of charcoal<br />
Test condition: pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
exhausted gap = 1 cm.<br />
water weight = 2,300, 3,000, 3,700 gm.<br />
Table 5.19 Test result of the effect of initial weight of charcoal on <strong>stove</strong><br />
HU and time to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of test Water weight Charcoal weight Time to boil HU<br />
(gm) (gm) (min) (%)<br />
1/5 5 2,300 300 17.0 26.3<br />
4 350 14.0 27.6<br />
4 450 13.0 30.8<br />
1/5 4 3,000 300 16.5 30.1<br />
4 350 16.5 30.8<br />
4 450 16.8 32.2<br />
1/5 4 3,700 300 24.0 30.7<br />
4 350 21.0 30.5<br />
4 450 19.0 32.0<br />
116
Results and Discussion<br />
In this experiment, the weight of charcoal varied from 300 to 350 and<br />
450 gm, and the weight of water controlled at 3 levels: 2,300, 3,000, and<br />
3,700 gm. Test results from Taole 5.19 and Fig. 5.13 showed that at all<br />
water weight levels, the eff.ciency of the <strong>stove</strong> increases witi the increase<br />
in charcoal load. The trend is weaker, however, as Lhe amount of water I s<br />
increased to the highest !nevel (3,700 gi) Time to boil is also reduced as<br />
the charcoal load is increased.<br />
These behaviors should be n.:-: L,tcd beca<strong>use</strong> whC1 Lhe amount of charcoal<br />
increases, the distance between the top charcoal layer and the pot bottom<br />
decreases as previously discussed. 'urthermore, the increase in charcoal<br />
load has contributed to more energy input but with a lower percentage of<br />
heat loss due to the absorption by the the <strong>stove</strong>'s mass.<br />
InitiaZ weight of water<br />
Test condition: pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
charcoal weight = 300, 350, 450 gm.<br />
exhausted gap = 1 cm.<br />
Table 5.20 Test result of the effect of initial weight of water on HU and<br />
time to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Charcoal weight Water weight Time to boil HU<br />
(gm) (gm) (min) (%)<br />
1/5 4 300 2,300 17.0 26.3<br />
4 3,000 16.5 3001<br />
4 3,700 24.0 . .7<br />
1/5 4 350 2,300 14.0 27.6<br />
4 3,000 16.5 30.8<br />
4 3,700 21.0 30.5<br />
1/5 4 450 2,300 13.0 30.8<br />
4 3,000 16,8 32.2<br />
4 3,700 19.0 32.0<br />
117
36<br />
34 \"22<br />
34<br />
-<br />
\..<br />
0<br />
A<br />
TIME TO BOIL<br />
WATER WIGHT<br />
2,300 Sm<br />
3,000 gm<br />
32 a 3,700 gm 0<br />
S30 2<br />
28-L6<br />
26 1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
- 24<br />
0 o 0<br />
16<br />
SIII I I I<br />
242001<br />
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550<br />
Charcoal weight, gm<br />
Fig. 5.13 The effect of the initial weight of charcoal on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency and time to boil<br />
118<br />
600<br />
L4<br />
1
Results and Discussion<br />
The effect of initial water weight variation on the HU and time to boil<br />
was tested at three charcoal load levels. Test results from Table 5.20 shows<br />
that, in most cases, the efficiency increases slightly with the increase of<br />
initial water weight. The effect is considerably noticeable only when the<br />
water weight is increased from 2,300 gm to 3,000 gm, but after that point<br />
the efficiency seems to reach the peak regardless of chaxcoal load. The<br />
increased in time to boil is evident as the amount of water is increased.<br />
Theoretically, the amount of heat required to increase the temperature<br />
up to its boiling point is proportional to the amount of water. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
it is no surprise that time to boil increases from 17.0 to 24.0 minutes in<br />
the 300 gm charcoal loadfrom 14.3 to 21.0 minutes in the 350 gm charcoal,<br />
and from 13.0 to 19.0 minutes in the 450 gm charcoal load as the weight of<br />
water increases from 2,300 to 3,700 kg. As <strong>for</strong> the HU, since the geometrical<br />
structure of the <strong>stove</strong> has not changed, heat produced by co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of<br />
charcoal occurs at the same rate. There<strong>for</strong>e, the rate of heat transfer to<br />
the water is not varied by the amount of water. Consequently, the<br />
accumulation of energy by the water is unchanged. Even after the temperature<br />
of water reaches the boiling point, heat accepted by the water within half<br />
an hour of prolonged boiling is not different <strong>for</strong> all cases. The<br />
efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>, there<strong>for</strong>e, is not greatly effected by the change<br />
of the initial weight of water particularly when the charcoal load satisfies<br />
the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity as in the case of 350 and 450 gm.<br />
Pot size<br />
Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />
water weight 3,700 gm.<br />
Table 5,21 Test result of the effect of pot size on HU and time to boil,<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Pot size Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (min) (%)<br />
1/4 6 24 18.8 28.2<br />
5 28 16.4 28.5<br />
5 32 16.4 28.1<br />
1/E3 5 24 16.5 34.1<br />
3 28 15.0 34.1<br />
3 32 16.0 34.8<br />
119
Results and Discussion<br />
The size of the <strong>cooking</strong> containers does not affect the efficiency of<br />
the <strong>stove</strong>. As shown in Table 5.21, the HU values are nearly constant when<br />
the size of the pot varies without changing the amount of water. This is<br />
due to the fact that in changing the pot size, the geometrical structure<br />
has not changed significantly: the distance between the top glowing<br />
charcoal layer to the pot bottow will change only slightly;i.e., a larger<br />
pot sits higher on the stoVe'S pot rests but at the same time a larger pot has<br />
more heat absorbing surface at the bottom and side wall. However, one might<br />
expect more heat loss in the larger pot than in the smaller one, owing to a<br />
larger surface exposed to the surroundings but this may be offset by the<br />
greater water evaporating surface <strong>for</strong> the larger pot size, The effect of pot<br />
size on time to boil seems to be insignificant within the size range tested.<br />
Charcoal size<br />
Test condition: charcoal weight 400 gm.<br />
water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.22 Test result of the effect of charcoal size on HU and time to boil,<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Charcoal size Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (mill) (%)<br />
1/5 3 2.54 18.3 31.5<br />
3 10.16 18.3 31.6<br />
1/12 3 2,54 17.7 27.5<br />
3 10.16 22.3 28.0<br />
1/14 3 2.54 17.0 24.4<br />
3 10.16 23.7 23.8<br />
1/20 3 2.54 19.0 24.5<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
3 <strong>101</strong>6 23.7 25.5<br />
Table 5.22 indicates that the size of the charcoal has an insignificant<br />
effect on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. Time to boil increases as the size of the<br />
charcoal increases: 17.7 to 22.3 minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/12, 17.0 to 23.7<br />
minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/1'#, and 19.0 to 23.7 minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/20. For<br />
<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, the time to boil does not change. This observation can be<br />
perhaps explained by the fact that the design of this <strong>stove</strong>, particularly<br />
120
the grate, is superior to others and ther<strong>for</strong>e can zompensate <strong>for</strong> charcoal<br />
size while the average design can not.<br />
The increase in time to boil could be attributed to the decrease in<br />
burning surface of the larger size pieces charcoal. During the heating up<br />
time, heat is released from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion faster when the charcoal size is<br />
small, and vice versa. There<strong>for</strong>e, the water needs a shorter time to boil<br />
with the small-size charcoal. However, a larger amount of charcoal is <strong>use</strong>d<br />
up during the heating-up process. When the experiment is in the boiling<br />
period, the rate of heat released from the small-size charcoal diminishus<br />
beca<strong>use</strong> a large portion of the charcoal was ised previously. The overall<br />
effect is that the efficiency is not significantly different between the<br />
two charcoal sizes investigated.<br />
Wind<br />
Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />
water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.23 Test result of the effect of wind on HU and time to boil<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Wind spped Time to boil HU<br />
m/min min rel. change % % rel. change %<br />
41 8 0 21.1 30.5<br />
1/5 1 3 80 18.0 -14.7 22.6 -26<br />
80 7 0 22.6 18.4<br />
1/12 2 3 80 23.3 + 5.7 18.4 -36<br />
1/17 50 6 0 20.0 32.3<br />
1.2 3 80 26 +30.0 21.9 -32<br />
113 6 0 27.2 23.5<br />
1/14 2.5 3 80 not boil + 15.6 -34<br />
1/20 102 6 0 30.3 24.9<br />
2 3 80 not boil + 16.6 -33<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
The effect of wind was simulated by the <strong>use</strong> of an electric fan<br />
approximately 16 inches in diameter placed at the distance of about 2 m from<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> air inlet port. The wind speed was measured by a vane type<br />
anemometer located right in front of the air inlet port. The result from<br />
121
Table 5.23 shows that the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency drops drastically when subjected<br />
to the wind of 80 m/mn (or 4.8 km/hr). The drop in HU relative to original<br />
value (without the wind) ranges from 26 - 36%. Time to boil,except <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/5, increased as little as 6% of original value to 30% and even to<br />
infinity in the case of <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/14 and 1/20 where the water cannot be<br />
brought to the boil. It is interesting to note that <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/5 has<br />
less time to boil when subjected to wind and the least change in HU. The<br />
behivior of this <strong>stove</strong> can be simply explained by the better control of heat<br />
loss since its exhausted gap/area (1 cm/41 cm 2 ) is very narrow (Table 5.1).<br />
For those <strong>stove</strong>s with wider gaps and exhausted areas such as nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/14 and<br />
1/20 (where the exhausted gaps/areas are 2.5 cm/113 cm 2 , and 2.0 cm/102 cm 2 ,<br />
respectively), the HU drops and time to boil increases considerably.<br />
Air relative humidity<br />
Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />
water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />
pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />
Table 5.24 Test result of the effect of air relative humidity on HU and time<br />
to boil.<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Humidity Time to boil HU<br />
(%) (min) (%)<br />
1/5 1 68 23.0 29.0<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
2 74 20.5 31.6<br />
1 76 21.0 31.6<br />
1 78 22.0 31.3<br />
1 80 19.0 30.6<br />
3 92 22.7 29.2<br />
The effect of air relative humidity on the HU and time to boil was<br />
investigated using tha test results that were previously recorded over a<br />
long period of time in which changes in humidity had actually occurred. The<br />
test results in Table 5.24 indicate that the HU and time to boil do not vary<br />
with the humidity.<br />
Air relative humidity presumably should influence the rate of water<br />
evaporation from the pot during boiling. For example, at low relative<br />
humidity the evaporation rate should be higher and vice versa. However,<br />
this has proved not to be the case. The plausible explanation is that at<br />
122
a very high vapor pressure of the boiling water, resulting from an intel<strong>use</strong><br />
heat generated by the glowing charcoal under the pot, more than enough energy<br />
potential is created to evaporate the weter from the pot.<br />
The change in air relative humidity, there<strong>for</strong>e, can have essentially no<br />
additionai effect on the evaporation rate.<br />
E. WOOD STOVE WITHOUT CHIMNEY<br />
In investigating the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, the<br />
variables are also classified in a similar way as in the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
They are divided into two groups--internal and external variables.<br />
Internal Variables<br />
In this section, the effect of internal variabaes are studied. These<br />
internal variables are <strong>stove</strong> gap, grate vs nongrate, grate hole area, and<br />
grate-to-pot distance.<br />
Stove gap/exhausted area<br />
Table 5.25 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap on HU and time to boil of<br />
the wood <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Gap exhausted Time to boil HU<br />
(cm) (min) (%)<br />
2/25R 5 1 12.6 28.92<br />
2/88 4 1 11.2 27.62<br />
2/lB 5 1.5 12.4 27.34<br />
2/13E 5 1.3 12.0 27.04<br />
2/24R 8 0.63 13.5 25.93<br />
2/5B 3 1.5 12.7 25.71<br />
2/22B 8 1.5 14.0 24.43<br />
2/4B 3 2.7 11.0 23.47<br />
2/23 6 1.8 14.5 23.20<br />
2/9B 8 2.0 12.0 22.76<br />
2/21N 3 3.0 16.0 21.63<br />
2/12S 3 2.0 14.0 21.01<br />
2/13S 3 1.6 14.0 20.99<br />
2/2S 3 2.0 13.0 20.80<br />
2/20S 3 2.0 14.7 20.69<br />
2/18S 3 2.0 13.7 20.28<br />
2/24S 3 1.5 14.3 20.19<br />
2/8S 3 1.5 17.3 18.13<br />
2/19S 3 2.5 14.3 17.75<br />
2/9S 3 3.0 17.3 14.48<br />
123
Results and Discussion<br />
As indicated with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the gap has an effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency. In the case of the wood <strong>stove</strong>, even when the mechanism of heat<br />
transfer is different, this effect is also observed. Fig. 5.14 is the<br />
plot of the HU values of wood <strong>stove</strong>s from various manufacturers against the<br />
gap heights. The scattering of points in the g~r is due to variations of<br />
<strong>stove</strong> geometry of different makes. Nevertheless, the trend can be deduced<br />
easily; as the gap height decreases, the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency increases.<br />
The increase of <strong>stove</strong> efficiency with the decrease of gap can be<br />
explained in the same line as that of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>. When the gap is<br />
large, heat is easily lost through the gap by the flame and exhaust gas<br />
convections. With the smaller gap the flame from burning firewood has a<br />
better contact with the pot side wall be<strong>for</strong>e exit to the atmosphere.<br />
Grate vs nongrate dsiw><br />
Table 5.26 Test result of the effect of grate on HU and time to boil of wood<br />
Stove.<br />
Stove No. of Base or grate-to-<br />
'a. tests pot-distance, cm<br />
2/5 4 14.0<br />
2/6 4 14.0<br />
2/7 3 14.0<br />
2/9 4 11.5<br />
2/10 3 12.0<br />
Average 13.1<br />
2/4 3 12.0<br />
2/13 3 14.5<br />
2/22 6 12.2<br />
2/23 6 12.2<br />
2/24 5 13.0<br />
Average 12.8<br />
Firewood<br />
<strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />
1,078<br />
1,394<br />
1,372<br />
1,266<br />
1,303<br />
1,283<br />
1,134<br />
1,192<br />
1,258<br />
1,143<br />
1,034<br />
1,152<br />
124<br />
Time to boil<br />
min<br />
17<br />
16.2<br />
18.7<br />
15.5<br />
15.3<br />
16.5<br />
14<br />
17<br />
13<br />
14.5<br />
16<br />
14.9<br />
HU<br />
%<br />
23.6<br />
14.6<br />
15.4<br />
19.5<br />
16.8<br />
17.9<br />
21.0<br />
20.2<br />
23.8<br />
23.2<br />
23.5<br />
22.3<br />
Remarks<br />
<strong>stove</strong><br />
group<br />
without<br />
grate<br />
<strong>stove</strong><br />
group<br />
with<br />
grate
Fig. 5.14 The effect of exhausted gap on efficiency of various wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
30<br />
20<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 o0<br />
0<br />
20<br />
10 1 2 3 cm<br />
125<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Exhausted Gap
Results and Discussion<br />
Comparing the two designs of wood <strong>stove</strong> (with and without grate), the<br />
test results in Table 5.26 indicate that with comparable base or grate-topot<br />
distance the <strong>stove</strong> group with grate has a much better heat utilization<br />
efficiency on the average.' The absolute efficiency difference is 4.4%. The<br />
times to boil are 16.5 and 14.4 minutes <strong>for</strong> the group without and with grates<br />
respectively. This difference, however, is considered to be insignificant<br />
<strong>for</strong> practical <strong>use</strong>. The <strong>stove</strong> with grate consumes approximately 10% less<br />
fuel on the average than the group without grate.<br />
The reason <strong>for</strong> the better per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> with grate is that<br />
the primary air induced from underneath the grate contributes to a more<br />
complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of fuel than those <strong>stove</strong>s without grates where the air<br />
can enter the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er through the firewood feeding port only.<br />
The poorer co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of nongrate <strong>stove</strong>s can be easily observed by the end<br />
of the test since more unburned charcoal remains.<br />
Grate hoie area<br />
Table 5.27 Test result of the effect of grate hole area on wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Stove<br />
No.<br />
No. of<br />
test nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
Grate hole<br />
diameter<br />
(cm)<br />
area<br />
(sq cm)<br />
Time to boil<br />
min average %<br />
2/8B 4 90 1.5 159.0 11.2 27.68<br />
2/23 6 90 1.5 159.0 14.5 23.20<br />
2/lB 5 90 1.5 159.0 12.4 27.34<br />
2/13E 5 90 1.5 159.0 12.0 27.04<br />
2/22B 8 90 1.5 159.0 14.0 24.43<br />
2/1GI 7 90 1.5 159.0 12.4 25.97<br />
2/24R 8 90 1.5 159.0 13.5 25.93<br />
HU<br />
average<br />
2/25B 4 90 1.5 159.0 11.7 17.7 25.27 25.5<br />
2/8E 9 37 2.5 181.6 16.7 25.57<br />
2 /20A 10 37 2.5 181.6 15.9 23.56<br />
2/13B 8 37 2.5 181.6 12.0 14.9 22.76 24.0<br />
2/8GI 4 61 1.23 72.5 12.0 26.36<br />
2/IA 6 61 1.23 72.5 13.8 12.9 25.12 25.7<br />
126
Results and Discussion<br />
The effect of grate hole area on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency was studied by<br />
selecting <strong>stove</strong>s of different grate designs. Three sets of hole diameter<br />
and a varying nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes were investigated; they are: A, 2.5 cm<br />
diameter and 37 holes; B, 1.5 cm diameter and 90 holes; and C, 1.23 cm<br />
diameter and 61 holes. The respective grate hole areas of A, B, and C are<br />
181.6, 159.0, and 72.5 sq cm. The efficiencies of A, B, and C are shown<br />
in Table 5.27. Only a slight increase in the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency with the<br />
decrease in the total grate hole area was observed: the efficiency of A<br />
was 24.0%, B 25.5%, and C 25.74%.<br />
The above phenomenon can be explained in terms of radiative heat loss.<br />
Through the grate holes, radiative heat can easily pass to the ash cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
Consequently, a grate with a smaller total hole area improves the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong>. In addition, the secondary air is always available through<br />
the firewood feeding port; there<strong>for</strong>e, the reduction of primary air itilet<br />
area by almost 2/3 does not ca<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance to change significantly.<br />
&rate-to-pot distance<br />
Table 5.28 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Stove No. of Grate distance Time to boil HU<br />
No. tests (cm) min average (%) average<br />
2/Al 3 9 15.0 23.04<br />
2/AlA 4 9 14.5 24.48<br />
2/AlAl 3 9 15.0 25.70<br />
2/A2A 4 9 14.25 26.00<br />
2/A2 3 9 14.67 14.7 24.32 24.7<br />
2/Cl 5 10 14.6 25.10<br />
2/CIA 4 10 14.75 27.12<br />
2/D2A 4 10 15.25 25.20<br />
2/D2 3 10 14.66 25.34<br />
2/E2 3 10 16.0 25.00<br />
2/Fl 6 10 15.33 26.05<br />
2/lG 3 10 15.66 15.2 25.65 25.6<br />
2/A2 5 11 15.6 27.53<br />
2/A3A 4 11 18.0 26.82<br />
2/A4A 3 11 18.0 28.0<br />
2/A4 5 11 18.0 17.4 28.25 27.7<br />
2/C2 5 12 15.2 23.78<br />
2/C2A 4 12 14.5 25.87<br />
2/DI 3 12 13.67 25.00<br />
2/DIA 4 12 13.75 26.82<br />
2/F2 6 12 14.5 26.35<br />
2/F2A 3 12 14.33 14.3 26.80 25.8<br />
2/30B 6 13 21 19.11<br />
2/30A 3 15 18.33 l'.75<br />
2/30 3 16 28.67 15.67<br />
127
Results and Discussion<br />
The effect of the grate-to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />
shown in Table 5.27 and Fig. 5.15. As the distance increases from 9 cm to<br />
about 11.0 cm, the average efficiency increases from 24.7 to 27.7%. However,<br />
as the distance increases further, tile <strong>stove</strong> efficiency drops. This<br />
behavior is also observed with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
At the small grate-to-pot distance, it is likely that the glowing wood<br />
is too near to the gap, causing high convective heat loss through the gap.<br />
Moreover, with too small a distance, fUrewood pieces would tend to jam up<br />
the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er causing limited flame to come into contact with the<br />
pot bottom and insufficient temperature of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er itself to initiate<br />
off-gas co<strong>mb</strong>ustion with the incoming secondary air. When the distance<br />
increases, this loss reduces; the per<strong>for</strong>mance, hence, improves. However,<br />
at great distances the radiative heat which is intercepted by the pot drops<br />
more quickly than the decrease in heat loss through the gap, resulting in<br />
the poor per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
External Variables<br />
Only two external variables are studied: wind effect, and fuel feed<br />
rate.<br />
Wind effect<br />
Table 5.29 Test result of the effect of wind ol wood sto.'e per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Stove No. No. of tests Wind velocity Time to boil HU<br />
(km/hr) (min) (%)<br />
2/2S 3 normal 13.0 17.65<br />
2/2B 3 6.3 13.7 16.21<br />
2/21N 3 normal 16.0 21.63<br />
2/21W 3 6.0 14.7 17.03<br />
2/25C 8 normal 11.9 21.64<br />
2/25D 3 5.0 14.0 14.58<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
From Table 5.28, wind is found to have a strong effect on the efficiency<br />
of the wood <strong>stove</strong>, in one experiment, the HU values dropped from 21.63% to<br />
17.03%, when the wind is induced through the <strong>use</strong> of an electric fan. In<br />
another experiment, the IIUvalues decreased from 21.64 to 14.58%. All of<br />
128
Fig. 5.15 The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the heat utilization<br />
efficiency (HU) of wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
30<br />
0<br />
00<br />
20 0<br />
10tI I I I<br />
10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
00<br />
129<br />
0<br />
Grate-to-pot distance, cm
the experiments, including those with the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, indicate<br />
a similar effect when the <strong>stove</strong> is subjected to wind. The amount of drop<br />
in efficiency, however, depends on the design characteristics, particularly<br />
the exhausted gap and fuel feeding port size.<br />
The decline in per<strong>for</strong>mance is due to the increase of heat loss by<br />
flue gas and flame convection through the gap, and the oversupply of air to<br />
the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. If more air is supplied than required by the co<strong>mb</strong>usited<br />
woL., the heat-up of excess air will decrease the temperature of the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er. There<strong>for</strong>e, the warm excess air, which contains a large<br />
amount of thermal energywill be lost with the flue gas.<br />
FueZ feed rate<br />
Table 5.30 Test result of the effect of firewood feeding rate on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Stove No. No. of Average feeding rate Time to boil HU Remarks<br />
tests gm/min min %<br />
2/8E 3 21.5 13.8 24.8 grate-to<br />
3 25.7 11.3 22.5 pot<br />
distance<br />
3 27.9 15.0 18.5 = 12 cm<br />
2/13A 3 31.6 11.4 23.5 <strong>for</strong> both<br />
tests<br />
3 38.8 9.7 21.9<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
2 42.0 9.4 20.9<br />
Unlike the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> where the fuel is loaded in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er at one time at the begining of ignition, the wood <strong>stove</strong> needs to be<br />
fed with firewood gradually and at a proper.distance to obtain the best<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion flame directed toward the pot bottom. The firewood feeding rate<br />
as shown in Table 5.29 indicates that this factor is quite sensitive to the<br />
efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>. A higher feed rate ca<strong>use</strong>s the drop in HU <strong>for</strong> both<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s evaluated. The time to boil shows a decreasing trend as the feed rate<br />
is increased (with one exception, <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 2/8E, where at the fastest<br />
rate of 27.9 gm/min the time to boil increases). This may be due to the clogged<br />
up co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and firing since this <strong>stove</strong> has a small firewood feeding<br />
port and co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
130
The drop in HU with a faster firewood feeding rate can be recognized<br />
by two important phenomena; first, the rate of heat absoption by the pot<br />
is not directly proportional to the rate of heat released by the fuel,<br />
particu7iarly when the flame is <strong>for</strong>ced through the exhausted gap with poor<br />
contact with the pot side; secondly, the clogging-up effect of the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er when too much or too fast firewood is fed in ca<strong>use</strong>s the<br />
incomplete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of hot gas.<br />
131
Chapter 6<br />
Theoretical Analysis of Charcoal Stove
THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHARCOAL STOVE<br />
A. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE BUCKET STOVES<br />
As seen in the preceding sections, the effects of only a few factors on<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency were studied experimentally. These factors include the<br />
distance from grate to pot H, the grate hole area Ag, the gap height G, the<br />
wall thickness D, and the <strong>stove</strong> weight m s . Consequently to be of any <strong>use</strong>,<br />
any mathematical model of the <strong>stove</strong>s has to relate the efficiency to these<br />
factors. It is the purpose of this section to develop such a model.<br />
Prior to the development of the mathematical model, an understanding of<br />
the heat transfer mechanisms occuring in the <strong>stove</strong> is essential. These<br />
mechanisms are briefly described in this section. They are then related to<br />
the above factors. The model is subsequently developed; parameters in the<br />
model are evaluated by fitting the model to the experimental results shown<br />
in the previous sections. With the obtained values of the parameters, the<br />
model is <strong>use</strong>d to predict the change of efficiency due to variation of one of<br />
the factors.<br />
Mechanisms Occuring in the Stove<br />
A known amount of charcoal is loaded into the <strong>stove</strong> grate and ignited.<br />
Air flows in by natural convection through the inlet opening to accelerate<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion; this operation is continued until all the charcoal is burned.<br />
During the <strong>cooking</strong> operation, most of the heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is<br />
consumed to raise the temperature of the charcoal to its burning point; if<br />
the process is assumed adiabatic, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion temperature will vary<br />
depending on the geometrical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>, the supply of air, and<br />
the arrangement and the amount of charcoal loaded.<br />
Air is naturally drawn into the <strong>stove</strong> due to the difference in pressure<br />
from the outside to the inside. The flow rate of air is, hence, dependent<br />
on the pressure difference and also on the air inlet area.<br />
In the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, oxygen in the air oxidizes carbon in the<br />
charcoal, producing heat. The amount of heat produced varies with the<br />
condition of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion: if a large quantity of charcoal is loaded and the<br />
air supply is not sufficient, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is incomplete; on the other<br />
hand, if air is sufficiently supplied or oversupplied, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is<br />
complete. The <strong>for</strong>mer condition yields less heat than the latter. However,<br />
oversupply of air tends to bring the <strong>stove</strong> temperature down. Consequently,<br />
heat produced by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion depends on the amount of charcoal and the<br />
flow rate of air.<br />
135
Heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of charcoal diusipates by three modes:<br />
conduction, convection, and radiation (see Thomas, 1980). The conductive<br />
heat transfers through the wall of the <strong>stove</strong> and the wall of the pot. During<br />
the transient state some heat is stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material, resulting in<br />
an increase of the temperature. This amount of stored heat varies directly<br />
with the mass and the temperature increment from its initial value to the<br />
steady-state value. At the steady state, according to the Fourier law of<br />
heat conduction, heat, conducedt through the <strong>stove</strong> wall, varies inversely<br />
with the wall thickness and directly with the temperature gradietit across the<br />
wall.<br />
The air, after co<strong>mb</strong>ustion with the charcoal, has a low density due to<br />
the increase in ;emperature. As a consequence, the exhaust air, carrying<br />
some heat with it, rises and leaves the <strong>stove</strong> through the gaps between the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> and the pot. A portion of the heat is released to the pot by<br />
conduction when the exhaust air (or the flame) comes into contact with the<br />
pot bottom; the remainder,accompanying the exhaust air out of the <strong>stove</strong>, can<br />
be considered as a loss. The whole mechanism here is actually natural<br />
convection. The flow rate of the exhaust air, hence, depends on the gap area<br />
and the pressi're gradient.<br />
The third <strong>for</strong>m of heat transfer in the <strong>stove</strong> is radiation. It is the<br />
most important mode among the thrLe since, according to the Stefah-Boltzmann<br />
law, the radiative energy from a surface, having an absolute temperature<br />
higher than 0 0 K, varies with the temperature to power four. With the<br />
temperature of the charcoal or the flame much higher than the temperature of<br />
the pot, the net flux of radiative energy from the flame to the pot is<br />
enormous. However, the net energy flux intercepted by the pot bottom decreases<br />
as the distance between the flame and the pot increases. The change in the<br />
net flux due to the change in the distance is commonly explained by the<br />
concept of view factor, which is simply defined as the ratio of the radiation<br />
from one surface intercepted by another surface to the total radiation from<br />
the first surface. The pot bottom, as the second surface in this definition<br />
gains the radiative energy from the charcoal, which acts as the first surface,<br />
1 y the amount proportional to the view factor from the charcoal to the pot.<br />
If the radiation is envisaged as energy particles or photons propelled<br />
outward from the flame in a random manner, the chance that the photons will<br />
hit the pot bottom diminished when the distance increases and the view factor<br />
decreases. Consequently, the radiative energy gained by the pot decreases<br />
with increasing distance.<br />
The above view of the heat transfer mechanisms in the <strong>stove</strong> lays the<br />
basis of modelling. It will include all the essential characteristics of the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> studied in experiments: the grate hole area Ag, relating to the natural<br />
convection of inlet air; the <strong>stove</strong> mass weight M s , connected to the heat<br />
stored in the material of the <strong>stove</strong>; the gap height G, associated with the<br />
natural convection of t:,e exhaust air; the wall thickness D, related to the<br />
heat conduction; and th! distance from grate to pot H, pertaining to the<br />
radiation (see Fig. 6.1).<br />
136
Fig. 6.1 Structure of the ideal Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>:<br />
a - pot stand;<br />
b - exha<strong>use</strong> gap;<br />
c - grate to pot distance;<br />
d - co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er;<br />
e - grate;<br />
f - ash compartment;<br />
g - opening <strong>for</strong> inlet air;<br />
h - <strong>stove</strong> base;<br />
i - <strong>stove</strong> width.<br />
137
Mathematical Modelling<br />
Heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion dissipates, as previously explained, by<br />
conduction, natural convection, and radiation. Heat fluxes resulting from<br />
these modes of heat transfer may be estimated from some mathematical<br />
relations available in many standard textbooks concerning heat transfer.<br />
Examples are books by Bird et al.(1960), Thomas (1980), Bennett and Myers<br />
(1974).<br />
For conduction of heat through solid slab, heat flux can be calculated<br />
from the Fourier's law of heat conduction. If the slab has a thickness of D,<br />
the two surfaces at different temperature T 1 and T 2 (T 1 > T 2), and its<br />
thermal conductivity of k, heat flux qcond at steady state, according to the<br />
Fourier's law, can be expressed as:<br />
qcond = k(T 1 - T 2 )/D (1)<br />
In the process of natural convection, it has been known that this mode<br />
of heat transfer is strongly dependent on the value of Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er, which<br />
is proportional to the temperature difference. The analysis of natural<br />
convection of fluid between two parallel infinite plates at different<br />
temperatures, aligned with the gravitation direction, shows the velocity of<br />
the buoyant fluid to vary directly with the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er (Bird et al, 1960).<br />
Undoubtedly, the natural convection between two plates is quite different<br />
from what actually occurs in the <strong>stove</strong>. However, it exemplifies the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned<br />
fact that natural convection is a function of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
or, as a consequence, due to the definition of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er, a function<br />
of temperature difference, that is:<br />
Vconv = f(Gr) (2)<br />
in which vconv is the velocity of the buoyant gas and Gr is the Grashof<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />
Heat fluxes due to radiation between two isothermal surfaces 2, a is<br />
factors between the surfaces are known, can be calculated from<br />
qrad = oF 1 (r - Ti)<br />
2 (3)<br />
in which qrad is the radiative heat flux from surface 1 to surface 2, a is<br />
Stefan-Boltzmann constant, F 1 2 is the view factor from surface 1 to surface<br />
2, and T 1 and T 2 are the respective temperatures of surfaces 1 and 2.<br />
For radiation between two circular discs of equal diameter, the view<br />
factors between the two discs have been calculated analytically and plotted<br />
against the ratio of the diameter to the distance between the discs (Thomas,<br />
1980). If the diameter is unchanged, the view factor is approximately<br />
proportional to the inverse of the distance H:<br />
F 1 2 = 1/H (4)<br />
138
To simplify the modelling, the following assumptions are made:<br />
1. Flame temperature is constant (about 800*C).<br />
2. Time and fuel required to increase the temperature of the fuel bed<br />
from its initial value (i.e. a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature) to the final temperature<br />
at 800C are negligible.<br />
3. The rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is proportional to the air mass flow rate<br />
into the bed.<br />
4. Density of the <strong>stove</strong> material p, and heat capacity 4p, thermal<br />
conductivity k are constant.<br />
5. The wall thickness is uni<strong>for</strong>m.<br />
6. The diameter of the grate and the diameter of the pot are constant.<br />
7. Only part of the radiation is considered as <strong>use</strong>ful in heating, the<br />
other modes of heat transfer contribute to heat loss.<br />
Since the air flow into and out of the <strong>stove</strong> is by natural convection,<br />
the velocity of the air is a function of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er. The relation<br />
between vconv and Gr in this situation can be obtained experimentally.<br />
However, no experiments with the purpose of procuring such relations have been<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med. In order that the modelling can proceed, the relationship has to<br />
be assumed. For simplicity, a linear relationship between the velocity of<br />
buoyant gas and the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er is adopted:<br />
or<br />
Vconv = (constant) Gr (5)<br />
Vconv = (constant) (Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (6)<br />
in which Tflame and Ta<strong>mb</strong> are the respective temperatures of the flame and<br />
the surroundings.<br />
Due to assumption 1, that the flame temperature Tflame is ccnstant,<br />
Fig. 6 indicates that the velocity of the upflow gas is constant:<br />
Vconv = constant (7)<br />
For air inlet, the air has to pass the grate holes be<strong>for</strong>e it is<br />
consumed in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion process. With constant air velocity, the volume<br />
flow rate is proportional to the grate hole area Ag. Consequently, the mass<br />
flow rate of the inlet air is also in proportion to the grate hole area.<br />
Assumption 3 and the argument in the previous paragraph give the<br />
consumption rate of charcoal in the following <strong>for</strong>m:<br />
- dm c/dt = aA (8)<br />
in which mc is the mass of charcoal, t is time, and a is a constant.<br />
139
Similarly, the volume flow rate of exhaust gas, which leaves the <strong>stove</strong><br />
through the gap, varies directly with the gap area. It was found later that<br />
the gap area changes in a linear fashion with the gap height G. Thus,<br />
volume flow rate, or, in other words, the mass flow rate of the exhaust gaL<br />
is proportional to the gap height G. Since the flame temperature is assumed<br />
constant, the heat loss due to this process then varies linearly with the<br />
gap height G. If Qconv is the rate of heat loss,<br />
in which B is a consti't.<br />
=<br />
Qconv BG (9)<br />
At the initial time the temperature of the <strong>stove</strong> material is the same<br />
as the a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature; the temperature increases to a certain value at<br />
steady state. The constancy of thermal conductivity indicated in assumption<br />
4 assures a linear temperature profile across the <strong>stove</strong> wall when the system<br />
is steady. Since the flame temperature is constant <strong>for</strong> any thickness of the<br />
wall, the temperature difference across it is also constant. Heat stored<br />
in the <strong>stove</strong> material can, hence, be calculated from the average temperature,<br />
which is unchanged <strong>for</strong> any <strong>stove</strong>. With the assumption of constant heat<br />
capacity, the total heat absorbed by the <strong>stove</strong> mass Qabs is proportional to<br />
the mass m. Dividing the total absorbed heat with the total heating time<br />
yields the rate of heat absorption Qabs:<br />
Qabs = Ems (10)<br />
in which c is a function of time and physical properties of <strong>stove</strong> material.<br />
For convenience, e is assumed constant.<br />
The rate of heat transferred through the wall by conduction Qcond is<br />
estimated from Eq (1):<br />
Qcond = kA(Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)/D (11)<br />
in which A is the total surface area of the <strong>stove</strong> wall.<br />
Since the density of the <strong>stove</strong> material is p, and the wall thickness<br />
is uni<strong>for</strong>m, the area A can be related to the mass and the thickness D:<br />
m s<br />
m s = pAD (12)<br />
Substitution of Eq (12) in Eq (11) gives<br />
or<br />
Qcond = k(Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)ms/pD 2 (13)<br />
Qcond , 6ms/D 2<br />
in which 6 = k(TfJame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)/P (15)<br />
Total heat generated by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is proportional to the rate of<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion if heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is constant: If Qco<strong>mb</strong> is the rate of heat<br />
generated, equation (8) gives<br />
140<br />
(14)
Qco<strong>mb</strong> , a*Aq<br />
in which a* is the product of a and the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion per mass of<br />
charcoal consumed.<br />
(16)<br />
Subtraction of conductive heat and convective heat from the total heat<br />
generated from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion would give the radiative heat:<br />
Qrad = a*A - OG - Em - 6m /D 2<br />
(17)<br />
in which Qrad is the rate of heat transfer by radiation.<br />
Not all the radiative heat is <strong>use</strong>d in boiling water. The amount of this<br />
heat varies with the view factor between the pot and the charcoal, which,<br />
according to Eq (4), is approximately in proportion to the inverse of the<br />
distance between the grate and the pot bottom H. If h is the rate of hea.<br />
supplied to the water,<br />
in which y is a constant.<br />
Qh = YQrad/H<br />
Substitution of equation (17) into equation (18) gives<br />
s<br />
(18)<br />
Qh = y(a*Ag - OG - Em - 6ms/D 2 )/H (19)<br />
s<br />
Fig. 19 will be <strong>use</strong>d as a means of estimating the heat in bringing the<br />
temperature of water from the initial state to the state of boiling, and<br />
in evaporating water.<br />
Period of heating water<br />
In this period, water is heated from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature Ta<strong>mb</strong> to<br />
the boiling point Tboil. Since the <strong>cooking</strong> pot <strong>use</strong>d in this work is made of<br />
aluminium which has the property of good thermal conduction, the heat that<br />
is intercepted by the pot is partially transferred to heat the water and the<br />
remainder is lost through the pot surface. If k and QI are the rates of<br />
heat absorbed by water and heat loss respectively, then<br />
=<br />
Q1 Qw + QI<br />
Part of the heat that is absorbed by the water prior to its boiling is given by:<br />
Qw = mwocpwdTw/dt<br />
in which mo is the initial mass of water, cpw is the heat capacity of water,<br />
and Tw is the water temperature at time t. The heat loss through the pot<br />
surface is given by:<br />
(20)<br />
(21)<br />
Q = hS(Tw - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (22)<br />
in which h is the heat transfer coefficient, and S is the surface area of<br />
the pot.<br />
141
Substitution of Eqs (21) and (22) into Eq (20) give<br />
h = m.oCpwdTw/dt + hS(Tw - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (23)<br />
The solution of this differential equation is<br />
Tw = BI/B 2 + (Ta<strong>mb</strong> - Bl/B 2) e-B2t (24)<br />
in which B 1 = (Qh - hSTa<strong>mb</strong>)/woCpw (25)<br />
B2 = hS/mwocpc,<br />
(26)<br />
Substitution Eqs (19), (25), and (26) into Eq (24), and then rearranging<br />
the result of substitution, one gets<br />
T = T a<strong>mb</strong> + y(* Ag - G - Rms - ms/D 2 ) (i e -B 2 t(<br />
hSH - (27)<br />
Eq (27) is <strong>use</strong>d to estimate the time required to increase the temperature<br />
of water from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient value to its boiling point.<br />
Period of boiling<br />
At boiling, the water molecules begin to move turbulently and become<br />
loosely bound. Eventually, some of the water molecules with enough kinetic<br />
energy will be able to escape from the water surface in the <strong>for</strong>m of vapor.<br />
If the rate of heat consumed in evaporating water is mvhfg, the overall energy<br />
balance is<br />
H (a*Ag - OG - em s - 6ms/D 2 ) - hS(Tboil Ta<strong>mb</strong>) = 4hfg (28)<br />
in which kv is the rate of evaporated water and hfg is the latent heat of<br />
vaporization.<br />
If t 2 is the total time <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment and t I is the time<br />
required in heating the water from its initial state to boiling, then the<br />
total heat consumed in boiling can be obtained by multiplying Eq (28) with<br />
t 2 - tl:<br />
[H (*Ag - - Em s - 6ms/D 2 ) - hS(Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)] (t 2 _ t 1 )<br />
= mvhfg(t 2 - t I ) (29)<br />
The results in parts A and B are <strong>use</strong>d to estimate the efficiency of<br />
the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Efficiency of <strong>stove</strong><br />
The heat utilization or the efficiency of the <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> n is<br />
defined as the ratio of the heat consumed in heating and boiling water to<br />
the total heat input into the system. Since the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is not<br />
a function of the charcoal mass as seen in Eq (8), the efficiency q can be<br />
expressed as<br />
142
Qsens + khfg ( t2<br />
aA AH t 2<br />
l )<br />
- t<br />
in which AH is the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, and Qsens is the sensible heat of<br />
water in increasing the temperature from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient to the boiling point.<br />
The time required to increase the Lehiperature of water, in the experiment,<br />
is usually less than the time required to reach the boiling point.<br />
Although the difference between the heating time and the boiling time is<br />
not really insignificant, the sensible heat will be excluded from Eq (30).<br />
This action is done <strong>for</strong> two reasons: one, the mass of water is not taken as<br />
one of the variables in this work; two, including the sensible heat adds at<br />
least one more variable, which not only complicates the evaluation of<br />
parameter, but may also obscure the effect )f other variables. Furthermore,<br />
heat loss through the pot surface will be neglected in Eq (29).<br />
efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> becomes<br />
Hence, the<br />
Y(a*Ag - $G - ems 2<br />
- 6ms /D ) (t2 - t1 ) (31)<br />
aA HAH t2 Eq (31) can be simplified where the constants are lumped together:<br />
t2 - t t2 - t1 a t2 -t 1 ms t2 - t1 = a 2H _ a2 AHt a3 ms( A2Ht2 ) -a4 2 AH (32)<br />
in which a, = y (33)<br />
a 2<br />
a 3<br />
a 4<br />
(30)<br />
= y /aAH (34)<br />
= ye/aAH (35)<br />
= y6/aAH (36)<br />
Eq 32 is actually linear with respect to the parameters. This fact<br />
can facilitate the method of evaluating the parameters.<br />
B. EVALUATION OF PARAMETERS<br />
Since Eq 32 is linear, the least square method or the method of<br />
multiple linear regression would be appropriate in evaluating the parameters<br />
al, a2, a 3 , and a 4 . However, with either method, Eq 32 has to be rearranged<br />
into the standard <strong>for</strong>m:<br />
= alX 1 + a 2X 2 + a 3X 3 + a 4X 4<br />
in which X 1 = (t 2 - tl)/Ht 2 (38)<br />
x 2<br />
X 3<br />
(37)<br />
= X1G/Ag (39)<br />
= Xlms/Ag (40)<br />
= X 3/AgD 2 (41)<br />
143
The method of multiple linear regression, which can be found in many<br />
textbooks on Statistics (e.g. Walpole and Myers, 1972; Hoel, 1971), is<br />
adopted in this work. The input data of those physical factors described<br />
earlier are selected from the previous baseline survey which consists of<br />
thirty-six bucket-type <strong>stove</strong>s. All the calculations are done by an INTRA<br />
microcomputer; the program is written in BASIC. The correlation coefficient<br />
from the calculation vith boiling time of 30 minutes is found to be very<br />
small, indicating the fluctuation of the data. This fluctuation is believed<br />
to be due to the fact that the <strong>stove</strong>s, obtained from thirty-six different<br />
locations throughout the country, have variable properties and composition<br />
which violaces one of the assumptions.<br />
Another reason <strong>for</strong> poor fitting can be due to some of the assumptions<br />
<strong>use</strong>d in developing the model. For example, e, which is the function of time<br />
and physical porperties of the <strong>stove</strong>, may have a severe effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
behavior. This function is, however, difficult to obtain. The nu<strong>mb</strong>er of<br />
parameters in the model of the bucket <strong>stove</strong>, which is a complicated system,<br />
may not be sufficient; and some of the other effects such as the<br />
sensible heat excluded from the equation of efficiency may be required.<br />
But too many parameters obscure the effect of variables under investigation<br />
and can, in some situations, lessen the value of the model. Another violation<br />
of the assumptions is the nonuni<strong>for</strong>mity of the wall thickness; the Thai<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong> generally has its wall area thicker near the base than that near<br />
the top of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
An alternative approach <strong>for</strong> the application of the model is to group<br />
the <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar effects, such as a group that would give a<br />
correlation coefficient greater than 90%. This is done with the INTRA<br />
microcomputer, the grouping is carried out randomly. The result from this<br />
analysis shows that the maximum of fifteen <strong>stove</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>inations would<br />
compromise the requirement. One of such groups is shown in Table 1 <strong>for</strong> which<br />
the correlation coefficient is 94%; the values of al, a, a 3 , and a 4 are<br />
653.8 em, 5,717.01 cm 2 , 26.23 cm 2 /kg, and 5,282.13 cm / g, respectively.<br />
This group is LSed in the next step; i.e. studying the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
when one of the variables is changed while others are kept constant.<br />
C. MODEL APPLICATION<br />
The model developed in the preceding sections is kept as simple as<br />
possible; it requires minimum knowledge of the <strong>stove</strong> characteristics. In<br />
this section, the simulation of the model is carried out to investigate<br />
the effect of each variable on the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Prior to simulation, owing to the geometrical variation of the hand-made<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the Thai market, an ideal <strong>stove</strong> is required to represent the<br />
actual ones. The <strong>stove</strong> is simply idealized as being enclosed by two<br />
coaxial truncated cones as illustrated in Fig. 6.2; the <strong>stove</strong> thickness<br />
(i.e. the distance between the cones) is assumed uni<strong>for</strong>m. When the concept<br />
of similar triangles is applied to the ideal <strong>stove</strong> (see Annex 3),the<br />
following relationships are obtained:<br />
144
%<br />
I' i I<br />
1i1<br />
- I I<br />
/ , :I' '1<br />
k- 'pe-<br />
I,<br />
Fig. 6.2 Geometry of the ideal <strong>stove</strong>: the dimension of the outer<br />
and the inner cones are respectively sy<strong>mb</strong>olized by<br />
capital and small letters.
m= 12 (Dt g) d3) - - d3)) (Ae + A 1 )D] (42)<br />
Dt = dt + 2D (43)<br />
D(dt - dg)<br />
Db = db + D - H (44)<br />
Dg = dg + 2D (45)<br />
in which Dt, dt are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
at the pot stand,<br />
Db, db are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
at the bottom,<br />
Dg, dg are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
at the grate position,<br />
Ae is the gap area,<br />
Al is the area of opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air.<br />
There are seven variables that completely fix the geometry of the <strong>stove</strong>;<br />
they are: the three inside diameters dt, dg, and db; the wall thickness D;<br />
the grate-to-pot distance G; the gap area Ae; and the area of the opening <strong>for</strong><br />
the inlet air A 1 (the dimensions of D, H, Ae and Ai are shown in Fig. 61.).<br />
Among these seven varibles, A e and Ai are not the variables in the model.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, they have to be related to other variables. Fig. 6.3 and 6.4<br />
illustrate the relationship between the air inlet area Ai and the grate hole<br />
area Ag, and between the gap area A e and the gap height G, respectively.<br />
When straight lines are drawn through these points, it is found that<br />
Ai = 0.82 Ag and Ae = 48 G. Substitution of these relationships in Eq (42)<br />
givesm = [2D D (D3 - dt) - (Db - 2<br />
d)} - (48G + 0.8 Ag)D]<br />
12(D t - Dg) P b b9 (46)<br />
The efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> in Eq (32) also depends on the time tl<br />
required to heat the water to the boiling point. From Eq (27), the estimation<br />
of t 1 can be achieved if B 2 is known. This implies the necessity of<br />
evaluating B 2 . There are two ways that the value of B 2 caa be estimated: one<br />
way is to employ the relation in Eq (26), and the other is to utilize the<br />
available experimental data. The first method requires the values of the<br />
heat transfer coefficient h and the heat transfer area S; both values have<br />
to be estimated. To avoid such approximation of h and S, and in order to<br />
fully utilize the experimental results, the second method is chosen.<br />
Substituting t and Tw in Eq (27) by tI and Tboil, and then rearranging<br />
it, one gets:<br />
1<br />
(Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) hSH<br />
t T2 [B y(a*Ag - 8G - ems - 2 ) ]<br />
(47)<br />
146
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
4+<br />
w +<br />
+<br />
+ + +e<br />
+<br />
0 5b 16o iA<br />
Grate hole area, cm 2<br />
Fig. 6.3 Relationship between the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> inlet air<br />
and the grate hole area.<br />
147
2001<br />
160"<br />
N<br />
U) 80-12<br />
0<br />
Fig. 6.4<br />
0~5 .0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.o<br />
Gap height, cm.<br />
Relationship between exhaust area and gap height.<br />
148
With the relationships in Eq,(33) to (36) and the fact that a* = aAH,<br />
Eq (47) can be expressed as:<br />
x = (I = e-B 2 tl)/p (48)<br />
in which x = H/(alAg - a 2G - a 3m s - a 4ms/D 2 ) (49)<br />
p = (Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)hS/a AH (50)<br />
Eq.(48) indicates that x increases from zero to 1/p as t, increases<br />
from zero to infinity. With the values of al, a a3, and a4 obtained in<br />
the section of parameter evaluation, x can be calculated <strong>for</strong> each pot in<br />
Table 6.1 and then plotted against the heating time tI . An exponential curve<br />
is drawn through the points as shown in Fig. 6.5; it appears to approach<br />
-<br />
the value of x = 3.5 x 10 4 when t, approaches infinity. Hence, 1/p equals<br />
3.5 x 10 - 4 . B2 , evaluated at t, of 1$ minutes, is found to have the value<br />
of 0.07; this value, according to Eq.(26), implies that in the heating<br />
period, energy stored in the water is much greater than heat lost through<br />
the pot surface. Since the time to heat water is usually less than the<br />
boiling time, energy <strong>use</strong>d in heating would be less than energy <strong>use</strong>d in<br />
boiling. Consequently, the loss of heat through the pot surface, in the<br />
period of boiling, is much smaller than the energy consumed in evaporating<br />
water. Neglecting the heat loss in deriving the equation of efficiency is,<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e, approved and acceptable.<br />
To estimate the mass of <strong>stove</strong> by Eq. (46), the density of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
material, which is fired clay, is required. But, as the <strong>stove</strong>s tested in<br />
this work come from various places in Thailand, each <strong>stove</strong> would have been<br />
subject to particular and different treatment during the process of<br />
manufacture. This, of course, would ca<strong>use</strong> a variation of density. Moreover,<br />
the <strong>stove</strong>s, after being tested, are still in good condition, so they are<br />
kept <strong>for</strong> further <strong>use</strong>. The density of the <strong>stove</strong> material, necessarily, has to<br />
be estimated from other clay products of similar make such as bricks. It is<br />
found that bricks have densities ranging from 103 to 128 lb/ft 3 (Perry and<br />
Chilton, 1973). As an illustration of model simulation, the density of the<br />
3 - 3 3<br />
<strong>stove</strong> material is taken to be 110 lb/ft or equivalent 1.76 x 10 kg/cm .<br />
The following dimensions are chosen to represent the standard<br />
dimensions of the <strong>stove</strong>: H = 10 cm, D = 5 cm, G = 1.8 cm, d = 15 cm,<br />
dt = 20 cm, db = 10 cm, and A = 80 cm 2 . These values are In the range of<br />
the dimensions of the <strong>stove</strong>s Investigated in the present work. The <strong>stove</strong><br />
with this standard structure has the efficiency of 28.73% when boiling is<br />
kept <strong>for</strong> 30 minutes, the mass of 10 kg and the time to boil of 19.9 minutes.<br />
With the above standard values of geometrical dimensions, and the values2 of the parameters previously obtained (i.e., a = 653.8 cm, a2 = 5,717.01 cm<br />
1<br />
a3 = 36.23 cm 2 /kg, a4 = 5,282.13 cm 5 /kg, and B2 = 0.07), the simulation is<br />
carried out to study the effect of each variable on the efficiency, the mass<br />
of the s'ove, and the time to boil.<br />
149
Table 6.1 Group of <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar behavior<br />
Stove<br />
No.<br />
Time to Grate-to Grate hole<br />
Boil Pot Distance area<br />
Gap<br />
Height<br />
Stvoe<br />
Weight<br />
Wall Efficiency<br />
Thickness<br />
(min) (cm) (cm2) (cm) (kg) (cm) (%)<br />
2 21.7 12 112 2 12.2 6.3 24.96<br />
3 22.3 12 112 1.8 8.7 3.9 25.7<br />
4 18.8 12.2 112 1.5 12.8 6.3 28.19<br />
6 18 12 69 1 8.6 6 28.83<br />
8 27 9 48 1.5 8.1 4.5 24.07<br />
12 22.6 9 65 2 7.2 4.8 29.02<br />
15 24.6 9 65 2 10 6 27.21<br />
19 23.8 11 94 2.5 10.5 6.8 23.94<br />
22 23.3 11 85 0.7 9.5 3.3 28.11<br />
28 20.1 10 74 2.3 12.2 4.5 25.1<br />
29 20 11.5 74 2 13.2 6 25.85<br />
31 16.7 12 94 0.5 11.8 6 32.39<br />
33 18.3 12 94 0.5 6.7 3.3 30.51<br />
35 20 10 70 1.9 10 4 27.7<br />
36 17 9.7 57 0.9 8 4.5 33.35<br />
150
6.<br />
5.<br />
X X O-4 4.<br />
V.x O 4 3.<br />
2<br />
1.<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />
Time, min.<br />
Fig. 6.5 Relationship between variable X, defined in Equation (49),<br />
and time to boil.<br />
X ....Experimental data; solid line ..... fitted curve.<br />
151
Effect of the grate-to-pot distance Y<br />
When the distance between the grate and the pot increasei, the model<br />
predictsa rapid drop of efficiency, increases of <strong>stove</strong> material and time to<br />
boil Fig. 6.6. As previously mentioned, the decrease in efficiency (curve n)<br />
when H increases, can be explained with the concept of view factor. As<br />
H increase the view factor decreaEas, causing the reduction of radiative<br />
heat being intercepted by the pot from the fiame; most of the heat is lost<br />
when the charcoal is very far from the pnt. Since the rate of heat supplied<br />
to the water in the pot is reduced due to the increase of H, the water in the<br />
pot will require a longer time to reach the state of boiling (curve tl).<br />
Geometrically, nny increp nf the diqtance between the grate and the<br />
pot, while keeping other characteristics unchanged, results in a comparatively<br />
larger increase in the total height of the <strong>stove</strong>. This implies a bigger<br />
size of <strong>stove</strong>; consequently, more <strong>stove</strong> material is required as predicted by<br />
the model (curve ms). The increase of the mass also affects the efficiency<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong>: more energy would be accumulated as heat in the <strong>stove</strong> material<br />
when the mass increases. Moreover, with the constant wall thickness, it<br />
means larger heat transfer area <strong>for</strong> the conduction; hence, more heat is lost<br />
to the environment. This effect, in addition to the effect of the reduction<br />
of view factor, further lessens the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Fig. 6 gives another impression that the model is improper at low values<br />
of H where the efficiency appears very high. However, such a condition is<br />
not likely to happen in practice, since a low H implicates a small co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er, which, if too small, cannot hold sufficient charcoal to run the<br />
test. Hence, reality will set the limitation of the model.<br />
Eff2ct of the <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness D<br />
As illustrated in Fig. 7, an increase of wall thickness, up to a certain<br />
value, tends to improve the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve T). Further<br />
increase in the thickness ca<strong>use</strong>s a slight reduction of the efficiency. Heat<br />
loss due to conduction across the wall is high in the <strong>stove</strong> with thin walls.<br />
Increasing the thickness hinders the conductive heat transfer, but, at the<br />
same time, promotes the loss of energy to be stored in the wall material.<br />
These two phenomena work simultaneously and antagonistically. The initial<br />
increase in wall thickness in Fig. 1.7 indicates the reduction of conduction<br />
is greater than the increase in energy stored in the material. As the<br />
thickness is increased, the relative rate of heat conduction is lower than<br />
the rate of energy being accumulated, resulting in the drop in efficiency.<br />
The choice of wall thickness not only helps improve the <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance, but it will also help in savi'ig raw material which, in this case,<br />
is clay. The increase in wall thickness r:eans more clay is required in<br />
making the <strong>stove</strong> (curve ms). An increase of the wall thickness from 2 to<br />
10 cm ca<strong>use</strong>s the mass of the <strong>stove</strong> to increase from 5 kg to more than 45 kg:<br />
an increase of wall thickness by 5 times induces an increase of the mass<br />
by about 10 times. I the wall thickness is kept at 6 cm instead of at<br />
10 cm, two <strong>stove</strong>s can be manufactured instead of one. Moreover, the two<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s with the thickness of 6 cm have higher efficiency of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
than the one <strong>stove</strong> with the thickness of 10 cm.<br />
152
40- 16 100-<br />
m I<br />
30 12 55 -- /0<br />
0 8 45<br />
0- 4- 25-<br />
4 60 12 14<br />
Height from grate to pot, cm.<br />
Fig. 6.6 Model prediction of the effect of grate-to-pot distance<br />
on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms)<br />
to boil , and<br />
(t8).<br />
time<br />
153
5j 50 - 30"<br />
40- 40<br />
S<br />
'.44<br />
25<br />
30 20<br />
'<br />
20 'n 20-<br />
10510<br />
1 10<br />
].<br />
"<br />
/°3<br />
iss I<br />
"<br />
IIII<br />
2 4 6 8<br />
Wall thickness, cm.<br />
I<br />
t<br />
s<br />
10 12 14<br />
the effect of wall thickness on<br />
Fig. 6.7 Model prediction of<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms ), and time<br />
to boil (t1 ).<br />
154
Curve t 1 shows the change of time as the thickness of the wall changes.<br />
The increase of the thickness from 1 to 4 cm reduces the time to boil from<br />
36 to 20 minutes. A slight increase of time to boil is seen when the wall<br />
thickness is larger than 6 cm. This behavior can be explained by the<br />
concept of antagonism between the heat conduction across the wall and the<br />
heat accumulated in the wall material as described be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />
Effect of the inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom db<br />
As the inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom db increases, the<br />
model predicts only a slight increase in efficiency, a slight decrease in<br />
time to boil, and a reduction of <strong>stove</strong> mass (see Fig. 6.8). Geometrically,<br />
the change of only db will mainly affect the ashing compartment without having<br />
any effect on the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, which is the major part of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
supplying heat to the water. An increase in db reduces the ashing cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
and, consequently, the <strong>stove</strong> mass. When db increases from 7 to 15 cm, the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> weight decreases from 15.9 to 14.3 kg (curve ms) - about 1% decrease<br />
in mass. The change of efficiency in this case is, conclusively, ca<strong>use</strong>d by<br />
the change in the amount of energy stored in the mass of <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Although the increase in the inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom<br />
lessens the raw material, the choice should depend on the structural strength<br />
and the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air.<br />
Effect of inside dicaneter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand dt<br />
The model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at<br />
the stand dt on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, the mass of <strong>stove</strong>, and the time<br />
required to increase the water temperature to its boiling point is illustrated<br />
in Fig. 6.9. When the inside diameter at the pot stand is slightly greater<br />
than the grate diameter (d = 15 cm), the efficiency is low (curve n), the<br />
mass of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve m) and the time to boil (curve tl) are high; at<br />
this value of dt, the distance between the bottom and the grate is very large,<br />
resulting in high requirement <strong>for</strong> raw material and, as a consequence high<br />
accumulation of energy in the <strong>stove</strong> material. The high loss of energy from<br />
the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion due to the <strong>stove</strong> material ca<strong>use</strong>s the reduction of energy<br />
supplied to the <strong>stove</strong>; hence, the time required to boil is high. The increase<br />
in dt will reduce the distance between the grate and the bottom, which<br />
simultaneously reduces the <strong>stove</strong> material. Consequently, less energy is<br />
stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material and the time required to boil is less.<br />
Effect of Gap Height G<br />
The model prediction in Fig. 6.10 indicates that as the gap height G<br />
increases, the efficiency n (curve n) decreases linearly at first and more<br />
rapidly at a later stage. The decrease of efficiency implies the increasing<br />
loss of energy carried out by exhaust gases due to the process of free<br />
convection. The larger the gap height, the larger the gap area, and the<br />
greater the loss of energy through convection. However, this loss is<br />
counteracted by the loss of energy accumulated in the mass of the <strong>stove</strong>, which<br />
decreases linearly wit' the increase of 6 (curve ms). The rate of change of<br />
155
16" 32<br />
• 30- ".s<br />
20- t<br />
5<br />
o-<br />
0<br />
-<br />
0<br />
15- A 28c;"<br />
.<br />
-<br />
<br />
. . .<br />
o 0 0 T -426<br />
141 21<br />
II I I I<br />
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />
I-iside diameter of <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, cm.<br />
Fig. 6.8 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of<br />
<strong>stove</strong> at the bottom on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency(q), <strong>stove</strong><br />
mass (ms), and time to boil (tl).<br />
156
50<br />
50 _<br />
40 40 -<br />
30<br />
*d30 0 30- '\%<br />
4 Ca<br />
g~ 2 20 22o<br />
1<br />
10 10 14-<br />
,10 1<br />
Fig. 6.9<br />
--<br />
1. ]<br />
S<br />
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30<br />
Top diameter, cm.<br />
Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of<br />
<strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (r),<br />
<strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to boil (t 1).<br />
157
60<br />
50<br />
1(<br />
50- . 40<br />
30-<br />
o 1> .<br />
"<br />
u<br />
20<br />
20" 1<br />
14 -- 1<br />
II<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
Gap height, cm.<br />
Fig. 6.10 Model prediction of the effect of gap height on the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to<br />
boil (tI).<br />
158
these losses is relatively constant at small G; but at large G, the natural<br />
convection becomes dominant and ca<strong>use</strong>s the rapid drop of the efficiency.<br />
Since loss of energy increases when G is inacreasing, the time to boil under<br />
these conditions will increase with G (curve tl).<br />
Effect of grate diameter 4i<br />
Fig. 6.11 illustrates the effect of grate diameter on the <strong>stove</strong><br />
efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass, and time to boil. At the grate diameter of 10 cm,<br />
the effic 4 .ency is about 32% which is approximately 3% greater than the<br />
efficienc of the standard <strong>stove</strong>; the efficiency drops slowly from 32% to<br />
28.7% when the grate diameter increases from 10 to 15 cm (curve n). As d<br />
is greater than 15 cm, the efficiency rapidly diminishes to 20% at dg =1 cm.<br />
The change in efficiency can be explained in relation to the change in<br />
mass (curve ms). When the value of dg is 10 cm, the <strong>stove</strong> mass is small,<br />
about 18 kg. At this value of dg the volume of the ashing compartment is very<br />
small, and in effect it represents a <strong>stove</strong> without an ashing compartment.<br />
This results in the fresh surrounding air coming into direct contact with the<br />
flame. The efficiency is <strong>improved</strong> not only by good-co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, but also by<br />
the reduction of energy stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material. Providing the area of<br />
the opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air has no effect on the air supply to the flame,<br />
an increase in grate diameter will increase the size of the ashing cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
and consequently, the <strong>stove</strong> mass is increased. Energy accumulated in the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> material increases. Moreover, the increase in material ca<strong>use</strong>s the<br />
increase in heat transfer area, which promotes heat loss due to conduction<br />
through the wall. These effects reduce the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> and at<br />
the same time increase the time to boil (curve ts).<br />
Effect of rvau;c i avea Aa<br />
The grate hole area,according to the assumption in modelling, controls<br />
the rate of air supply to the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. An increase in grate hole area<br />
thus improves the air supply which results in better co<strong>mb</strong>ustion and, as<br />
consequence, good per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve q in Fig. 6.12). The <strong>stove</strong><br />
mass decreases as Ag increases. This reduces the energy stored in the <strong>stove</strong><br />
material (curve ms). Due to good heat supply to water, the time to boil<br />
decreases (curve tl).<br />
It should be noted that the grate hole area cannot be increased without<br />
limit. The grate diameter, and the strength of the grate are factors that<br />
will constrain the grate hole area. Since the diameter of the grate of<br />
standard <strong>stove</strong> is 15 cm, the maximum area provided by the grate is about<br />
176 cm 2 ; the value of Ag greater than 176 cm 2 would be impractical. If the<br />
strength of the grate is considered, the grate hole area will be much less<br />
2<br />
than 176 cm .<br />
The comparative study, illustrated in this simulation, is based on the<br />
assumption that the flow rate of air depends only on the total area of grate<br />
holes; this, of course, implies that Ag increases beca<strong>use</strong> of the increase in<br />
the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of grate holes without altering the hole diameter. If the hole<br />
159
40- 40- 401<br />
30 _<br />
•<br />
S2CL 0 20-<br />
30 3 0:<br />
0 .8<br />
2Q_<br />
I1<br />
S<br />
IuI<br />
6<br />
Iu<br />
8 10 12<br />
Grate diameter, cm.<br />
t -<br />
-<br />
/<br />
/'<br />
14<br />
Iu<br />
19 2d<br />
Fig. 6.11 Model prediction of the effect of grate diameter on<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time<br />
to boil (t 1).<br />
160
16<br />
40-50<br />
E30/20"-\<br />
40<br />
14-220 t<br />
I I I I1<br />
60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />
2<br />
Grate hole area, cm<br />
Fig. 6.12 Model prediction of the effect of grate hole area on the<br />
efficiency(n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to boil (t 1).<br />
161
diameter changes, the resistance of the hole to the air flow will be affected;<br />
the parameter in Eq (8), there<strong>for</strong>e, has different values at different hole<br />
diameters. This point should be noted in comparing any <strong>stove</strong> efficiency.<br />
D. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION<br />
Many assumptions have been introduced in developing the model and the<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong> in this section. These assumptions are proposed to simplify the<br />
mathematical complexity and to relate major factors that are studied<br />
experimentally. As a consequence, the model prediction deviates from<br />
observation under some experimental condltions. This preliminary model, in<br />
the future, will be modified to provide a more detailed eyplanation.<br />
The process of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is very complex; the composition of the<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion products and the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion are strongly affected by the<br />
amount of air supplied to the <strong>stove</strong>. In the model, it is assumed that heat<br />
of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion and the composition of the exhaust gas are not changed--regardless<br />
of any variation in air supply. This assumptioa is valid only when co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
is complete. Such complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, however, in achieved only if sufficient<br />
air is provided to the <strong>stove</strong>. If air is undersupplied (which is ca<strong>use</strong>d by a<br />
small total grate hole area) heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is reduced and efficiency is<br />
also reduced. But if the grate hole area is too large, the air to<br />
oversupplied. Although the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is complete <strong>for</strong> this condition, a large<br />
amount of energy generated by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is lost in increasing the<br />
temperature of the excess air. Consequently, a drop of efficiency is expected.<br />
As the model does not account <strong>for</strong> this effect, the predicted efficiency keeps<br />
on increasing with the grate hole area. A detailed study of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
mechanism in relation to the grate hole area is necessary <strong>for</strong> any modifications<br />
of the model.<br />
In modelling the <strong>stove</strong>, the effect of the grate diameter on the view<br />
factor has been neglected. It has already been mentioned that the view factor<br />
between two circular discs with equal diameters varies with both the diameter<br />
and the distance between the discs. Since radiation is the major energy<br />
supply <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>, the inclusion of the grate diameter into the equation <strong>for</strong><br />
view factor estimation might stress the importance of the grate diameter on<br />
the efficiency.<br />
Another point that needs to be considered in improving the model is the<br />
energy required to increase the water temperature to its boiling point. The<br />
present model assumes that the time to boil is small and hence not much<br />
energy would be utilized in this process. However, the model predicts that<br />
the time to boil in some cases is large, indicating that a massive amount of<br />
energy has been consumed. For example, if the time to boil and the boiling<br />
time are 20 and 30 minutes, respectively, providing that the rate of heat<br />
supply from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is constant and heat loss is small, then the<br />
ratio of heat <strong>use</strong>d in heating up water and in boiling is 2 to 3. With a<br />
long time to boil, it is important to include heat consumed in increasing<br />
the water temperature when efficiency is being calculated.<br />
162
Although the present model is based on many assumptions, it can shed<br />
light on theunderstanding of interactions among the <strong>stove</strong> characteristics<br />
that influence <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. This model should give some basic idea<br />
of how the <strong>stove</strong> would per<strong>for</strong>m. For example, the model predicts that the<br />
grate-to-pot distance, which contributes the major part of efficiency,<br />
strongly affects the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>. If it is large, the<br />
efficiency decreases, but if it is small, the <strong>stove</strong> will per<strong>for</strong>m better.<br />
However, result from the experiment show that this is not exactly true: the<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance becomes poor when the grate-to-pot distance is smaller than a<br />
certain value. This is mainly due to radiative loss through the gaps.<br />
The thickness of the <strong>stove</strong> wall also strongly affects <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
If the wall is too thick, the efficiency is reduced. The same effect is<br />
predicted if the wall is too thin. The <strong>stove</strong> will exhibit the best<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance at a particular value of thickness.<br />
With a large grate hole area, the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ms better than<br />
that with a small grate hole area. This is due to the assumption that<br />
air flows into the <strong>stove</strong> at constant velocity; hence, the volume or mass<br />
flow rate of air is proportional to the grate hole area. The model, however,<br />
neglects to take into account the insulation effect of the grate. A<br />
large grate hole area implies a high loss of radiative heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er to the ash cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As a consequence, a <strong>stove</strong> with a<br />
grate hole area larger than a certain value could per<strong>for</strong>m poorly. The<br />
insulation effect of the grate should be considered in the model improvement.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The model, although based on many assumptions, can give us an understanding<br />
of the interactions of <strong>stove</strong> geometry on the per<strong>for</strong>mance. The<br />
dependence of <strong>stove</strong> efficiency on the grate-to-pot distance can be explained<br />
in terms of radiative heat obtained by the pot. Increasing gap height<br />
ca<strong>use</strong>s a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, indicated by the model as the result of<br />
high convective heat loss through the gap. Conductive heat loss, predicted<br />
by the model, is severe in the case of insufficient thickness of the <strong>stove</strong><br />
wall; the <strong>stove</strong> would per<strong>for</strong>m better if wall thickness is increased. However,<br />
if the wall is too thick, the model indicates that a large amount of<br />
heat is stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material, resulting in a drop in <strong>stove</strong> efficienc).<br />
As already discussed, the model can be modified to yield better predictions.<br />
The modifications should be per<strong>for</strong>med according to the recommendations<br />
in the previous section.<br />
163
Chapter 7<br />
Stove Models Developed
STOVE MODELS DEVELOPED<br />
This chapter presents the results of improvement of five generic types<br />
of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Based on commercial <strong>stove</strong> testing and analysis of results, experience<br />
gained during <strong>stove</strong> collections, <strong>stove</strong> construction and.modifications in the<br />
laboratory, and numerous contacts with <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers, the<br />
general requirement <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> concept, particularly<br />
within Thailand, can be stated as follows:<br />
a) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall be designed to accommodate as many<br />
various sizes and shapes of pots and pans as possible.<br />
b) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall reduce the time duration of <strong>cooking</strong><br />
or at least keep it constant. No <strong>stove</strong> with prolonged <strong>cooking</strong> time can be<br />
accepted, no matter how fuel efficient it may be.<br />
c) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall be made to have longer service life<br />
or durability.<br />
d) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s portability, and construction with a single<br />
pothole, are desirable components.<br />
e) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall consume less fuel or at least equal<br />
amounts to the existing good models.<br />
Z) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> operation shall be conducted with ease and<br />
safety, including the <strong>stove</strong>'s ignition, frequency of attendance, heat output<br />
control, refueling and fire extinguishing.<br />
Development then strictly followed such requirements. The design, testing<br />
and production of <strong>improved</strong> prototypes have yielded hardwares whose features<br />
and per<strong>for</strong>mances are presented in following sections.<br />
A. IMPROVED STOVE'S TERMINOLOGY<br />
In previous chapters, numerous discussions were made in reference to<br />
various <strong>stove</strong> terms. In order to avoid misunderstanding and to promote<br />
future <strong>stove</strong> development and standardization, drawings illustrating<br />
terminology are presented in Fig. 7.1 to 7.5. The five types are the charcoal<br />
<strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, wood <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />
without chimney, and rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney. All <strong>stove</strong>s, however, are<br />
of the single pothole type as desired by most Thai <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
167
Pot Diameter<br />
r------28 cm.<br />
.. ..... / Bucket Handle<br />
S-<br />
- Pot Rest<br />
Firing Cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
- Stove Body<br />
-Grate<br />
Refractory Lining<br />
4-' Insulator<br />
Primary Air Inlet And<br />
Ash Removal Port<br />
Gulvanized Bucket<br />
Bucket Support Ring<br />
Figure 7.1 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />
various parts'of the construction and terminology.<br />
168
Pot Diameter<br />
-2.4 cm.<br />
4-28 cm.<br />
.Lifting Handle<br />
Exhausted Gap - Pot Rest<br />
.4-Insulator<br />
--- Refractory Lining<br />
4.-- Stove Body<br />
! --- Firewood, Feeding Port<br />
- - Grate<br />
Primary Air Inlet<br />
And Ash Removal Port<br />
-Galvanized Bucket<br />
Figure 7.2 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
showing parts of the construction and terminology.<br />
169
Adjustable Air<br />
Valvet"<br />
e Chimney<br />
40<br />
Horse sho-,<br />
Contro <<br />
Pot #24 cm.<br />
Stove Body<br />
Refractory Lining<br />
Aape bSmoke Cap<br />
Wood Fuel<br />
Grate<br />
Primary Air Inlet Port<br />
Figure 7.3 Drawing of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype<br />
showing the construction and terminology.<br />
170
000 0000<br />
000 C<br />
00o<br />
0 0 0 L<br />
-- -24<br />
Pot Diameter<br />
cm.<br />
_Pot Rest<br />
_<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Exhaust Flue Outlet<br />
Refractory Lining<br />
Rice Husk Filled Cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
Stove Body<br />
Insulator<br />
Rice husk Flow Gap<br />
Tripod Base<br />
Air Inlet Hole<br />
Wooden Leg<br />
Outer Cone Metal Sheet<br />
-- _ - Ash Removal Port<br />
Figure 7.4 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />
showing the construction and terminology.<br />
171
o N<br />
0N<br />
Chimney<br />
Rice Husk $<br />
44 4JoD 0 Refractor<br />
Rice Husk<br />
Tray ' ' '.<br />
I Restricte Flu Exi<br />
Iron Grate co<strong>mb</strong>ustion ,<br />
' ",.Cha<strong>mb</strong>er'."<br />
Ash Removal Port A4.404 .lJ ' Lifting<br />
o . Hole<br />
Concrete Body ' ,".' -. . , , .<br />
. -...... .... ...... . . .. 1<br />
Figure 7.5 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />
showing the construction and terminology.<br />
172<br />
N
B. IMPROVED CHARCOAL STOVE MODEL RFD-1<br />
The physical dimensions and characteristics of the latest <strong>improved</strong><br />
charcoal <strong>stove</strong> called "RFD-l" can be described as follows:<br />
a) Stove weight, fired-clay body only 5.9 kg.<br />
fully fabricated (with bucket included) 10.1 kg.<br />
b) Stove height (no bucket) 25.0 cm.<br />
c) Top diameter (no bucket), outside 30.0 cm.<br />
inside 26.5 cm.<br />
d) Bottom diameter (no bucket), outside 19.0 cm.<br />
inside 16.0 cm.<br />
e) Vertical height from grate top to <strong>stove</strong> rim 15.0 cm.<br />
f) Vertical height of the pot rest portion 6.5 cm.<br />
g) Pots accommodation, pot diameter 16-32 cm.<br />
h) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity after refractory lining,<br />
normal full charcoal load 1,240 cm.,<br />
extra charcoal load <strong>for</strong> large <strong>cooking</strong> 2,000 cm?<br />
i) Grate, diameter 17.5 cm.<br />
thickness 4.0 cm.<br />
weight 0.7 kg.<br />
hole diameter (taper up) 1.2-1.4 cm.<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of hole 61<br />
hole area 94 cm<br />
hole area/grate area 39 %<br />
j) Average thickness of inside refractory lining 1.0 cm.<br />
k) Exhausted gap (<strong>for</strong> flue gas outlet) 1.0 cm.<br />
1) Air inlet port, 5 x 11 cm. 55 cm<br />
m) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness (including insulation<br />
and bucket 5.2 cmi<br />
n) Bucket weight 1.1 kg.<br />
The relationship of physical characteristics to external variables such<br />
as pot size, charcoal load, pot position relative to the top rim is shown<br />
in Table 7.1.<br />
173
Table 7.1 Physical characteristics of RFD-l charcoal <strong>stove</strong> relating to<br />
external variables<br />
Pot 0 Grate-to-pot Charcoal Charcoal top Exhausted Pot position<br />
cm distance, cm loadl gm layer-to-pot area, cm2 relative to the<br />
distance, cm <strong>stove</strong> rim, cm<br />
16 7 250 2 43.5 -7.0<br />
18 7.5 310 2 45.7 -6.3<br />
20 9 390 3 48.0 -5.5<br />
22 10 440 3 52.0 -4.3<br />
24 11 480 3 58.5 -3.2<br />
26 12 550 3 62.0 -2.2<br />
28 13 690 3 67.5 -1.0<br />
30 14 740 4 75.5 +0.6<br />
32 15 770 5 75.5 +1.0<br />
* the load based on high density mangrove charcoal prepared to the average<br />
size of 5 cm in length and 2 cm in cross-sectional width.<br />
Test results of developed charcoal <strong>stove</strong> (RFD-I) are shown in Table 7.2.<br />
Table 7.2 Average test results of RFD-l charcoal <strong>stove</strong> under different <strong>use</strong><br />
conditions*<br />
Pot 0 No. of Charcoal Initial Charcoal Average Time to<br />
cm test load, g water remained burning rate boil HU %<br />
wt gm gm gm/min<br />
16 3 130 1,180 16.7 2.4 17 21.6<br />
20 6 240 2,190 34.0 4.2 19.5 25.4<br />
24 3 400 3,700 50.0 7.4 17.3 32.1<br />
28 3 640 5,920 90.0 10.6 22 34.2<br />
32 3 800 7,400 93.3 12.6 26 30.2<br />
* In this test, the ratio of charcoal load to initial water weight was kept<br />
constant at 1:9.25 based on standard tests where 400 gm of charcoal and<br />
3,700 gn of water were <strong>use</strong>d. The water occupies approx. 3/4 of the pot<br />
capacity. Test durations are 30 minutes plus time to boil, all starting<br />
from a cold <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
174
From Table 7.2 the heat utilization efficiency is lowest when a very<br />
small load of charcoal (130 gm) is <strong>use</strong>d. This should be expected beca<strong>use</strong><br />
a large percentage of heat from charcoal input is absorbed by the <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
but even with such a small charcoal fuel, 1.18 liters of water can be brought<br />
to boil in 17 minutes. The HU begins to peak when operating the <strong>stove</strong> at<br />
400-640 gm charcoal, with a 24 - 28 cm pot diameter, and the amount of water<br />
between 3,700 - 5,900 gm. This particular range of operation represents<br />
the conditions <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>cooking</strong> by most rural Thai families. Time to boil<br />
achieved by this <strong>stove</strong> based on standard comparison tests (pot #24, water<br />
3,700 gm, charcoal 400 gm) is 17.3 minutes which is equal to the best topline<br />
model in the market, as previously shown in Table 5.6. In those tests,<br />
the time to boil of existing commercial bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ranged from 16.7 - 32.0<br />
minutes and averaged 22.8 minutes.<br />
Regarding the <strong>stove</strong> durability, the RFD-l <strong>improved</strong> model is considered<br />
superior to all commercial models since the fired clay body is made of<br />
refractory material which can withstand thermal shock without cracking much<br />
better than commeicial models. For details of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong><br />
production please refer to Chapter 8.<br />
Recalling the six criteria of <strong>use</strong>r's requirements stated earlier, it<br />
can be concluded with a high degree of confidence that the RFD-l <strong>improved</strong><br />
model has met all those requirements.<br />
Fig. 7.6 and 1.7 are photo-illustrations of the sample <strong>stove</strong> made from<br />
actual production by a group of retrained local <strong>stove</strong> makers in Roi-et Province.<br />
C. IMPROVED NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE MODEL RFD-2<br />
This nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, model RFD-2, has the designed purpose of<br />
overcoming weaknesses in physical features of commercia] wood bucket <strong>stove</strong>s,<br />
particularly its too wide exhausted gap, too small co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, too<br />
restricted firewood feeding port, and poor <strong>stove</strong> rim design to fit pots and<br />
pans properly. Besides, the <strong>improved</strong> design is intended to replace the<br />
three-stone <strong>stove</strong>s which are ranked second in popularity among rural Thai<br />
<strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
After a long process of attempting to make a dual purpose <strong>stove</strong> both<br />
<strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood, test results have indicated that such a <strong>stove</strong><br />
would greatly compromise on charcoal fuel <strong>use</strong>d and would make the operation<br />
more difficult when using firewood. This conclusion, there<strong>for</strong>e, has led to<br />
the development of a separate wood burning <strong>stove</strong> and charcoal burning<br />
<strong>stove</strong>.<br />
The <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-2 was previously<br />
illustrated in Fig. 7.2. Its physical dimensions and characteristics can<br />
be described as follows:<br />
175
(a)<br />
Figure 7.6. Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-l"showing (a) fixeoor<br />
and (c) inside of<br />
resistant body,(b) with grate and<br />
fabricated <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Prov o s IF<br />
(b)<br />
(c)
(a)<br />
Figure 7.7 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-l"showing (a) <strong>stove</strong><br />
external ready <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>, (b) and (c) sectional views showing<br />
different pai s of construction.<br />
178<br />
(b)<br />
(c)
a) Stove weight, fired clay budy only 6.9 kg.<br />
fully fabricated 9.8 kg.<br />
b) Stove height 23.5 cm.<br />
c) Top diameter, outside 28.0 cm.<br />
inside 24.0 cm.<br />
d) Bottom diameter, outside 25.0 cm.<br />
inside 21.0 cm.<br />
e) Vertical height from grate top to <strong>stove</strong> rim 13.5 cm.<br />
f) Pots accommodation, pot diameter 18-32 cm.<br />
g) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity 3,040 cm<br />
h) Grate, diameter 21.0 cm.<br />
thickness 3.0 cm.<br />
weight 0.9 cm.<br />
hole diameter 1.6 cm.<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 37<br />
hole area 60 cmi<br />
hole area/grate area 21 %<br />
i) Exhausted gap (<strong>for</strong> smoke outlet) 1.0 cm.<br />
j) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness, body only 2.0 cm.<br />
with insulation and bucket 5.3 cm.<br />
k) Primary air inlet port (4 x 12.5 cm) 50 cm<br />
1) Firewood feeding port (9 x 12.5 cm) 100 cmi<br />
Test of the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the RFD-2 <strong>stove</strong> conducted in the laboratory<br />
(based on standard testing method as described in Chapter 4) are as shown<br />
in Table 7.3.<br />
Table 7.3 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-2<br />
with bucket.<br />
Test Firewood Charcoal produced Average fuel Time to boil<br />
run <strong>use</strong>d, at end of test, burning rate mHU%<br />
no. gm gm gm/mmn<br />
515 820 20 18.2 15 27.4<br />
516 810 20 18.0 15 28.8<br />
517 750 20 17.4 15 28.1<br />
601 780 30 17.0 16 28.7<br />
604 790 25 18.4 13 28.9<br />
606 740 30 18.1 11 30.4<br />
average 781.7 24.0 17.9 14.2 28.7<br />
179
From the above Table, the heat utilization efficiency of RFD-2 is<br />
considered high when compared with all commercial model test results<br />
(previously presented in Table 5.7 and in Fig. 5.3 where the HU ranged from<br />
14.2 - 25.9% and averaged 19.8%). The time to boil of the RFD-2 seems to<br />
fluctuate somewhat; the average feeding rate <strong>for</strong> each run is almost the same<br />
(17 - 18 gm/min). This reflects the intrinsic characteristic of wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
where duplications of actual feeding are difficult. At any rate, the<br />
average time to boil of 14.2 min <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> is very satisfactory when<br />
considering the burning rate figure. The RFD-2 consumed firewood only 17.9<br />
gm/min while that of commercial models ranged from 22.6 - 35.4 gm/min and<br />
averaged 28.4 gm/min (See Table 5.7). This means that the RFD-2 model would<br />
save approximately 59% of firewood over those commercial models on the<br />
average, while maintaining the same average time to boil (14 minutes).<br />
Figs. 7.8 and 7.9 show the RFD-2 <strong>stove</strong> from the actual production by a<br />
group of retrained local <strong>stove</strong> makers in Roi-et Province. Since the heat<br />
released from burning wood inside the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is not so intense<br />
as in the case of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the RFD-2 model can be produced either<br />
with or without a bucket and insulation restraint outside. This option shall<br />
be decided by consumers according to their ability to pay, preference <strong>for</strong><br />
a neat appearance, together with ease of cleaning. The per<strong>for</strong>mance of RFD-2<br />
of both options is the same within 45 min of operation under the standard<br />
test.<br />
D. IMPROVED CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />
The second type of wood <strong>stove</strong> developed is the chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
However, only three commercial models exist with one pothole as discussed<br />
in Chapter 5 and illustrated in Annex IlI. Even though the <strong>stove</strong> is not<br />
popular and finds very limited <strong>use</strong> in rural Thailand, it could compete<br />
with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> in certain applications if it could be developed to<br />
attain the efficiency level of up to 20 - 25%. Recalling that heat<br />
utilization efficiency (HU) of the <strong>improved</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong> is 32% and the<br />
maximum efficiency in conversion of wood to charcoal is 60% (see report of<br />
charcoal improvement component), the absolute efficiency of the charcoal<br />
<strong>stove</strong> as calculated directly from wood raw material, there<strong>for</strong>e, is equal to<br />
19.2%.<br />
The development of the one pothole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has faced<br />
problems; namely, a) fitting of various sizes of pots and pans is not<br />
possible b) directing the flame toward the pots' bottom and around their<br />
side walI is very difficult. Too much draft and improper baffling will<br />
direct most of the flame toward the flue gas exit hole. On the other hand,<br />
too week a draft and too restricted a baffliLig will ca<strong>use</strong> the smoke to come<br />
out from the firewood feeding port.<br />
A compromise was made on the above problems. Designs and various<br />
modifications were then made and tested. The prototype selected is shcwn in<br />
Fig. 7.3 and 7.10. Physical dimensions and characteristics are as follows:<br />
180
(a)<br />
Figure 7.8 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-2"<br />
(a) fire-resistant body with grate (b) fabricated model<br />
without bucket and (c) Sectional view showing parts of<br />
construction.<br />
181<br />
(b)<br />
(c)
Figure 7.9 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-2"showing :<br />
.(a) and (b) fire resistant <strong>stove</strong> fabricated model with<br />
bucket (c) sectional view showing parts of construction.<br />
182<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)
-II<br />
Figure 7.10 Prototype of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
showing different parts of construction.<br />
183
a) Stove weight 7.9 kg.<br />
b) Stove height 23 cm.<br />
c) Pot hole diameter (fit best only one size) 24 cm.<br />
d) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity 4,400 cm!<br />
e) Grate, diameter 23 cm.<br />
hole diameter 2 cm.<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 38<br />
hole area 60 cm?<br />
f) Grate-to-pot distance (pot #24) 13.5 cm.<br />
g) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness 3.5 cm.<br />
h) Primary air port 50 cm<br />
i) Firewood feeding port (8 x 15 cm.) 120 cm<br />
j) Flue gas outlet hole (4 x 10 cm.) 44 cm<br />
k) Baffle, half-ringed length 30 cm.<br />
flue gas trough, height x width 3 x 1.5 cm.<br />
1) Chimney, diameter 10 cm.<br />
height 2.2 m.<br />
m) Adjustable external damper at lower end of chimney below the flue<br />
gas exit hole level.<br />
Test results of an <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype are shown<br />
in Table 7.4.<br />
Table 7.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of the prototype <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Firewood Rnn.burning Charcoal produced Average rate,H% fuel Time to boil<br />
Run no. <strong>use</strong>, gm at end of test, gm gm/min min<br />
494 1,025 25 20.1 21 19.6<br />
495 970 40 19.4 20 18.5<br />
496 950 20 18.6 21 18.5<br />
499 1,080 20 21.6 20 19.0<br />
503 1,130 20 21.3 23 17.3<br />
505 1,110 30 21.8 21 21.8<br />
average 1,044 25.8 20.6 21 19.1<br />
Prev2Qo opjz<br />
185
Test results from Table 7.4 indicate that 11Uincreased by approximately<br />
4.6% over the average existing models shown in Table 5.8, (that is, from 14.5<br />
to 19.1%). Time to boil increased from 17.7 to 21 minutes on the average.<br />
The major contribution of this prototype is that the firewood <strong>use</strong> is<br />
considerably less than the commercial models; i.e. 1,044 gm versus 1,583 gm<br />
or 34% less on the average.<br />
Since the original aim was to raise the efficiency of this chimneyed<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong> to 20 - 25% while maintaining at least the same time to boil, this<br />
prototype <strong>stove</strong> still has not met with requirements. There<strong>for</strong>e, this <strong>stove</strong><br />
should receive more improvement in the future be<strong>for</strong>e trial promotion or<br />
commission of the production.<br />
E. IMPROVED NON-CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />
The nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> from Khao-I-Dang refugee camp (also called<br />
the "Meechai <strong>stove</strong>") is quite unique in its design and operating efficiency.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, only a little improvement and modification need to be done.<br />
Possible modifications include the material of construction, air inlet hole<br />
size and nu<strong>mb</strong>er, the inner cylinder height and exhausted flue gas area, and<br />
the outer cone insulation. The final design has the following features:<br />
a) Outer cone, mild steel gauge 0.70 mm.<br />
upper diameter 45 cm.<br />
lower diameter 10 cm.<br />
cone angle 60 deg.<br />
vertical height 30.5 cm.<br />
b) Air inlet hole, diameter 0.9 cm.<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 274<br />
c) Inner cylinder, diameter 21 cm.<br />
height 19 cm.<br />
exhausted area 3(3 x 13 cm) 117 cm?<br />
d) Fuel flow, gap 2 cm.<br />
gap area 163 cm?<br />
f) Outer cone insulation thickness 0.5 cm.<br />
This <strong>improved</strong> model has the heat utilization efficiency of 19 - 20% and<br />
a time to boil of 11 - 13 minutes under standard tests. Rice husk <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong><br />
one test (approximately 40 - 45 min operation) is 1.7 - 1.8 kg at 10 - 13%<br />
moisture content. The insulation of the outside cone with rice husk ash-clay<br />
mixture, eyen though offering only 1 - 2% increase in HU over the uninsulated<br />
one, has greatly helped in keeping the cone metal from repeated extreme heat<br />
exposure and rust. In so doing, however, the flow friction (the husk on<br />
clay mixture surface) is also increased. To correct it, the rice husk<br />
ash-clay mixture insulating surface must be made as smooth as possible to<br />
avoid rice husk sticking at the flow gap. Future development to smooth this<br />
186
surface should be tried, particularly with cheap glazing material such as a<br />
salt solution. The operation of this <strong>stove</strong> is only suitable <strong>for</strong> a wellventilated<br />
area such as around the yard. A container to receive hot rice<br />
husk ash from the ash port is necessary. In case of windy conditions, the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> will not operate well unless a shield is improvised.<br />
Fig. 7.11 shows part of construction and operation of this <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
F. IMPROVED CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE MODEL "RFD-3"<br />
The design of the RFD-3 chimneyed rice husk (and other residues of<br />
similar <strong>for</strong>m) <strong>stove</strong> has the purpose of correcting the following weaknesses of<br />
commercial models: a) <strong>stove</strong> and chimney cracking beca<strong>use</strong> of an intense heat<br />
and flame generated in both cement and fired-clay constructions, b) poor<br />
conversion efficiency due to lack of baffling, too large flue gas exit hole<br />
and too far a distance from co<strong>mb</strong>ustion zone to the pot bottom, c) too large<br />
a pot hole diameter so that the common family pot size (#22 - 36) cannot be<br />
<strong>use</strong>d, d) weight of models (most are too heavy to be moved by two persons),<br />
and e) frequency of fire attendance during operations of some fuel efficient<br />
models.<br />
The development of the RFD-3 model has resulted in the design of physical<br />
structures and characteristics as follows:<br />
a) Stove weight, <strong>stove</strong> body only 68 kg.<br />
with insulation 75 kg.<br />
b) Stove height 33 cm.<br />
c) Pot hole diameter, no insulation 28 cm.<br />
d) Pot accommodation 22-32 cm.<br />
(only one size of pot has to be decided by <strong>use</strong>rs prior<br />
to insulation lining of the <strong>stove</strong>)<br />
e) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity, no insulation 14,800 cm?<br />
with insulation <strong>for</strong> 24 cm pot 10,000 cm?<br />
f) Iron grate, slope 43 deg.<br />
rod diameter 6 mm.<br />
finished length 36 cm.<br />
g) Air inlet area 450 cm<br />
h) Ash removal port 60 cm<br />
i) Flue gas exit hole uninsulated 50 cm<br />
insulated 32 cm<br />
j) Base to pot distance <strong>for</strong> pot #24 19 cm.<br />
187
a b<br />
PrviOUS Paz 189<br />
c<br />
Figure 7.11<br />
Nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />
"Improved Meechai" model showing: a)<br />
an insulated outsidc -one sitting on<br />
the steel ring with three wooden legs,<br />
the inside cylinder with three<br />
exhausted gaps <strong>for</strong> flue yas exit, and<br />
the ash removal port at bottom of the<br />
cone, b) the <strong>stove</strong>'s top view be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
flue loading and c) the <strong>stove</strong> during<br />
operation.
k) Average insulation thickness 1.2 cm.<br />
1) Chimney, inside diameter 10 cm.<br />
total height 220-240 cm.<br />
length of refractory bottom portion 50 cm.<br />
Tests of the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the RFD-3 model (based on the standard method<br />
previously described) are as shown in Table 7.5.<br />
Table 7.5 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-3<br />
Rice husk Average burning Time to boil HU % Remarks<br />
<strong>use</strong>, gm rate, gm/min min<br />
142 2,830 61.5 16 10.0 Operated at the<br />
143 2,930 65.1 15 10.5 chimney height<br />
146 3,300 68.8 18 9.4 of 220 cm.<br />
151 3,310 66.2 20 11.6<br />
152 3,330 62.8 23 10.7<br />
average 3,140 64.9 18.4 10.4<br />
From Table 7.5 the heat utilization efficiency of the RFD-3 reached an<br />
average of 10.4%. This increase was quite considerable when compared with<br />
the original commercial models in Table 5.9 (where HU was only 4.2 - 7.1%).<br />
The time to boil <strong>for</strong> commercial <strong>stove</strong>s without any modifications ranged from<br />
18.5 - 27.0 minutes and averaged 22.4 minutes. The RFD-3 per<strong>for</strong>mance in this<br />
respect (average 18.4 min) is quite satisfactory. The fuel consumption of<br />
the commercial models ranging from 65.6 - 160.7 gm/min (with a mean of<br />
108.0 gm/min) was considerably higher than the RFD-3 <strong>stove</strong> which consumes<br />
only 64.9 gm/min.<br />
Regarding the <strong>stove</strong> cracking problem, the inside insulation lining using<br />
an inexpensive rice husk ash-clay mixture has proven to be very effective<br />
and also serves the purpose of fitting a particular size of pot to the <strong>stove</strong><br />
well. This insulation application (including some repairs later) should be<br />
done by <strong>use</strong>rs, however.<br />
The reception of the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> in certain areas of<br />
Central and Northeastern Thailand is, at present, quite good though still<br />
not as popular as charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s. Based on trial promotions, many<br />
groups of village people seem to accept the RFD-3 readily and claim that<br />
its construction cost of 200 baht (excluding the chimney) is much cheaper<br />
than the price of commercial models.<br />
Fig. 7.12 shows the RFD-3 <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> from actual<br />
production by one rice husk <strong>stove</strong> manufacturer at Rangsit, Phatumtani Province.<br />
. .. . " 191
P9 0<br />
Figure 7.12<br />
re.,o s<br />
a b<br />
Improved rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, the "RFD-3" model:<br />
a) an example of installation during a demonstration with<br />
inside insulation <strong>for</strong> 24 cm pot diameter, two portions of<br />
chimney, a refractory at bottom and an ordinary drain pipe<br />
at top; b) cement cast body with uninsulated firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er,<br />
flue gas exit hole and tunnel, sloping iron-grate and ash<br />
removal port under; c) side view with sleeves and hole to<br />
reduce its weight.<br />
193
Chapter 8<br />
Improved Stove Designs and Production<br />
i 7(
IMPROVED STOVE DESIGNS AND PRODUCTION<br />
The design and construction of a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> are critical. Factors<br />
that influence <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance must be fully recognized. In producing a<br />
<strong>stove</strong>, there<strong>for</strong>e, the technical drawings, the construction instructions and<br />
the methods <strong>for</strong> mass production should be closely followed.<br />
A. TECHNICAL DRAWINGS OF IMPROVED STOVES<br />
Figs. 8.1 - 8.4 are the drawings of the 4 <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models<br />
developed within the framework of this study. They are the charcoal bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong>, the non-Thimney wood <strong>stove</strong>, the non-chimney rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, and the<br />
chimney rice husk .tove.<br />
B. CONSTRUCTION 7NSTRUCTIONS<br />
In producing efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (which will be <strong>use</strong>d daily <strong>for</strong> at<br />
least 1,000 hours a year) long-term service and durability must be taken into<br />
account. In order to construct such a <strong>stove</strong>, the clay body must be chosen<br />
carefully, <strong>for</strong>med properly and dried and fired under the correct conditions.<br />
Further, the grate, the bucket, and the insulation must be fabricated and put<br />
together correctly. And, finally, the <strong>stove</strong> must be inspected <strong>for</strong> quality<br />
control at various stages in its production.<br />
Clay Material <strong>for</strong> Pottery Lined Stoves<br />
A refractory clay body must be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production since<br />
the operating temperature (particularly of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>) can reach<br />
1,000 - 1,200 0 C. The project investigated a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of clay bodies and found<br />
a refractory clay body very suitable <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong> production<br />
in the Panomprai district, province of Roi-et. Local artisans have been<br />
using this kind of clay <strong>for</strong> limited wood <strong>stove</strong> production <strong>for</strong> at least one<br />
generation. The dark brown sedimentary clay from the central lowlands that<br />
is widely <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery production is un<strong>for</strong>tunately not<br />
refractory. A <strong>stove</strong> made from this kind of material will normally crack<br />
the first or second time it is <strong>use</strong>d beca<strong>use</strong> of thermal shock. Further<br />
operation will ca<strong>use</strong> further degradation. Refractory clay bodies require<br />
a high alumina content as well as some amount of iron oxide to facilitate<br />
a lower firing temperature. Silica, a major component of the clay body that<br />
gives strength to the final fired-product, must also be present in the proper<br />
proportion to the alumina & iron oxide. Weight loss after firing indicates<br />
the presence of organic or humus matter in the clay body. (The humus matter<br />
creates the porosity necessary in the final product thac improves the <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />
insulating properties and makes it light weight.) However, too much organic<br />
matter will greatly reduce plasticity and the handling strength of the wet<br />
19b
clay during <strong>for</strong>ming. Table 8.1 shows compositions and fire-resistant<br />
properties of some local clay materials <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery<br />
manufacturing.<br />
Clay Preparation<br />
Since the project mainly <strong>use</strong>d clay <strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production from<br />
the source at Roi-et, the following discussion covers only this clay type;<br />
however, tie in<strong>for</strong>mation is applicable to the preparation of clay <strong>for</strong> making<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s in other situations, given that a properly refractory clay body has<br />
been found.<br />
The dried clay raw material was soaked with water in a pit and left<br />
standing fo. at least 12 hours. After 12 hutirs the wet clay was separated<br />
into two parts (2 and J). Two-thirds would be <strong>use</strong>d later as a main mix.<br />
One-third was further mixed with an equal volume of fresh rice husk and hand<br />
<strong>for</strong>med into biscuits. After air drying, these biscuits were open fired with<br />
fuelwood <strong>for</strong> 6-12 hours until all pieces were evenly baked. The baked<br />
biscuits were pounded into small granules (with the bigger size not more than<br />
1 mm in diameter). The prepared substance (or so-called "caking powder") was<br />
added to the main mix (two-thirds of the original clay) previously set aside.<br />
These two components were then mixed as thoroughly as possible with enough<br />
water added to ensure that the wet clay mixture would retain its shape during<br />
<strong>for</strong>ming and/or throwing.<br />
Forming the Stove from Wet Clay<br />
In practice, <strong>for</strong>ming a <strong>stove</strong> from clay is carried out using three<br />
different methods as follows:<br />
Using of potter'L wheel and external mold<br />
Using a potter's wheel with an external mold is the most popular method<br />
<strong>use</strong>d in bucket <strong>stove</strong> making, particularly in !Xntral Thailand in areas such<br />
as Rajaburi, Nakorn Pathom, Pathumthani, and Chachoengsao. The clay is quite<br />
soft and can be <strong>for</strong>med easily on the potter's wheel with an external mold<br />
acting as a restraint shell. This method, at present, gives the highest<br />
production rate but yields poor accuracy of the critical inside dimensions<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is not a suitable method <strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />
production.<br />
Using of wooden spatter and hand foming<br />
The wooden spatter and hand <strong>for</strong>ming method is still practiced by Panomprai<br />
<strong>stove</strong> makers. By hand, the potters <strong>for</strong>m the hard clay into the ihape of.the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> desired. Thereafter, a wooden spatter is <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> beating around the<br />
outer surface to ensure final integrity and strength. This method is<br />
considered a very poor method <strong>for</strong> commercial Troduction since the production<br />
rate is low and there is poor control of the <strong>stove</strong>'s dimensions.<br />
198
Table 8.1<br />
Compositions and fired resistant property of some local clay materials <strong>use</strong>d<br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery productions<br />
Clay source and/or Major clay composition % Fire resistance<br />
mixture Loss on SiO 2 Al203 Fe203 Others 0C<br />
ignition<br />
1. Pano,,prai Roi-et, an original 9.8 61.5 24.5 2.4 1.8 1632<br />
raw material sample<br />
2. Panomprai Roi-et. a final 8.6 61.7 23.8 2.6 3.3 1621<br />
mixture sample prior to<br />
throwing<br />
3. Banmor Mahasarakarm, a river 6.2 77.4 11.9 2.0 2.5 1501<br />
bed sample<br />
4. Pakred Nondhaburi, a dark 8.9 59.0 19.2 6.9 6.0 na<br />
brown central lowland sample<br />
5. Pakplee Prachinburi. a white 12.3 56.1 25.9 3.0 2.7 na<br />
clay or kaolin sample<br />
Source: Clay samples no. 1-3 wece analyzed and tested by Department of Science Service, Ministry of<br />
Science Technology and Energy.<br />
Data on compositions of clay samples no. 4 and 5 were obtained from Industrial Service<br />
Division, Department of Industrial Promotion, Ministry of Industry.
Using the internal mold in cooperation with a potter's'wheel and spatter<br />
Using an internal mold, a potter's wheel and spatter was a method<br />
developed by project personnel as a co<strong>mb</strong>ined technique to improve the above<br />
two methods and control the <strong>stove</strong>'s internal dimensions, integrity, and<br />
provide a reasonable production rate. A detailed production process is<br />
shown in the following photographs (Figs. 8.5 - 8.8). After the Pranomprai<br />
<strong>stove</strong> makers were trained briefly in this production method, the production<br />
rate, precision and <strong>stove</strong> quality greatly <strong>improved</strong>. Using this technique<br />
more than 3,500 charccal and wood pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s were produced in<br />
three months (<strong>for</strong> the project's initial dissemination) employing four molds<br />
and eight workers from four families.<br />
Stove Drying<br />
Stoves newly <strong>for</strong>med from wet clay require shaded air drying <strong>for</strong> several<br />
days (approximately 3 - 5 days in the dry season and 10 - 12 days in the<br />
rainy season). During this drying stage, the clay <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong>m will shrink.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, care should be taken to ensure uni<strong>for</strong>m and gradual drying to avoid<br />
<strong>stove</strong> distortion and/or cracking. When the clay <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong>m has become<br />
"leather hard" it can be placed in the sun <strong>for</strong> a final i - 2 days of drying.<br />
Stove Firing<br />
After <strong>stove</strong>s have been properly dried in both stages, a quality check<br />
must be per<strong>for</strong>med. Stoves with severe defects such as cracking, distortion,<br />
and dimension discrepancies (due to excessive shrinkage) will be rejected.<br />
(The clay can be re-wet <strong>for</strong> r6jse as raw material in another batch.) Firing<br />
of <strong>stove</strong>s is carried out in an old-fashioned manner. Local <strong>stove</strong> makers<br />
employ an open-firing technique. Open-firing requires that a level ground<br />
area of 8 - 10 sq meters be laid with dried rice straw approximaterly 3 - 4 cm<br />
thick. Dried firewood sticks (approximately diameter 3 - 4 cm) are placed<br />
horizontally as the first layer on the straw bed. Then the second layer of<br />
firewood (slightly larger in size, approximately 5 - 10 cm) is horizontally<br />
stacked on top, with the length perpendicular to each other. Altogether,<br />
3 - 5 layers of firewood are required to make the pile approximately 40 cm<br />
high. The amount of firewood required <strong>for</strong> this size of a pile is 700-800 kg<br />
(at 12 - 15% wood moisture content). This pile will accommodate 100 <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
per firing.<br />
Stoves to be fired are carefully placed on the firewood pile as close<br />
to each other as nossible in one single layer. The rice straw around the<br />
pile is then ignite.- After the first layer of firewood starts catching<br />
fire, the operator will throw rice straw on top and around the pile, As the<br />
straw keeps on burning it will release heat and provide insulation to the<br />
top and sides of the <strong>stove</strong> pile. The firewood inside will continue burning<br />
<strong>for</strong> approximately 2 - 4 hours. Then the pile will be left alone <strong>for</strong> self<br />
curing and cooling <strong>for</strong> 12 - 15 hours more. Stoves are normally unloaded<br />
from the pile the following day.<br />
200
Figure T.ec ica) aing of te Io<br />
U-<br />
L sJr4LY4:4<br />
S---..I<br />
K'~~~S<br />
I iiI . . . . .<br />
-A i~IT<br />
,/' U,.,, ': 1 -'"... r _ . . 2-<br />
0<br />
'- - -....... - 4<br />
Figure 8.1 Technical Drawing of the Improved Charcoal Stove
\Ix FL 1 '1-,<br />
4LI7I7f-4771<br />
* . --<br />
SegK SODY VaW) A '4t <br />
.<br />
0 •<br />
000 0<br />
00u0t 4444<br />
I *<br />
I--..'-4--<br />
... .<br />
- iwF-bi<br />
GRA'rE S'"I<br />
8.2 1 ISO 11fm11S<br />
Figure 8.2 Technical Drawing of the Improved Wood Stove
-a0G 0----* - -<br />
&.<br />
-------- , -.<br />
_ _ _ _/<br />
- . I I,<br />
-itl<br />
lioi i1<br />
*,.1<br />
Figure 8.3 Technical Drawing of Improved Rice Husk Non-chimney Stove<br />
RK FOeS1 .- Th oo<br />
.en-
41<br />
. ..<br />
1Iihrn:tR,-', -<br />
K,, --gnu4<br />
. . eI<br />
,1,4 i__O/ -<br />
Figure 8.4 Technical Drawing of Improved Rice Husk Stove with Chimney
Figure 8.5 Preparation of biscuits and firing to be later <strong>use</strong>d<br />
<strong>for</strong> clay mixture.<br />
Figure 8.6 Production of charcoal <strong>stove</strong> on the potter's wheel<br />
using the internal mold.<br />
205
Figure 8.7 Disasse<strong>mb</strong>ling of the internal mold from a newly made<br />
charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Figure 8.8 Improved charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s after finished<br />
firing and ready <strong>for</strong> further fabrication.<br />
206<br />
k.
Stove's Quality Inspection<br />
Even when firing is carried out by experienced local <strong>stove</strong> makers, some<br />
defects may occur due to non-uni<strong>for</strong>m heat and cooling at certain spots in<br />
the pile. The final inspection will reject the <strong>stove</strong>s that are underfired,<br />
cracked and distorted. Normally, however, our results show a rejection of<br />
less than 7%.<br />
Stove's Grate Making<br />
Pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s, as well as charcoal wood <strong>stove</strong>s, need grates <strong>for</strong><br />
efficient co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. However, the design <strong>for</strong> each is slightly different.<br />
See their detailed dimensions in Figs. 8.1, 8.2, 8.9. The clay composition <strong>use</strong>d<br />
<strong>for</strong> making the grate is different from the clay mixture <strong>use</strong>d to make the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> body. The rice husk ash content is higher in the grate body to reduce<br />
shrinkage during production and to enable the grate to withstand high thermal<br />
stress during <strong>use</strong>.<br />
The normal composition of a thick charcoal grate is approximately 2-parts<br />
clay to 3-parts refined white rice husk ash by volume. The grate is hand<strong>for</strong>med<br />
in a ringed-mold and hand-punched by a tapered tube with the help of<br />
a hole template. After air drying <strong>for</strong> approximately 15 days, this type of<br />
grate need not be fired since it becomes cured during <strong>use</strong> and has enough<br />
initial strength to withstand a charcoal load.<br />
A wood <strong>stove</strong> grate, on the other hand, is thinner and larger in diameter.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, prior to <strong>use</strong>, it must be fired first to become strong. In<br />
addition, a wood <strong>stove</strong> grate is made with a rougher clay body 1-part clay<br />
body and 3 parts black rice husk ash (which has not been refined and/or<br />
sieved).<br />
Stove Bucket Making<br />
Long term servicability and heat conservation within the <strong>stove</strong> rely<br />
heavily on the outside bucket. A good bucket is designed to fit the <strong>stove</strong><br />
properly, so that the gap <strong>for</strong> packing the insulation between the <strong>stove</strong> and<br />
the bucket is 1.5-2.0 cm around the tapered wall. The bucket height will be<br />
0.5 cm shorter than that of the <strong>stove</strong> to facilitate insulation filling and<br />
sealing with cement. A standard galvanized iron sheet of 0.3 mm gauge is<br />
considered the suitable size <strong>for</strong> the prototype <strong>stove</strong>. This material can<br />
withstand the alkalinity of rice husk ash insulating material reasonably<br />
weli; it can withstand external rusting due to moisture and other factors.<br />
A handle is an essential part of the bucket and must be able to withstand<br />
the normal <strong>stove</strong> weight of 10 - 12 kg in long-term service. A good quality<br />
bucket can be ordered in quantity (and there<strong>for</strong>e at less cost) from a water<br />
bucket manufacturing plant.<br />
207
35-40 MM<br />
Figure 8.9 Grate hole design <strong>for</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong> hole<br />
6<br />
170<br />
diameter 1.3 cm.,with 61 holes in 5 shells<br />
around the center hole.<br />
208
Stove Fabrication<br />
Essentially, pottery lined <strong>stove</strong>s (wood and charcoal) consist of four<br />
separate components as follows:<br />
" The fired clay body;<br />
" The grate;<br />
* The bucket; and<br />
* The refractory and insulation linings.<br />
The composition of material <strong>for</strong> the interior refractory lining is 5 - 6<br />
parts common rice husk ash and one-part clay. That <strong>for</strong> exterior insulation<br />
lining is 12-parts ash and 1-part clay. Both must be thoroughly mixed.<br />
The fabrication is completed by first pouring the insulati.ca mix into<br />
the bucket bottom (about 1.5 cm). The <strong>stove</strong> body is then positioned inside<br />
the bucket. More insulation mix is added to the gap and then is tightly<br />
packed inside the gap between the <strong>stove</strong> body and the bucket. The <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />
top rim and the edge around the air inlet door are then sealed off-by cement<br />
mortar (3 parts fine sand and 1 part Portland cement). The grate is then<br />
positioned and fixed with refractory mix inside the <strong>stove</strong> body in such a way<br />
that the bottom edge of the grate is in line with the upper rim of the air<br />
inlet door. Finally, the refractory mix is lined around the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
approximately 1 cm thick to seql the edge between the grate and the <strong>stove</strong><br />
body. The whole <strong>stove</strong> is thun aiL-dried <strong>for</strong> at least 24 hours be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>use</strong> to<br />
avoid cracking of the refractory lining.<br />
C. A MASS PRODUCTION SCHEME TO MAKE CHARCOAL AND<br />
WOOD STOVES USING THE HYDRAULIC PRESS<br />
In the section on "Forming the Stove From Wet Clay" three <strong>for</strong>ming methods<br />
were discussed. However, these methods cannot meet the <strong>stove</strong> production<br />
criteria of high production rate, precision of internal and external <strong>stove</strong><br />
dimensions, and high uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong>ming pressure of hard clay to withstand high<br />
thermal stresses. In order to meet all three requirements, it is envisaged<br />
that a hydraulic press with an internal mold and an external mold would<br />
provide a better method <strong>for</strong> long-term commercial production. The need <strong>for</strong><br />
this kind of simple equipment <strong>for</strong> local production cannot be overemphasized<br />
if the "<strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion program" hopes to see the quick replacement<br />
of 5 - 6 million poor charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s throughout rural Thailand.<br />
The prototype of such a hydraulic press in <strong>for</strong>ming the clay bucket<br />
(includif.g molds) has been designed and individual parts have been made.<br />
Fabrication and testing of this machine are underway at the present tf-e.<br />
It is hoped that this device will work out well and out-per<strong>for</strong>m those <strong>stove</strong><br />
manufacturing techniques presently employed in Thailand. A detailed sketch<br />
of the hydraulic press <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> molding is shown in Fig. 8.10.<br />
209
20<br />
Figure 8.10 100-ton Hydraulic Automatic Press-<br />
Machine <strong>for</strong> Charcoal and Wood Stove. SCALE 1-5<br />
210<br />
B.SRISOM<br />
JANUARY 84
Chapter 9<br />
Improved Stove Promotion
IMPROVED STOVE PROMOTION<br />
Laboratory research and development df highly efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong><br />
<strong>stove</strong>s were carried out <strong>for</strong> approximately 2 years. As a result, four types<br />
of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s were proposed <strong>for</strong> trial promotion. They<br />
were the: charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the wood <strong>stove</strong> without a chimney, and the<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with and without a ch:nney. The four <strong>improved</strong> types gave<br />
satisfactory per<strong>for</strong>mance. Tneir absolute efficiencies increased approximately<br />
5 - 7% on the average. Furthermore, per<strong>for</strong>mance tests on durability (long<br />
service life), ease of opetation (easy to start up the fire and continuously<br />
give high heat output with equal or little attendance), accommodation of<br />
various pot sizes (one <strong>stove</strong> fits pot diameter from 16 to 32 cm), and<br />
portability (light weight) were satisfactory. Only the wood <strong>stove</strong> with a<br />
chimney requires further improvement of efficiency and to accommodate a<br />
variety of pot s:izes.<br />
Any problems that arise during <strong>stove</strong> development can usually be solved<br />
in the 'aboratory. However, problems dealing with the introduction of the<br />
newly developed <strong>stove</strong>s to <strong>use</strong>rs need to be solved in the field. Stove<br />
promotion is a most important project task. The work involved in research<br />
and development will have been wasted if <strong>improved</strong> models are not accepted<br />
by <strong>use</strong>rs. Hence,the promotion of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is one of the main<br />
concerns of this project.<br />
This chapter presents some activities and field work involved in<br />
introducing <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s to rural families.<br />
A. OVERALL TARGET OF STOVE PROMOTION<br />
The population of Thailand is approximately 50 million. The avcrage<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er persons in a family is 6 persons. Approximately 80% of Thai families<br />
live in rural areas. Thus, there are roughly 6 million <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
<strong>use</strong>d by rural families. This presumes that each family has only one <strong>cooking</strong><br />
scove. (In fact, a large nu<strong>mb</strong>er of rural families have 2 - 3 <strong>stove</strong>s in their<br />
possession). The main problem of promotion then becomes how to get all of the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s replaced within a certain time frame. If Thailand were to replace<br />
all 6 million Inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s within say, 5 years, approximately 1.25<br />
million <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s must be produced. The activity involved in<br />
producing this many <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is tremendous. It is not possible <strong>for</strong><br />
a government agency to carry on such a heavy task alone. Stove manufacturers<br />
throughout the country must be involved in the production process. However,<br />
to begin this implementation program, the government must initiate and<br />
stimulate <strong>stove</strong> promotion activities so that <strong>stove</strong> replacement time will be<br />
shortened.<br />
This project had only 6 months to begin the campaign. Stove promotion<br />
and training schedules have been established. There are two projects under<br />
the same component leader: Charcoal Improvement and Stove Improvement.<br />
, ... . . 2 13
There<strong>for</strong>e, both projects have been co<strong>mb</strong>ined into one promotional campaign.<br />
Each promotion activity generally takes 5 - 10 days. Improved <strong>stove</strong>s are<br />
introduced during the first 1 - 2 days and charcoal production is demonstrated<br />
during the remaining time. The subjects present in the promotion activity<br />
depend on the level of education and the capability of participants. For<br />
representatives of government agencies and rural development associations,<br />
promotion activity elaborates both theoretical and practical details (since<br />
this group is more knowledgeable and is directly responsible <strong>for</strong> carrying out<br />
this development program in rural areas). Another group of participants<br />
consists of people who live in the villages. Hence, the promotion activity<br />
is less technical, and emphasizes only the practical, specific features of<br />
good <strong>stove</strong>s and their proper care. A prepared time-schedule <strong>for</strong> promotion<br />
activities is presented below:<br />
1. The first trial promotion of the charcoal and <strong>stove</strong> improvement projects.<br />
Place: Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />
Development<br />
Muang District, Mahasarakarm,.Northeastern<br />
Date: 9 - 16 Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 1983<br />
2. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>-the<br />
first official training course <strong>for</strong> government and rural development<br />
agencies.<br />
Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />
Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />
Date: 9 - 20 January 1984<br />
3. Improved production of charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />
rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers and officials of the<br />
Mobile Military Development Unit.<br />
Place: Mobile Military Development Unit #32<br />
Pannanikorm District, Sakolnakorn, Northeastern<br />
Date: 1 - 11 February 1984<br />
4. Improved ?roductionof charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />
rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />
Place: Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />
Development<br />
Muang District, Pitsanulok, Northern<br />
Date: 5 - 9 March 1984<br />
5. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
to rural families--the second official training course <strong>for</strong> Government<br />
and Rural Development agencies.<br />
Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />
Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />
Date: 13 - 23 March 1984<br />
214
6. Improved produntion of charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
to rural families--a trainig course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />
Place: Khao Hin Sorn<br />
Educational Development Center,<br />
(under H.M. the King's direction)<br />
Panomsarakarm District, Chachoengsoa<br />
Date: 16 - 20 April 1984<br />
7. Improved production of charcoa:. and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />
rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />
Place: Ban Thatoom Secondary School<br />
Muang District, Maharasakarm, Northeastern<br />
Date: 30 April - 4 May 1984<br />
8. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
to rural families--the third official training course <strong>for</strong> the Mobile<br />
Military Development Unit.<br />
Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />
Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />
Date: 14 - 25 May 1984<br />
9. Improved production of charcoal and introduction<br />
to<br />
of<br />
rural<br />
developed<br />
families--a<br />
<strong>stove</strong><br />
training course at the Mobile Military Development<br />
Unit.<br />
Place: Mobile Military Development Unit #22<br />
Poa District, Nan, Northern<br />
Date: 3 - 10 June 1984<br />
To achieve this project goal, it must be<br />
of<br />
emphasized<br />
newly developed<br />
that the<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s<br />
promotion<br />
is not just to distribute<br />
variety<br />
the <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
of aspects<br />
to <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
must<br />
A<br />
be considered. For<br />
fabrication,<br />
example, <strong>stove</strong><br />
repair<br />
production,<br />
and maintenance,<br />
<strong>stove</strong><br />
and criteria<br />
from<br />
<strong>for</strong><br />
the<br />
selection<br />
markets<br />
of<br />
should<br />
good<br />
be<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s<br />
included in promotional<br />
of this field<br />
workshops.<br />
work is,<br />
The<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
intention<br />
to educate <strong>use</strong>rs on<br />
well.<br />
the above<br />
In fact,<br />
subjects<br />
trainees<br />
as<br />
are required to participate<br />
They<br />
in<br />
install<br />
<strong>stove</strong> fabrication.<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> grate, prepare insulating<br />
refractory<br />
materials,<br />
part,<br />
line the<br />
fill<br />
inside<br />
the <strong>stove</strong> bucket with insulation<br />
rim. Overall<br />
and seal<br />
promotional<br />
the <strong>stove</strong><br />
activities are summarized in the subsequent section.<br />
B. CREATION OF PUBLIC AWARENESS<br />
In order to distribute 1.25 million <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s to rural families<br />
throughout the country (in additioi, to promotional activities carried out<br />
by this project), the government must step in to initiate various kinds of<br />
campaigns such as press conferences, radio interviews, distribution of<br />
leaflets and posters, etc.<br />
The first introduction of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (and related subjects) to the<br />
public was conducted by the National Energy Authority on 3 - 4 August 1983.<br />
Cooperating closely with the Stove Improvement Project, the meeting included<br />
215
a seminar, demonstration, and exhibition of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. The participants<br />
consisted of representatives from government institutions such as universities,<br />
the Agricultural Department, the Rural Development Department, the Welfare<br />
and the private sector such as<br />
Department, the Ministry of Education, etc.,<br />
the Population and Social Development Assoication, VITA company, Appropriate<br />
Technology Association, and a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers, etc. The purpose<br />
of this campaign was to bring together the researchers, <strong>use</strong>rs, and<br />
manufacturers to join in a panel discussion in order to share points of view<br />
on several aspects of the project such as standard methods of <strong>stove</strong> testing,<br />
special features of highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s, experience in <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing,<br />
marketing, and quality control.<br />
Another promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t was the press conference on newly dereloped<br />
<strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s which was held in February 1984 at the Ministry of<br />
Science and Technology. Representatives from radio and television stations<br />
the meeting.<br />
and representatives from various newspapers were invited to<br />
a <strong>use</strong>r's guide on <strong>stove</strong> maintenance<br />
Leaflets, posters, T-shirts as well as<br />
and repairs were distributed.<br />
It should be emphasized that the work involved in promoting <strong>improved</strong><br />
<strong>stove</strong>s to <strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers is extensive and should be continued with<br />
the support of various government agencies.<br />
C. INTRODUCTION/TRAINING ON EFFICIENT STOVES<br />
<strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> local rural develoment<br />
The introduction/training on<br />
officials, school teachers, village leaders, etc. has been carried out<br />
The training<br />
following the program described in section A of this chapter.<br />
activities include:<br />
1. Instruction on the five proposed types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s on the<br />
fundamentals of <strong>stove</strong> design and construction (see Fig. 9.1);<br />
2. Efficiency test comparison between the developed <strong>stove</strong>s and the currently<br />
marketed <strong>stove</strong>s (see Fig. 9.2);<br />
3. Demonstration and trainee participation in installing the grate into the<br />
<strong>stove</strong> body, lining refractory material around the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, and<br />
placing the insulating materials between the bucket and the <strong>stove</strong> body, etc.<br />
(see Fig. 9.3)/ and<br />
4. Distribution of the finished <strong>stove</strong>s (fabricated by traii. ;s)to those<br />
who have participated in building their own selected <strong>stove</strong>s (see Fig. 9.4).<br />
The training activities are discussed in the following section.<br />
216
Table 9.1 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial staves in<br />
Mahasarakarm<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> Chimneyed rice husk Nonchimneyed rice husk<br />
developed comm. I comm. 2 developed comm. developed developed<br />
(pranomprai)<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,520 1,490 3,800 3,070<br />
Half time to boil (64'C), min 9 14 17 7 9 9 14<br />
Time to boil, min 17 27 27 12 14 29 22<br />
Water evaporated, gin 810 420 450 1,310 1,210 1,400 1,160<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 60 40 40 25;5701 45;330 550 1,050<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gmn 340 360 360 950 1,160 3,250 2,020<br />
Efficiency, % 31.01 20.59 21.27 24.90 19.90 9.60 13.67<br />
Note: 1. Charcoal remaining; wood remaining
The First Promotion Trial <strong>for</strong> the Charcoal and Stove Improvement<br />
Projects, 9 - 16 Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 1984, Muang District, Mahasarakarm<br />
The purpose of this trial was to provide the trainers with experience<br />
in <strong>stove</strong> promotion training. There were 35 trainees, they included:<br />
5 Officers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />
Development<br />
2 Officers from Lhe NEA Training Center<br />
4 Promotors and researcherl<br />
4 District agriculture offirs<br />
2 Sub-district development officers<br />
15 Village leaders<br />
2 Primary school teachers<br />
1 Public health reporter<br />
The training program consisted of the four activities described at the<br />
beginning of this section. The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong><br />
charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> and the commercial<br />
ones are shown in Table 9.1.<br />
Thirty-two questionnaires were distributed to the trainees after the end<br />
of the program. The results are summarized below.<br />
Within this district in Mahasarakarm, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> was the<br />
most popular <strong>stove</strong> type. The non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, the chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>, the non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, and the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />
were less popular--in that order. 93% of the trainees said they knew more<br />
about the specific features of the highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s as well as criteria<br />
<strong>for</strong> selecting good <strong>stove</strong>s after the training. 56% of the trainees increased<br />
their knowledge of building and designing good <strong>stove</strong>s. 84% of the trainees<br />
felt they had a better understanding of <strong>stove</strong> care and maintenance. However,<br />
only 50% of the trainees said they could transfer this training to others.<br />
Responding to length of training, 66% said the timing was convenient and the<br />
length of training was adequate. Other comments were personal that additional<br />
training on the method of making the.developed <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong> was needed; more<br />
promotion and distribution of <strong>stove</strong> samples to other villages, more training<br />
should be offered to other private and government agencies as well as to<br />
interested outsiders; and there was a request <strong>for</strong> construction blueprints of<br />
the five developed <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 9 20 January 1984<br />
The <strong>stove</strong> promotion workshop in Saraburi was the first official training<br />
course and the opening of the Charcoal Research Center. The ceremony was<br />
witnessed by the following representatives:<br />
1 Representative from the National Energy Administration<br />
4 Chief engineers and officers from USAID office, Thailand<br />
2 Representatives from Food and Agriculture Organization, Asia and Pacific<br />
Region<br />
218
2 Representatives from the Forestry Department<br />
1 Representative from Kasetsart University<br />
1 Chief of a biogas development project<br />
1 Chief of a renewable energy project, from the support office<br />
2 Representatives from the Regional Forestry Office, Saraburi<br />
1 Representative from the Provincial Forest Office, Saraburi<br />
The trainees consist of:<br />
5 NEA officers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />
2 Training officers from the National Security High Command<br />
4 Field officers from the Community Development Department<br />
2 Field officers from the Family Planning and Population Development<br />
Association<br />
2 Field officers from the Land Development Department<br />
The <strong>for</strong>mal training program was carried out as outlined in the beginning<br />
of this section. The charcoal <strong>stove</strong> comparison was per<strong>for</strong>med and the results<br />
are shown in Table 9.2.<br />
Since this training program was devoted mainly to charcoal production,<br />
<strong>stove</strong> promotion was only minimally presented to participants. Only the <strong>stove</strong><br />
charcoal <strong>stove</strong> comparison was demonstrated. See Table 9.2.<br />
No <strong>stove</strong> questionnaires were distributed<br />
Table 9.2<br />
Comparison Test <strong>for</strong> Efficiency<br />
between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />
Condition Charcoal Stove<br />
Developed Rangsit Cholburi Boobparam<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 400<br />
Half time to boil (64*C), min 11 12 13 14<br />
Time to boil, min 17 24 27 31<br />
Water evaporated, gm 790 450 410 400<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 40 35 45 35<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 365 355 365<br />
Efficiency, % 29.16 21.40 20.48 19.73<br />
'219
Stove Promotion in Sakolnakorn on 1 - 11 February 1984<br />
The participants consisted of:<br />
17 Training personnel from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />
5 Officers from the District Development Section<br />
1 Teacher from the Nonroau school<br />
3 Village leaders<br />
19 Villagers<br />
The training program was conducted as previously described. The results<br />
of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison between the developed models and the commercial <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
are shown in Table 9.3.<br />
The results were obtained from 45 questionnaires, From analysis of the<br />
questionnaire responses, the following can be concluded.<br />
Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s made up 68% of all <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d by the trainees<br />
at home. Within this region, 56% of rural families <strong>use</strong>d the non-chimneyed<br />
type. 88% of the trainees believed that they had learned more about the<br />
criteria <strong>for</strong> selection of good <strong>stove</strong>s by the end.of the training. 94% of the<br />
trainees <strong>improved</strong> their knowledge on proper care and maintenance of <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
All participants (100%) agreed that the developed <strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>med better<br />
than the commercial ones.<br />
33% of the trainees preferred the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, 32% preferred<br />
the non-chimnened wood <strong>stove</strong>, 19% preferred the non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>,<br />
and 16% preferred the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
At the end of trainiL.g, each participant received a <strong>stove</strong>. The<br />
nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong>s distributed: 43 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 27 non-chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, 4 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, and 15 chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Out of the total nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong> distributed, 45 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to villagers,<br />
2 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to a youth group from Moungkai village, and 42 <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
were given to the Mobile Military Development Unit.<br />
Stove Promotion in Pitsanulok, 5 - 9 March 1984<br />
The Pitsanulok training was held at the Regional Energy and Technology<br />
Center. There were 33 participants involved; they are:<br />
5 Officers and workers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />
4 Lecturers from the Educational College and teachers from the primary<br />
school<br />
9 Sub-district senior personnel and assistants, village assistants and<br />
leaders of village committees<br />
14 Farmers and people from the region<br />
The results of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> model and<br />
the commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.4.<br />
220
Table 9.3<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Sakolnakorn<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> Chimneyed rice husk<br />
developed commercial developed commercial 1 commercial 2 commercial 3 developed<br />
Charcoal wt, gm 400 400 1,100 1,050 2,275 1,240 2,800<br />
Time to boil, min 22 -1 14 15 22 31 19<br />
Water evaporated,<br />
gm 640 110 1,240 1,140 950 600 1,440<br />
Fuel remaining,<br />
gm 45 25 40;2302 25;0 265;170 50;365 300<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 355 375 870 1,050 2,105 865 2,500<br />
Efficiency, % 29.2 14.7 12.7<br />
Note: i. not boil (windy on the test day)<br />
2. charcoal remaining; wood remaining
The results of training are summarized below. The basic in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
on the type of <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d among the trainee's families revealed that 75%<br />
had: charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 8% had non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s ana 17% had<br />
chimneyed and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s. 97% of the trainees chose<br />
the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> as their preferred model. 38% chose the non-chimneyed<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong> as their second preference. All trainees gained confidence in<br />
their knowledge of how to select good <strong>stove</strong>. 50% of the participants were<br />
in favor of the present desing and the other 50% preferred the new design.<br />
All trainees agreed that they better understood <strong>stove</strong> care and maintenance.<br />
This training was highly successful. The trainees showed great interest<br />
and cooperated well during fabrication and discussion. At the end of each<br />
day, trainees gathered around the training site and discussed the problems<br />
that had arisen during the day. All 71 participants received a developed<br />
<strong>stove</strong>.<br />
Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 13 - 23 March 1984<br />
The March 1984 workshop was the second official training course at the<br />
Charcoal Research Center in Saraburi.<br />
A total of 11 persons from various government agencies and private<br />
associations participated in the <strong>stove</strong> promotion program. These included:<br />
3 Training officers from Military Central Security<br />
2 Workers from the Family Planning and Population Development Association<br />
4 Workers from Community Development Department<br />
1 Worker from the Land Development <strong>for</strong> Agriculture Division<br />
1 Worker from the Thai-German Center, Welfare Department, Lopburi<br />
The training course was carried out according to the program previously<br />
mentioned. The <strong>stove</strong> comparison <strong>for</strong> efficiency is shown in Table 9.5.<br />
Evoluation of this training from the responses on the returned<br />
questionnaires can be summarized as follows: 82% of the participants <strong>use</strong>d<br />
charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 18% <strong>use</strong>d gas <strong>stove</strong>s. All trainees (100%) said<br />
they had a better underscanding of the criteria <strong>for</strong> selecting a good <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
82% of the trainees (moderately) believed that they could transfer their<br />
<strong>stove</strong> knowledge to rural people.<br />
Stove Promotion in Chachoengsoa on 16 - 20 April 1984<br />
The training in Chachoengsop was set up at thu Khao Hin Sorn Educational<br />
Development Center under His Majesty the King's direction in Panomsarakarm<br />
district, Chachoengsoa Province. There were 36 participants; they included:<br />
6 Agricultural workers from th2 Land Development Division, Khao Hin Sorn<br />
Development Center<br />
2 Field officers from the Community Development Department, Khao Hin Sorn<br />
Development Center<br />
222
3 Field officers from the Forest Nursery Plant Center, Forestry Division<br />
9 Students from the Rachaburi Agricultural Institute, Rachaburi<br />
16 Villagers from Khao Hin Sorn region and nearby<br />
The results of comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> model and commercial<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.6.<br />
At the end of the training program, 34 questionnaires were distributed<br />
to participants. The results are presented below.<br />
The charcoal bucket was the most popular types of <strong>stove</strong>. 71% of the<br />
participants chose it as their preference. The other choices were non-chimneyed<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong>--18%, non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>--5%, chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>-<br />
3%, and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>--3%.<br />
All participants (100%) agreed that their knowledge about selecting highly<br />
efficient <strong>stove</strong>s had increased significantly. 977 -tated that their<br />
undersvanding of <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>, care, and maintenance .J also increased;41% of<br />
the participants have confidence in their ability to transfer their <strong>stove</strong><br />
knowledge to others. In addition, many participants requested more elaborate<br />
details <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> making.<br />
At the end of training, 24 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 9 non-chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s, and 4 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were given to participants.<br />
Another 18 <strong>stove</strong>s were donated to the Land Development Center, the Forest<br />
Nursery Center and representative students from the Agricultural Institute<br />
<strong>for</strong> future u in <strong>stove</strong> promotion activities.<br />
Stove Promotion in Mahasarakarm on 30 April - 4 May 1984<br />
56 people participated in this training:<br />
2 Teachers from Ban Thatoom school<br />
1 Teachers from Ban Dotangarm school<br />
1 Teacher from Ban Napangdonhi<br />
2 Offi ers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />
3 Village leaders<br />
1 Assistant village leader<br />
44 Villagers<br />
2 Observers from the External Educational Center<br />
The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s and the<br />
commercial ones are presented in Table 9.7.<br />
From the responses on the questionnaires, it was determined that 67% of<br />
the participants <strong>use</strong>d charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 29% <strong>use</strong>d non-chimneyed wood<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s at home. 73% preferred charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s while 21% preferred<br />
non-chimneyed woo.k <strong>stove</strong>s. 97% of the participants believed that their<br />
knowledge in selecting good <strong>stove</strong>s had increased, as had their ability to<br />
repair and maintain <strong>stove</strong>s in good condition. 50% believed that they<br />
could transfer this knowledge to other people. There were also many requests<br />
<strong>for</strong> complete instructions on how to make the <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> one's own <strong>use</strong>--starting<br />
223
from nothing. The training course only lets each participant place a<br />
pre-shaped and fired <strong>stove</strong> body into a bucket. He then places the geate,<br />
lines it with the refractory material, and fills it with insulating materials.<br />
This request is similar to other previous training course. However, the metilod<br />
of making <strong>stove</strong> body is rather complicated, time-consuming, and requires high<br />
skill; hence, this function needs to be per<strong>for</strong>med by <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers.<br />
Instead it was suggested that the participants take the <strong>stove</strong> samples to <strong>stove</strong><br />
manufacturers in their villages <strong>for</strong> trial production.<br />
There were altogether 137 <strong>stove</strong>s distributed at the end of training. 56<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s were given to participants, 81 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to Ban Thatoom school.<br />
The distributtA <strong>stove</strong>s included 80 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 50 non-chimneyed<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong>s, 5 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, and 2 chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 14 - 25 May 1984<br />
The May 1984 training took place at the Charcoal Research Center in<br />
Saraburi. There were 19 participants; they included:<br />
3 Military officers from the Central Security Division<br />
5 High-ranking military officers from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />
6 Noncommissioned officers from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />
5 Participants from the Regional and Voluntary Self-defense Association<br />
The results of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison are shown in Table 9.8.<br />
Questionnaire evaluation showed that 88% of the participants <strong>use</strong>d charcoal<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 6% <strong>use</strong>d gas <strong>stove</strong>s at home. Their increased ability to<br />
identity and seiect highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s was reported to be 94%. The ability<br />
of participants to transfer this training knowledge to other people was 50%,<br />
and the trainer's capability of interpretating and monitoring the <strong>stove</strong><br />
training course was 72%.<br />
At the end of the training program, participants received 19 newly<br />
developed charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
Improved Stove Promotion in Nan on 2 - 8 June, 1984<br />
This prnram was the last training course of the project. The training<br />
was coordinated by Colonel Dusit Menapothi, Chief of Training division, Central<br />
Security High Command and Special Colonel Padej Anwong, Commander of the<br />
Military Mobile Development Unit #22, Nan. There were 54 participants. They<br />
included:<br />
2 Training officers from the Military Mobile Development Unit #21, Uttaradit<br />
20 Training officers from the Military Mobile Development Unit #22, Nan<br />
4 Field officers from the Battalion Cavalry , Nan<br />
3 Workers from the external Education Center, Nan<br />
4 Noncommissioned officers<br />
21 Villagers<br />
224
Table 9.4<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Pitsanulok<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commerical<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 - -<br />
Time to boil, min 241 (17) _2 24 11 13<br />
Water evaporated, gm * 720 460 540 1,340 1,240<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 30 20 25 20 15<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 370 380 375 890 1,160<br />
Efficiency, % 29.5 22.1 24.5 26.8 19.1<br />
Note: 1. The value is somewhat higher due to trainees' lack of skill in lighting the fuel. The same test<br />
was repeated on the next day and a new time to boil was quoted in the parenthesis.<br />
2. Not boiling.
01<br />
Table 9.5<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Developed Commercial Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 - _<br />
Time to boil, min 19 23 20 27 18<br />
Water evaporated, gm 610 510 1,310 1,210 1,000<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 40 30 50 55 25<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 370 1,030 1,170 1,020<br />
Efficiency, % 28.4 24.5 23.8 19.7 19.2
Table 9.6<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Chachoengsoa<br />
Condition Charcoal Stove Nonchimneyed Wood Stove<br />
Developed Commercial Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400<br />
Time to boil, min 17 32 17 16 15<br />
Water evaporated, gm 620 410 1,130 1,100 1,250<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 40 45 55 50 50<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 355 820 920 1,210<br />
, Efficiency, % 26.33 21.64 24.86 21.75 18.0<br />
* Very windy condition during the test day<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-
Table 9.7<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,390 1,410 1,570<br />
Time to boil, min 24 26 _1 14 19 19<br />
Water evaporated, gm 560 480 60 1,260 960 1,140<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 65 65 110 505 720 635<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 335 335 290 885 690 935<br />
Efficiency, % 31.14 28.79 22.15 25.06 23.97 21.28
The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> models and the<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.9.<br />
54 questionnaires were returned. The. result are summarized below.<br />
The most popular type of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>r trainees was the charcoal<br />
bucket <strong>stove</strong>; <strong>use</strong>d them at home 68%. The next popular type was the nonchimneyed<br />
wood <strong>stove</strong> accounting <strong>for</strong> 29%, and the chfmneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />
3% ccounting <strong>for</strong> all participants received a <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
At the end of the training, 54 developed <strong>stove</strong>s were distributed.<br />
D. INTRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE STOVE<br />
TO HOUSEHOLD USERS<br />
The trial promotion and training course in <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s should<br />
include free distribution of <strong>stove</strong> samples to rural villagers under the<br />
condition that the promotors follow up and record the results. Thus, any<br />
problems that may arise during the application of the new models can be<br />
addressed and improvements made. Free distribution of sample <strong>stove</strong>s must be<br />
supported by the government, particularly in the trial promotion and monotoring<br />
phases.<br />
E. ORGANIZATION OF STOVE MANUFACTURERS TO PRODUCE<br />
IMPROVED DESIGN STOVES<br />
Introduction to manufacturers of the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is a very difficult<br />
task beca<strong>use</strong> of iack of concern and cooperation among local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers.<br />
These problems are believed to exist beca<strong>use</strong> they:<br />
* Have little credibility with the government agency;<br />
w Believe that the <strong>stove</strong>s they are making are best (due to lack of<br />
scientific knowledge);<br />
* Believe that the <strong>stove</strong> making profession is doomed beca<strong>use</strong> of strong<br />
competition from gas <strong>stove</strong>s and their LPG fuel government subsidies.<br />
a Believe that Thailand is running out of wood and charcoal. Many state<br />
that riiey will give up <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing when there is no more wood.<br />
Hence, government agencies should focus on educating local <strong>stove</strong><br />
manufacturers to better understand Thailand's precious, indigenous and<br />
reproducible source of unargy--wood--and t)y providing them with guidance and<br />
<strong>use</strong>ful scientific knowledge on <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> technology. This can be<br />
achieved by the following government ef<strong>for</strong>ts:<br />
1. Publication and distribution of documents describing the important<br />
features of good <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
229
D<br />
Table 9.8<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commerical <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,670 1,710 1,500<br />
Time to boil, min 20 21 26 14 22 i6<br />
Water evaporated, gm 360 345 360. 950 710 1,020<br />
Fuel remaining, gm 40 55 40 40;7201 55;1,000 35;480<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 730 550 440 1,360 920 1,260<br />
Efficiency, Z 30.32 27.50 23.52 26.23 28.33<br />
Note: 1. charcoal remaining #; wood remaining<br />
22.83
Table 9.9<br />
Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Nan<br />
Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />
Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />
Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400<br />
1<br />
1,440 1,460 1,440<br />
Time to boil, min -<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Water evaporated, gm 600 410 - 1,280 1,060 1,020<br />
Fuel remaining, gin 40 35 - 40;300 60;190 50;215<br />
Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 365 - 1,140 1,410 1,225<br />
Efficiency, % 27.7 22.6 - 20.7 14.9 16.6<br />
Note: 1. not recorded<br />
2. charcoal remaining; wood remaining
2. Methods of selecting <strong>stove</strong> materials such as fire resistant clay,<br />
insulating material, etc. and how to improve such materials.<br />
3. Government development and provision of the <strong>stove</strong> mold <strong>for</strong> mass<br />
production of the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
4. Government advertising campaigns to boost sales and marketing of the new<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
5. Providing awards and incentives to cooperative manufacturers. Stove<br />
competitions and awards to manufacturers producing the most efficient<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s are highly recommended. Stoves that pass a standard test <strong>for</strong><br />
efficiency and ruggedness should be given a government guarantee<br />
certificate. This will give the <strong>use</strong>rs confidence enough to buy and<br />
motivate manufacturers to produce good <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
232
Figure 9.1 Introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to participants<br />
Figure 9.2 Stove contest <strong>for</strong> efficiency comparison between<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s and developed models<br />
233
Figure 9.3 Trainee participation in installing <strong>stove</strong>'s parts<br />
Figure 9.4 Distribution of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to all participants<br />
234
Chapter 10<br />
Conclusions
CONCLUSIONS<br />
As a result of the implementation of the Improved Biomass Cooking Stove<br />
Component, many activities and achievements took place. Accomplishments can<br />
be described as follows:<br />
1. As a part of institution strengthening, the component has succeeded in<br />
establishing a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> testing laboratory at the Forest Products<br />
Research Division, Royal Forest Department, Through project f.,nding, the<br />
laboratory was equipped with invaluable, basic test instruments and<br />
facilities--including a microcomputer system <strong>for</strong> future applications.<br />
2. Long-term training of project personnel to increase their future<br />
capabilities was minimum beca<strong>use</strong> time was short (30 months) and they were<br />
needed on site to carry outi.project tasks. There<strong>for</strong>e, all technical personnel<br />
were indispensable <strong>for</strong> project implementation. They could not be spared <strong>for</strong><br />
long term training.<br />
3. The component has produced five generic types of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />
namely, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys, and<br />
rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys. The absolute heat utilization <strong>for</strong><br />
charcoal and both types of wood <strong>stove</strong>s increased up to 7% over that of the<br />
average commercial models. Further, an increase of 5 and 3% was achieved<br />
with rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys respectively. In terms of<br />
comparative efficiency increases, the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> reached a 26% increase<br />
over the average commercial models, while <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without<br />
chimneys they were 58 and 35% respectively. The increase <strong>for</strong> the rice husk<br />
<strong>stove</strong> with chimney was 100%, or double the efficiency of the average<br />
commercial models. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney had the least<br />
increase--15 - 16%.<br />
4. The investigation conducted on existing commercial <strong>stove</strong>s revealed that<br />
fuel efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> charcoal, wood, or rice husk are rare. The<br />
laboratory tests have led to the identification of the <strong>stove</strong>s' critical<br />
physical parameters. They consist of <strong>stove</strong> weight; exhausted gap/area;<br />
co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity; rim design <strong>for</strong> proper fit of variously-si7ed<br />
pots and pans; grate-to-pot distance; grate parameters such as hole area, hole<br />
size and distribution, and thickness; height of chimney, and flue gas baffle<br />
(<strong>for</strong> chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>s). Other strong factors also influencing <strong>stove</strong><br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance are external variables--fuel load or fuel feeding rate, amount of<br />
water to be boiled, and the wind factor. The in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained was later<br />
<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> redesigning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models.<br />
5. Good quality clay material suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing has been<br />
identified and a production technique has also been developed <strong>for</strong> small-scale<br />
and home industries. Local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in one district of Roi-et<br />
Province were trained without any difficulty in this technique of <strong>stove</strong><br />
production. Improved <strong>stove</strong>s, particularly charcoal and nonchimney wood models,<br />
are heat refractory and can withstand thermal shock much better than present<br />
237
commercial ones. In addition, the application of the internal mold has<br />
greatly <strong>improved</strong> the precision necessary to control the critical internal<br />
dimensions. This metnod was found to be superior to the traditional one<br />
using an external mold which hardly controlled the internal dimensions.<br />
6. The production cost of the <strong>improved</strong> models as described in (2) above<br />
presently is approximately 2.5 times more than the cost of the poorer quality<br />
commercial models. However, when compared with top quality charcoal bucket<br />
<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the market, the <strong>improved</strong> models' cost is 25 - 30% lower,<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, in long-term commercial production, the <strong>improved</strong> models will be<br />
competitive when production increases and more <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s reach the<br />
market.<br />
7. So far, nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion and training programs have been<br />
carried out among villagers at various places around the country. The<br />
reception <strong>for</strong> the charcoal bucket and the non-chimney wood <strong>stove</strong>s was very<br />
good, while the good reception of the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong> was limited<br />
to a few localities where only rice husk is available. The chimneyed wood<br />
and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> are of less interest to rural <strong>use</strong>rs than the<br />
c&arcoal bucket and the non-ehimneyed wood and the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
It is believed that with good follbw-up and promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t, some of the<br />
<strong>improved</strong> developed models will witastand harsh <strong>use</strong> and serve <strong>use</strong>rs well in<br />
rural kitchens. However, these long-term results are yet to be seen.<br />
8. Beca<strong>use</strong> of time constraints, the project had a limited time to approach<br />
manufacturers on a large scile. However, among a few large manufacturers in<br />
the Central area, the response to the idea of mass production of the<br />
developed models was not enthusiastic. This lack of enthusiasm is perhaps<br />
a result of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers being accustomed to the production of their<br />
rough products and being reluctant to manufacture <strong>stove</strong>s with which they have<br />
little or no experience. Moreover, they probably want to see the market <strong>for</strong><br />
high quality, efficient <strong>stove</strong>s develop first be<strong>for</strong>e committing their resources<br />
to their production. There<strong>for</strong>e, more time and more education are needed <strong>for</strong><br />
them to change their attitude and adapt their production techniques.<br />
238
Chapter 11<br />
Recommendations
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
On the basis of the overall work of this project, some recommendations<br />
are presented below:<br />
1. Beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion involve the social customs and<br />
habits of millions of people in Thailand and around the world, it is highly<br />
recommended that <strong>stove</strong> research and development be carried on to further<br />
improve present designs and find more alternatives <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
2. Stove development should ,mphasize each generic type of <strong>stove</strong>; namely,<br />
charcoal, wood with and without chimney, and agriresidue <strong>stove</strong>s with and<br />
without chimney so that <strong>use</strong>rs have choices.<br />
3. Stove research and development must not only emFhasize the good<br />
conversion efficiency, but it must also facilitate ease of <strong>use</strong> and other<br />
<strong>cooking</strong> functions, without causing undue change in people's <strong>cooking</strong> habits.<br />
4. Stove promotion is a most difficult activity. It will take a groat<br />
deal of time and resources. There<strong>for</strong>e, continuous ef<strong>for</strong>t must be made <strong>for</strong><br />
at least five years with reasonable financial and human resource support in<br />
order to see a real impact among 6 million rural <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
5. In Thailand there are quite a few researchers and interest groups working<br />
on <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, all lack guidelines and<br />
coordination. For national <strong>stove</strong> programs to be directed toward this common<br />
goal, leading government agencies are needed to provide close coordination.<br />
6. During the course of <strong>stove</strong> development, many contacts were made with<br />
experienced <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. It was found that, regardless of their<br />
long experience, their basic understanding of good <strong>stove</strong> configuration, design<br />
and its per<strong>for</strong>mance was very much lacking. This problem was also manifested<br />
in the presence of a large majority -I poor quality and less efficient<br />
commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in the market. 'nere<strong>for</strong>e, it is strongly recommended that<br />
concerned government agencies take an initiative toward arranging <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
training programs <strong>for</strong> the promotion of the essential, scientific knowledge<br />
required among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. Incentives or approaches such as offering<br />
a certificate and/or reward to manufacLurers of efficient <strong>stove</strong>s would be<br />
a highly motivating factor.<br />
7. The lack of understanding among <strong>use</strong>rs on the criteria <strong>for</strong> selection and<br />
<strong>use</strong> of efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s was also evident. There<strong>for</strong>e, the concerned<br />
government agency should establish a long-range,adequately funded educational<br />
campaign program <strong>for</strong> efficient <strong>stove</strong>s--particularly through primary and<br />
secondary school systems.<br />
8. The cost of <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong> production is still high. If simple<br />
hydraulic molding can be developed and employed at the village level,<br />
production costs can be greatly reduced. Under these conditions <strong>stove</strong><br />
dimensions wil be more precise and the production rate will be increased<br />
significantly.<br />
241<br />
7~
9. Selection of clay raw material and improvement of the clay mixture and<br />
firing to attain a product with fire resistant charicteristics (particularly,<br />
the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> body) are essential to a <strong>stove</strong>'s long service life. The<br />
weight of the <strong>stove</strong> also needs further reduction (to achieve peak per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
with even lower charcoal loads).<br />
10. The <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed.wood <strong>stove</strong> is quite efficient <strong>for</strong> the present<br />
developed model. IL can conveniently be <strong>use</strong>d to replace three-rock <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />
However, the same problems exist in its mass production techniques as exist<br />
<strong>for</strong> the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />
11. Smoke in the kitchen is a problem inherent in non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
including the three-stone and open fire. Research should be carried out in<br />
Thailand to determine whether smoke from undeveloped and even developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />
(which noticeably gives less smoke over the undeveloped ones), has any<br />
significant effect on long-term health of <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />
12. Up to the present time, the one hole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has attained<br />
an efficiency up to only 18-19%. In addition, there are problems fitting<br />
pots and pans to this <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is recommended that development<br />
on this type of <strong>stove</strong> be continued in order to improve both heat utilization<br />
efficiency and comparability with various pots and panb. Moreover, the <strong>stove</strong><br />
material (as in the case of the non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s and the charcoal<br />
<strong>stove</strong>) should also be investigated.<br />
13. Even though, at present, the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> is still not<br />
popularly <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand, the chance <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> to become popular in<br />
certain regions is high. This is beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> granulated fuels other<br />
than rice husk (such as sawdust, peanut shell, seed waste, <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>biomass</strong><br />
scraps, etc). There are several further improvements that need consideration.<br />
These include the improvement of the <strong>stove</strong>'s configuration to fit various<br />
pots and pans and reduction of its weight so that sometimes it can be moved<br />
around the ho<strong>use</strong> (yard) when needed. For two people to carry the <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />
weight should not exceed 50 kg.<br />
14. The experience gained from the <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaigns among rural<br />
<strong>use</strong>rs, even in its short duration, strongly indicated that the-! is a good<br />
chance of success in replacing relatively inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s ax..ng 6 million<br />
rural Thai families with efficient <strong>stove</strong>s. It is, there<strong>for</strong>e, recommended that<br />
the government support a nationwide efficient <strong>stove</strong>-promotional campaign <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers as soon as possible.<br />
15. Since better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, in part, mean better living<br />
<strong>for</strong> millions of rural families around the world, the idea of<br />
continuous development to attain even better per<strong>for</strong>mance than the present<br />
developed models should be the challenging subject among applied research<br />
scientists and cuncerned institutions.<br />
242
ANNEX I<br />
Commercial Charcoal Bucket Stove Investigated
A !<br />
wI 1/2<br />
245<br />
Stove No. 1/2 (Charcoal & wood)<br />
Name Heng Siem Lee<br />
Pot hole diameter 19, 23 cm<br />
Weight 12.2 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />
2<br />
Exhaust area 96 cm<br />
2<br />
Grate hole area 112 cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 21.7 min<br />
HU 24.96 %
m J Jt(AIl<br />
~~~~~7<br />
- ,': W. . .. .- ...... 1<br />
ZZ<br />
246<br />
S, yoe No. /3 (Non insulated)<br />
Name Ifeng Siem Lee<br />
[lot hole diameter 19,24<br />
We I It 8.7 kq<br />
xhaust gap ].8CHI<br />
Exhaust area " cr-"<br />
Grate hole area 112 CI112<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cjn<br />
Time to boil 22.3 min<br />
625.70<br />
CI
Stove No. 1/4<br />
Name Rungsit<br />
Pot hole diameter 19,23.5 cm<br />
Weight 12.8 kg<br />
,xhaust gap 1.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 76 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 112 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />
F'uel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm 3<br />
4 Time to boil 18.8 mil<br />
I7 28.19<br />
247
~-iII -mm<br />
MT<br />
5 11nT.I Stove No. 1/5 (Stainless bucket)<br />
- Name~i Rung Sit<br />
248<br />
Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />
Weiqhlt 9.3 kg<br />
ExIl.lst oap 1.0 cm<br />
( Ia',t.L<br />
.,41<br />
. I e ar ,s;l<br />
80<br />
2<br />
Cm<br />
("1112<br />
r;ate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1575 cni 3<br />
Time to boil 21.1 min<br />
H4 30.53 %
15 ,2 1/5 2<br />
Stove No. 1/5<br />
Name Rungsit<br />
Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />
Weight 9.3 kg<br />
V Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />
249<br />
Exhaust area 41 cm 2<br />
2<br />
Grate hole area 80 cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er sine 1575 cm 3<br />
Tine to l,n il 21.1 n i.n<br />
flU 30,53 %
1 /6<br />
.......... AL .<br />
6ir#rfv<br />
.7 Stove No. 1/6<br />
250<br />
Name Rungsit<br />
Pot hole diameter 20,0 cm<br />
Weight 8.6 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />
Exhaust area 41 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 69 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.36<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2065 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 18.0 min<br />
H 28.83 %
,". f u<br />
251<br />
5<br />
Stove No. 1/7<br />
Name Ayudthya<br />
Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust gap<br />
Exhaust area<br />
Grate hole area<br />
Grate: grate hole area<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Time to boil<br />
21 cm<br />
6.4 kg<br />
2 cm<br />
63 "m2<br />
66 cm 2<br />
1:0.23<br />
-4<br />
1931 cm 3<br />
28 min<br />
2 5 .6 1%
1/8<br />
,%, .,;,M-_ Stove No. 1/<br />
252<br />
Name unknown<br />
Pot hole diameter 18 cm<br />
Weight 8.1 kq<br />
Exhaust gip 1.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 70 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 48 c2n<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.2<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1832 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 27 min<br />
IlU .<br />
24.07
, - .- , ..<br />
Stove No. ]/9<br />
Name Chachernrsat<br />
lot hole dianeter 23 cm<br />
Weiqht 8.7 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 3 cm<br />
Exhiust area 66 cm 2<br />
Gr~ite hole qrea 94 cm 2<br />
Grt.e: grate hole area 1:0.28<br />
Ftel chai<strong>mb</strong>er size 3232 cm 3<br />
Tire to boil 23 mill<br />
'7 H28.42 %<br />
253
1/10jrf<br />
i,~<br />
-m •<br />
-W<br />
7 Stove No. 1/10<br />
254<br />
Name unknown<br />
Pot hole diameter 21 cm<br />
weight 4.2 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />
Exhaust area 80 cm 2<br />
2<br />
Grate hole area 54 cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.21<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 31.7 min<br />
HU 26.54 %
Stove No. 1/11<br />
Name unknown<br />
Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />
Weight 4.2 kg<br />
iExhaust gap 2 Cin<br />
255<br />
lIxi ,;astrea 80 111<br />
2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.21<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 22.3 min<br />
HtU 26.52 %
A<br />
Stove No. 1/12<br />
Name Booppararm<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 CM<br />
Weight 7.2 kg<br />
N Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />
256<br />
Exhaust area 8c cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 65 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.22<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2856 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 22.6 min<br />
flu HU29.02 %
--- 2 -r- :- .... ..... .<br />
1 kStove No. 1/13<br />
Name Samyakphicharg<br />
$ Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
257<br />
Weight 10.7 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.6 cm<br />
Exhaust area 74 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 76 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.28<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2390 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 23.9 min<br />
HU 26.12 %
258<br />
Stove No. 1/14<br />
Name Booppararm<br />
Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />
Weight 19 kg<br />
Echaust gap 2.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 113 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 65 cm2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3464 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 27.2 in<br />
HU23.53<br />
flu %
low<br />
Stove No. 1/15<br />
1 ! Name Banglion&<br />
259<br />
PoL hole diameter 20 cm<br />
Weiqht 10.0 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />
Exhiius area 108 cm 2<br />
(:riLe hole grea 65 cm 2<br />
o(Irite: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />
Iuf cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2865 Cm 3<br />
927.21<br />
'nto)boil 24.26 mi
260<br />
11M<br />
Stove NO. 1/16<br />
Name Ayudthya<br />
Pot hole diameter 21 cm<br />
Weight 6.6 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />
Exhaust area 45 cm2<br />
Grate hole area 59 cm2<br />
Gr,-te: grate hole area 1:0.2<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>e ie 268cm3<br />
Time to boi.1 27.2 rain<br />
HIU 27.45 %
1/17<br />
261<br />
Stove No. 1/17<br />
Name Cholburi<br />
Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />
Weight 5.9 kg<br />
E*:xhaust gap<br />
Lxhtu'L area<br />
rate nole .area<br />
(;rate: grate<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
Time to boil<br />
Hu<br />
hole<br />
size<br />
1.2<br />
50<br />
54<br />
area 1:0.31<br />
2013<br />
20<br />
32.30<br />
cm<br />
Cm 2<br />
C1m<br />
2<br />
cm 3<br />
mir<br />
%
262<br />
W.1<br />
Stove No. 1/18<br />
Name Cholburi<br />
Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
l:xhausL t ap<br />
Exhaus t area<br />
Grate iole area<br />
Grate: grate hole area<br />
Fuel<br />
Time<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
to boil<br />
21 ci<br />
7.2<br />
2<br />
96<br />
68<br />
1:0.25<br />
size 3202<br />
23.6<br />
IHU 26.85<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
cm 2<br />
cm 2<br />
cm<br />
mill
4 ,4<br />
Stove No. 1/19<br />
Name Samrong<br />
Pot hole diameter 18 cm<br />
Weight 10.5 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 105<br />
2<br />
cm<br />
4, 1I (;rate hole area 94 CHI 2<br />
263<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.5<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3X42 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 23.8 min<br />
flU 23.94 %
4 0<br />
4.4 1,<br />
V fe<br />
14Stove No. 1/20<br />
264<br />
Name Cholburi<br />
Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust gap<br />
Exhaust area<br />
Grate hole area<br />
(;rate: grate hole<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Time to boil<br />
23<br />
10.2<br />
2<br />
102<br />
94<br />
area 1:0.30<br />
2516<br />
30.3<br />
cm<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
c mn<br />
C1 2<br />
cmn 3<br />
mill<br />
flflu 24.49 %
'265<br />
265<br />
Stove No. 1/21<br />
toe DaNo. 1/2<br />
Pot hole diameter 22.5 cm<br />
Weight 11.1 kg<br />
Ixhtus t caj 3 cm<br />
I.xhaust area 107 cm 2<br />
(Grcate hole grea 68 cm 2<br />
Grite: grate hole area 1:0.22<br />
uel clia<strong>mb</strong>er size 2414 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 32.7 min<br />
HU "<br />
24.13 %
266<br />
Stove No. 1/22<br />
Name Barnponge<br />
Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />
Weight 9.5 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 0.7 cm<br />
Exhaust area 38 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 85 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.29<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3155 cm,<br />
Time to boi.] 23.3 min<br />
flu 28.11 %
J/23i tr LJ UV<br />
Stove No. 1/23 (non insulated)<br />
Name Heng Siem Lee<br />
Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />
W; Weight 7.2 kg<br />
267<br />
: ull,-I St: qap 1 On<br />
Ix'hwA t o4trea 41 cmI2<br />
GtL, ti hole area 80 (:l 2<br />
(;rate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1575 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 215 min<br />
IU 29.17 %
A Name Cholburi<br />
268<br />
Stove No. 1/24 (Charcoal & wood)<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
Weight 13.8 kg<br />
Exhaust (lilt) 2.2 cm<br />
1.xh.iust aroa 112 cm 2<br />
Grate hole a rea 77 1i1 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3815 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 22.7 min<br />
flU 25.9 %
269<br />
Stove No. 1/25 Charcoal & wood)<br />
. Name .le~ Sie-m Lpe modified<br />
Pot. hole diameter 19,23 cm<br />
We I 13.2 kg<br />
.Xhmat yap cm<br />
2<br />
Exhast area 96 cm<br />
(;rate hole area 112 cmI 2 a<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />
1-'uel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm<br />
,ime to boil 11.8 min<br />
lu 26.59
i %<br />
I'<br />
g<br />
b<br />
", -Grate:<br />
S'<br />
:: i"Fuel<br />
Stove No. 1/26<br />
Name Darnkwian<br />
, Pot hole diameter<br />
270<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust1%";I<br />
gal<br />
Exhaust area<br />
Grate hole area<br />
grate hole area<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Grte<br />
oth grt ol o~ ra<br />
(non insulated)<br />
23<br />
66k<br />
1.5m<br />
90<br />
752m<br />
1:0.24<br />
270 0<br />
23 l24<br />
cm<br />
cm2 a<br />
cmm
L- A<br />
97ttv<br />
Stove No. 1/28<br />
YName Sa Sua<br />
A'M<br />
Pot hole diameter 23 cm<br />
Weight 12.2 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2.3 cm<br />
2<br />
Exhaust area 131 cm<br />
04at", +1Grate hole area 74 cm 2<br />
1 Q I,!IGrate:<br />
grate hole areal:0.24<br />
271<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4261 cm<br />
Time to hoti] 20.1 mi<br />
IU 25.10
272<br />
Stove No. 1/29<br />
Name Sa Sua, modified<br />
Pot hole diameter 19 cm.<br />
Weight 13.2 kg.<br />
Exhaust gap 2 cm.<br />
Exhaust area 85 cm. 2<br />
Grate hole area 74 cm. 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.33<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3414 cm.<br />
Time to boil 20 min.<br />
HU 28.85
,:,1/30 So N<br />
Name Nakornchaisee<br />
Pot hole diameter 2(J,24 cm<br />
Weight 18 kq<br />
\Exhaust qap 1.5 cm<br />
... area 72 dir 2<br />
rs<br />
t;ra to he Ie area 111 cm 2<br />
(Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2992 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 16.9 min<br />
.......... fu 24.25 %<br />
273
01.<br />
rr<br />
274<br />
Stove No. 1/31<br />
Name nakornchaisee<br />
Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust gap<br />
Exhaust area•<br />
(;rate hole area<br />
Grate: grate hole<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Time to boil<br />
SliU<br />
area<br />
17,20<br />
11.8<br />
o.5<br />
20<br />
94<br />
1:0.44<br />
9')50<br />
16.7<br />
32.3q<br />
cm<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
C1112<br />
c1,12<br />
Cmn3<br />
rmin
~I<br />
Stove No. 1/32<br />
Name NAkornchaisee<br />
Pot hole diameter 20,24 cm<br />
Weiqht 8.2 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />
2<br />
Exhaust area 102 cm<br />
Grate hole area 131 cm 2<br />
* (;rate: grate hole areal:O.46<br />
275<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2992 cm<br />
Time to boil 17.6 mill<br />
IfU 24.61 %
:%: 'S tove No. 1/33<br />
P, Name Nakornchaisee<br />
276<br />
[Pot hole diaueter 17,20 cm<br />
We iqht 6.7 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 0.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 20 Cm 2<br />
Grate hole grea 94 cmn!l<br />
irat.e: grate hole area 1:0.41<br />
'utelcha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2550 cm.<br />
2u6 to bol 18.3 ii<br />
jIG 30.51
wnI 1/34<br />
SlU<br />
277<br />
Stove No. 1/34<br />
Name Bang Sue<br />
Pot hole diameter 30 cm<br />
Weight<br />
10.4<br />
Exhaust gqap 1.8 cm<br />
Exhaust area 103<br />
2<br />
cm<br />
Grate hole area 68<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.27<br />
luel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
2829<br />
kg<br />
2 "<br />
cm<br />
3<br />
Cm<br />
'Tillie to ho i 21.2 inin<br />
26.07
I Stove No. 1/35<br />
'Name Bang Sue<br />
278<br />
U-<br />
Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />
Weight 8 kg<br />
Exhaust qap 1.7 cm<br />
2<br />
Exhaust area 82 cm<br />
Grate hole area 54 ctll.<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.27<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm3<br />
Time to boil 19.8 min<br />
IlU 27.22<br />
I1AJ
!Y'IfJ u I/36<br />
•.<br />
279<br />
.;Iw<br />
.~ ~..... .i ..... .<br />
Stove No. 1/36<br />
Name Bang Sue<br />
IPot hole diameter<br />
weiht<br />
Ilxhaust<br />
Exhaust<br />
gap<br />
area<br />
15<br />
6.5<br />
56<br />
1.5<br />
cm<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 44 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
area 1:0.31<br />
1568 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 20.8 min<br />
Il u 30.67 %
37mm<br />
I-<br />
-iQj<br />
il O<br />
.0 280<br />
"<br />
280<br />
Stove No. 1/37<br />
Name Booppararm<br />
Pot hole di ameter 15 cm<br />
Weiht<br />
Exhaust gal)<br />
Exhaust area<br />
Grate hole area<br />
Grate: grate hole area<br />
,uel<br />
Time<br />
1.U<br />
cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
to boil<br />
6.5<br />
0.7<br />
30<br />
25<br />
1:0.14<br />
1140<br />
26<br />
28.07<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
cm 2<br />
cm 2<br />
cm3<br />
rni1
.,<br />
281<br />
1/3 1i/31 1<br />
1 , ,<br />
Stoveinc'd1/38<br />
Name? unknown<br />
[loat hole<br />
weiqht<br />
Li:xhaust gap<br />
xhaust area<br />
(SaLe hole grA<br />
diameter 19,22<br />
grate hole<br />
1.*Iim-l cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
10<br />
1.9<br />
12,cm<br />
70<br />
area 1:0.35<br />
2000<br />
cm<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
2<br />
cm 2<br />
cm 1<br />
TL to boil 20 rain<br />
Ilu<br />
27.7
1/39<br />
.... ,Stove No. 1/39<br />
*cm<br />
-,,. Name Cholburi Dab.modified<br />
.4 ' Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
22.5<br />
8<br />
cm.<br />
kg.<br />
' Exhaust gap0. cm<br />
6 J "6. xhaust area 47 c~<br />
282<br />
Grate hole area 57 cm./<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0. 2 8<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2800 cm. 3<br />
Time to boil 17 min.<br />
HU 33.35 %
ANNEX II<br />
Commercial and User Built Wood Stove<br />
Without Chimney Investigated
Stove No. 2/1<br />
Name Roi-et (Original)<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
Weight 5.9 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.3 cm<br />
Exhaust area 25.3 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area - cm 2<br />
Grate: -trate hole area -<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7600 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 12 min<br />
flu 17.59 %<br />
285
Stove No. 2/2<br />
Name Thick dome, clay<br />
7A<br />
Pot hole diameter 23 cm<br />
Weight 11.8 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2.1 cm<br />
Lx h,ust- area 18.2 (:m 2<br />
raL' hole arca - c= 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area -<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5800 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 14 min<br />
fHU 19.25 %<br />
286
n n " 21,.3 1 r;.: i ii .. . -...<br />
Stove No. 2/3<br />
Name Thick horse shoe, clay<br />
Pot hole diameter 25 cm<br />
Weight 13.2 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.9 cm<br />
Exhaust area 86.7 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area - cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area -<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6870 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 13.7 rain<br />
HU 19.08 %<br />
287
Stove No. 2/4<br />
Name Morn Pakred, modified<br />
Pot hole diameter 27 cm<br />
Weight 2.5 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 2.6 cm<br />
Exhaust area 90.7 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 160.9<br />
2<br />
cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7440<br />
3<br />
cm<br />
Time to boil 14 min<br />
fu 20.94 %<br />
288
Stove No. 2/5<br />
Name Morn Pakred,<br />
Pot hole diameter<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust gap<br />
.twti;L i ea<br />
(Cl. .. hole ,reii<br />
Grate: grate hole<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
Time to boil<br />
Ifu<br />
2/ ifIliIjln/<br />
289<br />
small<br />
area -<br />
18 cm<br />
12 kg<br />
5.0 CM<br />
210 (Ml2<br />
2<br />
CII1<br />
3600 cm 3<br />
17 min<br />
23.27 %
Stove No. 2/6<br />
Name Tripod<br />
Pot hole diameter - cm<br />
Weight 0.7 kg<br />
Exhaust gap - cm<br />
Exhaust area - cm 2<br />
Grate hole area - cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area -<br />
Fuel chamher size - cm 1<br />
T ime to h) i 1 16.2 rain<br />
flu 1.4.2<br />
290
Stove N''. 2/7<br />
Name Morn Pakied, largo<br />
PoL hole diameter cm<br />
Weiqht 3.3 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 5.4 cm<br />
Exhaust area 222.6 cm 2<br />
2<br />
Grate hole grea - cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area <br />
L.u1 chi<strong>mb</strong>er size 7440 cin 3<br />
T ime to boil 18.7 1 in<br />
iU 15.39<br />
291
Stove No. 2/8<br />
II-<br />
Name Modified Roi-et, clay<br />
Pot hole diaweter 22 cm<br />
Weight 6.6 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1 tm<br />
lxI,iu.L aera<br />
Crate holetare,<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />
2<br />
55.5 cm<br />
2<br />
99.6 Cni<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4560 Cm 3<br />
Time to boil 15 min<br />
ftU 20.92<br />
292
Stove No. 2/9<br />
Name Horse shoe,<br />
Pou hol.e diameter<br />
Weight<br />
Exhaust gap<br />
Exhaust area<br />
Grate hole area<br />
Grate: grate hole<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
clay<br />
25 cm<br />
8.1<br />
2.5<br />
197.1<br />
area -<br />
-<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
cm 2<br />
cm 2<br />
6380 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 15.5 min<br />
flU 19.48<br />
293
2/10 Mlletu"41<br />
1"i 0 i0 w<br />
Stove No. 10<br />
Name Thin horse shoe, clay<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
Weight 7.4 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 3.6 cm<br />
Exhaust area 77.6 CM 2<br />
Grate hole area cm7<br />
Grate: grate hole area -<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4560 cm3<br />
Time to boil 15.3 min<br />
IfU 16.77 %<br />
294
Stove No. 2/13<br />
Name Dome, clay<br />
Pot hole diameter 24 cm<br />
Weight 15 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.3 cm<br />
Exhaust area 62.4 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 160.9 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5400 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 17 min<br />
flu<br />
295<br />
20.2
7j<br />
:.~~ ~~21 m It/6 :++ ,..<br />
Stove No. 2/16<br />
Name Pot shaped, clay<br />
Pot hole diawiioeer 22 cm<br />
Weicjht 10.3 kq<br />
Exhaust gap 1.8 cm<br />
2<br />
Exhaust area 86.4 cm<br />
Grate hole area - cm2<br />
Grate: grate hole area<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7030 cm<br />
Time to boil 16.7 min<br />
flu 14.37 %<br />
296
12/222 l-j~lbS<br />
Stove No. 2/22<br />
211,<br />
Name Dome with cap, clay<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
Weight 11.3 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 1.5 cm<br />
Exhaust area 73.1 cm 2<br />
Grate hole grea 160.9 cm 2<br />
GraLe: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />
lue cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6840 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 14 min<br />
IIU 24.4 %<br />
297
Mi<br />
Stove No. 2/23<br />
Name Modified Roi-et, clay<br />
Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />
Weight 14 kg<br />
E~xhaust q(q) 1.8 cm<br />
kxhIust ar a 86.6 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 160.9 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hcle area 1:0.34<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4950 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 14.5 mill<br />
IIU 23.2 %<br />
298
IA<br />
*:!2/24 irnitzrn<br />
Stove No. 2/24<br />
Name Cylinder, steel<br />
Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />
Weight 3.7 kg<br />
Exhaust gap 0.6 cm<br />
Exhaust area<br />
32.2<br />
cm<br />
2<br />
Grate hole area 99.6 cm<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />
2040<br />
2<br />
3<br />
cm<br />
Time to boil 13.5 min<br />
HU 25.93 %<br />
299
ANNEX III<br />
Commercial Wood Stove with Chimney Investigated
.L<br />
,Stove No. 2/11<br />
Name Saengpen, Narn<br />
Pot hole diameter 19 cm<br />
Weight 24.8 kg<br />
Exhaust gap - cm<br />
Exhaust area 72.3 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 72.3 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.19<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5190 cm 3<br />
Time to boil 20 min<br />
HU 13.88 %<br />
S..303
304<br />
Stove No. 2/12<br />
Name Samrong, Samutprakarn<br />
Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />
Weight 24.8 kg<br />
Exhaust gap - cm<br />
Exhaust area 23.6 cm 2<br />
Grate hole area 65.4 cm 2<br />
Grate: grate hole area 1:0.20<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4400 u,3<br />
Time to boil 19.5 min<br />
flu 1UI].99 %
7."<br />
305<br />
•<br />
Stove No.<br />
2/15<br />
Name Ban Pong, Rajaburi<br />
Pot hole diameter 29.0<br />
69.5<br />
Weight 695<br />
Exhaust gap-<br />
Exhaust area<br />
(;rate hole grea<br />
23.8<br />
94.3<br />
cm<br />
kg<br />
cm<br />
cm 2<br />
cm 2<br />
GraLc: grate hole area 1:0.20<br />
l-'uelcha<strong>mb</strong>et size 5890 cm 3<br />
Tree to bo' 16.7 min<br />
IU 11.01
ANNEX IV<br />
Commercial Rice Husk Stove with Chimney Investigated
309<br />
VC,'<br />
Stove No. 3/2<br />
Name Ngo Gew Ha<br />
Pot hole diameter 32.0 cm.<br />
Weight 85.0 kg.<br />
2<br />
Flue gas outlet area 78.0 cm<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 19,000 cm<br />
Chimney height 240 cm<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cmHU 5.48%,TTB 20.0 mi
Stove No. 3/4A<br />
Name Thai charoen<br />
_VI Pot hole diameter 33.0 cm.<br />
Weight 96.7 kg.<br />
Flue gaIs outlet area 47 cm 2<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 16,400 cm 3<br />
Chimney height 240 cm.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,IIU 6.24%,TTB 23 min.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, $ 30 cm,HU 9.26%,TTB 24.3 min.<br />
310
Stove No. 3/4B<br />
Name Thai Charoen<br />
Pot hole diameter 30.0 cm.<br />
Weight 95.5 kg.<br />
2<br />
Flue gas outlet area 95 cm<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 12,600 cma<br />
Chimney height 240 cm.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 0 30 cm,HU 8.53%,TTB 28.3 min<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 0 24 cm,HU 7.23%,TTB 25 min.<br />
311
Stove No. 3/5<br />
Name Banglane<br />
Pot hole diameter 30.0 cm.<br />
Weight 95.5 kg.<br />
, , Flue gas outlet area 113.0 cm 2<br />
312<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 19,100 cm 3<br />
Chimney height 230 cm<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 30 cm,HU II.14%,TTB 20.3 min.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,HU 4.24%,TTB 28.5 min.
(o5 ~Flue %<br />
Stove No. 3/6<br />
Name Sayan<br />
Pot hole diameter 27 cm.<br />
Weight 65.0 kg.<br />
gas outlet area<br />
2<br />
28.0 cm<br />
3<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6,200 cm<br />
Chimney height 240 cm.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,HU 7.13%,TTB 27.0 min.<br />
313
314<br />
Stove No. GC2<br />
Name Sooksunt<br />
* ,<br />
Pot hole diameter 28 cm.<br />
Weight 62 kg.<br />
Flue gas outlet area 71.0 cm 2<br />
Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 10,600 cm 3<br />
Chimney height 160 cm.<br />
Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 6 24 cm,HU 9.23%,TTB 21.7 min.
ANNEX V<br />
List of Staff <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement Component
ANNEX 3<br />
List of Staff and Personnel <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement Component<br />
1. Dr. Aroon Chomcharn<br />
2. Mr. Arkom Vejsupasuk<br />
3. Mr. Songdham Jaikwang<br />
4. Ms. Malee Rungsrisawadh<br />
5. Mr. Piroj Uttarapong<br />
6. Ms. Pojanee Jongjitirat<br />
7. Mr. Banyat Srisom<br />
8. Ms. Nongluck Thong-in<br />
9. Mr. Wattanapong Woottha<br />
10. Ms. Sudarat Ngamkajohnwiwat<br />
11. Mr. Pratya Kanapoosed<br />
12. Ms. Kevalee Musikapong<br />
13. Mrs. Kunthon Santudkarn<br />
14. Mrs. Lek Ninmanee<br />
15. Mrs. Hame Krisangsri<br />
317<br />
Component leader, RFD<br />
Assistant comp. leader, RFD<br />
Project officer, RFD<br />
Project officer, RFD<br />
Project consultant, Kasetsart Univ.<br />
Project consultant, King Mongkut's<br />
Institute of Technology<br />
Project consultant, Temp. employee<br />
Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />
Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />
Piojcct researcher, Temp. employee<br />
Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />
Project coordinator, Temp. employee<br />
Supporting service, RFD<br />
Stove fabricator, RFD<br />
Stove fabricator, RFD
REFERENCES<br />
'',<br />
"1"'":'J':" '. 'IIi . : . .j\
REFERENCES<br />
Bennett, C., Myers, J.E., Moment'm, Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw Hill<br />
International Book Co., Singapore, 2nd ed., 1974.<br />
Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomena, Wiley<br />
International Edition, New York, London, John Wiley and Sons, Tn-., 1960.<br />
Bronowski, J., The Ascent of Man, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1973.<br />
Bumroong, T., Economical Stove, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong> Education,<br />
Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology, Ministry of<br />
Education, Bangkok, pp. 61 - 65, 1981.<br />
Catlyn, A., Joseph, S., and Shanahan, Y., Testing of the Zip Stove,<br />
Intermediate Technology Development Group, Stoves Project, Technical Notes<br />
No. 3, 1983.<br />
Chomcharn, A. et. al., Energy from Wood (5): Test <strong>for</strong> Efficiency of Fuel<br />
and Bucket Stove, Forestry Meeting Annual Report, Forest Products Research<br />
Division, pp. -29 - 254, 1981.<br />
Cook<strong>stove</strong> Bulleting, Priyagni: A New Stove from CPRI, Tata Energy<br />
Documentation and In<strong>for</strong>mation Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, pp. 4 - 5, 1984.<br />
Cook<strong>stove</strong> Handbook, Pilot edition, Tata Energy Research Institute Documentation<br />
Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, 1982.<br />
Deeammart, L., Economical Stove, A Report on Stove Testing and Evaluation<br />
Using Agriresidue, Military Research and Development Center, Supreme Command<br />
Headquarter, pp. 61 - 63, 1981.<br />
Dunn, P. et al., Traditional Thai Cooker, Energy from Biomass: 2nd E.C.<br />
Conference, pp. 748 - 752, 1982.<br />
Forestry Statistics 1982, Forest Statistics Section, Planning Division,<br />
Royal Forest Department, p. 9.<br />
Foley, G. and Moss, P., Improved Cooking Stove in Developing Countries,<br />
Earthscan, Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Programme, Technical Report No. 2, ITED,<br />
London, 1983.<br />
Gupta, C.L., Usha, K., Energy Vol. 5, pp. 1213 - 1222, 1980.<br />
Hoel, P.G., Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Wiley International<br />
Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, London, Sydney, Toronto,<br />
4th ed., 1971.<br />
Joseph, S., Stove Testing, ITDG, 1979.<br />
321 ''
Joseph, S., Shanahan, Y., Trussell, J., and Bialy, J., Compendiwn of Tested<br />
Stove Designs, ITDG Stoves Programme <strong>for</strong> the UN Food and Agricultural<br />
Organization, 1980.<br />
Kaufman, M., From Lorena to a Mountain of F,"' , A case study oi Yayasan Dian<br />
Desa's fuel efficient <strong>stove</strong> program 1978 - 1983.<br />
De Lepelaire, G., Prasad, K.K., and Verhart, P., A Wood Stove Compendiiun,<br />
Prepared <strong>for</strong> the Terhnical Panel of Fuelwood and Charcoal, UNERG, Nairobi,<br />
1981.<br />
Madon, G., L. DIOP and E. Lagandre, Leo Consommatione de Co<strong>mb</strong>ustibles<br />
Domestiques au Senegal Sur Foyers Traditionnels et sour Foyers Areliorees,<br />
CERER, University of Dakpr and USAID, Undated.<br />
Meechai: Economical Stove, Papers from Family Planning and Public Development<br />
Association, 8 Sukhumvit Rd., BKK 11, undated.<br />
Noi, P., EconomicaZ Stove and Charcoal Fuel, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong><br />
Education, Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology,<br />
linistry of Education, Bangkok, pp. 115 - 129, 1981.<br />
Omar, K.J., Chula-Need <strong>for</strong> Improvement, Dept., of Chemical Engineering,<br />
BUET, Dacca, Bangladesh, Undated.<br />
Openshaw, K., A Comparison of Metal and Clay Charcoal Cooking Stoves,<br />
Division of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Veterinary,<br />
Science, University of Dar es Salaam, Morongoro, undated.<br />
Osuwasn S. and Booyakiat, K., Study of Varic-bles Affecting Charcoal Stove<br />
Efficiency, Journal of Chemical Engineering Food and Fuel Technology,<br />
pp. 5 - 95, Bangkok, 1982.<br />
Perry, R.H., Chilton, C.H., Chemical Engineers' Handbook, McGraw Hill C-.,<br />
5th ed., 1973.<br />
Ponnoum, S., Wongopalert, A., Arnold, J., Jr., Stove Experiments and Cooking<br />
Observations, Meat Systems Inc., Thai Group, February, 1982.<br />
Prasad, K.K. , ;orwel Per<strong>for</strong> iaen [oots on Open Firec and the Family Cooker,<br />
Woodburning Stove Group, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical<br />
Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven and TNO, Apeldoorn,<br />
Netherlands, 1980.<br />
Prasad, K.K., A §tud U on the Perfo2vwaicc of 'iso14etalovcs , Woodburning<br />
Stove Group, Technical University of Eindhoven and TNO, Apeldoorn,<br />
Netherlands, 1981.<br />
Prasad, K.K., S'ome Studleo on Open Fires, Shielded (0i HadeaO':" Stoves,<br />
the Woodburning Stove Group, Eindhoven University of Technology and TNO,<br />
Apedoorn, Netherlands, 1981.<br />
322
Sherman, M. and Srisom, B. et al., Thailand National Renewable Energy Project,<br />
Interim Report of 1982, Activity Stove Improvement Component, 1983.<br />
Singer, H., Report to the Government of Indonesia on Improvement of Fuelwood<br />
Cooking Stoves and Economy in Fueloood Constaption, Report No. 1315, FAO,<br />
Rome, 1961.<br />
Sooksant, S., Economical Stove <strong>for</strong> Rural Village, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong><br />
Education, Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology,<br />
Ministry of Education, Bangkok, pp. 71 - 89, 1981.<br />
Suwat, T. and Paitoon, M., Cooking Stove Using Agriresidues as Fuel,<br />
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Songkhla University, undated.<br />
Tata Energy Research Institute, Documentation Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, 1979.<br />
Thomas, L.C., Fundcientalsof Heat Transfer, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood<br />
Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, 1980.<br />
Vita News, Report from Upper Vol-,,, New Direction in Wood Stoves,<br />
pp. 8 - 9, 1984.<br />
Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.H., P2,obability and Statistics <strong>for</strong> Engineers and<br />
Scientists, McMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, Collier McMillan<br />
Publishers, London, 1972.<br />
323