07.01.2013 Views

improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...

improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...

improved biomass cooking stove for household use - (PDF, 101 mb ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Forest Products Research Division<br />

Royal Forest Department<br />

Ministry of Agriculture and Coo~perativt's<br />

IMPROVED BIOMASS<br />

COOKING STOVE<br />

FOR HOUSEHOLD USE<br />

Submitted to the<br />

National Energy Administration<br />

Ministry of Science, Technology and Energy<br />

Under the<br />

Renewable Nonconventional Enu.rgy Protect<br />

Royal Thai Government<br />

U.S. Agen~cy (or International Development<br />

\~


"Ho<strong>use</strong>hold development in any soc-ety<br />

can only be achieved when the most iLaportant<br />

part of the kitchen, the ciok<strong>stove</strong>, has also<br />

been <strong>improved</strong>."


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I wish to express my appreciaticn to USAID/Thailand, to the Natio:lal<br />

Energy Administration and Department of Technical and Economic Cooperation<br />

<strong>for</strong> their support and <strong>for</strong> providing a timely opportunity to prove the wood<br />

energy conservation case In rural application. The Royal Forest Department<br />

responded eagerly to the request <strong>for</strong> project personnel and facilities needed<br />

<strong>for</strong> implementation.<br />

I am obliged to Mr. Suthi Harnsongkram, the Director of Forest Products<br />

Research, who had kindly helped in the execution of the project plan in his<br />

capacity as the Department's Director General.<br />

Acknowledgements are due Miss Pojanee Jongjitirat of KMIT <strong>for</strong> the<br />

preparation of the main part of this final report and <strong>for</strong> helping with the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>'s promotional training; Mr. Banyat Srisom <strong>for</strong> the final <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />

technical drawings, development of produztion technique and quality control<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> designs, and helping with the <strong>stove</strong>'s promotional training;<br />

Mr. Piroj Uttarapong of Kasetsart University <strong>for</strong> assisting in test data<br />

compilation, <strong>stove</strong> cataloguing, and promotional training.<br />

Mr. Arkom Vejsupasook. the component assistant, Mr. Songdham Jaikwang,<br />

and Miss Malee Rungsrisawadth, project officers, were indispensable <strong>for</strong> the<br />

day-to-day project operation, by conducting the experiment and collection of<br />

data, commissioning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s production, and organizing of<br />

promotional training programs.<br />

Personally, I wish to extend my special thanks to Mr. Sompongse Chantavorapap,<br />

the project manager, and Mr. Minta a Silawatshananai, the USAID<br />

project officer, <strong>for</strong> their unfailing assistance whenever problems arose.<br />

I am also grateful to my research colleaques whose names are all listed<br />

in the Annex <strong>for</strong> their invaluable contribution to the success of this project.<br />

Finally, credit is given to secretarial and the editorial staff of the<br />

Office of Project Support who patiently strived <strong>for</strong> a quality final report.<br />

Aroon Chomcharn<br />

Component Leader<br />

Stove Improvement Component<br />

Royal Forest Department


CONTENTS<br />

Page<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................... 11<br />

List of Tables .......................................................... 17<br />

List of Figures ......................................... :.............. 21<br />

Terms and Abbreviations ............................................... 25<br />

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION<br />

A. The Project ........................................... 31<br />

B. Historical Background ................................. 32<br />

C, Statement of the Problem ............................... 34<br />

D. Objectives of the Study ............................... 36<br />

E. Potential Benefits <strong>for</strong> Rural Development .............. 37<br />

F. Scope of Work ......................................... 37<br />

CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

A. Stove Construction and Design ......................... 43<br />

B. Standard Methods of Testing Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ......... 48<br />

C. Factors Affecting Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ................... 51<br />

D. Conclusion ............................................ 53<br />

C1APTER 3 PLAN AND DESIGN OF THE PROJECT<br />

A. Laboratory and Facility Set Up ........................ 57<br />

3. Collection of Existing Local Stoves ................ 57<br />

C. Investigation of Existing Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance ........... 58<br />

D. Analysis of Stove Physical Factors ..................... 58<br />

E. Development of Improved Prototype ..................... 58<br />

F. Testing of Prototype and Remodif.cation ............... 58<br />

G. Production of Developed Stoves ........................ 59<br />

H. Field Promotion of Developed Stoves ................... 59<br />

CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES<br />

A. Fuel Type and Preparation .............................. 63<br />

B. Tests of Existing Thai Cooking Stoves ................. 64


CONTENTS (continued)<br />

C. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variable on<br />

the Charcoal Bucket Stove ............................<br />

D. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of External Variables on<br />

the Charcoal Bucket Stove ............................<br />

E. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Variables on the<br />

'Non-chimneyed Wood Stove .............................<br />

F. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of External Variables on<br />

the Non-chimneyed Wood Stove .........................<br />

G. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />

CIimneyed Wood Stove .................................<br />

H. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />

Chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ............................<br />

I. Test <strong>for</strong> the Effect of Internal Variables on<br />

Non-chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ........................<br />

Page<br />

J. Development of Improved Stove Prototype ......... 04... 75<br />

CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

A. Physical Structure of Commercial Stoves .............. 79<br />

B. Terminology ..........................................<br />

C. Per<strong>for</strong>mance of Commercial Stoves Tested ............... 85<br />

D.<br />

The Effect of Internal and External Variables ........ 99<br />

CHAPTER 6 THEORETICAL,ANALYSIS OF CHARCOAL STOVE<br />

A. Mathematical Model of the Bucket Stoves<br />

66<br />

68<br />

70<br />

71<br />

72<br />

73<br />

73<br />

85<br />

............. 135<br />

B. Evaluation of Parameters ............................. 143<br />

C. Model Application .................................... 144<br />

D. Discussion and Evaluation ............................ 162<br />

CHAPTER 7 STOVE MODELS DEVELOPED<br />

A. Improved Stove's Terminology ......................... 167<br />

B. Improved Charcoal Stove Model "RFD-1"................ 173<br />

C. Improved Non-chimneyed Wood Stove Model "RFD-2 " ........ 175<br />

D. Improved Chimney Wood Stov . .......................... 180<br />

E. Improved Non-chimneyed Rice Husk Stove ............... 186<br />

F. Improved Chimneyed Rice Husk Stove Model "RFD-3"....... 187


CONTENTS (continued)<br />

CHAPTER 8 IMPROVED STOVE DESIGNS AND PRODUCTION<br />

Page<br />

A. Technical Drawings of Improved Stove .................. 197<br />

B. Construction Instructions ............................ 197<br />

C. A Mass Production Scheme to Make Charcoal and<br />

Wood Stoves Using the Hydraulic Press ................ 209<br />

CHAPTER 9 IMPROVED STOVE PROMOTION<br />

A. Overall Target of Stove Promotion .................... 213<br />

B. Creation of Public Awareness ......................... 215<br />

C. Introduction/Training on Efficient Stoves ............ 216<br />

D. Introduction and Distribution of Sample Stove<br />

to Hn<strong>use</strong>hold Users ................................... 229<br />

E. Organization of Stove Manufacturers to Produce 229<br />

Improved Design Stoves ..............................<br />

CHAPTER 10 CONCLUSIONS.......................................237<br />

CHAPTER 11 RECOMMENDATIONS . ................................... 241<br />

ANNEXES<br />

I.<br />

Commercial Charcoal Bucket Stove Investigated ......... 245<br />

II. Commercial and User Built Wood Stove Without<br />

Chiminey Investigated ................................. 285<br />

III. Commercial Wood Stove With Chimney Investigated ...... 303<br />

IV. Commercial Rice Husk Stove With Chimney<br />

Investigated ......................................... 309<br />

V. List of Staff and Personnel <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement<br />

Component ............................................ 317<br />

REFERENCES .........................................................321


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

Energy <strong>for</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> in Thailand depends largely on <strong>biomass</strong><br />

mainly in the <strong>for</strong>m of wood and charcoal. The annual consumption of both<br />

fuels in terms of solid wood is approximately 40 million cubic meters, with<br />

in estimated value of well over 7.5 billion baht. If this quantity of<br />

wood fuel were to be provided by commercial fuels such as kerosen LPG and<br />

LNG, the national spending on such imports would be at least three times<br />

higher. Furthermore, many problems would exist both with effectively<br />

distributing these <strong>for</strong>ms of energy to rural areas, as well as with its prohibitive<br />

cost.<br />

Statistics on wood consumption of the country reveal that the <strong>use</strong> of<br />

wood <strong>for</strong> fuel is approximately 75-80% of all <strong>use</strong>s (with such purposes as<br />

construction and industrial applications comprising the remainder). This<br />

consumption ratic indicates that the country's dependence on wood fuel is<br />

likely to persist <strong>for</strong> a long time to come.<br />

The present scarcity of fuelwood has already appeared in many areas<br />

of the country. This will occur more frequently as the natural <strong>for</strong>est<br />

diminishes and the population increases. In order to correct this problem,<br />

in addition to planting morc fast-growing species of trees, conservation<br />

through the improvement of inefficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is necessary. As<br />

a cnnsequeD-e the Cooking Stove Improvement <strong>for</strong> Ho<strong>use</strong>hold Use Project was<br />

launched.<br />

The objectives of the project were:<br />

a) to investigate the per<strong>for</strong>mance of existing <strong>stove</strong>s currently<br />

<strong>use</strong>d in Thailand,<br />

b) to make necessary improvements on each type of <strong>stove</strong> (charcoal,<br />

wood, and agriresidue) <strong>for</strong> better fuel efficiency and ease of<br />

operation,<br />

c) to establish <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production techniques suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> small-scale rural industries,<br />

d) to disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation, technology and/or <strong>improved</strong><br />

hardware to <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs, manufacturers, and the general<br />

public, and<br />

e) to increase the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of trained personnel and institutional<br />

research facilities <strong>for</strong> future campaigns investigating<br />

efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

This project component was operated by the Forent Products Research<br />

Division of the Royal Forestry Department. The operation phase was<br />

started in March 1982 and ended in Septe<strong>mb</strong>er 1984. Activities undertaken<br />

included collection and selection of commercial <strong>stove</strong>s, <strong>stove</strong> development<br />

to yield better design, prototype testing, <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production and<br />

fabrication, and promotion of the <strong>improved</strong> final models.<br />

11


Accomplishments can be summarized as follows:<br />

1) The per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand<br />

(both commercial and <strong>use</strong>r-built models) was investigated.<br />

2) Based on the heat utilization efficiency (HU) rating under<br />

the same test standard, it was found that the average HU's<br />

<strong>for</strong> LPG, pressurized kerosene, charcoal bucket, nonchimneyed<br />

wood, chimneyed wood, nonchimneyed rice husk, and chimneyed<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were 46, 48, 27, 20, 12, 16, and 5% respectively.<br />

3) The improvements on the five generic types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

mentioned above have resulted in HU increases of 26% <strong>for</strong><br />

chqrcoal, 35% <strong>for</strong> nonchimneyed wood, 58% <strong>for</strong> chimneyed wood,<br />

20% <strong>for</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk, and 100% <strong>for</strong> chimneyed rice<br />

husk <strong>stove</strong>s as compared with the average existing models.<br />

4) In addition to the HU increase (indicating the net increase<br />

in work output per unit fuel input), certain <strong>stove</strong> featurewere<br />

also <strong>improved</strong> -- particularly the <strong>stove</strong> rim design to<br />

accommodate various sizes of pots and pans, fire-resistant<br />

characteristics of pottery liners <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, and increases of their service lives.<br />

5) A better clay raw material <strong>for</strong> pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s was<br />

identified and a production technique suitable <strong>for</strong> rural<br />

industries developed. A trial production by village <strong>stove</strong><br />

makers employing this technique was successful. 2000 charcoal<br />

and 1200 wood <strong>stove</strong>s of acceptable quality were obtained<br />

with good production precision.<br />

6) The component conducted nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> training courses<br />

<strong>for</strong> concerned rural government officials and rural <strong>stove</strong><br />

<strong>use</strong>rs. The reception <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong> models (particularly<br />

charcoal and nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s) was very encouraging.<br />

The reception <strong>for</strong> rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s was also enthusiastic,<br />

but was restricted to a few rural areas only.<br />

7) During the trial promotion, approximately 1500 charcoal,<br />

800 nonchimneyed wood, 150 nonchimneyed rice husk, and 50<br />

chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were distributed to trainees,<br />

to interested government and private organizations, and<br />

to individual <strong>use</strong>rs upon request.<br />

8) As a result of the project implementation, a modest <strong>stove</strong><br />

laboratory, adequately equipped with basic facilities <strong>for</strong><br />

future work, was established at RFD.<br />

12


CONCLUSIONS<br />

As a result of the implementation of the Improved Biomass Cooking Stove<br />

Component, many activities and achievements took place. Accomplishments can<br />

be described as follows:<br />

1. As a part of institution strengthening, the component has succeeded in<br />

establishing a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> testing laboratory at the Forest Products<br />

Research Division, Royal Forest Department. Thrcugh project funding, the<br />

laboratory was equipped with invaluable, basic test instruments and<br />

facilities--including a microcomputer system <strong>for</strong> future applications.<br />

2. Long-term training of project personnel to increase their fLcure<br />

capabilities was minimum bcca<strong>use</strong> time was short (30 months) and they were<br />

needed on site to carry out project tasks. There<strong>for</strong>e, all technical personnel<br />

were indispensable <strong>for</strong> project implementation. They could not be spared <strong>for</strong><br />

long term training.<br />

3. The component has produced five generic types of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />

namely, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys, and<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys. The absolute heat utilization <strong>for</strong><br />

charcoal and both types of wood <strong>stove</strong>s increased up to 7% over that of the<br />

average commercial models. Further, an increase of 5 and 3% was achieved<br />

with rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys respectively. In terms of<br />

comparative efficiency increases, the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> reached a 26% increase<br />

over the average commercial models, while <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without<br />

chimneys they were 58 and 35% respectively. The increase <strong>for</strong> the rice husk<br />

<strong>stove</strong> with chimney was 100%, or double the efficiency of the average<br />

commercial models. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney had the least<br />

increase, 15 - 16%.<br />

4. The investigation conducted on existing commercial <strong>stove</strong>s revealed that<br />

fuel efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> charcoal, wood, or rice husk are rare. The<br />

laboratory tests have led to the identification ot the <strong>stove</strong>s' critical<br />

physical parameters. They consist of <strong>stove</strong> weight; exhausted gap/area;<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity; rim design <strong>for</strong> proper fit of variously-sized<br />

pots and pans; grate-to-pot distance; grate parameters such as hole area, hole<br />

size and distribution, and thickness; height of chimney, and flue gas baffle<br />

(<strong>for</strong> chimneyed stov;es). Other strong factors also influencing <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance are external variables--fuel load or fuel feeding rate, amount of<br />

water to be boiled, and the wind factor. The in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained was later<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> redesigning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models.<br />

5. Good quality clay material suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing has been<br />

identified and a production technique has also been developed <strong>for</strong> small-scale<br />

and home industries. Local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in one district of Roi-et<br />

Province were trained without any difficulty in this technique of <strong>stove</strong><br />

production. <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, particularly charcoal and nonchimney wood models,<br />

are heat refractory and can withstand thermal shock much better than present<br />

13


commercial ones. In addition, the application of the internal mold has<br />

greatly <strong>improved</strong> the precision necessary to control the critical internal<br />

dimensions. This method was found to be superior'to the traditional one<br />

using an external mold which hardly conLrolled the internal dimensions.<br />

6. The production cost of the <strong>improved</strong> models as described in (2) above<br />

presently is approximately 2.5 times more than the cost of he poorer quality<br />

commercial models. Howevdr, when compared with top quality charcoal bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the market, the <strong>improved</strong> models' cost is 25 - 30% lower.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, in long-term commercial production, the <strong>improved</strong> models will be<br />

competitive when production increases and more <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s reach the<br />

market.<br />

7. So far, nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion and training programs have been<br />

carried out among villagers at various places around the country. The<br />

reception <strong>for</strong> the charcoal bucket and the non-chimney wood <strong>stove</strong>s was very<br />

gdod, while the good reception of the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong> was limited<br />

to a few localities where only rice husk is available. The chimneyed wood<br />

and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> are of less interest to rural <strong>use</strong>rs than the<br />

charcoal bucket and the non-chimneyed wood and the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

It is believed that with good follow-up and promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t, some of the<br />

<strong>improved</strong> developed models will withstand harsh <strong>use</strong> and serve <strong>use</strong>rs well in<br />

rural kitchens. However, these long-term results are yet to be seen.<br />

8. Beca<strong>use</strong> of time constraints, the project had a limited time to approach<br />

manufacturers on a large scale. However, among a few large manufacturers in<br />

the Central area, the response to the idea of mass production of the<br />

developed models was not enthusiastic. This lack of enthusiasm is perhaps<br />

a result of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers being accustomed to the production of their<br />

rough products and being reluctant to manufacture <strong>stove</strong>s with which they have<br />

little or no experience. Moreover, they probably want to see the market <strong>for</strong><br />

high quality, efficient <strong>stove</strong>s develop first be<strong>for</strong>e committing their resources<br />

to their production. There<strong>for</strong>e, more time and more education are needed <strong>for</strong><br />

them to change their attitude and adapt their production techniques.<br />

14


RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

On the basis of the overall work of this project, some recommendations<br />

are presented below:<br />

1. Beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion involve the social customs and<br />

habits of millions of people in Thailand and around the world, it is highly<br />

recommended that <strong>stove</strong> research and development be carried on to furtner<br />

improve present designs and find more alternatives <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

2. Stove development should emphasize each generic type of <strong>stove</strong>; namely,<br />

charcoal, wood with and without chimney, and agrirenidue <strong>stove</strong>s with and<br />

without chimney so that <strong>use</strong>rs have choices.<br />

3. Stove research and development must not only emphasize the good<br />

conversion efficiency, but it most also facilitate ease of <strong>use</strong> and other<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> functions, without causing undue change in people's <strong>cooking</strong> habits.<br />

4. Stove promotion i.sa most difficult activity. It will take a great<br />

deal of time and resources. There<strong>for</strong>e, continuous ef<strong>for</strong>t must be made <strong>for</strong><br />

at least five years with reasonable financial and human resource support in<br />

order to see a real impact among 6 million rural <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

5. In Thailand there are quite a few researchers and interest groups working<br />

on <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, all lack guidelines and<br />

coordination. For national <strong>stove</strong> programs to be directed toward this common<br />

goal, leading government agencies are needed to provide close coordination.<br />

6. During the course of <strong>stove</strong> development, many contacts were made with<br />

experienced <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. It was found that, regardless of their<br />

long experience, their basic understanding of good <strong>stove</strong> configuration, design<br />

and its per<strong>for</strong>mance was very much lacking. This problem was also manifested<br />

in the presence of a large majority of poor quality and less efficient<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in the market. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is strcngly recommended that<br />

concerned government agencies take an initiative toward arranging <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

training programs <strong>for</strong> the promotion of the essential, scientific knowledge<br />

required among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. Incentives or approaches such as offering<br />

a certificate and/or reward to manufacturers of efficient stolres would be<br />

a highly motivating factor.<br />

7. The lack of understanding among <strong>use</strong>rs on the criteria <strong>for</strong> selection and<br />

<strong>use</strong> of efficiett <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s was also evident. There<strong>for</strong>e, the concerned<br />

government agency should establish a long--range,adequately funded educational<br />

campaign program <strong>for</strong> efficient <strong>stove</strong>s--particularly through primary and<br />

secondary school systems.<br />

8. The cost of <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong> production is still high. If simple<br />

hydraulic molding can be developed and employed at the village level,<br />

production costs can be greatly reduced. Under these conditions <strong>stove</strong><br />

dimensions will be more precise and the production rate will be increased<br />

significantly.<br />

15


9. Selection of clay raw material and improvement of the clay mixture and<br />

firing to attain a product with fire resistant characteristics (particularly,<br />

the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> body) are essential to a <strong>stove</strong>'s long service life. The<br />

weight of the <strong>stove</strong> also needs further reduction (to achieve peak per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

with even lower charcoal loads).<br />

10. The <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> is quite efficient <strong>for</strong> the present<br />

developed model. It can conveniently be <strong>use</strong>d to replace three-rock <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

However, the same problems exist in its mass production techniques as ex.st<br />

<strong>for</strong> the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

11. Smoke in the kitchen is a problem inherent in non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

including the three-stone and open fire. Research should be carried out in<br />

Thailand to determine whether smoke from undeveloped and even developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

(which noticeably gives less smoke over the undeveloped ones), has any<br />

significant effect on long-term health of <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

12. Up to the present time, the one hole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has attained<br />

an efficiency up to only 18-19%. In addition, there are problems fitting<br />

pots and pans to this <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is recommended that development<br />

on this type of <strong>stove</strong> be continued in order to improve both heat utilization<br />

efficiency and compatability with various pots and pans. Moreover, the <strong>stove</strong><br />

material (as in the case of the non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s and the charcoal<br />

<strong>stove</strong>) shoul] also be investigated.<br />

13. Even though, at present, the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> is still not<br />

popularly <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand, the chance <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> to become popular in<br />

certain regions is high. This is beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> granulated fuels other<br />

than rice husk (such as sawdust, peanut shell, seed waste, <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>biomass</strong><br />

scraps, etc). There are several further improvements that need consideration.<br />

These include the improvement of the <strong>stove</strong>'s configuration to fit various<br />

pots and pans and reduction of its weight so that sometimes it can be moved<br />

around the ho<strong>use</strong> (yard) when needed. For two people to carry the <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />

weight should not exceed 50 kg.<br />

14. The experience gained from the <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaigns among rural<br />

<strong>use</strong>rs, even in its short duration, strongly indicated that there is a good<br />

chance of success in replacing relatively inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s among 6 million<br />

rural Thai families with efficient <strong>stove</strong>s. It is, there<strong>for</strong>e, recommended that<br />

the government support a nationwide efficient <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaign <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers as soon as possible.<br />

15. Since better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, in part, mean better living<br />

<strong>for</strong> millions of rural families around the world, the idea of<br />

continuous development to attain even better per<strong>for</strong>mance than the present<br />

developed models should be the challenging subject among applied research<br />

scientists and concerned institutions.<br />

16


LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table Title Page<br />

4.1 -.Characteristics of Biomass fuel <strong>use</strong> in the experiment ooo........ 64<br />

5.1 Physical dimensions of tested charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s .......... ... 80<br />

5.2 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimneys ...... 82<br />

5.3 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys ......... 84<br />

5.4 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney ......... 86<br />

5.5 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney ............ 87<br />

5.6 Average testing results of commercial charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s ........... 88<br />

5.7 Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney .......... 96<br />

5.8 Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney ............. 97<br />

5.9 Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney .........98<br />

5.10 Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney ..... 100<br />

5.11 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhausted area<br />

on HU and time to bo>i ........................................... 103<br />

5.12 Test results of the effect of grate hole area on HU and<br />

time to boil .............................................. 104<br />

5.13 Test re;ult of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on HU<br />

and time to boil ............................................... 107<br />

5.14 Test result of the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on<br />

HU and time to boil ............................................. 108<br />

5.15 Test result of the effect of air inlet door on HU and<br />

time to boil ....................................................110<br />

5.16 Test result of the effect of grate thickness on <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance ..................................................... 113<br />

5.17 Test result of the effect of insulation on HU and time to boil ...113<br />

5.18 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> weight on the HU<br />

and time to boil ................................................ 115<br />

5.19 Test result of the effect of initial weight of charcoal<br />

on <strong>stove</strong> HU and time to boil ................................... 116<br />

17


LIST OF TABLES (continued)<br />

Table Title Page<br />

5.20 Test result of the effect of initial weight of water<br />

on HU and time to boil ..........................................<br />

5.21 Test result of the effect of pot size on HU and time to boil .... 119<br />

5.22 Test result of the effect of charcoal size on HU and time<br />

to boil ......................................................... 120<br />

5.23 Test result of the effect of wind on HU and time to boil ........ 121<br />

5.24 Test result of the effect of air relative humidity on<br />

HU and time to boil ............................................. 122<br />

5.25 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap on HU and time<br />

to boil of the wood <strong>stove</strong> ....................................... 123<br />

5.26 Test result of the effect of grate on HU and time to<br />

boil of wood <strong>stove</strong> .............................................. 124<br />

5.27 Test result of the effect of grate hole area on wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 126<br />

5.28 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on<br />

<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 127<br />

5.29 Test result of the effect of wind on wood <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ..... 128<br />

5.30 Test result of the effect of firewood feeding rate on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance ............................................... 130<br />

6.1 Group of <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar behavior and show good<br />

correlation in regression analysis .............................. 150<br />

7.1 Physical characteristics of RFD-1 charcoal <strong>stove</strong> relating<br />

to external variablec ........................................... 174<br />

7.2 Average test results of RFD-I charcoal <strong>stove</strong> under<br />

different <strong>use</strong> conditions ........................................ 174<br />

7.3 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model<br />

RFD-2 with bucket ............................................... 179<br />

7.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of the prototype <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> ...... 185<br />

7.5 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-3 .. 191<br />

8.1 Compositions and fired resistant property of some local<br />

clay materials <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery productions ........... 199<br />

18<br />

117


LIST OF TABLES (continued)<br />

Table Title Page<br />

941 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency.between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm ............................... 217<br />

9.2 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 219<br />

9.3 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Sakolnakorn ................................ 221<br />

9.4 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Pitsanulok ................................. 225<br />

9.5 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 226<br />

9.6 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Chachoengsoa ............................... 227<br />

9.7 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm ............................... 228<br />

9.8 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi ................................... 230<br />

9.9 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Nan ........................................ 231<br />

19


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure Title Page<br />

5.0 Time-temperature characteristic curves of charcoal<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ......................................... ..... ... 90<br />

5.1 Pe,-t rmance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />

(HU) of commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ........................ 91<br />

5.2 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of commercial<br />

charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s .......................................... 92<br />

5.3 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />

(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s .................. 94<br />

5.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of nonchimneyed<br />

and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s ....................................... 95<br />

5.5 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />

(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s ............. <strong>101</strong><br />

5.6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boll of nonchimneyed<br />

and chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s .................................. 102<br />

5.7 The effect of exhausted gap on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency and<br />

time to boil ...................................................105<br />

5.8 The effect of the grate hole area on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil ...... ............ ............................. 106<br />

5.9 The effect of grate--to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency and time to boil .................................... 109<br />

5.10 The effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency and time to boil of three different <strong>stove</strong>s tested .... 11<br />

5.11 The effect of air inlet door on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil ................................................ 112<br />

5.12 The effect of grate thickness on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil ......................<br />

5.13 The effect of the initial weight of charcoal on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency and time to boil ............................... 118<br />

5.14 The effect of exhausted gap on efficiency of various<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong>s ...................................................<br />

5.15 The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the heat utilization<br />

efficiency (HU) of wood <strong>stove</strong>s .................................. 129<br />

6.1 Structure of the ideal Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> ................. 137<br />

P-,. 21<br />

114<br />

125


LIST OF FIGURES (continued)<br />

Figure Title Page<br />

6.2 Geometry of the ideal <strong>stove</strong> ..................................... 145<br />

6.3 Relationship between the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> inlet<br />

air and the grate hole area ..................................... 147<br />

6.4 Relationship between exhaust area and gap height ................ 148<br />

6.5 Relationship between variable X, defined in equation (49),<br />

and time to boil ................................................ 151<br />

6.6 Model prediction of the effect of grate-to-pot distance<br />

on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ............ 153<br />

6.7 Model prediction of the effect of wall thickness on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 154<br />

6.8 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong><br />

at the bottom on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time<br />

to boil ......................................................... 156<br />

6.9 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong><br />

at the pot stand on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and<br />

time to boil ................................................... 157<br />

6.10 Model prediction of the effect of gap height on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ......................... 158<br />

6.11 Model prediction of the effect of grate diameter on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 160<br />

6.12 Model prediction of the effect of grate hole area on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass and time to boil ................... 161<br />

7.1 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> showing various<br />

parts of the construction and terminology ....................... 168<br />

7.2 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> showing parts<br />

of the construction and terminology ............................. 169<br />

7.3 Drawing of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype<br />

showing the construction and terminology ........................ 170<br />

7.4 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />

the construction and terminology ......................... ...... 171<br />

7.5 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> showing the<br />

construction and terminology ............................ .. . 172<br />

7.6 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-I" ...... ...... .177<br />

22


LIST OF FIGURES (continued)<br />

Figure Title Page<br />

7.7 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-I" .......................... 178<br />

7.8 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-2"................... 181<br />

7.9 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model "RFD-2" ................. 182<br />

7.10 Prototype of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />

different parts of construction ................................ 183<br />

7.11 Nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, the "Improved Meechai" model ..... 189<br />

7.12 Improved rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, the "RFD-3" model ....... 193<br />

8.1 Technical Drawing of the Improved Charcoal Stove ............... 201<br />

8.2 Technical Drawing of the Improved Wood Stove ................... 202<br />

8.3 Technical Drawing of the Improved Rice Husk Nonchimneyed Stove . 203<br />

8.4 Technical Drawing of the Improved Rice Husk Stove with<br />

Chimney ........................................................ 204<br />

8.5 Preparation of biscuits and firing to be <strong>use</strong>d later <strong>for</strong><br />

clay mixture ................................................... 205<br />

8.6 Production of charcoal <strong>stove</strong> on the potter's wheel<br />

using the internal mold ........................................ 205<br />

8.7 Disasse<strong>mb</strong>ling of the internal mold from a newly made<br />

charcoal <strong>stove</strong> ................................................. 206<br />

8.8 Improved charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong> after finished firing<br />

and ready <strong>for</strong> further fabrication .............................. 206<br />

8.9 Grate hole design <strong>for</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s .......................... 208<br />

8.10 100-ton hydraulic automatic press machine <strong>for</strong> charcoal<br />

and wood <strong>stove</strong> ................................................. 210<br />

9.1 Introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to participants ............... 233<br />

9.2 Stove contest <strong>for</strong> efficiency comparison between commercial<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s and developed models .................................... 233<br />

9.3 Trainee participation in installing stov's parts .............. 234<br />

9.4 Distribution of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to all participants ........... 234<br />

23


A total surface area, sq cm<br />

A e<br />

A g<br />

A i<br />

c pw<br />

gap area, sq cm<br />

TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS<br />

grate hole area, sq cm<br />

area of opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air, sq cm<br />

heat capacity of wLter, J/gm C<br />

D wall thickness, cm<br />

D b<br />

D g<br />

Dt db outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, cm<br />

outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the grate position, cm<br />

outside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand, cm<br />

inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, Cm<br />

d inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the grate position, cm<br />

g<br />

d t<br />

E c<br />

inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand, cm<br />

heating value of charcoal, 26340 J/gm<br />

Ef heating value of fuel, J/gm<br />

Ek heating value of wood kindling, 17890 J/gm<br />

F12 view factor from surface 1 to surface 2<br />

G gap height, cm<br />

Gr Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

AH heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, J/gm<br />

H grate-to-pot distance, cm<br />

Hba distance between the base and the apex of the outside cone, cm<br />

Hg b<br />

distance between the grate and the base of the outside truvcated<br />

cone, cm<br />

25


Htg distance between the grate and the potstand of the outside cone,<br />

cm<br />

HU heat utilization efficiency, %<br />

h heat transfer coefficient, W/sw cm C<br />

hba distance between the base and the apex of the inside cone, cm<br />

hfg latent heat of vaporization, J/gm<br />

hg b<br />

distance between the grate and the base of the inside truncated<br />

cone, cm<br />

htg distance between the grate and the pot stand of the inside cone,<br />

cm<br />

k thermal conductivity, J/cm s'C<br />

L heat of vaporization of water at lO0C, 2256 J/gm<br />

mc mass oZ charcoal, gm<br />

m <strong>stove</strong> weight, kg<br />

I rate of evaporatcd water, gm/s<br />

V<br />

m initial weight of water, gm<br />

Qabs rate of heat absorption, J/s<br />

Qh rate of heat supplied to water, J/s<br />

QI rate of heat loss, J/s<br />

Qsens sensible heat of water, J<br />

&w rate of heat absorbed by water, J/s<br />

qcond heat flux by conduction, J/s sq cm<br />

c dd heat flux by radiation, J/s sq cm<br />

S specific heat of water, 4.18 J/gm<br />

surface area of pot, sq cm<br />

T temperature, 0 C<br />

Ta<strong>mb</strong> a<strong>mb</strong>ient room temperature, 0 C<br />

Tboil boiling water temperature, 'C<br />

T water temperature, 'C<br />

26


T temperature of water at start of test, OC<br />

T 2<br />

temperature of water at boiliDg point, *C<br />

TTB time to boil, min<br />

t time, min<br />

vc velocity of buoyant gas, cm/s<br />

W weight of water in pot at start of test, gm<br />

W c<br />

W e<br />

weight of charcoal remaining at end of each test, gm<br />

weight of water evaporated at end of each test, gm<br />

Wf weight of fuel <strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />

Wk weight of kindling, gm<br />

p density, g/cu cm<br />

a Stefan-Boltzmann consta.t<br />

efficiency of <strong>stove</strong>, %<br />

27


Chapter 1<br />

Introduction


INTRODUCTION<br />

This publication presents th3 major findings on the testing and<br />

development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand--<strong>stove</strong>s that <strong>use</strong> wood,<br />

chtrcoal and agricultural residues. The Stove Improvement Project has four<br />

major parts responsible <strong>for</strong> different project functions;<br />

1. Stove Testing: Selection of available commercial <strong>stove</strong>s to be tested;<br />

2. Stove Development: Measurement and analysis of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance to<br />

yield designs of new models;<br />

3. Stove Construction and Fabrication: Production of engineering drawings<br />

of the newly developed designs as well as construction and fabrication<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong>s; and<br />

4. Stove Promotion: Carrying out field promotion <strong>for</strong> the newly developed,<br />

highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

A. THE PROJECT<br />

Stove Improvement is one component of 14 separate components involved in<br />

the Renewable Nonconventional Energy Project #493-0304. Projects carried out<br />

include:<br />

Industrial Biogas<br />

Biomass Gasification<br />

Charcoal Improvement<br />

Energy Master Plan Support<br />

Micro-Hydro Project<br />

National Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Center<br />

Pyrolysis of Rice Husks<br />

Regional Energy Centers<br />

Solar Thermal Processes<br />

Solar/Wind Assessment<br />

Stove Improvement<br />

Village Survey<br />

Village Woodlots<br />

Water Lifting Technology<br />

This Project is jointly funded by the United States Agency <strong>for</strong><br />

International Development (USAID) and the Royal Thai Government through the<br />

National Energy Administration (NEA) and Royal Forest Department. The Stove<br />

Improvement program is operated by the Forest Products Research Division of<br />

the Royal Forest Department.<br />

31


B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND<br />

This section briefly discusses the evolution of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in the<br />

world (and Thai cocking <strong>stove</strong>s in particular) in terms of popular types of<br />

hardware and cultural and social habits associated with various models.<br />

Evolution of Cooking Stoves in the World<br />

Evidence of the <strong>use</strong> of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel, particularly wood, has been found<br />

within the caves of Peking man as early as 400,000 years ago (Bronowski,1973).<br />

At that time, <strong>biomass</strong> was presumably <strong>use</strong>d as fuel <strong>for</strong> weather conditioning<br />

(warmth). Its application to <strong>cooking</strong> developed later. While styles and<br />

methods of <strong>cooking</strong> have developed into a variety of artistic and elaborate<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms, the <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s which are the hardwar-e supporting this<br />

activity (as holders <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> utensils and as fuel co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>ers)<br />

have changed very littlu in structure and per<strong>for</strong>mance from their ancient<br />

predecessors.<br />

When compared with modern <strong>stove</strong>s such as oil, gas, and electric, the<br />

<strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are far less efficient. The efficiency of kerosene or<br />

LPG fuelled <strong>stove</strong>s can be as high as 45-48%, while that of a wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

averages only 15-20%. Even though the -ap in efficiency is partially explained<br />

by the lower calorific value of the wood fuel, the main problem still rests<br />

heavily on the hardware design of the <strong>stove</strong> itself.<br />

The development of <strong>stove</strong>s can be seen as eccurring over two periods of<br />

time. The first period began with the birth of the three stone <strong>stove</strong> and<br />

continued until the discovery and application of electricity. The second<br />

period has lasted from that time until the present. While the latter period<br />

amounts to only about 100 years, the first period lasted many thousands of<br />

years.<br />

The slow development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in the early period can<br />

be explained by the abundant supply of wood and the consequent lack of any<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> higher efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s. Most of the ef<strong>for</strong>t toward <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

design in the second period of time has been in the area of the electric, gas,<br />

and oil <strong>stove</strong>s popular in western countries. The application of scientific<br />

principles and knowledge to the design of better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s has<br />

been neglected. However, as the world population has increased tremendously<br />

in the last 100 years, particularly in poor and less developed countries Lhat<br />

are dependent on <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, the demand <strong>for</strong> wood fuel has risen<br />

sharply. The increase in demand coupled with the rapid loss of <strong>for</strong>est land<br />

to agriculture has made the procurement of wood <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> both difficult<br />

and expensive. With the current situation, the time has come <strong>for</strong> humankind<br />

to start applying modern engineering principles to the design of <strong>biomass</strong><br />

<strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s in order to improve this long neglected but widely and daily<br />

<strong>use</strong>d appliance.<br />

32


History of Thai Cooking Stoves<br />

In Thailand, as in many developing countries, a large majority of people<br />

cook meals with <strong>biomass</strong> fuels. The largest proportio.. of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel<br />

consumption consists mainly of wood (59.8%) and charcoal (29.9%) (Pounoum,<br />

Wongopalert, and Arnold 1982). Other types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>use</strong>d as <strong>cooking</strong> fuel<br />

make a considerably smaller contribution. These include rice husk (8.0%),<br />

rice straw (1.7%), and coconut shell (0.6%). The wood and charcoal consumption<br />

in terms of solid wood are reported to be 40 million cubic meters annually.<br />

The quantity of solid fuel <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> is certainly going to increase in<br />

the near future beca<strong>use</strong> of the increase in population. Substitution with other<br />

fuels will be limited. This increasing trend of fuelwood consumption cannot<br />

be ignored beca<strong>use</strong> it results in a greater demand on the fuelwood supply. In<br />

fact, a fuelwood scarcity has already occurred in many areas of the country.<br />

Cooking in Thailand relies heavily on wood beca<strong>use</strong> of its ideal nature<br />

as a fuel. However, most of the <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d by Thai families are still<br />

inefficient. If the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> could be <strong>improved</strong> by only 5-10%<br />

(in fact 50% improvement can be achieved over the average commercial models),<br />

the quantity of wood and charcoal consumed by 6 million rural families in<br />

Thailand can be greatly reduced.<br />

A survey of popular types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is very essential<br />

beca<strong>use</strong> it can be <strong>use</strong>d as a guideline <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> improving strategies. Many<br />

new designs of highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s have failed to gain popular acceptance<br />

beca<strong>use</strong> the new models require changes in family <strong>cooking</strong> habits and social<br />

traditions. In addition, the operation of newly introduced designs is often<br />

more difficult. Hence, some important factors influencing the acceptance of<br />

highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s by rural families are considered in the following<br />

discussion of hardware and cultural and social habits.<br />

PopuZar types of hardware<br />

A survey of <strong>cooking</strong> hardware <strong>use</strong>d by Thai rural families (Pounoum,<br />

Wongopalert, and Arnold 1982) reported that the most popular type was a<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong> which accounted <strong>for</strong> 71% of rural families. Eighteen percent of<br />

rural families <strong>use</strong> the three-stone <strong>stove</strong> and 11% <strong>use</strong> other types of <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

that <strong>use</strong> fuel such as rice husk, sawdust, biogas, etc. The bucket <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

commercially sold in the markets are primarily designed <strong>for</strong> charcoal. However,<br />

some bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are designed <strong>for</strong> dual purposes where either charcoal or<br />

wood can be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> fuel. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, these dual features have<br />

significantly compromised the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (to be discussed later in this<br />

report). Prices vary from 20 baht to 300 baht depending on design, workmanship<br />

and bucket materials. For example, a stainless steel bucket <strong>stove</strong> may<br />

cost 150 baht a piece: it is the most expensive <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

The bucket <strong>stove</strong> is believed to have originated in China as it is known<br />

by Chinese name, "Ang-lo", which means "red color" (the color of low<br />

temperature fired clay). The period in which the bucket <strong>stove</strong> was brought<br />

to Thailand is not known. It possibly could have been brought here as long<br />

as 1,000 years ago during the earliest trade between Thailand and China during<br />

the Sukhothai Period. Or, on the other hand, the bucket <strong>stove</strong> may have come<br />

33


with Chinese migration during the Chinese civil war beca<strong>use</strong> the word "Ang-<br />

Lo" is from the dialect of one Chinese ethnic group that migrated to Thailand<br />

in large nu<strong>mb</strong>ers during that time. If this is true, then the time of its<br />

appearance in Thailand would be only about 100 years ago.<br />

The three-stone is really an ancient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>d throughout the<br />

world that may have originated hundreds of thousands of years ago. It still<br />

exists today, and in Thailand is <strong>use</strong>d only with wood. For other oiomass,<br />

such as rice husk, sawdust, and peanut shells, the other <strong>stove</strong> is <strong>use</strong>d,<br />

particularly in central areas where fuelwood is scarce. Rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

normally include chimneys beca<strong>use</strong> burning husks requires an induced draught<br />

to facilitate continuous co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Recently, non-chimney rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

have been found being <strong>use</strong>d by some Kampuchean refugee families at Kao-I-Dang,<br />

Refugee Camp in eastern Thailand. Both types of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, chimney and<br />

non-chimney, have not been widely <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand so far.<br />

Cutlturci and .ociaZ habits<br />

The size of a Thai family averages 6 persons. To cook food <strong>for</strong> this<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of people usually takes about 45 minutes to 1 hour. Most of the<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> is of rice (boiling or steaming), with an average <strong>cooking</strong> time of<br />

about 15-30 minutes. Meat and vegetable dishes are usually cooked rapidly<br />

thereafter and, hence, the <strong>cooking</strong> time is less than 10 minutes/dish. This<br />

kind of <strong>cooking</strong> always requires high heat intensity, and there<strong>for</strong>e, a onehole<br />

<strong>stove</strong> is preferred over multiple ones. Furthermore, in Thai culture,<br />

me<strong>mb</strong>ers of the family do not gather around the fireplace after the meal,<br />

drinking tea or coffee. Hence, the second pot hole (<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> warming a hot<br />

drink) is not needed. Neither hot water <strong>for</strong> bathing nor room heating is<br />

required.<br />

For these characteristics and <strong>cooking</strong> practices of Thai families, the<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong> is considered the most suitable and, there<strong>for</strong>e, has become the<br />

most popular type of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> throughout the country. It is believed<br />

that at least 4 million bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are being employed in Thailand at<br />

present.<br />

C. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM<br />

The problems associated with <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are discussed in the<br />

following section.<br />

Use of Inefficient Cooking Stoves<br />

Rough efficiency tests have been per<strong>for</strong>med on commercial charcoal, wood<br />

as well as three-stone <strong>stove</strong>s at the <strong>use</strong>r end (Pounoum, Wongopalert, and<br />

Arnold 1982). It was found that most <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are inefficient. For<br />

example, the average efficiency of wood burning <strong>stove</strong>s is 13.6%, and charcoal<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong>s 21.6%. The low efficiency per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is due<br />

mainly to poor design. For instance, the bucket <strong>stove</strong>s available on the<br />

market usually have an overly large exhaust gap through which a large<br />

34


quantity of sensible heat escapes. The <strong>stove</strong> rim is also poorly designed<br />

and can accommodate only a few pots and pans. Some wood <strong>stove</strong>s do not have<br />

grates and hence air <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is distributed pQorly, resulting in<br />

poor co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of the fuel.<br />

Lack of Knowledge and Awareness in Selecting Good Stoves<br />

Almost all people who <strong>use</strong> <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s daily seem to be<br />

unconcerned about the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. This may be due to the lack of<br />

awareness and knowledge of how a good <strong>stove</strong> could per<strong>for</strong>m and the inability<br />

to recognize higher efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s. The selection of the appropriate type<br />

of <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> specific <strong>biomass</strong> fuel is also very important. For example, if<br />

charcoal is uced in a bucket <strong>stove</strong> designed <strong>for</strong> wood, the efficiency of that<br />

<strong>stove</strong> will be reduced at least oy 5-10%.<br />

Lack of Interest and Knowledge axnong Manufacturers in the<br />

Production of Good Stoves<br />

Even though there exist some large bucket <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in Thailand.<br />

the majority of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s are generally produced within family<br />

industries where me<strong>mb</strong>ers of the family do the work. Stove manufacturing<br />

knowledge (or poor knowledge) and skill has usually been passed down through<br />

new me<strong>mb</strong>ers over time. However, after conversing with many manufacturers, it<br />

was found that most of them still lack the interest and knowledge to recogPize<br />

the essential features of good <strong>stove</strong>s. The idea of competing <strong>for</strong> cheaper<br />

products among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers without concern <strong>for</strong> quality is quite<br />

prominent. This has brought about poor efficiency and durability of <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

on the market.<br />

Lack of Knowledge of Stove Maintenance<br />

Commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are made of a low temperature fired clay material.<br />

Their durability when exposed to very high temperatures, such as the hot<br />

glowing charcoal bed in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, is such that it will last<br />

only about 3-6 months at the most without an outside restraining device. If<br />

this fired clay <strong>stove</strong> is bucketted and prorerly filled with insulating<br />

materials and lined around the inside wall with an inexpensive refractory<br />

mixture, the service life of the <strong>stove</strong> can be prolonged to approximately 1<br />

year. Good care of <strong>stove</strong>s such as the repairing or the replacing of the<br />

grate, refractory lining, and rim sealing can greatly help to extend the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s life expectancy. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, most <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> tenders also lack<br />

this knowledge. In addition, it has been found that quite often the <strong>stove</strong><br />

is overloaded with charcoal above the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and hence, the<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> pot that rests on the charcoal bed will directly assert its own<br />

weight on to the grate. This will daanage the grate and ca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

degradation. Hot liquid splashing on to the <strong>stove</strong> rim and inside the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er due to severe boiling also affects the <strong>stove</strong>'s life<br />

expectancy beca<strong>use</strong> it will ca<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong>'s rim and body to crack.<br />

35


Lack of Understanding of Fuel Preparation<br />

Wet fuel burns less effectively than dry fuel beca<strong>use</strong> part of the heat<br />

of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is consumed to evaporate the water. Fresh wood generally<br />

contains about 50% moisture; there<strong>for</strong>e, wood should be ideally dried down to<br />

a moistura content of approximately 15%-12% be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>use</strong>. This can be done<br />

easily by placing it under the grate during <strong>cooking</strong>, or by letting it air dry<br />

<strong>for</strong> several days after splitting. It was found that many ho<strong>use</strong>hola cooks do<br />

not practice fuelwood preparation and drying. Another factor that<br />

contributes to the inefficient consumption of fuel is the lack of understanding<br />

of fuel <strong>use</strong>. For example, some <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> cooks insert a large piece of log<br />

into the <strong>stove</strong>. This kind of practice not only prolongs <strong>cooking</strong> time but also<br />

requires more firewood. In addition, the heavy wood piece can damage the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> structure easily. Smaller sized wood burns more effectively than fuel<br />

of a larger size, since a smaller size has a larger surface area of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

with air. There<strong>for</strong>e, large pieces of wood should be split or chopped into<br />

smaller ones <strong>for</strong> more efficient <strong>use</strong> of fuel.<br />

High Cost, Limited Production and Distribution of Good Stoves<br />

Since the main energy sources <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> in Thailand are wood and<br />

charcoal, the degradation of natural <strong>for</strong>est has become evident in many areas<br />

of the country. The rate of de<strong>for</strong>estation has increased tremendously during<br />

the last decade. For example, the <strong>for</strong>est areas of the country have been<br />

reduced from 273,628 sq.km. in 1961 to 156,600 sq.km. in 1982 (Forestry<br />

Statistics 1982). Even though the depletion of the <strong>for</strong>est is not only ca<strong>use</strong>d<br />

by the consumption of fuelwood <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> but also by slash and burn<br />

agriculture, road construction, etc., 40 million cu.m./yr of wood fuel is<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> alone. This will contribute significantly to the wood<br />

scarcity problem in the near future.<br />

Fortunately, commercial, fast-growing tree plantations that produce fuel<br />

(such as the mangrove, Eucalyptus, and Casuarina) can somewhat reduce the<br />

depletion of wood. However, if the commercial wood plantations are not<br />

expanded on a large scale, or are developed without the attempt to reduce<br />

heavy woodfuel consumption by initiation of efficient <strong>stove</strong>s, or by encouraging<br />

the people to grow more wood <strong>for</strong> their own <strong>use</strong>, Thailand's natural <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

can become exha<strong>use</strong>d within a very short time.<br />

D. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY<br />

The following are the five major objectives of the study:<br />

1. Tu established a model <strong>stove</strong> testing and evaluation center to<br />

accommodate the national need <strong>for</strong> present and future research and<br />

development of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

2. To conduct a systematic investigation on present per<strong>for</strong>mance of existing<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s being <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand.<br />

36


3. To make necessary improvements in terms of heat conversion efficiency,<br />

ease of operation and durability <strong>for</strong> three generic types of <strong>stove</strong>;<br />

namely, charcoal, wood, and rice husk/agriresidue.<br />

4. To develop an <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production technique suitable <strong>for</strong> present<br />

small scale and medium scale rural industries.<br />

5. To disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>improved</strong> hardware and/or technology generated<br />

by this study to <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs, manufacturers, and the general public.<br />

E. POTENTIAL BENEFITS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

The potential benefits expected to be gained by the people who live in<br />

rural areas of Thailand are:<br />

1. Decrease in national overall fuelwood consumption, and hence, an indirect<br />

decrease in the rate of de<strong>for</strong>estation.<br />

2. Helping stimulate the establishment of indigenous renewable sources of<br />

energy in community, village and private woodlots through the popular<br />

employment of efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

3. Retarding the rate of increase of imported petroleum derived <strong>cooking</strong><br />

fuels.<br />

4. Reduction of <strong>cooking</strong> time as well as ease of <strong>cooking</strong> through the <strong>use</strong> of<br />

highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s and also a plausible reduction in kitchen air<br />

pollutants due to mre complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of the fuel.<br />

5. Individual savings on <strong>stove</strong> costs and woodfuel costs due<br />

life and better efficiency.<br />

to longer service<br />

6. The improvement of material and technology <strong>for</strong> constructing the developed<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s co<strong>mb</strong>ined with the better understanding of <strong>stove</strong> operation, care,<br />

and maintenance will altogether help the economy of <strong>stove</strong> producers and<br />

<strong>use</strong>rs in the long run.<br />

F. SCOPE OF WORK<br />

The <strong>stove</strong> improvement component project was designed to invertigate types<br />

of <strong>biomass</strong> fuels and types of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. Charcoal, wood, and rice husk<br />

are the prominent <strong>biomass</strong> fuels <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand and, hence, were to be<br />

selected <strong>for</strong> this study. The popular types of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s among <strong>use</strong>rs and<br />

those which are strictly <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> were to be chosen <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

development. A detailed scope of work which includes laboratory set up, <strong>stove</strong><br />

testing, analyses of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, designs of developed models,<br />

construction and fabrication, and <strong>stove</strong> promotion follows. These lists<br />

present the steps that were to be taken <strong>for</strong> all aspects of the project.<br />

37


Laboratory Set Up<br />

1. Selection of the site and laboratory construction at the Royal Forest<br />

Department.<br />

2. Acquisition of test instruments and facilities.<br />

3. Acquisition of technical consultants and researchers.<br />

Stove Testing Program<br />

1. Collect from the field various models of <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d in different parts<br />

of Thailand.<br />

2. Select fuels to be <strong>use</strong>d in tests and determine standard fuel preparatior<br />

methods.<br />

3. Select appropriate <strong>cooking</strong> and water boiling experiments and techniques.<br />

4. Test the <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s according to the selected testing experiment.<br />

Analyses of Stove Per<strong>for</strong>mance Yield Design of Improved Model<br />

1. For each model tested, determine the design parameters to be modified.<br />

2. Measure the per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>stove</strong> models and the effects of changas in<br />

design parameters; per<strong>for</strong>mance measures include fuel consumption, rate<br />

of heat generation, <strong>cooking</strong> and boiling times, and efficiency<br />

determination.<br />

3. Select <strong>stove</strong> designs which have good per<strong>for</strong>mance characteristics.<br />

4. Design the prototype of developed models.<br />

Stove Construction and Fabrication<br />

1. Discuss with village craftsmen the methods of fabrication, the materials<br />

available <strong>for</strong> fabrication and the cost of constructing the units.<br />

.2. Select and improve clay materials <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production.<br />

3. Improve technique of <strong>stove</strong> production.<br />

4. Trial production of developed <strong>stove</strong>s in actual small scale rural <strong>stove</strong><br />

manufacturing factories.<br />

5. Prepare <strong>stove</strong> guideline <strong>for</strong> fabrication, <strong>use</strong>, and maintenance.<br />

6. Prepare technical drawings of developed <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

38


Stove Promotion<br />

1. Introduce developed <strong>stove</strong>s through gwernment agencies and villagers<br />

via training courses, and in<strong>for</strong>matioh!brochure distribution.<br />

2. Organize <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers to produce <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

3. Distribute <strong>stove</strong> sampleb to <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs in rural areas via Regional<br />

Energy Center of NEA.<br />

39


Chapter 2<br />

Review of Literature<br />

Par. ., 'Z , ,, " " j.<br />

" ' ' 2- c.


REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s have been <strong>use</strong>d by human beings <strong>for</strong> a long time<br />

but the knowledge of how various <strong>stove</strong> designs per<strong>for</strong>m under different<br />

conditions is still vague. Most of the work done in the past was directed<br />

at trying to improve <strong>stove</strong> configuration; a few studies attempted to<br />

develop methods of testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In this Chapter, a review of<br />

<strong>stove</strong> construction and design, methods of testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, and<br />

factors affecting <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance will be presented.<br />

A. STOVE CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN<br />

Various <strong>stove</strong> configurations are seen in Thailand and overseas. The<br />

variation comes about as a consequence of <strong>cooking</strong> habits and simplicity.<br />

In some countries people prefer to sit while <strong>cooking</strong>, while in others<br />

standing is preferred. To suit such <strong>cooking</strong> habits, <strong>stove</strong>s are constructed<br />

differently. In this section, construction and design of open fire Thai<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, and overseas <strong>stove</strong>s are reviewed.<br />

Open Fire Stoves<br />

The open fire <strong>stove</strong> is a primitive <strong>stove</strong> which is still widely <strong>use</strong>d in<br />

the developing world. The fire is encircled by more stones, bricks,cement,<br />

or lumps of other inco<strong>mb</strong>ustible material. The open fire <strong>stove</strong>sometimes<br />

called the three-stone <strong>stove</strong> (or fire), has no cost; no special materials<br />

or tools are needed to construct it and it can be located anywhere.<br />

Moreover, the heat output from the fire can be controlled by adding or<br />

withdrawing fuel.<br />

Many different arrangements are found. Many countries <strong>use</strong> metal trivets;<br />

the trivet consists of a horizontal metal ring to which three legs are<br />

attached. in Senagal, 55% of the rural population <strong>use</strong>s trivets (Modon et<br />

al., 1982).<br />

Thai Stoves<br />

A variety of <strong>stove</strong>s can be found in Thailand, both <strong>use</strong>r built and<br />

commercially manufactured. Charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, which can be found almost<br />

everywhere in Thailand, have been studied by Thai investigators (Osuwan and<br />

Boonyakiat, 1982). The structure of this <strong>stove</strong> will be described in a later<br />

chapter, The book by Dunn, et al.(1982) and De Lepeleria.et al.(1981) also<br />

has detailed descriptions. Since the Thai charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> was<br />

investigated in this study, it is appropriate to review the literature and<br />

the various investigations already conducted.<br />

43


Thai Charcoal Bucket Stove<br />

Although there are various kinds of bucket <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand, they<br />

have a common structure. The <strong>stove</strong> is normally made of fired clay in the<br />

shape of an inverse truncated cone, (or cylinder) which is placed in a<br />

metal (generally zinc) bucket-liked container; hence, the name "bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong>." Charcoal is the main fuel <strong>for</strong> this kind of <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

In 1982, Meta Systems Inc. Thai Group, sponsored by USAID, investigated<br />

the per<strong>for</strong>mance of Thai charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s made by different local<br />

manufacturers (Pounoumet al., 1982). The group utilized boiling water tests<br />

and <strong>cooking</strong> tests (described later in this chapter) in their study. Using<br />

the water boiling tests, they found that the ratio between the water and the<br />

fuel affected <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance more than the size of <strong>stove</strong> and <strong>cooking</strong><br />

vessel. Time to boil ranged from 11 to 51 minutes. Pounoum et al.(1982)<br />

also considered the effect of starter fuels on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, since<br />

starter fuels vary among villagers. Using the "<strong>cooking</strong> test," they compared<br />

the quantities of fuel, food and water <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>cooking</strong> rice. The average<br />

amount of released heat from the fuel consumed was found to be 3.2 kilocalories<br />

per gram of food cooked. Further, <strong>stove</strong> efficiency obtained from<br />

"the water boiling test" demonstrated that the average value <strong>use</strong>d by food<br />

in <strong>cooking</strong> was 650 calories per gram of food.<br />

Osuwan and Boonyakiat (1982) applied water boiling tests to examine the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of Thai charcoal bucket lLoves. They found that <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

was affected by <strong>stove</strong> size, air inlet area, gap height, grate hole area,<br />

aluminium pot size, quantity of water <strong>use</strong>d in the test, and quantity and mass<br />

of charcoal. Their results showed that <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance improves if <strong>stove</strong><br />

diameter is increased, or the air inlet area is decreased, or the gap height<br />

is reduced. The efficiency of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance varied from 20.86 to 33.95%.<br />

feechai rice husk <strong>stove</strong> (Meechai, undated)<br />

The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> *iscomposed of four structural metal pieces: a cone,<br />

a <strong>stove</strong> body, stands, and an ash receiver. The cone, the <strong>stove</strong> body and<br />

the ash receiver are made from scrap metal or galvanized sheet; the stands<br />

are steel rods. The <strong>stove</strong> body is put into the cone, which itself is set<br />

on the stands; rice husks fill the space between the <strong>stove</strong> body and the cone.<br />

At the apex of the cone, an ash removal service is positioned to let the ash<br />

fall out of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Sooksunt economy <strong>stove</strong> (Sooksunt, 198Z)<br />

The Sooksunt <strong>stove</strong> can be made of bricks, cement, or a mixture of clay<br />

and rice husk. It has a chimney. There are three types. Type 1 can be<br />

<strong>use</strong>d with any kind of fuel except rice husk and sawdust. Type 2 can be<br />

<strong>use</strong>d with any fuel. Type 3 is designed <strong>for</strong> the Hill Tribes in Thailand and<br />

cannot <strong>use</strong> rice husk or sawdust as fuel. Detailed designs can be found in<br />

the article by Sooksunt (1981).<br />

The rice <strong>cooking</strong> test was per<strong>for</strong>med to test <strong>cooking</strong> time. For a<br />

family of 5 people, the Sooksunt <strong>stove</strong> can steam rice in 30 minutes. The<br />

time <strong>use</strong>d as reported was not much different from that required by gas <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

44


The <strong>stove</strong> is recommended <strong>for</strong> a medium income family (Intrapanich, 1981)<br />

beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> any waste materials as fuels.<br />

Swat <strong>stove</strong> (Suwat, undated)<br />

The Suwat 6tove has two pot holes; each pot hole is made from steel and<br />

insulated with sand, ash, clay, and cement. The first pot hole is above the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er; the second is located between the first and a steel<br />

chimney. An efficiency of approximately 23% has been obtained from the <strong>stove</strong><br />

when sawdust is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, ana 17% when rubber wood wastes are <strong>use</strong>d.<br />

Nai La <strong>stove</strong><br />

The Nai La <strong>stove</strong> is made from a cylindrical paint can, 6-7 inches in<br />

diameter and 12 inches high. At the lower part of the can, 2" x 2" air<br />

inlet hole is cut away to be <strong>use</strong>d as the ignition port. Since the <strong>stove</strong> is<br />

made from a can, it is sometimes called a "canned <strong>stove</strong>" (Bumroong, 1981).<br />

Fuels <strong>use</strong>d are normally sawdust and rice husk, The packing of fuel is<br />

achieved by placing a long ba<strong>mb</strong>oo stick or a pipe at the axis of the can.<br />

After the can is filled with fuel and compressed in the bucket, the stick<br />

is pulled out, leaving a hole <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion along the tunnel from the<br />

outway ignition port.<br />

It has been found that <strong>stove</strong> efficiencies are 14-16%, and 12% when<br />

sawdust and rice husk are <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, respectively.<br />

Noi Palipu (1981) has <strong>improved</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> in both construction materials<br />

and size to gain more durability and reliability <strong>for</strong> daily practical <strong>use</strong>.<br />

This <strong>stove</strong> has been recommended <strong>for</strong> the family with low income since<br />

the material <strong>for</strong> construction is inexpensive and easy to find (Intrapanich,<br />

1981).<br />

Economy fixed <strong>stove</strong><br />

The Economy fixed <strong>stove</strong> is made of cement and brick, or clay. There<br />

are two pot seats aligned with a chimney. The <strong>stove</strong> base is tilted such<br />

that the distance between the base and the chimney is lower than that between<br />

the base and the pot seat. Fuel can be wood or rice husk.<br />

Overseas Stoves<br />

Stoves found in developing countries are summarized below.<br />

Traditional <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

The traditional Bangladesh Chula consists of a short, slightly downwardsloping<br />

tunnel dug into the ground, with a pothol, cut in the roof at the<br />

end. The fire is lit beneath the pot and is kept alight by feeding it with<br />

fuel pushed in from the open end of the tunnel. In some cases, the size of<br />

the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er is increased, and two potholes are provided. The depth<br />

45


of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er in these Chula <strong>stove</strong>s is approximately 40-55 cm. (Omar,<br />

undated).<br />

Tungku Muntilan (Joseph et aL, 1980) report that a traditional <strong>stove</strong><br />

constructed in Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia, is constructed from clay<br />

and has approximate dimensions of 65 cm x 33 cm x 22 cm. It weighs<br />

approximately 20 kgs. There are two poL seats, the second acting as a chimney.<br />

The <strong>stove</strong> is sun dried, not fired. It hardens after <strong>use</strong> in the kitchen.<br />

Portable <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

In Kenya and other East African countries, a metal <strong>stove</strong> called a Jiko<br />

(Foley and Moss, 1983) is made from scrap metals in the <strong>for</strong>m of a cylinder<br />

approximately 25 cm in diameter and 15 cm high. It has a per<strong>for</strong>ated metal<br />

grage mid-height. Pot supports are fixed to the top edge and project<br />

inward a few centimeters. Fueling is done by feeding small pieces of<br />

charcoal around and under the pot, or by lifting the pot. Ashes are removed<br />

through a small side door at the base of the <strong>stove</strong>. This door can be <strong>use</strong>d<br />

as a means of controlling the flow of air to the grate.<br />

In India, a <strong>stove</strong> made of light sheet steel is equipped with a carrying<br />

handle, like that on the bucket. In some areas, the <strong>stove</strong> is lined with<br />

mud and cement. This insulates the <strong>stove</strong>, and cuts down on the radiant heat<br />

loss from tne sides (Gupta and Usha, 1980).<br />

A cylindrical <strong>stove</strong> with an outside wall of steel and an inner lining<br />

of cement is also <strong>use</strong>d in Indonesia. The grate consists of iron bars fixed<br />

into the lining (de Lepeleire et aL, 1981).<br />

The Rural Znergy Laboratory of the Central Power Research Institute,<br />

Bangalore (India), has developed a <strong>stove</strong>, called a Priyagni (Cook<strong>stove</strong><br />

Bulletin, 1984). The <strong>stove</strong> is cylindrically shaped with metal stands to<br />

keep it steady and help in moving it. A cylindral co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er closed<br />

both at the top and the bottom has slotted plates of a particular pattern,<br />

A grate is fitted inside the cha<strong>mb</strong>er slightly above the bottom slotted plate.<br />

The dimensions of the slotted plate and the cha<strong>mb</strong>er have been proportioned<br />

to achieve <strong>improved</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. An aluminium sheet lining is also provided<br />

in the cha<strong>mb</strong>er to reflect heat and to reduce wall radiation loss. The <strong>stove</strong><br />

has been produced in 3 different sizes--small, medium and large.<br />

The Keren <strong>stove</strong>, a <strong>stove</strong> widely <strong>use</strong>d in Central Java <strong>for</strong> boiling water<br />

and frying, is made of fired clay. It consists of a spherical firebox over<br />

which a pot is placed. There are 7 holes (1.5 cm in diameter) spaced evenly<br />

around the sides at the base of the firebox. The diameter of the firebox<br />

is 24 cm and the height is 16 cm. The enl:rance cf the firebox is 18 cm widL<br />

and 7 cm high. The <strong>stove</strong> weighs 3 kgs (Joseph eL al, 1980).<br />

The single pot ceramic Chula is found n many Asian countries. It is<br />

called Keren in Indonesia, Kamado cooker in Japan. This <strong>stove</strong> is usually<br />

cylindrical, approximately I cm in diameter and 10 cm in height, weighs<br />

about 5 kg and is easily portable. Fuel is added through a hole in the side<br />

at ground level. Wood, straw, dung, and other materials are burned as fuel.<br />

46


When charcoal is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, a grate is required (Foley and Moss, 1983).<br />

Tunga Sae, <strong>use</strong>d in urban areas of Indonesia, is made from clay by a<br />

potter using either a pottery wheel and/or coiling techniques. It consists<br />

of a firebox, a connecting flue and a second pot seat. The connecting flue<br />

slopes up from the firebox and has a cross-section of 8 cm x 8 cm. The<br />

firebox has a height of 21 cm and a diameter of 24 cm. The second pot seat<br />

Las a height of 25 cm and a diameter of 20 cm. The <strong>stove</strong> weighs 8 kgs.<br />

Wood or wastes can be burned in this <strong>stove</strong>. When the first pot boils, it can<br />

be interchanged with the second pot to achieve faster <strong>cooking</strong> time and lower<br />

wood consumption. The first pot, now on the back hole, will simmer while<br />

the pot on the front is brought to boil (Joseph et al, 1980).<br />

A <strong>stove</strong> especially made <strong>for</strong> burning rice husk is <strong>use</strong>d in Bali. It<br />

simply consists of an open-top oil drum with a hole in the side at ground<br />

level. Be<strong>for</strong>e loading it with rice husk, a thick stick is laid horizontally<br />

across the bottom of the drum from the center outward through the hole in<br />

the side. Another stick is held vertically at the center. The rice husk<br />

is then packed tightly around the two sticks. When a fire is required, the<br />

sticks are removed, leaving passage <strong>for</strong> air through the opeuing in the side,<br />

across the base, and up through the center of the fuel bed. The fire is<br />

kindled at the bottom, and provides approximately two hours burning (Cook<br />

Stoves Handbook, 1982).<br />

Recently, a company in the U.S.A. designed and constructed a portable<br />

<strong>stove</strong>, called the Z Stove (private communication). The <strong>stove</strong> is made of<br />

a pop-riveted, galvanized sheet steel box 7 x 7 inches square, 10 inches<br />

tall and 4 pounds in weight. The <strong>stove</strong> features a cylindrical firebox inside,<br />

with a galvanized screen fire grate at its bottom, an aperture <strong>for</strong> inserting<br />

bits of fuel, a small drawer beneath the grate <strong>for</strong> insertion of kindling, a<br />

draft/damper control, an X-type <strong>cooking</strong> vessel support and a wire bale<br />

handle. The <strong>stove</strong> can burn any solid fuel from wood to animal dung. The<br />

manufacturer claims that the <strong>stove</strong> is highly efficient. However, ITDG testing,<br />

showed that the Zip was 25.4 to 29.7% efficient (from Testing of the Zip Stoves,<br />

Stove Project Technical Notes No. 3).<br />

Fixed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

Fixed <strong>stove</strong>s are usually constructed from mud, mud and clay bricks, or<br />

mud and sand. Collectively, these are often referred to as mud <strong>stove</strong>s, When<br />

constructed, these <strong>stove</strong>s are sometimes coated with a thin paste of cowdung<br />

to prevent them from cracking.<br />

In a simple fixed <strong>stove</strong> design, fire surrounds three sides with an<br />

opening <strong>for</strong> fuel at the front. It is built to take a single pot. The pot<br />

is sometimes seated on three or more small raised mounds around the pot hole.<br />

These permit the hot gases and smoke from the fire to escape upwards around<br />

the sides of the pot. In other cases the pot sits tightly into the pothole.<br />

In some rural areas of India, the opening <strong>for</strong> the fuel is bridged<br />

across to provide a complete surrounding <strong>for</strong> the bottom of the pot (Cook<br />

Stove Handbook, 1982).<br />

47


Many types of mud <strong>stove</strong>s have two or more potholes. Magan Choolah <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

in India are made from mud, dung or straw cuttings and cowdung. This <strong>stove</strong><br />

has three potholes situated at the three corners of a triangle and<br />

interconnected by ducts. The hot gases pass ftom the first pot seat to the<br />

second, and then to the third. One damper is rositioned in the connecting<br />

duct between the first and second pot seat to control the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion.<br />

A chimney is incorporated as a smoke outlet (Tata, 1979). Similar mud <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

are found in the urban areas of Indonesia (de Lapeleire et al, 1981).<br />

A smokeless HERL Choolah <strong>stove</strong> was designed at the Hyderabad Engineering<br />

Research Laboratories in Hyderabad, India (Tata, 1979). It is made from<br />

bricks and mud or only mud. There are 4 pot seats situated on a L-S shaped<br />

duct, the first three are <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>, the fourth is <strong>for</strong> heating water. One<br />

damper is positioned inside the connecting duct between the fourth pot<br />

seat and the chimney to control the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Only the first pot<br />

seat receives the maximum heat. When one or two pot seats are in <strong>use</strong>, the<br />

others are kept closed.<br />

In some mud <strong>stove</strong>s with two or more potholes, these potholes are<br />

positioned more or less symmetrically over the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er and each pot<br />

obtains roughly the same amount of heat. One of these <strong>stove</strong>s is an <strong>improved</strong><br />

HERL Choolah, which has three pot seats (Tata, 1979). A variety of <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

(varying only in detail) are <strong>use</strong>d in different parts of Indonesia (de<br />

Lapeleire et al, 1981; Singer, 1961).<br />

The Lorena mud <strong>stove</strong> which was developed at the Ahagui Experimental<br />

Station, Guatemala has five openings, <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> and a chimney <strong>for</strong> smoke<br />

outlet (Tata, 1979; Kaufman, 1983). The first pct is heated directly by<br />

fuel; the others are heated by the hot gases which pass through a long system<br />

of ducts connecting one pot seat to others. There are three dampers: the<br />

first is in the duct that connects the mouth of the <strong>stove</strong> to the first pot<br />

seat; the second is between the second and the third pot seats; and the<br />

third is between the fourth and the fifth pot seats,<br />

B. STANDARD METHODS OF TESTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />

Although human being have been using <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> a long<br />

time, standard methods of comparing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance evolved only recently.<br />

Joseph and Shanahan (1980) realized the necessity of standardizing testing<br />

methods; they found that improper stacking of wood could produce as much<br />

as a 100% in difference per<strong>for</strong>mance figures.<br />

A few methods of testing have been proposed (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980;<br />

Joseph, 1979). For a <strong>stove</strong> test to be <strong>use</strong>ful, Joseph (1979) recommends that<br />

the test should be simple, reproducible, adaptable to any fuel <strong>stove</strong>, and<br />

reflect local <strong>cooking</strong> practices. It is found that neglecting the last<br />

recommendation can ca<strong>use</strong> a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance when <strong>use</strong>d with different<br />

practices (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />

In addition, Joseph (1979) suggests that the tests should be atle to<br />

determine the amount of energy <strong>use</strong>d to cook a meal or boil water, and the<br />

amount of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel consumed. The reason <strong>for</strong> these two determinations<br />

48


is that the first will give the heat utilization or <strong>cooking</strong> efficiency, and<br />

the second the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion efficiency.<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance of a <strong>stove</strong> is usually expressed in terms of heat<br />

utilization. This term is defined as "the ratio of heat absorbed by the<br />

water to heat liberated fL:om the burning <strong>biomass</strong>" (Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />

There are two kinds of he.It utilization: one does not include the heat<br />

required in evaporating, the other includes the heat required in evaporating.<br />

Another term that is sometimes <strong>use</strong>d in comparing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />

"burning rate". Burning rate is defined as the amount of wood (<strong>biomass</strong>)<br />

burnt (in the experiment) divided by the duration (of the experiment)<br />

(Joseph and Shanahan, 1980). The burning rates are found to vary with size<br />

of wood.<br />

Two types of tests are commonly cariied out on <strong>stove</strong>s: one is the<br />

"boiling water" test, and the other is the "<strong>cooking</strong> food". Other tests such<br />

as co<strong>mb</strong>ustion tests are also sometimes <strong>use</strong>d (Joseph, 1979).<br />

Boiling water tests<br />

There are 4 tests being <strong>use</strong>d as standard methods:<br />

1. A fixed quanLi'v of water is evaporated, with fuel and time as<br />

variables.<br />

2. Quantities of fuel and water are fixed, with time as a variable.<br />

3. A fixed quantity of fuel is burnt, with the quantity of water<br />

evaporated and time as variables.<br />

4. The quantity of water evaporated within 30 minutes is determined,<br />

with fuel as a variable.<br />

Water boiling tests have been <strong>use</strong>d by the Department of Applied Physics<br />

and Mechanical Engineering at Eindhoven University of Technology in the<br />

Netherlands, to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the Family Cooker and the De<br />

Lepeleire/Van Daele <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Ponnoum et al.(1982) have <strong>use</strong>d the boiling water tests in studying the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and wood <strong>stove</strong>s in Thailand. They<br />

found difficulty in identifying the time at which boiling started.<br />

Joseph et al.(1980) have developed another method of testing. They<br />

set the boiling time and vary the time <strong>for</strong> evaporation. For example, a<br />

pot of water takes a certain time, say "t" minutes, to boil. The water is<br />

then allowed to evaporate <strong>for</strong> 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. At the end of<br />

the experiment, the following measurements are recorded:<br />

" Weights of wood <strong>use</strong>d and remaining and<br />

"<br />

The amount of water evaporated at each evaporating time. These<br />

measurements are then <strong>use</strong>d to calculate heat utilization.<br />

49


Cooking food tests<br />

Simulated <strong>cooking</strong> tests measure the amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d and the time<br />

taken to cook a variety of standard meals under controlled conditions. The<br />

principle objective of the <strong>cooking</strong> test is then to determine the influence<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong> design on the amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d and time taken to cook a meal<br />

(Joseph and Shanahan, 1980).<br />

Cooking rice tests have been <strong>use</strong>d by Pennoum et al.(1982) in<br />

investigating the per<strong>for</strong>mance of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and wood <strong>stove</strong>s in<br />

Thailand. They measured the quantities of fuel, food, and water <strong>use</strong>d. All<br />

the tests were per<strong>for</strong>med with metal <strong>cooking</strong> vessels. Regular rice was<br />

placed in a pot and covered with water. The qua;city of rice and the ratio<br />

of water-to-rice was determined based cn <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> practices. The water and<br />

rice were brought to a boil. After a short period of time the excess water<br />

was poured off and the rice dried either over the fire or away from the<br />

fire. The rice <strong>cooking</strong> took from 25 to 40 minutes.<br />

One important point that must be stressed to investigators using this<br />

kind of test is that the tests should involve cookinp loca. dishes and that<br />

it is necessary to prepare the food in the same way <strong>for</strong> each test, using<br />

the same type of food. To obtain such in<strong>for</strong>mation, a survey of the villagers'<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> habits must be per<strong>for</strong>med. This approach has been carried out<br />

carefully by Pennoum et al.(1982) in their investigation of <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance in Thailand. Designers also need to devise their own grading<br />

systems in collaboration with local women, to ascertai,. what the women<br />

regard as "cooked" food--<strong>for</strong> all the types of <strong>cooking</strong> (frying, baking,<br />

stewing, etc.). It is also important to get different village women to<br />

<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong> to cook these same meals and see if there is a change in the<br />

time taken and fuel wood <strong>use</strong>d (Joseph, 1979).<br />

Steaming and open steaming are the two processes frequently <strong>use</strong>d in<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> (Joseph, 1979). Steaming involves bringing water to boil and letting<br />

it evaporate. The steam then passes through the food. Some of the steam<br />

escapes and some condenses on the food and on the lid. If there is no food<br />

in the pot, the amount of heat required to totally evaporate the water is<br />

less than if there is food. Consequently, steaming of food cannot be<br />

simulated using only boiling water. In the case of open steaming, a small<br />

amount of food is placed in a relatively large pot of water, which is<br />

evaporated slowly. Most of the energy involved in the <strong>cooking</strong> process is<br />

<strong>use</strong>d in the boiling and evaporating of water. Thus boiling water can<br />

simulate the process of slow open steaming. The simulation can also be<br />

applied to stewing.<br />

Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion test<br />

In co<strong>mb</strong>ustion tests (Joseph, 1979), gas analysis and measurement of the<br />

stack temperature were obtained. These data gave a measure of how much heat<br />

was being lost due to process co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. According to this test, fuel is<br />

burning efficiently if:<br />

50


" The percentage of CO is less than 0.5%;<br />

" The average amount of oxygen in the flue gas is less than 11%; and<br />

" The average carbon dioxide content in the flue gas is approximately<br />

6-8%.<br />

Measurement of the chimney temperature, in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion test, indicates<br />

how much heat is being transferred to the pots. A high stack temperature<br />

means that the pots cannot absorb the amount of heat being liberated. As<br />

the temperature of gases decreases, the amount of air being drawn into the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er also decreases.<br />

C. FACTORS AFFECTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />

Problems that occur in the <strong>stove</strong> are classified and discussed below.<br />

Convective heat loss<br />

Convection is the mechanism by which gas moves up due to a difference<br />

in temperature. In <strong>stove</strong>s, convection can occur through the exhaust gap.<br />

When gas with a high temperature leaves the <strong>stove</strong>, it carries thermal energy<br />

with it. This energy is considered a loss.<br />

Wind promotes this mode of heat loss. An example is the open fire.<br />

Efficiency of an open fire drops in the windy condition since the fire is<br />

not protected. Efficiency can be <strong>improved</strong> by constructing a shield to<br />

protect the fire from the wind. It is found that the efficiency of an<br />

open fire <strong>stove</strong> increases to approximately 17 percent when the fire is moved<br />

into the kitchen (Vita News, 1984),<br />

In bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, it is found that <strong>stove</strong> efficiency can be increased<br />

by reducing the size of the exhaust area (Somzhai and Kanchana, 1983). The<br />

improvement is due to the reduction of convective heat loss through the gap.<br />

In <strong>stove</strong>s with many pot seats such as the Smokeless HERL Choolah.<br />

convection can be reduced by closing t,e seats that are not <strong>use</strong>d (Tata, 1979).<br />

When all the seats are <strong>use</strong>d, the convective loss is low since hot gases have<br />

to pass all the pot holes; hence, a higher proportion of the heat contained<br />

in them is <strong>use</strong>fully absorbed.<br />

Conductive heatloss<br />

Conductive heat loss occurs when the <strong>stove</strong> is not well insulated. Such<br />

loss is seen in the metal <strong>stove</strong>. To reduce this loss, the <strong>stove</strong> has to be<br />

insulated. However, thick insulation can also reduce <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

during one or two hours of <strong>cooking</strong>, since massive walls absorb more heat<br />

than bare walls lose to the outside (Vita News, 1984).<br />

51


Radiative heat loss<br />

Since heat is transferred to the pot mainly by radiation, any loss due<br />

to radiation can affect <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. It is believed that radiative<br />

heat loss can occur through the exhaust gap (Somchai and Kanchana, 1983).<br />

Reducing the gap will decrease the radiative heat loss, and hence, impiove<br />

<strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In the case that the pot does not fit the pot seat,<br />

radiative heat loss is high.<br />

Size of fuel<br />

One of the problems affecting the comparison of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance (even<br />

when <strong>stove</strong>s and test conditions are standardized) is the size of the fuel<br />

<strong>use</strong>d. It is found that the efficiency of the bucket <strong>stove</strong> increases when<br />

the size of the charcoal decreases (Somchai and Kauchana, 1983).<br />

Types of <strong>biomass</strong><br />

There are many kinds of <strong>biomass</strong> fuel that can be <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>stove</strong>s. They<br />

include wood, charcoal, and agricultural wastes such as rice husk. These<br />

fuels, when co<strong>mb</strong>usted, supply heat unequally. Chomcharn et al (1981) <strong>use</strong>d<br />

the water boiling test to study the efficiency of a bucket <strong>stove</strong> fuelled by<br />

different types of charcoals, different firewood species, sawdust, rice<br />

husk, and lignite briquets. They found that the efficiency of the bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong> varied with the fuel type <strong>use</strong>d and ranged from 18.5 to 33.1%.<br />

Air supply<br />

Since the energy obtained in the <strong>stove</strong> is the energy from co<strong>mb</strong>ustion,<br />

the degree of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion strongly limits <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. There is no<br />

doubt that wood, which has a high heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, will poorly render<br />

heat under the conditions of insufficient supply or undersupply of air. On<br />

the other hand, if air is oversupplied, a certain amount of heat will be<br />

<strong>use</strong>d in raising the temperature of excess air. This air then leaves the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> together with the exhaust gas. In this latter case, <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

also decreases.<br />

Internal variables<br />

The initial project study that appeared in the interim report (Sherman<br />

and Bunyat, 1983) revealed that the internal variables of the charcoal<br />

<strong>stove</strong>(such as <strong>stove</strong> weight, grate hole area, exhaust area, air inlet area,<br />

and slope of the inner wall) strongly affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Stove material<br />

As a <strong>stove</strong> caiibe made from either clay, cement, or metal, its<br />

efficiency varies. Openshaw (undated) compared metal and clay <strong>cooking</strong><br />

<strong>stove</strong>s. He found that 40% of charcoal <strong>use</strong>d could be saved by the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong><br />

if the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>use</strong>d a clay <strong>stove</strong> instead of metal <strong>stove</strong>. In addition, the<br />

material chosen more or less reflects the long term service ability.<br />

52


D. CONCLUSION<br />

In the above review of the literature, it is apparent that there are<br />

many problems associated with <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> research,<br />

development and <strong>use</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, be<strong>for</strong>e researchers e<strong>mb</strong>ark on a <strong>stove</strong><br />

development program they must first accommodate the mult4-faceted complex<br />

of problems of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. Precognition of and distinctions between<br />

should be made regarding the following:<br />

" Stove types and kinds: chimneyed or non-chimneyed, single pot or<br />

multille pot holes, appropriate size to suit the need <strong>for</strong> individual<br />

or family in the working area.<br />

* Social nature or tradition of <strong>cooking</strong>: size of the family, normal<br />

duration of <strong>cooking</strong> time, low heat vs intense heat requirement,<br />

cuisine, extra services required from the <strong>stove</strong> besides <strong>cooking</strong>, etc.<br />

" Special requirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs: speediness in cookiaig, ease<br />

of operation, reliability and consistency of <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, and<br />

the accommodation of various sizes and shapcs of pots, pans, and<br />

woks.<br />

" Materials and techniques <strong>for</strong> construction: inexpensive, locally<br />

available material vs expensive exotic material, simple construction<br />

vs complicated construction, and the <strong>stove</strong>'s durability.<br />

" Fuel types and physical characteristics: charcoal, wood or agriresidues,<br />

fuel's <strong>for</strong>ms in lump, long stick, chip, granule, dust,<br />

briquette and etc., fuel's moisture content, density, specific heat<br />

of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, soundness of the fuel, i.e. fresh or biodegradable.<br />

" Methods <strong>for</strong> testings and per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluations of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />

water boiling vs simulated food <strong>cooking</strong> tests, duration of tests,<br />

assignments of dependent and independent measuring criteria such as<br />

time, fuel load, water evaporated, etc.<br />

53


Chapter 3<br />

Plan and Design of the Project<br />

prwIaa


PLAN AND DESIGN OF THE PROJECT<br />

The project design aimed at:<br />

* Establishing a laboratory and facility to per<strong>for</strong>m project tasks as<br />

well as <strong>for</strong> long-term <strong>stove</strong> improvement research and development;<br />

" Collecting existing local <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> testing and evaluation;<br />

* Investigating existing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance;<br />

" Analyzing the physical factors of <strong>stove</strong>s that inhibit per<strong>for</strong>mance;<br />

" Developing an <strong>improved</strong> prototype;<br />

" Testing the prototype and its remodification;<br />

" Producing developed <strong>stove</strong>s; and<br />

" Promoting developed <strong>stove</strong>s in the field.<br />

A. LABORATORY AND FACILITY SET UP<br />

The project required an experimenting room <strong>for</strong> testing <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

An area of approximately 80 sq.m. was located behind the Forest Research<br />

Institute at the Royal Forest Department in Bangkok. The room consisted<br />

of space <strong>for</strong> storing the <strong>stove</strong>s, two large cement top counters <strong>for</strong> handling<br />

hot <strong>stove</strong>s during the testii.g, a sink with tap water <strong>for</strong> cleaning purposes,<br />

and an exhaust hood with ventilation fans fpr outletting the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

smoke. All tests were conducted in this natural environment.<br />

The instruments applied to accompany the tests included: 3 weighing<br />

scales of different ranges from 500 gm, 7 kg, and 20 kg. 3 cromel/alumel<br />

thermo-couple and digital thermometers with a range of 0-800 °C <strong>for</strong><br />

temperature measurement; bulk thermometer with a range of 0-100 'C; hygrometer<br />

<strong>for</strong> humidity measurement; electric oven <strong>for</strong> fuel drying; a series of<br />

aluminum <strong>cooking</strong> pots with sizes ranging from 16 cm to 32 cm; measuring<br />

tapes and calipers <strong>for</strong> dimensional measurements; and workshop tools.<br />

B. COLLECTION OF EXISTING LOCAL STOVES<br />

As previously mentioned, the three generic types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong><br />

<strong>stove</strong>s (which consist of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>, and rice husk<br />

<strong>stove</strong>) were the main concern of the project <strong>for</strong> further development. The<br />

task of this phase was to collect as many of the various kinds (with various<br />

features) of these three types of <strong>stove</strong>s. Since <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

57


were widely distributed throughout the country, a <strong>stove</strong> collecting team was<br />

sent out to various locations to collect the <strong>stove</strong> samples and bring them<br />

back to the laboratory <strong>for</strong> testing.<br />

C. INVESTIGATION OF EXISTING STOVE PERFORMANCE<br />

Efficiencies of all collected <strong>stove</strong>s were evaluated using the same<br />

standard testing conditions which is described in the next chapter. All<br />

calculations based on data received from the <strong>stove</strong> testing were done on<br />

an IBM main frame computer at Kasetsart University. The results were<br />

analyzed closely <strong>for</strong> relevant relationships between the efficiency and the<br />

physical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>s. This in<strong>for</strong>mation was critical <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

development.<br />

D. ANALYSES OF STOVE PHYSICAL FACTORS<br />

The <strong>stove</strong>s physical factors (such as section <strong>for</strong> air inlet, area <strong>for</strong><br />

exhaust gas outlet, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate, <strong>stove</strong> body, etc.) were<br />

analyzed. If one of these factors was changed so was the geometry of the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>. Such an effect was classified as an internal variable. There was<br />

another group of variables that had no effect on the geometry of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

when their values changed (wind velocity, humidity, air temperature, pot<br />

size, etc.). This group made up the external variables. The effects of<br />

both the internal and external variables on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>stove</strong>s were<br />

studied. The understanding of their effects on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

would be crucial in designing <strong>stove</strong>s with high efficiency.<br />

E. DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED PROTOTYPE<br />

When the order of most important variables chat affected the efficiency<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong> was determined from the test analysis, design of high<br />

efficiency <strong>stove</strong>s corresponding to the prominent variables was then<br />

accomplished. Technical drawings of thu <strong>stove</strong> prototype were made.<br />

After achieving the dusign of the <strong>stove</strong> prototype, the next step<br />

involved the selection of suitable quality <strong>stove</strong> materials, and, finally,<br />

construction of the <strong>stove</strong> prototype. Stove asse<strong>mb</strong>ly closely followed the<br />

guidelines of the technical drawing.<br />

F. TESTING OF PROTOTYPE AND REMODIFICATION<br />

The finished <strong>stove</strong> sample was then subjected to the same efficiency<br />

tests. The results were compared with the existing <strong>stove</strong>s. This step<br />

might be carried out several times to assure that the developed <strong>stove</strong>s had<br />

reliable per<strong>for</strong>mance and high efficiency.<br />

58


G. PRODUCTION OF DEVELOPED STOVES<br />

Several manufacturers were selected <strong>for</strong> the production of the developed<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s. Guidelines and in<strong>for</strong>mation were provided to the manufacturers to<br />

enoure consistency of the products made in large quantities.<br />

H. FTELD PROMOTION OF DEVELOPED STOVES<br />

The developed <strong>stove</strong>s were introduced to the public via mass media,<br />

schools, rural development organizations--both private and governmental.<br />

Relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion was distributed in the <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

pamphlets, manuals, brochures. Short term instruction on how to make, to<br />

select, and to properly operate various types of cook<strong>stove</strong>s that conserve<br />

wood and other <strong>biomass</strong> resources were also provided. Training of villagers,<br />

village leaders and rural development officers on the fabrication and<br />

selection of good <strong>stove</strong>s was also undertaken.<br />

59


Chapter 4<br />

Experimental Techniques and Procedures<br />

)<br />

• ,' (Q\


EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES<br />

This chapter will discuss the experimental techniques and ?rocedures<br />

involved in selecting and preparing fuels (firewood, charcoal, and rice husk),<br />

testing local existing <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, standard testing conditions, definition<br />

of heat utilization efficiency, and testing <strong>for</strong> the effects of the internal<br />

and external variables of charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

A. FUEL TYPE AND PREPARATION<br />

Besides having appropriate kinds of fuels <strong>for</strong> the three generic types<br />

of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (namely, firewood, charcoal, and rice husk) preparation of<br />

the fuels was necessary to ready them <strong>for</strong> testing. Using fuels with varying<br />

characteristics can lead to inaccurate <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance measurements. The<br />

following sections discuss the method of preparing the fuel by *ype of fuel.<br />

Firewood<br />

Firewood selected <strong>for</strong> the experiment was approximately 4 year old<br />

plantation grown Casuarinajunghuniana. The diameter was between<br />

2.5 - 7.5 cm. Each piece was then split laterally into 2 - 4 smaller pieces<br />

and sun-dried <strong>for</strong> several days.<br />

Charcoal<br />

In urban areas, charcoal is the most popular fuel <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>. It<br />

burns withcut 6moke or smell and is thus suitable <strong>for</strong> indoor <strong>use</strong>. The<br />

charcoal <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment wa.3 produced from plantation grown Rhizophora<br />

apiculata, a premium mangrove species <strong>for</strong> charcoal making. The selected<br />

species was approximately 10 - 12 years old and of a diameter of about<br />

2.5 - 5 cm, The process of firing the wood into charcoal occurred in standard<br />

commercial brick beehive kilns.<br />

Rice husk<br />

In the central area of Thailand, rice husk is often <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>.<br />

It is usually <strong>use</strong>d in a rice husk <strong>stove</strong>. The cost of this fuel is very low.<br />

The rice husk <strong>use</strong>d in the laboratory was obtained fresh from a<br />

commercial rice mill near Bangkok. It was dried later under laboratory<br />

conditions.<br />

The important characteristics of firewood, charcoal, and rice husk <strong>use</strong>d<br />

in the experiment are summarized in Table 4.1.<br />

Fuels <strong>use</strong>d in all of the experiments were acquired in large quantity and<br />

stored inside the test building under the same conditions.<br />

63


Table 4.1 Characteristics of Biomass Fuel Used in the Experiment<br />

Fuel Density Moisture content Heating value<br />

(gm/cm) (%) (MJ/kg) (Kcal/kg)<br />

Charcoal 0.78 3.5 - 5.0 26.34 6,300<br />

Wood 0.75 - 0.85 10.0 - 13.0 17.89 4,230<br />

(ave. 0.79)<br />

Rice husk 0.11 10.0 - 13.0 13.79 3,300<br />

B. TESTS OF EXISTING THAI COOKING STOVES<br />

Approximately 36 different types of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 39 wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, and 5 rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were brought back to the laboratory <strong>for</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation. The physical dimensions of every <strong>stove</strong> were measured<br />

and recorded. These physical values were very important variables, and were<br />

<strong>use</strong>d later in the analyses. All tests were per<strong>for</strong>med by the Royal Forest<br />

Department staff. During each test run, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion characteristics and <strong>stove</strong><br />

behavior were observed clo-sely. The numerical, measured values of required<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation on water, a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature, humidity, fuel weight, water<br />

weight, etc. were recorded on a data sheet. Efficiency <strong>for</strong> each test run<br />

was then evaluated, and the calculations were per<strong>for</strong>med by an IBM mainframe<br />

computer at Kasetsart University.<br />

In order to study the per<strong>for</strong>mance and efficiency of various types of<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, standard testing conditions need be followed. The procedure <strong>use</strong>d<br />

in these experiments is summarized in the following section.<br />

64


Standard Testing Conditions<br />

All the tests were conducted under the following standard conditions:<br />

" Pot diameter: 24 cm (pot no. 24). (This pot size is commonly found<br />

in rural kitchens);<br />

* Wood kindling weight: 50 gm <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>, 30 gm <strong>for</strong> charcoal and<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s;<br />

" Fuel weight: <strong>for</strong> charcoal, <strong>use</strong> 400 gm, <strong>for</strong> wood and rice husk,<br />

feed in at normal rate as needed;<br />

" water weight: 3,700 gm.<br />

The pot is weighed and filled with 3,700 gm of water. The initial<br />

temperature of the water is controlled at 28 ± 10C, 50 gm of kindling is<br />

placed into the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and ignited. About 30 seconds of lighting<br />

time should be sufficient to ensure that the kindling is ignited. The<br />

charcoal is then loaded onto the burning kindling. The pot is covered with<br />

a lid and is placed on the <strong>stove</strong> and the time is immediately recorded. The<br />

temperature of the water in the pot is measured every few minutes until the<br />

water starts to boil. Time required to bring the water from its initial<br />

state to the state of boiling is noted; the noted time is called "time to<br />

boil". Time to boil is one of the important variables which determine<br />

the characteristic per<strong>for</strong>mance of a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

When the water starts to boil, the lid is removed and boiling is<br />

continued <strong>for</strong> 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, any water remaining in the pot<br />

is reweighed as is any remaining fuel. The amount of water evaporated<br />

and the weight of the charcoal consumed in the test are then calculated.<br />

For wood and rice husk stcves, the test proccdures are carried out in the<br />

same manner.<br />

Stove efficiency is calculated from the data gathered in the procedure<br />

discussed above. The term "efficiency" will be <strong>use</strong>d interchangeably with<br />

"heat utilization efficiency" in order to con<strong>for</strong>m with the <strong>use</strong> of this word<br />

in other publications.<br />

Heat Utilization Efficiency (HU)<br />

The heat utilization efficiency (HU) is the percentage of actual energy<br />

transferred from potential energy stored in the fuel to the water in the pot.<br />

The equation <strong>for</strong> determining the HU value is adapted from Joseph (Joseph,<br />

1979).<br />

65


SX W (Tf - T) + (L x W)<br />

U, Z2 X 100<br />

x<br />

[(EfX Wf) + (EX W] (E W<br />

Where, S = Specific heat of water, 4.18 J/gm<br />

WM Weight of water in pot at start of test, 3,700 gm<br />

m<br />

Tf 2 Temperature of water at boiling point, 1000 C<br />

T a Temperature of water at start of test, 0 C<br />

L Latent heat of water at 1000 C, 2,256 J/gm<br />

W - Weight of water evaporated at end of each test, gm<br />

e<br />

Efm = heat value of fuel, J/gm<br />

Wf - Weight of fuel <strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />

E - Heat value of wood kindling, J/gm<br />

Wk Weight of kindling, gm<br />

E - Heat value of charcoal, J/gm<br />

Co<br />

W = Weight of caarcoal remaining at end of each test, gm<br />

c<br />

C. TEST FOR ':HE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLE<br />

ON THE CHARCOAL BUCKET STOVE<br />

Most Thai bucket <strong>stove</strong>s have the following important physical features:<br />

* Stove gap/exhaust area;<br />

* Grate hole area;<br />

* Grate-to-pot distance;<br />

* Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size;<br />

* Air inlet door; and<br />

* Crate thickness.<br />

66


The variation of one of the above characteristics is expected to have<br />

an impact on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. These variables, moreover, are properties<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong> itself. Hence, they can be called the internal variables.<br />

To study the effect of one of the internal variables, it is necessary<br />

that the others are kept unchanged, or constant. The variable that is tested<br />

is varied in the range of its physical limit. Additional tests on a few<br />

more <strong>stove</strong>s may be required to confirm the effect of that variable on <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. This experimental technique was <strong>use</strong>d in all project experiments.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variables Study<br />

Stove gap/exhaust area<br />

The <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d in this study were <strong>stove</strong> nos. 1/5 and 1/31; their<br />

respective gap areas were 98.4 and 98.6 cm. For these two <strong>stove</strong>s, the time<br />

to boil and the charcoal consumption were experimentally determined; the HU<br />

values were subsequently calculatad. The gap areas of each <strong>stove</strong> was then<br />

reduced three times by adjusting the pot rest. The gap area tested on <strong>stove</strong><br />

no. 1/5 was 86.1, 65.6, and 20.5 cm. The gap areas tested on <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/31<br />

were 86.0, 65.6 and 40.2. The <strong>stove</strong>s were retested <strong>for</strong> time to boil and<br />

charcoal consumption.<br />

Although the exhaust area did not appear in the equation <strong>for</strong> finding the<br />

HU value, it can indirectly affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The exhaust area<br />

regulates the flow rate of the exhaust gas from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As<br />

a consequence, the loss of heat, due to natural convection of gas through<br />

the gap, varies accordingly. For this reason, the exhaust area of the gap<br />

had to be considered as one factor that influenced <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. In<br />

this study, the gap area was reduced by adding clay to its width; this means<br />

that after the addition of clay, the length of the exhaust area is virtually<br />

unchanged. The variation of exhaust area, then, can be represented by the<br />

change in gap height.<br />

Total grate hole area<br />

Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The diameter of the grate<br />

was 15 cm, and the total grate area was 176.5 cm. The total grate hole area<br />

was 80.0 cm,<br />

To study the effect of grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, the grate<br />

hole area had to be varied by reducing the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes. The hole<br />

reduction was carried out by plugging the chosen holes with a rice husk<br />

ash and clay mixture. However, it should be kept in mind that the holes<br />

chosen to be filled up were distributed properly so that the inlet air, after<br />

reducing the grate hole area, was still distributed uni<strong>for</strong>mly.<br />

Two tests using gap height as a parameter were per<strong>for</strong>med to study the<br />

effect of the grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance; both tests <strong>use</strong>d <strong>stove</strong><br />

no.1/5. The grate hole areas, with the above procedure, were set at 80.0,<br />

52.8 and 26.4 cm. The gap height of the <strong>stove</strong> was changed, using the method<br />

67


described in the above section on <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhaust area. It was 0°5 cm in<br />

the first test and 2.5 cm in the second.<br />

Grate-to-pot distance<br />

Grate-to-pot distance is defined as the distance measured from the<br />

surface of the grate to the pot bottom. This internal variable has a direct<br />

effect on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance; if the distance is small, the pot is iear the<br />

flame and <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is good--as would be expected. On the contrary,<br />

a large distance would render a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. However, too small<br />

a distance will restrict charcoal loading and charcoal capacity.<br />

Stove no. 1/4 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The grate-to-pot distance<br />

was varied from 7.5 cm to 9.3 cm and then to 11.0 cm. A distance of less<br />

than 7.5 is not recommended since the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er becomes too small<br />

to hold enough charcoal to cook a meal. Time to boil, the amount of water<br />

evaporated and the amount of charcoal consumed were all recorded.<br />

Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion chcanber size<br />

The test <strong>for</strong> the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

<strong>use</strong>d three charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s: <strong>stove</strong> nos. 1/28, l/A3, and l/Dl. The<br />

respective volumes of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er were 4,216, 2,460, and 2.946 cm.<br />

After the first series of tests was completed, the volume of each <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er was reduced by increasing the lining thickness to<br />

3,414 cm (<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/28), 1,787 cm (<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/A3), and 1,510 cm<br />

(<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. I/Dl). All <strong>stove</strong>s were then subjected to the same test.<br />

Air inZet door<br />

Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the air inlet door area<br />

on its per<strong>for</strong>mance. The <strong>stove</strong> had a gap height of 1 cm and an air inlet<br />

door area of 66 cm. The area was later reduced to 49.5, 33.0, and 16.5 cm,<br />

which corresponded to 75, 50 and 25% of the initial area. The <strong>stove</strong> (as<br />

each door area was reduced) was tested <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Grate thickness<br />

Stove nos. l/E3 and I/E4 were tested <strong>for</strong> grate thickness. The grate<br />

thickness <strong>for</strong> both <strong>stove</strong>s was initially 2.0 cm and was later changed to<br />

3.6 cm. At these two grate thicknesses, the test <strong>for</strong> the efficiency was<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

D. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL VARIABLES OF THE<br />

CHARCOAL BUCKET STOVE<br />

In the previous section, the internal variables--the properties of the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>--were discussed. There is another group of variables that can affect<br />

the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>, but they are not the properties of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

itself. The variables in this group are called the external variables.<br />

Examples of them are;<br />

68


* Initial weight of charcoal;<br />

e Initial weight of water;<br />

* Pot size;<br />

e Charcoal size;<br />

e Wind effect; and<br />

* Humidity effect.<br />

To study the effects of the external variables (pot size, charcoal size,<br />

wind and humidity) a laboratory test was conducted, using the same testing<br />

procedure described in this chapter in the section on Standard Testing<br />

Conditions. For the initial weight of charcoal and the initial weight of<br />

water, the other two external variables, one of them is varied at a time.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the External Variable Study<br />

The external variable experiments tested the initial weight of charcoal,<br />

the initial weight of water, the pot size, the charcoal size, the wind effect,<br />

and the humidity effect. Procedures are discussed below.<br />

Initial weight of charcoal<br />

Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. The first test <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance was per<strong>for</strong>med with the initial weight of charcoal at 300 kg and<br />

the initial weight of water at 2,300 kg.<br />

The experiments were then repeated, keeping the same initial weight of<br />

water, but changing the initial weight of the charcoal to 350 and 450 gm.<br />

The above procedure was repeated with the initial weights of water set<br />

at 3,000 and 3,700 gm. The results obtained from the experiments were <strong>use</strong>d<br />

in calculating the HU values of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Initial weight of water<br />

The experimental technique <strong>for</strong> this study was described in the<br />

last section. The data is analyzed to obtain effect of initial weight of<br />

water on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Pot size<br />

Stove nos. 1/4 and l/E3 were <strong>use</strong>d in this experiment. Three different<br />

pots with diameters of 24, 28, and 32 cm were <strong>use</strong>d. The test was carried<br />

out under standard conditions.<br />

69


CharcoaZ size<br />

In order to study the effect of charcoal size on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, a<br />

long piece of charcoal (an approximately uni<strong>for</strong>m cross section) was cut<br />

into pieces. These were then <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment. The term "size", in<br />

fact, refers to the length of the charcoal. In this test, two different<br />

lengths of charcoal were <strong>use</strong>d: 2.54, and 10.16 cm. Stove nos. 1/5, 1/12,<br />

1/14 and 1/20 were <strong>use</strong>d in the test.<br />

Wind effect<br />

Stove nos. 1/2, 1/5, 1/17, and 1/20 were <strong>use</strong>d to test the effect of<br />

wind. Wind was induced by an electric fan; the speed was measured by an<br />

anemometer. The tests were first per<strong>for</strong>med without turning on the fan; this<br />

represents the condition without wind effect--the reference condition.<br />

Later, the tests were repeated with the fan on. The wind speed <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

nos. 1/2, 1/5, 1/17 as measured was 80 m/min, and <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> no. 1/20 was<br />

86.7 m/min.<br />

Humidity<br />

Stove no. 1/5 was <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment. The humidity of the<br />

experimenting room was measured by a psychrometer (wet and dry bulb thermometers).<br />

In order to test the <strong>stove</strong> under an environment of varying<br />

humidity the test was per<strong>for</strong>med at various times of day and in different<br />

seasons. The percentages of humidity recorded on six experimental days were<br />

68, 74, 76, 78, 80, and 92.<br />

E. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF VARIABLES ON THE<br />

NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />

Similar to the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the internal variables being<br />

studied include:<br />

9 Stove gap/exhaust area;<br />

9 Grate hole area;<br />

e Grate-to-pot distance;<br />

* Air inlet door; and<br />

e Ratio of exhaust area to grate hole area.<br />

The variation of one of the above characteristics is expected to<br />

affect the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> in a manner similar to that of the<br />

charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

70


Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variables Study<br />

Stove gap/exhaust area<br />

Twenty-two wood <strong>stove</strong>s, having different gap areas and being made by<br />

different manufacturers, were tested <strong>for</strong> the effect of the gap on <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. The gap heights ranged from 1 to 3.0 cm. Each <strong>stove</strong> was tested<br />

at least three times. Time to boil was recorded, and the HU values were<br />

calculated from the difference between the amounts of wood initially put into<br />

and left in the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Total grate hole area<br />

To investigate the impact of the grate hole area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong>s from various sources were <strong>use</strong>d. The <strong>stove</strong>s were divided into<br />

3 gro:tps according to the nu<strong>mb</strong>er and the size of the grate holes. Group A<br />

had 37 grate holes with a diameter of 2.5 cm; in group B, the hole was<br />

1.5 cm in diameter, ard the total nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes was 90; group C had 61<br />

holes, each of which was 1.23 cm in diameter. Every <strong>stove</strong> in the test had<br />

the same grate-to-pot distance of 12 cm.<br />

Grate-to-pot distance<br />

More than twenty wood <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of grate-topot<br />

distance on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The distance ranged from 9 to 17.5 cm.<br />

The <strong>stove</strong>s were again obtained from different manufacturers. Each <strong>stove</strong><br />

was tested at least three times.<br />

Air inlet door<br />

The impact of the air inlet door on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied with<br />

the wood <strong>stove</strong>s having door open at first and closed later. Each <strong>stove</strong> was<br />

tested at least three times. Time to boil and HU value were then calculated.<br />

F. TEST FOR THE EF}'ECT OF EXTERNAL VARIABLES OF THE<br />

NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVES<br />

Only the effect of wind velocity and fuel feeding rate were studied.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the External Variables Study<br />

Wind effect<br />

The effect of wind on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied. Three <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

were <strong>use</strong>d in this investigation; each was run at least three times under<br />

two conditions--with and without wind. Wind was induced by an electric<br />

fan. The wood <strong>stove</strong>s came from differen. manufacturers. Time to boil<br />

was noted and the HU values were calculated.<br />

71


Fuel feeding rate<br />

In this Lest, the wood was fed into the <strong>stove</strong> at different rates. The<br />

rate was measured along with the weight of wood, since wood was put into<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> at regular intervals Three rates were studied, labelled low,<br />

medium and high. The tests were per<strong>for</strong>med using two wood <strong>stove</strong>s, one with<br />

a grate height of 12 cm and the other with a grate height of 15 cm. The<br />

weights of wood <strong>for</strong> the low, medium and high rates were 0.84 kg, 1.00 kg,<br />

and 1.21 kg, respectively, <strong>for</strong> the first <strong>stove</strong>. The weights of wood <strong>for</strong><br />

the second <strong>stove</strong> were 1.31, 1.53, 1.75 kg, which reflect the low, medium,<br />

and high rates of fuel feeding, respectively.<br />

G. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />

CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />

Stove per<strong>for</strong>mance tests were conducted on three wood <strong>stove</strong>s with a<br />

chimney. They wer <strong>use</strong>d to test the effect of chimney materials, metal ring<br />

around the pot hole and the baffle. No external variables were investigated.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />

Metal ring around pot hole<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance of wood <strong>stove</strong> no. 2/11 was measured <strong>for</strong> the effect of the<br />

metal ring around the pothole. The <strong>stove</strong> initially had a metal ring. After<br />

it had been tested, the ring was then removed. The <strong>stove</strong> was then retested.<br />

All the necessary data <strong>for</strong> comparing efficiency were recorded.<br />

Chimney material<br />

To study the effect of chimney material on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, <strong>stove</strong><br />

no. 2/12 was <strong>use</strong>d. The <strong>stove</strong> was first tested as initially constructed.<br />

Later, the chimney material was changed to iron, and the <strong>stove</strong> was then<br />

retested. The material was changed again to cement and another test was<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med. Data were recorded under each condition.<br />

Baffle<br />

Stove no. 2/12 (the same <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>d to investigate the effect of chimney<br />

material) has no baffle between the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er and the chimney; there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

it was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of a baffle on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Two<br />

kinds of baftles were examined: one made of fire clay and the other made of<br />

iron. The iron baffle was tested first. The standard test was then applied<br />

to estimate <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. The iron baffle was then replaced by a fire<br />

clay baffle and the te-st was repeated.<br />

72


H. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />

CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />

Four internal variables were investigated <strong>for</strong> their effects on the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>. They were the fuel gas outlet<br />

area, base-to-pot distance, firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, and chimney height.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />

Fuel gas outlet area<br />

A chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> was <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the fuel gas<br />

outlet area on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The initial outlet area of the <strong>stove</strong> was<br />

95.0 sq cm. This area was reduced by adding clay to the outlet in the<br />

second and the third runs; the areas were 47.0 and 38.0 sq cm, respectively.<br />

In each case, time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were recorded.<br />

Base-to-pot distance<br />

To study the effect of base-to-pot distance on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the<br />

chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, <strong>stove</strong>s with different distances were <strong>use</strong>d, In the<br />

test, the distances were varied from 18.0 to 36.0 cm. Each <strong>stove</strong> was tested<br />

at least 3 times. Data on time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were collected.<br />

Firingcha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

The effect of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance was studied by<br />

varying the size of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er. This was done by adding clay to the<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er to reduce its volume. The initial size of the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er was<br />

16,600 cu cm; it was then reduced 3 times. The volume became 16,400,<br />

12,600, and 12,400 cu cm, respectively. Data were collected <strong>for</strong> time to<br />

boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d.<br />

Chimney height<br />

The chimney height is another parameter that affects the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong>, since height ca<strong>use</strong>s change in the rate of exhaust outflow.<br />

To study this effect, the chimney of a <strong>stove</strong> was decreased from 230 to 200 cm.<br />

Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d be<strong>for</strong>e and after reducing chimney height<br />

were recorded.<br />

I. TEST FOR THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL VARIABLES ON<br />

NON-CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />

Since there are many kinds of non-chimneyed rice husk st'ves, testing<br />

all the <strong>stove</strong>s marketed would have been tedious. Only one <strong>stove</strong> design was<br />

chosen as the representative of non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s. This <strong>stove</strong><br />

was designed by Mr. Meechai.<br />

73


The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> consists of 2 parts -- the outer cone and the<br />

inner cylinder. For the outer cone, the following parameters were<br />

studied: height, upper diameter, lower diameter, slope angle of cone,<br />

and nu<strong>mb</strong>er of air inlet holes. For the inner cylinder, the effects of<br />

height, exhaust area, and fuel flow area were investigated. The dimensions<br />

of the reference Meechai <strong>stove</strong> are as follows:<br />

Outer cone<br />

Inner cylinder<br />

Height 37.0 cm.<br />

Upper diameter 46.0 cm.<br />

Lower diameter 8.0 cm.<br />

Slope angle of cone 63.0 deg.<br />

Nu<strong>mb</strong>er of air inlet holes 329<br />

Diameter 16.0 cm.<br />

Exhaust area 184.0 sq cm.<br />

Fuel flow area 163 sq cm.<br />

Stove Preparation <strong>for</strong> the Internal Variable Study<br />

Height of the outer cone<br />

Four Meechai <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the height of the<br />

outer cone on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The heights were 30.5, 33, 37.0, and<br />

47.0 cm. Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were recorded.<br />

Upper diameter of the outer cone<br />

To investigate the impact of the upper diameter of the outer cone on<br />

Meechai <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, three <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d. The diameters of the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s were 46.0, 43.0, and 41.0 cm.<br />

Lower diameter of outer cone<br />

Three <strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d to study the effect of the lower diameter of the<br />

outer cpne on <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. These <strong>stove</strong>s had diameters of 8.0, 9.0,<br />

10.9 cm, respectively. The water bciling test was <strong>use</strong>d to compare <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency. Time to boil and amount of fuel <strong>use</strong>d were noted.<br />

74


Nwnber of air inlet holes<br />

The Meechai <strong>stove</strong> is similar to other types of <strong>stove</strong>s in that air inlet<br />

holes control the supply of fresh air to co<strong>mb</strong>ustion.<br />

air inlet holes has some impact on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>stove</strong>s with the following nu<strong>mb</strong>ers of holes: 331<br />

was tested at least 4 times.<br />

Height of inner cylinder<br />

Indeed, the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of<br />

The investigation<br />

and 274. Each <strong>stove</strong><br />

The inner cylinder contains the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As a consequence, the<br />

height of the cylinder was expected to affect <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Only three<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s were <strong>use</strong>d in the study. Each was tested at least 5 times. The<br />

heights of these three <strong>stove</strong>s were 16.0, 19.0, 20.0 cm.<br />

Exhaust area<br />

To investigate the effect of the exhaust area, four <strong>stove</strong>s were subjected<br />

to the test. The exhausc areas were 184, 165, 129, 123 sq cm, respectively.<br />

Fuel flow area<br />

Rice husk in Meechai <strong>stove</strong> has two roles--it is <strong>use</strong>d as fuel, and it<br />

insulates the <strong>stove</strong>. The insulating rice husk, which is situated in the<br />

space between the inner cylinder and the outer cone, sooner or later becomes<br />

fuel <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. Thus, the fuel flow area should control the fuel<br />

supply to the <strong>stove</strong>. To verify this hypothesis, four <strong>stove</strong>s with the fuel<br />

flow areas of 163 and 184 sq cm were tested. Each <strong>stove</strong> was run at least<br />

two times. Data on time to boil and amount of fuel consumed were recorded.<br />

J. DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED STOVE PROTOTYPE<br />

Using the techniques outlined in the previous sections, the effects of<br />

both internal and external variables on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance were studied. The<br />

results were then <strong>use</strong>d to design a high per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>stove</strong>. To achieve this<br />

end, all the internal variables had to be analysed carefully. The analysis<br />

indicated which factors contributed significantly to <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Five prototypes of different <strong>stove</strong>s were developed; they were prototypes<br />

of a charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, a wood <strong>stove</strong> with and without chimney, and a rice husk<br />

<strong>stove</strong> with and witbout a chimney. These prototypes were then tested to<br />

ensure high per<strong>for</strong>mance prior to commissioning persons to produce the <strong>stove</strong><br />

in quantity fo- trial promotion.<br />

75


Chapter 5<br />

Analysis of Results and Discussion


ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

This chapter analyzes the measured values of the physical structure of<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s. Per<strong>for</strong>mance and characteristics of tested commercial<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s are evaluated and discussed. An intensive analysis of the internal<br />

and external variables affecting commercial charcoal and non-chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>mance is presented in the chapter.<br />

A. PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF COMMERCIAL STOVES<br />

Of the five types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> stves already mentioned, the<br />

commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> and the wood bucket <strong>stove</strong> without chimney<br />

are the most popular in Bangkok and urban areas. Their structure consists<br />

of an inverted truncated cone made of fired clay placed inside the metal<br />

sheet bucket. The prominent component parts of both charcoal and wood bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s that may influence the <strong>stove</strong>'s behavior are: pothole diameter,<br />

size of fuel firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate diameter, grate hole area, grate thickness,<br />

grate-to-pot distance, exhausted gap, <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness, and air inlet<br />

area. Most bucket <strong>stove</strong>s are insulated with a mixture of rice husk ash and<br />

clay. Since the fuel feeding method of a wood <strong>stove</strong> differs from that of<br />

a charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the wood <strong>stove</strong> includes a small removable feeding port<br />

above the air inlet door. In practice, this bucket wood <strong>stove</strong> is often<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> charcoal fuel also.<br />

While the structures of the bucket <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood <strong>use</strong> in<br />

urban areas are similar, the physical appearance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> in rural<br />

areas may vary from place to place. Some wood <strong>stove</strong>s are shaped like a dome,<br />

some like a horseshoe, an enclosed horse shoe, a pit in the ground and three<br />

stones; almost none have any insulation or grates.<br />

The measured physical dimensions of charcoal and non-chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 5.1 and Table 5.2. Since their shapes are so<br />

diverse, the appearance of each iidividual <strong>stove</strong> is fully displayed by the<br />

photographs in Annex I and II at the end of this report.<br />

For wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys, there are three distinct models, namely<br />

Saeng Pen, Samrong, and Banpong. Their physical configurations can be seen<br />

in Annex III. The main structural components cf this <strong>stove</strong> are much the<br />

same as those of the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, except <strong>for</strong> a fuel gas outlet<br />

port with connected chimney located at the opposite side of the fuel feeding<br />

port. The dimensions of the fuel gas outlet area and the chimney as well<br />

as other important structures are listed in Table 5.3.<br />

For the rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, the only practical type found<br />

is <strong>use</strong>d by the Kampuchean refugees in Khao-I-Dang camp and is called the<br />

"Meechai Stove". (See the photograph in Chapter 7). This kind of rice<br />

husk <strong>stove</strong> was constructed from a rough drawing at the RFD workshop and was<br />

tested <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Its main features consist of an outside fuel<br />

receptacle cone and an inner co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cylinder. Between these two parts


Table 5.1 Physical dimensions of tested charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

Code Name/source Stove Pot hole Firinq Grate Grate Exhaust Ave.wall Air inlet<br />

no. -t -diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole thickness to pot oap area thickness area<br />

(cm) (cm) (cm ) (cm) dia hole area (cm) (cm) (c=) (cm 2<br />

, (cm) (cm 2<br />

)<br />

(cm) (cm 2<br />

)<br />

1/2 Rangsit 12.2 19.0 2426 17.5 1 .3 85 112.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 96.0 5.8 70.0<br />

1/3 Rangsit 8.7* 19.0 2426 17.7 1.3 85 112.0 3.5 12.0 1.8 97.0 4.1 70.0<br />

1/4 Ranosit 12.8 19.0 2426 17.5 1.3 85 112.0 4.0 1Z.? 1.5 76.0 5.9 70.0<br />

I/5 Rangsit(atainless case) 9.3 16.0 1575 11.0 1.3 61 80.0 3.5 12.0 1.0 41.0 5.7 66.0<br />

1/6 Rangsait 8.6 20.0 2065 !5.5 1.2 61 69.0 3.5 12.0 1 .0 41.0 5.8 66.0<br />

1/7 Ayudthava 6.4 21.0 1931 19.0 2.1 19 66.0 3.5 12.0 1.0 41.0 5.8 66.0<br />

1/8 Unknown 8.1 18.0 1831 17.5 1.8 19 48.0 1.8 6.5 2.0 68.0 3.8 60.0<br />

1/9 Chachoenosao 8.1 18.0 1832 15.7 1.8 19 48.0 2.0 9.0 1.5 70.0 5.4 55.0<br />

CD 1/10 Unknow 6.6 21.0 2475 18.5 2.4 19 86.0 1.8 8.0 1.0 90.0 3.4 66.0<br />

1 /11 Unknown 4.3 20.0 2176 18.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.6 10.0 2.0 80.0 2.2 58.0<br />

1/12 Booopararm 7.2 21. 2856 19.5 1.5 37 65.0 1.6 10.0 2.0 80.0 2.2 58.0<br />

1/13 Samvakohichal 10.7 22.0 2390 18.5 1.9 27 96.0 1.8 10.0 1.6 74.0 6.2 48.0<br />

1/14 Booopararm 19.0 20.0 3464 19.0 1.5 37 65.0 2.0 11.0 2.5 113.0 6.1 60.0<br />

l.'.- Banolane 10.0 20.0 2865 19.0 1.5 36 65.0 1.2 9.0 2.0 108.0 6.0 76.0<br />

1 16 Ayudtha.ya 6.7 21.0 2618 14.5 2.0 19 59.0 2.0 7.5 1.0 45.0 3.4 66.0<br />

1/17 Cholburi 5.9 17.0 2013 15.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.5 10.4 1 .2 50.0 4.7 60.0


Table 5.1 (continued)<br />

Code Name/source Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate Exhaust AveWall Air inlet<br />

no. wt<br />

(cm)<br />

diameter<br />

(cm)<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

(cm 3<br />

)<br />

die<br />

(cm)<br />

hole<br />

die<br />

no.of<br />

hole<br />

hole<br />

area<br />

2<br />

(cm) (cm )<br />

thickness<br />

(cm)<br />

to pot<br />

(cm,<br />

oap<br />

(cml<br />

area<br />

(cm 2<br />

)<br />

thickness<br />

1/18 Cholburi 7.2 21.0 3202 18.5 1 .8 27 68.0 1.9 11.0 2.0 96.0 3.9 70.0<br />

1/19 Samrono 10.5 18.0 3042 15.5 1 .8 37 94.0 1.8 11.0 2.5 <strong>101</strong>.0 6.3 70.0<br />

1/20 Cholburi 10.2 23.0 2516 20.0 ( .8 37 94.0 1.9 7.0 2.0 102.0 5.3 70.0<br />

I-, Darnkvian 11.1 22.5 2414 20.0 1.8 27 68.0 (.8 9.0 3.0 107;.0 4.5 80.0<br />

1/22 anpong 9.5 20.0 3155 18.5 1.5 48 85.0 2.5 11.0 0.8 38 3.4 80.0<br />

1/23 Raegsit 7.2 16.0 1575 15.0 1.3 61 80.0 3.9 12.0 1.0 41.0 4.2 66.0<br />

1/24 Cholburi 13.8 22.0 3815 10.5 1.9 27 77.0 2.2 11 .0 2.2 112 6.1 108.0<br />

1/25 Rangsit 13.2 19.0 2426 27.0 1.3 85 112.0 4.0 9.0 2.0 96.0 6.2 70.0<br />

1/26 Darnkwian 6.6' 23.0 2700 20.0 (.8 30 75.0 1.6 9.5 1.5 90.0 2.9 86.0<br />

1/28 Sa-Sua 12.2 23.0 4216 20.0 1.6 37 74.0 2.2 10.0 2.3 131.0 4.5 124.0<br />

1/29 Sa-Sua 13.3 19.0 3414 17.0 1.6 37 74.0 2.0 11.5 2.0 85.0 4.8 124.0<br />

1/30 Nakornchaisri 18.0 20.0 2992 19.0 1 .5 73 131 3.5 12.0 2.0 102 3.7 127.0<br />

1/31 Nekornchaisri 11.8 17.0 2250 16.5 1.4 61 94.0 3.0 12.0 0.5 20.0 -6.2 88.0<br />

1/32 Nakorncheisri 8.2 20.0 2992 19.0 1.5 73 131 3.5 12.0 2.0 102.0 3.7 127.0<br />

1/33 Nakornchaisri 6 7. 17.0 2550 17.0 1.4 61 94.0 3.0 12.0 0.5 20.0 3.8 88.0<br />

1/34 Bangsue 10.0 20.0 2829 18.0 1.8 27 68.0 1.5 9.0 .8 103.0 6.3 105.0<br />

1/35 Ban.sue 8.0 17.0 2176 16.0 1.6 27 54.0 1.6 11.0 1.7 82.0 5.6 81.0<br />

1/26 Bangsue 6.5 15.0 1568 13.5 1.7 19 44.0 * .6 9.5 1.9 56.0 6.2 75.0<br />

1/37 BooPpararm 6.5 15.0 1130 13.0 1.3 19 25.0 1.6 -9.0 0.7 60.0 4.6 38.0<br />

1/38 Unknown 10.0 19.0 2000 16.0 1.0 89 70.0 1.9 10.0 1.9 122.0 4.2 66.0<br />

fNaked <strong>stove</strong> without insulation and bucket.<br />

(cm)<br />

area<br />

(cm 2


Table 5.2 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />

Code Name/ourte Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate/bese txnaust Wall Pri -ary Feedin<br />

no. -t ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole to pot oac area thicxness air tor: port<br />

(cm) (cm) (qa) (cm3 (cm) dia hole area (cm Ic.; (c 2<br />

2<br />

(cm) (cm )<br />

) (cml (cm ( 2<br />

)<br />

1/2 Rangsit 12.2 27.0 19.0 2426 17.5 1 .3 35 112.0 12.0 2.0 36.0 6.0 70.0 54.0<br />

1/8 Unknown 8.1 18.5 18.0 1832 17.5 1 .8 19 48.0 9.0 1 .5 70.0 5.4 75.0 55.0<br />

1/9 Chachoenc-ao e.7 2-.0 23.0 3232 20.5 1 .8 37 94.0 6.5 2-.0 62.0 4.8 90.0 57.9<br />

1/12 Ecoooararm 7.2 22.5 21.0 2851 19.5 1 .5 37 65.0 9.0 2.0 80.0 4.6 118.0 60.0<br />

1/13 Samakohichai 10.9 18.0 22.0 2390 18.5 1 .9 27 76.0 10.0 1 .6 74.0 6.2 48.0 44.0<br />

1/19 Samronge 18.0 16.5 18.0 3040 15.5 1 .8 27 94.0 11.0 2.5 <strong>101</strong>.0 6.3 70.0 56.3<br />

1:20 -holburi 10.2 24.0 22.0 2516 20.0 1 .8 37 94.0 7.0 2.0 102.0 5.3 70.0 13.7<br />

1/21 Darnkwian 11.4 30.0 22.5 2414 20.0 1.8 27 68.0 9.0 2,.0 107.0 4.5 34.5 80.0<br />

1/24 :holbur- 13.8 27.0 22.0 3815 20.5 1.9 27 77.0 11.0 2.: 112.0 6.1 10E.0 224.0<br />

1,'25 Rangsit 12.2 30.0 19.0 2426 27.0 1 .3 85 112.0 9.0 2.0 96.0 6.0 78.0 81.3<br />

2 11 Roi-et (oricinall 5.9 21.C 22.0 7600. no grate 20.9 1 .3 25.3 2.0 - 296.4<br />

2/2 Thick dome, tIay 11.8 14.8 22.0 5800 14.3 2.1 162.0 7.0 - 181.5<br />

2.:3 Thick horse shce. clay 18.2 15.3 25.0 £870 1. .4 8S.3 6.0 - 225.0<br />

2'4 morn PaKred, mt ,ied 2.5 12.0 27.0 7440 24.5 1.5 90 160.9 12.0 2.5 90.7 1.7 20.0 243.0<br />

2'5 .rn Pa5e, s.ca: I<br />

2.6 12.0 18.0 3600 - no grate - 14.0 5.0 210.0 2.0 - 280.0


Table 5.2 (continued)<br />

Code Name/source Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Grate/base Exhaust wall Primary Feeding<br />

no. wt ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er dia hole no.of hole to pot qap area thickness air port port<br />

(cm) (cM) (cm) (cm ) (cm) dia hole area (cm) (c--) (cm 2<br />

) [ c2 (. 2 )<br />

(cm) (cm 2<br />

)<br />

2/6 Tripod 0.9 14.0 2C.0 4080 no grate 14.0 - - - - 82.0<br />

2/7 Morn Pakrad, larae 3.3 14.0 27.0 7440 - 14.0 5.4 222.6 2.0 - 332.0<br />

2/8 Modified Ro±-et, clay 6.6 15.0 22.0 4560 14.8 1.0 55.5 3.8 - 204.3<br />

2/9 Norse shoe, clay 8.1 13.4 25.0 6380 - 11.5 2.5 197.1 5.5 - 208.0<br />

2/10 Thin horse shoe, clay 7.4 14.0 22.0 4560 12.0 3.6 77.6 3.8 - 325.0<br />

2/13 Dome, clay 9.3 15.0 24.0 5400 24.5 1.5 9:.O 160.9 14.5 1.3 62.4 4.0 60.0 175.0<br />

2/16 Pot shaoed, clay 10.3 18.5 22.0 7030 1 no grate 18.0 1.8 86.4 5.0 - 157.5<br />

2/22 Dome with cap, clay 11.3 18.7 22.0 6840 24.5 1.5 91.0 160.9 17.2 1.5 73.1 3.3 76.0 202.0<br />

2/23 odified Roi-It. clay 14.0 19.0 24.5 4950 24.5 1.5 910 160.9 12.2 1.8 86.6 3.5 115.0 114.0<br />

2/24 Cylinder, steel 3.7 17.0 17.0 2040 23.4 1.2 89.0 99.6 13.0 0.6 32.2 1.8 42.0 94.5<br />

Note <strong>stove</strong> 1/2 -1/25 are nf the bucket type asid 2/1 - 2/24 are the non-bucket


Table 5.3 Physical dimensions of tested wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />

Code flaei Source StD'e st-Ve Pot hcle Firin. Grate Grate Flue cas A.e.'all n.ir- - i.-no Chimney<br />

no. "t nt diameter thamner die hole no.of hole to pot out'et thicktness air port Dart hr<br />

(-) (cm) (Cm, (crn ) (cm) Icm) hole area cm)<br />

[c 2)<br />

c.-; (c<br />

2<br />

c" (CM)<br />

2/11 Saenq Pen 24.S 235 19.0 5190 22.0 2.0 22 72.2 17.0 75.2 4.3 34.0 20.3 71.0<br />

2/12 Sarc'onq 24-3 3:-5 20.9 4400 20.5 0.5 3. 65.4 1".0 22.5 4.2 185.7 11! .r 80.0<br />

2/15 BarDonq -5 25.3 29.0 5890 24.5 2.0 30.3 44.3 12.0 22.A ".0 216.0 24:.) 230.0


there is a gap through which the rice husk flows. The slope of the outside<br />

cone plays an important role in facilitating the rice husk's slide to the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion zone. The co<strong>mb</strong>ustion air is drawn in through the punched holes<br />

evenly distributed oilthe lower part of the outer cone wall. A list of the<br />

physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimneys is shown in Table<br />

5.4.<br />

For rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimneys, five recognizable makes are found,<br />

namely Ngo Gew Ha of Lamlooka, Thai Charoen of Rangsit, Takeseng of<br />

Banglane, Sayun of Samrong, and Sooksunt of Dhonburi. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

are made of either cement or fired clay. They are quite heavy, a factor<br />

decreasing their popularity. The prominent features of this type of <strong>stove</strong><br />

include a pothole, firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er, grate, air inlet port, fuel gas outlet<br />

port, chimney, ash removed port, and <strong>stove</strong> high mass body. The physical<br />

dimensions of the five <strong>stove</strong>s described above are measured and presented<br />

in Table 5.5. Photographs of these <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Annex IV.<br />

B. TERMINOLOGY<br />

For clarity, the terminology <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> describing the features of each<br />

type of <strong>stove</strong> is presented in Fig. 7.1 to 7.5 in Chapter 7.<br />

C. PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL STOVES TESTED<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong> with and without<br />

chimneys and rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys is discussed as<br />

follows:<br />

Charcoal Stove<br />

The results of 34 commercial <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance tests shown in Table 5.6<br />

indicate that their efficiencies vary from 23% - 32%. The time to bring<br />

water from the iiritial controlled temperature to the boiling point varies<br />

from approximately 17 minutes - 32 minutes. The rate of fuel consumption or<br />

burning rate varies from about 6 gm/min to nearly 8 gm/min Fig. 5.1 and<br />

Fig. 5.2 show the plotted values between the individual <strong>stove</strong> and its<br />

efficiency and the <strong>stove</strong> and its time to boil.<br />

The <strong>stove</strong>s with high efficiency (such as <strong>stove</strong> no. 31, 17, 36, 5 and<br />

33) have shown a prominent effect on the rate of bringing water temperature<br />

to boiling. That is, the time to boil of a group of high efficiency or good<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s is shorter than a group of low effieicney or poor <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Time-temperature characteristic curves of poor and good charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

are shown in Fig. 5.0.<br />

85


Table 5.4 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />

Code<br />

no.<br />

Outer cone<br />

Upper Lower<br />

diameter diameter<br />

(cm.) (cm.)<br />

height<br />

(cm.)<br />

Air inlet<br />

No. 6, cm.<br />

Insulation<br />

Inner cylinder<br />

PExhaus,-d<br />

Iame ter tIeight area<br />

(cm.) (cm.) (cm)<br />

Fuel flow gap<br />

area<br />

cm)<br />

A 46.0 8.0 37.0 329 0.6 no 21.0 16.0 184.0 163.0<br />

B 46.0 8.0 37.0 329 0.6 yes 21,0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />

C 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yes 21.0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />

D 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yes 21.0 20.0 129.0 184.0<br />

£ 43.0 9.0 30.5 331 0.6 yea 21.0 16.0 184.0 163.0<br />

F 43.0 9.0 30.5 274 0.9 yes 21.0 19.0 123.0 163.0<br />

0 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 yes 21.0 19.0 123.0 163.0<br />

F) 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 no 21.0 16.0 165.0 163.0<br />

1 41.0 10 33.0 274 0.9 no 21.0 20.0 129.0 184.0<br />

86


Table 5.5 Physical dimensions of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />

Code Name/scure Stove Stove Pot hole Firing Grate Air inlet Flue gas Chi.mtney Base to pot<br />

I". ht diameter cha<strong>mb</strong>er slooe area outle- area ht distan=e<br />

( . (cm) (cm) (cm3 (cm2 (cm2) (cm) (cm)<br />

3/2 Nc Ge, Ia e5.o 38.0 32.0 19,000 45 490.0 78.0 240.0 29.0<br />

3/3 Thai tnaroen 96.0 39.0 21.0 17,100 47 420.0 78.0 240.0 29.0<br />

3/4 Thai :aroen 96.0 29.0 32.0 16,600 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />

3/4A1 Thai Charven 96.7 39.0 33.0 16,400 44 442.0 47.0 240.0 26.0<br />

3/4A3 Thai Charoen 96.7 39.0 33.0 16.400 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />

3/480 Thai Charo-n 94 .0 39.0 '3.0 12,600 44 442.0 95.0 240.0 26.0<br />

0o<br />

4 3/482 Thal Charven 96.0 39.0 33.0 12.400 44 442.0 38.0 240.0 26.0<br />

3/5 Banolane 95.5 59.0 30.0 19,100 40 723.0 113.0 230.0 36.0<br />

3/5A Sanolane 95-5 S.u 30.0 19,100 40 703.0 113.0 200.0 36.0<br />

3/5I Banalane 95-5 59.0 30.0 19,100 40 703.0 4C.0 230.0 36.0<br />

3/5A2 5anolane 95.5 59.0 30.0 18,100 40 703 116.0 230.0 36.0<br />

3/6 Sayun 65.0 28.0 27.0 6,200 41 362.5 28.0 240.0 23.0<br />

3/8 Sooksunt 62.0 22.5 28.0 10.600 47 270.0 71.0 160.0 18.0<br />

3/8C2 Sooksunt 62.0 22.5 28.0 10,600 30 210.0 71.0 160.0 18.0<br />

Stnv- nu<strong>mb</strong>ers which followed by latter codes such as A, AI,82, and C2 indicate that modificatiors have been made to the<br />

oriqinal models to observe the per<strong>for</strong>mance responses.


Table 5.6<br />

Average testing results of commercial charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate<br />

no. test (gm) (gm/min)<br />

1/2 6 337.0 6.57<br />

1/3 6 332.0 6.17<br />

1/4 6 340.0 7.01<br />

1/5 18 330.0 6.47<br />

1/6 3 316.0 5.45<br />

1/7 6 316.0 5.45<br />

1/8 3 323.0 5.65<br />

1/9 3 313.0 5.9i<br />

1/10 3 295.0(min) 4.81(min)<br />

1/11 3 312.0 5.96<br />

1/12 7 316.0 6.01<br />

1/13 11 325.0 6.05<br />

1/14 6 327.0 5.73<br />

1/15 9 323.0 5.92<br />

1/16 6 301.0 5.29<br />

1/17 6 320.0 6.42<br />

1/18 7 325.0 6.17<br />

1/19 8 344.0 6.45<br />

1/20 6 315.0 5.10<br />

1/21 3 313.0 5.47<br />

1/22 3 317.0 5.96<br />

1/23 6 322.0 6.27<br />

1/24 6 327.0 6.23<br />

1/26 3 325.0 6.07<br />

1/28 9 342.0 6.82<br />

1/29 4 343.0 6.86<br />

88<br />

Time to boil<br />

(min)<br />

21.7<br />

22.3<br />

18.8<br />

21.1<br />

18.0<br />

28.0<br />

27.3<br />

23.0<br />

31.7<br />

22.3<br />

22.6<br />

23.9<br />

27.2<br />

24.6<br />

27.2<br />

20.0<br />

23.6<br />

23.8<br />

32.0(max)<br />

27.3<br />

23.3<br />

21.5<br />

22.7<br />

23.7<br />

20.1<br />

20.0<br />

Heat conversion<br />

efficiency(%)<br />

24.96<br />

25.70<br />

28.19<br />

30.53<br />

28.53<br />

25.61<br />

24.07<br />

28.42<br />

26.54<br />

26.41<br />

29.02<br />

26.12<br />

23.53(min)<br />

27.21<br />

27.45<br />

32.30<br />

26.85<br />

23.89<br />

24.94<br />

24.73<br />

28.11<br />

29.17<br />

25.60<br />

24.36<br />

25.60<br />

25.85


Table 5.6<br />

(continued)<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />

no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />

1/30 7 3 6 4.0(max) 7.77(max) 16.9 24.25<br />

1/31 6 334.0 7.17 16.7(min) 32.43(max)<br />

1/32 8 360.0 7.57 17.6 24.61<br />

1/33 3 340.0 7.04 18.3 30.51<br />

1/34 5 336.0 6.58 21.2 26.07<br />

1/35 6 340.0 6.83 19.8 27.35<br />

1/36 5 322.0 6.34 20.8 30.67<br />

1/37 3 322.0 5.75 26.0 28.07<br />

Average 327.0 6.21 22.8 27.00<br />

89


90 /<br />

so<br />

U<br />

70<br />

Figure 5.0 Time-Temperature characteristic curves of charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

31175 AiN 14 20<br />

/ '<br />

.20<br />

.*"<br />

4 "Good <strong>stove</strong> Poor <strong>stove</strong><br />

(60 Stove No. 31 17 .5 AN 19 14 20<br />

' HU % 32.4 32.3 30.5 34.4<br />

$4s-o<br />

a)4)<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10'<br />

0<br />

/ /' "<br />

"<br />

Time to boil (min.) 17 18 19 20 24 26 29<br />

Boiling duration (min.) 30 30 30 30 9 10 11<br />

Last temperature (C) 97 96 96 97 88 87 89<br />

Total operation time (min.) 47 48 49 50 54 56 59<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Time of operation, min.<br />

14


dP<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

25<br />

24<br />

23<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

Figure 5.1<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization<br />

efficiency (lU) of cormnercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

1<br />

STOVE NUMBER


34<br />

33<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

28<br />

25<br />

24<br />

r,23<br />

H22<br />

.0<br />

0<br />

4 J 2 1<br />

Is<br />

17<br />

17<br />

16<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

L<br />

Figure 5.2<br />

N<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil of<br />

commercial charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

M H M '1 1-1 r-1 4.-H M J N N C1 N'J 'M H4<br />

92<br />

STOVE NUMBER


Wood Stove without Chimney<br />

25 wood <strong>stove</strong>s were subjected to the per<strong>for</strong>mance tests. The results<br />

show that the efficiency of non-bucket wood <strong>stove</strong>s i.e., <strong>stove</strong> No. 2/1 to<br />

2 /24,varies from 14% - 23%. For bucket-type wood <strong>stove</strong>, (<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/2 to<br />

1/25), the efficiency varies from 18 - 25%. (See Fig. 5.3 - 5.4 and Table<br />

5.7). The time to boil <strong>for</strong> both types of <strong>stove</strong>s ranges from 17 - 19 min.<br />

and fuel burning rates range from 22 - 35 gm/min. The wood <strong>stove</strong>s with<br />

buckets have much the same level of effective per<strong>for</strong>mance as these nonbucket<br />

counterparts (that is around 21%).<br />

Wood Stove with Chimney<br />

Table 5.8 and Fig. 5.3 and 5.4 show that the efficiency of <strong>stove</strong> No.<br />

2/11, 2/12 and 2/15 is 13.88, 16.30 and 11.0, respectively. T,.z time to<br />

boil is in the range of 17 - 19 minutes.<br />

These chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>m at a considerably low level when<br />

compared to the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney. Hence, the wood <strong>stove</strong> with<br />

chimney can be regarded as an inefficient type of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>. The low<br />

HU and long time to boil of commercial chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s as compared<br />

with the nonchimneyed are mainly ca<strong>use</strong>d by two factors;<br />

a) Too much heat (and flame) loss has occurred through the flue gas<br />

exit hole which is located just the opposite of the fire feeding<br />

port and no flame restriction or baffle exists.<br />

b) The <strong>stove</strong>s are poorly designed in such a way that only a small<br />

portion of the pot bottom comes into contact with the flame,<br />

thus causing poor heat transfer.<br />

Rice Husk Stove with Chimney<br />

From Table 5.9, the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the six original models tested were<br />

as follows. The heat utilization efficiency ranged from 4.2 to 7.1% and<br />

averaged 5.6%. Time to boil was between 18.5 - 28.2 minutes and averaged<br />

23.4 minutes. The burning rate ranged from 58.5 - 160.7 gm/min and<br />

averaged 99.8. The overall rice husk consumption per test was on the<br />

average 5.2 kg.<br />

After the original designs were modified according to the specifications<br />

in Table 5.5, their per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>improved</strong> considerably. The average HU<br />

increased to 8.3%. Time to boil varied greatly (15.7 - 30 min), but on the<br />

average remained like the unmodified model. The big reduction was in the<br />

fuel <strong>use</strong>d and the average burning rate which were 4.0 kg and 79 gm/mmn<br />

respectively. This is equivalent to approximately a 25% fuel saving. The<br />

very low efficiency value of the original models is due mainly to a great<br />

amount of heat loss through the flue gas exit. For example, <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s 3/4<br />

and 3/4A1, the efficiency of the <strong>for</strong>mer is increased by 100% (from 5.15 to<br />

10.30%) upon reducing the area of the flue gas outlet by one half (from<br />

93


dP<br />

Z<br />

27<br />

26<br />

25 Ficure 5.3<br />

24<br />

23<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization efficiency<br />

(HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed*wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

STOVE NUMBER


o<br />

0<br />

0<br />

E-4<br />

2.<br />

21-<br />

26­<br />

19-­<br />

15<br />

13­<br />

12­<br />

.1<br />

10"<br />

RI<br />

W<br />

7,<br />

7-­<br />

4"<br />

1--<br />

Figure 5.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to boil<br />

of nonchimneyed and chimneyed*wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

(N ('TC I1(N(4HHN Cq ( ' .4 (N H H H. C WH<br />

HCJ H CJ' N HN'(N C N HH (N H CN 1- N<br />

H ~ ~ H H' ~ N ~ ~<br />

95<br />

STOVE NUMBER


Table 5.7<br />

Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s without chimney<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />

no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />

2/1 6 1483 35.36(max) 12.0 17.59<br />

2/2 3 1308 31.08 14.0 19.25<br />

2/3 4 1251 28.60 13.7 19.08<br />

2/4 3 1134 25.80 14.0 20.96<br />

2/5 4 1078 23.07 17.0 23.57<br />

2/6 4 1394 30.23 16.2 14.20(min)<br />

2/7 3 1372 28.13 18.7(max) 15.39<br />

2/8 4 1236 27.46 15.0 20.92<br />

2/9 4 1266 27.84 15.5 19.48<br />

2/10 3 1303 28.74 15.3 16.77<br />

2/13 3 1192 25.29 17.0 20.20<br />

2/16 3 1468 31.50 16.7 14.37<br />

2/22 6 1258 29.31 13.0 23.80<br />

2/23 6 1143 25.82 14.5 23.20<br />

2/24 5 1034 22.57(min) 16.0 23.47<br />

1/2 3 1337 31.09 13.0 20.80<br />

i/8 3 1253 26.48 17.3 18.30<br />

1/9 3 1625 34.24 17.3 14.48<br />

1/12 3 1265 28.77 14.0 21.01<br />

1/13 3 1202 27.34 14.0 20.99<br />

1/19 3 1330 30.00 14.3 17.75<br />

1/20 3 1415 32.19 14.0 20.60<br />

1/21 3 1367 29.75 16.0 21.63<br />

1/24 8 1059 24.40 13.5 25.90<br />

1/25 10 1054 25.28 ll.8(min) 25.90(max)<br />

Average 1273 28.41 14.3 19.8.<br />

96


Table 5.8<br />

Average testing results of wood <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />

no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />

2/11 3 1316 27.0 18.7 16.32<br />

2/12 3 1247 26.2 17.70 16.30<br />

2/15 3 2186 46.5 16.7 11.0<br />

Average 1583 33.2 17.7 14.54<br />

97


Table 5.9<br />

Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with chimney<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />

no., test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency(%)<br />

3/2 5 5863 117.30 20.0 5.48<br />

3/3 4 5147 93.30 25.2 4.95<br />

3/4 4 5303 103.59 21.3 5.15<br />

3/5 4 7789 160.70(max) 18.5 4.24(min)<br />

3/6 3 3736 65.56 27.0 7.13<br />

3/8 5 3394 58.49 28.2(nax) 6.57<br />

Original model ave. 5205 99.82 23.4 5.59<br />

3/4 Al 3 4472 84.45 23.0 10.30<br />

3/4 A3 3 3513 68.07 21.7 7.48<br />

3/4 BI 3 3877 70.57 25.0 7.23<br />

3/4 B2 3 2531 42.23 30.0 9.16<br />

3/5 A 4 6686 139.10 18.0 5.15<br />

3/5 Al 3 4280 93.74 15.7(min) 7.05<br />

3/5 A2 3 4436 88.12 20.3 11.14(max)<br />

3/8 C2 3 2498 4 8.46(min) 21.7 9.23<br />

Modified models ave. 4037 79.34 21.9 8.34<br />

* The test condition deviates from normal, using pot 30 cm. diameter.<br />

98


95 to 47 cm 2 ). The same result was also obtained from <strong>stove</strong> Nu<strong>mb</strong>er 3/5 and<br />

3/5Al where the efficiency was increased by 66% with the reduction of the<br />

original flue -as exit by approximately 60%. The chimney height also has<br />

an impact on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency since too high a chimney ca<strong>use</strong>s high<br />

suction of hot gas; too low a chimney hinders the outflow of the gas and<br />

creates a difficulty in initial ignition. In both cases poor heat<br />

utilization efficiency will result. Stove No. 3/5 and 3/5A illustrate this<br />

effect.<br />

These trial modifications were later <strong>use</strong>d as the bases <strong>for</strong> redesigning<br />

the <strong>improved</strong> model.<br />

Block diagrams in Fig. 5.5 and 5.6 show the HU and time to boil of the<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong> plotted against the <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

Rice Husk Stove without Chimney<br />

Test results from Table 5.10 have indicated that the <strong>stove</strong> made<br />

according to the original drawing (that is, <strong>stove</strong> code A but with better<br />

steel material <strong>for</strong> construction) had the HU of 17% and time to boil of<br />

approximately 14 minutes. Various trials of modifications of physical<br />

structures shown in Table 5.4 (<strong>stove</strong> code B to I) took place such as the<br />

insulation of outer cone, changing of cone slope, changing size and nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

of air inlet holes, the inner cylinder height and exhausted gas outlet, and<br />

rice husk flow gap between the outer cone and inner cylinder. These<br />

parameters have, more or less, some influence on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. The<br />

reduction of exhausted area seems to increase the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency, as<br />

indicated by <strong>stove</strong>s B and D in Table 5.4. Stoves B and C illustrate the<br />

effect of the height of the outer cone: the HU increases from 15.34 to<br />

18.58% when the height decreases from 37.0 to 30.5 cm. However, the best<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ination was obtained from <strong>stove</strong> G where the HU and TTB are 20.3% and<br />

11.4 minutes respectively. This <strong>stove</strong> was <strong>use</strong>d as a basis <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong><br />

model.<br />

The <strong>for</strong>egoing sections summarize the <strong>stove</strong> testing results. A thorough<br />

analysis of the results of <strong>stove</strong> testing needs a knowledge of heat and mass<br />

transfers. To illustrate such a method of analysis, the results of testing<br />

the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> and the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney will be discussed<br />

in detail in the following section.<br />

D. THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VARIABLES<br />

This section studies the effect of various factors on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

The factors are divided into 2 main groups according to their characteristics:<br />

first, properties that are fixed <strong>for</strong> a <strong>stove</strong> such as the <strong>stove</strong> gap and inlet<br />

air area; secondly, properties that can be changed such as wind, humidity,<br />

and charcoal weight. The first group is called internal variables, and<br />

the second the external variables.<br />

99


Table 5.10<br />

Average testing results of rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney<br />

Stove No. of Fuel <strong>use</strong>d Burning rate Time to boil Heat conversion<br />

no. test (gm) (gm/min) (min) efficiency'(%)<br />

A* 6 1929 44.04 13.8 16.97<br />

B 2 2002 47.12 12.5 15.34<br />

C 4 1628 38.73 12.0 18.58<br />

D 5 1804 42.75 12.2 18.32<br />

E 3 1848 42.69 13.3 16.00<br />

F 5 1736 41.24 12.2 19.52<br />

G 5 1887 45.57 11.4 20.29<br />

H 5 1704 40.36 12.2 17.68<br />

1 5 1755 42.39 11.4 18.87<br />

Average 1810 42.77 12.3 21.70<br />

* The model A is an original design.<br />

100


22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

LB<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

8<br />

7<br />

5.<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4 -I<br />

Figure 5.5 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on heat utilization<br />

0-och'Je ec-<br />

efficiency (HU) of nonchimneyed and chimneyed<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

JA Ie cI<br />

cl i:xi &<br />

<strong>101</strong><br />

STOVE NUMBER


0<br />

0<br />

*<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

28<br />

28<br />

24<br />

22­<br />

20.<br />

18-<br />

L4.<br />

12<br />

10<br />

4-.<br />

4 -­<br />

Figure 5.6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance rating based on time to<br />

boil of nonchimneyed and chimneyed rice<br />

husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

nncn aye i -- -c c l Ie<br />

102<br />

STOVE NUMBER


Internal Variables<br />

The internal variables are the characteristics that come with the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

They include all the geometrical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>., .rtove exhaust gap,<br />

grate-hole area, grate-to-pot distance, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size, air inlet<br />

door, and grate thickness. The results of changing such variables will be<br />

discussed. For all terms <strong>use</strong>d In the following section please refer to the<br />

illustration in Fig 7.1 in Chapr;er 7.<br />

Exhausted gap/exihausted area<br />

Test condition: Charcoal 400 gm.<br />

water 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 gm.<br />

Table 5.11 Test results of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap/exhausted area on HU and<br />

time to boil.<br />

Stove No. of Gap area Gap height Time to boil Unburned HU<br />

No. tests (sq cm) (cm) (min) charcoal (%)<br />

(sm)<br />

1/5 3 20.5 0.5 19.0 92 34.5<br />

4 65.6 1.6 18.0 70 29.7<br />

3 86.1 2.1 18.7 62 28.0<br />

4 98.4 2.4 18.0 54 27.2<br />

1/31 3 40.2 1.1 16.0 60 32.8<br />

3 65.6 1.6 16.3 60 29.3<br />

3 86.0 2.2 16.0 52 28.3<br />

3 98.6 2.6 18.0 48 26.6<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

From Table 5.11, as the exhausted gap increases from 0.5 cm to 2.4 cm<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, and from 1.1 cm to 2.6 cm <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/31, the HU<br />

value decreases from 34.5 to 27.2% and 32.8 to 26.6%, respectively. With<br />

<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, when the exhausted gap is increased by a factor of 4.8, the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency is decreased by the ratio of 21% of the original value.<br />

Similarly, an increase of the gap by a factor of 2.3 in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/31<br />

decreased the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency by the ratio of 19%. Hence, both <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

show an identical trend.<br />

103


The efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>s is inversely proportional to the exhausted<br />

gap or the exhausted area. The larger the exhaust area, the greater a<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion heat energy that is allowed to escape through it. The optimum<br />

gap determined from this experiment is 0.5 cm. From Fig. 5.7, if both lines<br />

are extrapolated, the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>s should be even higher, or<br />

approaching infinity as the gap area approaches zero. However, with the<br />

real physical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>, the exhausted gap of under 0.5 cm is<br />

considered the minimum limit <strong>for</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion air to flow through, without<br />

disturbing the optimum co<strong>mb</strong>ustion rate, particularly when oper:ating the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> from cold conditions.<br />

Grate hoZe area<br />

Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />

water = 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.12 Test results of the effect of grate hole area on HU and time to<br />

boil.<br />

Stove<br />

No.<br />

No. of<br />

tests<br />

Gap height<br />

(cm) %<br />

Grate hole<br />

(cm 2 )<br />

area<br />

(%)*<br />

Time to boil<br />

(min)<br />

Unburned<br />

charcoal<br />

(gm)<br />

1/5 3 0.5 80.0 45.3 19 S2 34.5<br />

3 52.8 29.9 21 S8 34.1<br />

5 26.4 14.9 26 109 32.3<br />

1/5 4 2.5 80.0 45.3 18 54 27.3<br />

3 52.8 29.9 20 67 27.1<br />

3<br />

* -% of total grate area<br />

26.4 14.9 24 87 27.0<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

From Table 5.12, and Fig. 5.8 the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> increases with<br />

the increase in grate hole area. With a smaller gap of 0.5 cm, the effect<br />

is, however, more prominent than with the larger gap of 2.5 cm. This should<br />

be expected since the gap has proven to be a strong factor controlling the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency as previously discussed.<br />

Grate hole area has a strong influence on time to boil and the amount<br />

of unburned charcoal. At 0.5 cm gap, time to boil increases from 19 to<br />

26 minutes and the amount of unburned charcoal increases from 92 to 109 gm<br />

as its grate hole area decreases from 80 to 26.4 sq cm. Similarly, at<br />

2.5 cm gap, the decrease in the grate hole area by the same amount ca<strong>use</strong>s<br />

time to boil and the amount of unburned charcoal to increase from 18 to 24<br />

minutes and 54 to 87 gm, respectively.<br />

104<br />

HU<br />

(%)


36<br />

34 -. 319<br />

13<br />

1/5<br />

.TTB<br />

32 - 1/31 18<br />

II .0<br />

30 0. 31<br />

00<br />

28 -<br />

-A16<br />

)(1/5<br />

3HU<br />

01/3 1<br />

261<br />

15<br />

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0<br />

gap, cm.<br />

Fig. 5.7 The effect of e,:hausted gap on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency and<br />

time to boil.<br />

105<br />

20<br />

0


36 128<br />

34- 0 HU 26<br />

32 1.,0\'. 3gap.5 cm. 24o 24<br />

\ 0<br />

30 N I 22P<br />

28-. 220­<br />

28 gap 2.5 cm. -TTB 20<br />

Y" '" AHU<br />

26 I I I N - . TTB 18<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

Grate hole area, cm.<br />

Fig. 5.8 The effect of the grate hole area on che <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil.<br />

106


Grate-to-pot distance<br />

Test condition: charcoal = 4O gm.<br />

water = - 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.13 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on HU and time<br />

to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of test Grate-to-pot distance Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (min) (%)<br />

1/4 6 11.0 18.8 28.2<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

5 9.3 15.4 31.1<br />

6 7.5 19.0 28.2<br />

The curve as shown in Fig. 5.9 indicates that the optimum value of<br />

grate-to-pot distance is 9.3 cm. At this point the <strong>stove</strong> yields 31%<br />

efficiency.<br />

The grate distance is one o± the important factors that distinctly<br />

influence the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. A parabolic curve means that either too<br />

short or too long a grate-to-pot distance will lower the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency.<br />

With the shallow grate, the hot charcoal bed is closer to the gap and more<br />

heat will be lost through it by radiation. In addition, the shallow grate<br />

will decrease the firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity, causing a packing up of charcoal<br />

up to the pot bottom. Consequently, the draft from the bottom is limited<br />

and poor co<strong>mb</strong>ustion results. On the other hand, if the grate is too far<br />

from the pot, the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency will fall again. This can be explained<br />

in terms of radiative heat flux from surface 1 to surface 2 which is<br />

inversely proportional to the distance. Hence, when the grate-to-pot<br />

distance is past the optimum value the efficiency begins to fall. From this<br />

experiment witl- the medium <strong>stove</strong> size (23.5 cm pot hole diameter) and<br />

400 gm of charcoal load, the cptimum value of grate-to-pot distance is about<br />

9 cm.<br />

Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion ch<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />

water 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

107


Table 5.14 Test result of the effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size on HU and<br />

time to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of test Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume Time to boil. HU<br />

(cu cm) (min) (%)<br />

1/28 9 4,216 20.1 25.6<br />

4 3,414 20.0 25.9<br />

l/A3 4 2,'.0 15.7 30.8<br />

3 1,787 18.0 33.1<br />

I/D1 4 2,946 19.7 26.9<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

4 1,510 18.0 30.6<br />

It can be seen from Table 5.14 and Fig. 5.10 that the decrease in<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er increases the HU value of the <strong>stove</strong>. For example, the<br />

HU value of <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/A3 increases from 30.8 to 33.1% when the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er decreases from 2,460 to 1,787 cu cm; the HU value of <strong>stove</strong> No. l/Dl<br />

also increases from 26.9 to 30.6% corresponding to the decrease in the<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er from 2,946 to 1,510 cu cm. Not much increase in the HU value of<br />

<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/28 is observed as the result of the reduction of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

beca<strong>use</strong> the percentage of reduction from original design is smallest.<br />

Besides, this <strong>stove</strong> has many features in addition to the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size that<br />

are poorly designed (see Annex I).<br />

The volume of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is reduced by adding a clay-rice<br />

husk ash mixture to the inside wall of the <strong>stove</strong>. By doing so, the wall<br />

thickness increases; consequently, the insulation may improve slightly. But<br />

more importantly, the diameter of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er decreases due to<br />

the enlargement of the <strong>stove</strong> wall. With the same amount of charcoal being<br />

loaded, the distance between the glowing charcoal and the pot bottom gets<br />

nearer as compared with the <strong>stove</strong> without reducing the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

As a consequence, more radiative heat can reach the water as the distance<br />

becomes smaller.<br />

For <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/28, the reduction of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er does not show a<br />

significant effect on the per<strong>for</strong>mance. This is due to the fact that although<br />

its volume is reduced from 4,216 to 3,414 cu cm, the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size is still<br />

quite large to contain 400 gm of charcoal. The distance between the glowing<br />

charcoal and the pot bottom would there<strong>for</strong>e vary slightly when the same<br />

amount of charcoal is loaded. The improvement of the radiative heac transfer<br />

is, hence, insufficient to clearly reflect its effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance. However, a slight increase of the HU value can be noticed<br />

from the experiment.<br />

108


32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28-<br />

27 5<br />

Fig. 5.9<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/.<br />

/18<br />

"<br />

TTB<br />

1<br />

6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Grate-to-pot distance, cm.<br />

The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil<br />

109<br />

HU<br />

20<br />

19 .<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

13<br />

0<br />

.o<br />

0


Ai, inZet door<br />

Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />

water 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.15 Test result of the effect of air inlet door on HU and time to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Exhausted gap Air Inlet opening Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (%) (sq cm) (min) (%)<br />

1/5 18 1 100 66.0 21.0 30.5<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

8 75 49.5 24.9 29.6<br />

7 50 33.0 22.1 29.8<br />

7 25 16.5 22.6 30.9<br />

The effect of air inlet door area is small. The air inlet varies from<br />

100% opening down to 25%, the HU value only differs by 1.3%. See Fig. 5.11.<br />

Since the amount of air flow through the <strong>stove</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is<br />

governed by the temperature gradient Detween the air inlet door and the<br />

exhausted gap, if the inlet opening gets smaller, by the equation of<br />

continuity, i.e., Qair = AVi - A2V2 = constant, the velocity of the<br />

inlet air will be increased. Hence, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion rate will not be affected<br />

by the supply of oxygen in the air. This is why the HU value of Fig. 5.11<br />

is constant. The time to boil, however, shows the tendency of increasing<br />

as the air inlet area is decreased.<br />

Grate thickness<br />

Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />

water = 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

110


# 1/28<br />

34 ­ 20<br />

32 - HU 19<br />

/./"A -.- TTB<br />

30 A18 .<br />

g 0<br />

28 /1<br />

/<br />

26 / o-"2/28 16<br />

24<br />

1000 1500<br />

I<br />

2000<br />

I<br />

2500<br />

I<br />

3000<br />

I<br />

3500 4000 4500<br />

15<br />

5000<br />

3<br />

Co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume, cm<br />

Fig. 5.10 The effect of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er volume on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil of three different <strong>stove</strong>s tested.<br />

111


50 25<br />

45-<br />

HU 24<br />

45--. HUH TTB 2<br />

0<br />

40 23 -0<br />

....... .......... -=W<br />

AA<br />

35 0 0 HU 22 H<br />

30 TTB 21<br />

25 I 20<br />

20 30 40 50 60 79 80 90 100 110<br />

Air inlet door opening, %<br />

Fig. 5.11 The effect of air inlet door on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil.<br />

112


Table 5.16 Test result of the effect of grate thickness on <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Stove No. No. of test Grate thickness Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (min) (%)<br />

1/E3 5 2.0 16.6 31.3<br />

5 3.6 16.0 34.1<br />

1/E4 5 2.0 19.4 30.1<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

5 3.6 16.8 33.6<br />

Only two values of grate thickness, as restricted by the <strong>stove</strong> firing<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er and grate-to-pot distance parameters, were chose- <strong>for</strong> the experiment:<br />

2 cm and 3.6 cm. The tests <strong>for</strong> efficiency were per<strong>for</strong>m, in <strong>stove</strong> No. l/E3<br />

and l/E4. The test results from Table 5.16 and Fig. 5.12 showed that the<br />

thicker grate gives a higher efficiency. The HU values <strong>for</strong> the first <strong>stove</strong><br />

are 31.3 and 34.1% <strong>for</strong> the grate of 2.0 and 3.6 cm thick, and 30.1 and 33.6%<br />

<strong>for</strong> the second <strong>stove</strong>, respectively.<br />

With the thicker grate, the heat lost by conduction is smaller beca<strong>use</strong><br />

the grate is made of clay and rice husk ash which is a considerably good<br />

insulator. There<strong>for</strong>et, the thicker grame seems to be the best (as long as<br />

the thickness incre e has not significantly altered other physical para<br />

meters). Time to boil seems to slightly increase as the result of this<br />

change. However, more experiments should be per<strong>for</strong>med to determine the<br />

optimum value of grate thickness based on different size of <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Stove insulation<br />

Test condition: charcoal 400 gm.<br />

water 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.17 Test result of the effect of insulation on HU and time to boil.<br />

Pair No. Stove No. Insulation Time to boil HU<br />

(min) (%)<br />

1 1/3 no 22.3 25.7<br />

1/4 yes 18.8 28.2<br />

2 1/23 no 21.5 29.2<br />

1/5 yes 21.1 30.5<br />

3 1/33 no 18.3 30.5<br />

1/31 yes 16.7 32.4<br />

113


35 20<br />

A l/E3 - HU<br />

34 -.- TTB 19<br />

l/E4<br />

33 ' 18<br />

32 17<br />

1/E4<br />

31 - 0 1/E3 16<br />

/ /E<br />

30 1<br />

0 1<br />

­<br />

3 4<br />

1<br />

5 6 7<br />

- 15<br />

8<br />

Grate thickness, cm<br />

Fig. 5.12 The effect of grate thickness on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

and time to boil<br />

114<br />

0<br />

0


Results and Discussion<br />

The bucket <strong>stove</strong> as the name implies has a bucket to contain the pottery<br />

body inside; between the bucket and the body is found insulation normally<br />

made from rice husk ash-clay light weight material. The function of the<br />

insulation and the bucket are threefold: that is, to minimize heat loss from<br />

the inside wall; to provide the constraint against thermal expansion without<br />

causing <strong>stove</strong> cracking or the <strong>stove</strong> integrity in long term service; and to<br />

facilitate transportability of <strong>use</strong>rs both frow the market and during <strong>use</strong>.<br />

To study the effect of insulation, a matched pair of identical <strong>stove</strong>s were<br />

tested (one with,the other without insulation and bucket); the results are<br />

as shown in Table 5.17. From Table 5.1 it is quite apparent that the<br />

non-insulated <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ms more poorly than the insulated counterparts.<br />

The pair of larger size <strong>stove</strong>s (No. 1/3 and 1/4) showed a stronger effect<br />

than the smaller size pair in both HU% and time to boil. This may be due<br />

to the fact that a larger size <strong>stove</strong> has greater surface area <strong>for</strong> heat loss<br />

than the smaller one.<br />

Stove's weight<br />

Test condition: charcoal = 400 gm.<br />

water = 3,700 gm<br />

pot diameter 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.18 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> weight on the HU and time to<br />

boil.<br />

Pair No. Stove No. Stove weight Time to boil HU<br />

(kg) (min) (%)<br />

1 1/2 12.2 21.7 25.0<br />

1/5 9.3 21.1 30.5<br />

2 1/30 18.0 16.9 24.3<br />

1/31 11.8 16.7 32.4<br />

3 1/32 8.2 17.6 24.6<br />

1/33 6.7 18.3 30.5<br />

4 1/35 8.0 19o8 27.2<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

1/36 6.5 20.8 30.7<br />

Heat absorption by the <strong>stove</strong> largely depends on its weight. This is<br />

particularly true <strong>for</strong> the <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> where it is normally started<br />

from cold conditions and <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> a short duration (within one hour) with<br />

115


limited charcoal load. Almost all of the <strong>stove</strong>s tested regardless of this<br />

variation in physical parameters show that the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> efficiency<br />

varies more or less inversely with its weipht. The <strong>stove</strong> sample pairs in<br />

Table 5.18 come from the same make and debign.<br />

From Table 5.18, it is quite clear that the <strong>stove</strong> weight has a strong<br />

effect on the <strong>stove</strong> heat utilization efficie-cy but almost no effect on the<br />

time to boil. It must be pointed out, however, that the cha<strong>mb</strong>er size of<br />

each <strong>stove</strong> in the pair studied was not the same. It was larger <strong>for</strong> the<br />

heavier <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er size must also be co<strong>mb</strong>ined<br />

with the <strong>stove</strong> weight. It is not possible to single out the weight factor<br />

alone.<br />

The Effect of External Variables<br />

The external variables are the environmental factors. These include<br />

the initial weight of charcoal and water, pot size, charcoal size, wind,<br />

and air relative humidity.<br />

Initial weight of charcoal<br />

Test condition: pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

exhausted gap = 1 cm.<br />

water weight = 2,300, 3,000, 3,700 gm.<br />

Table 5.19 Test result of the effect of initial weight of charcoal on <strong>stove</strong><br />

HU and time to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of test Water weight Charcoal weight Time to boil HU<br />

(gm) (gm) (min) (%)<br />

1/5 5 2,300 300 17.0 26.3<br />

4 350 14.0 27.6<br />

4 450 13.0 30.8<br />

1/5 4 3,000 300 16.5 30.1<br />

4 350 16.5 30.8<br />

4 450 16.8 32.2<br />

1/5 4 3,700 300 24.0 30.7<br />

4 350 21.0 30.5<br />

4 450 19.0 32.0<br />

116


Results and Discussion<br />

In this experiment, the weight of charcoal varied from 300 to 350 and<br />

450 gm, and the weight of water controlled at 3 levels: 2,300, 3,000, and<br />

3,700 gm. Test results from Taole 5.19 and Fig. 5.13 showed that at all<br />

water weight levels, the eff.ciency of the <strong>stove</strong> increases witi the increase<br />

in charcoal load. The trend is weaker, however, as Lhe amount of water I s<br />

increased to the highest !nevel (3,700 gi) Time to boil is also reduced as<br />

the charcoal load is increased.<br />

These behaviors should be n.:-: L,tcd beca<strong>use</strong> whC1 Lhe amount of charcoal<br />

increases, the distance between the top charcoal layer and the pot bottom<br />

decreases as previously discussed. 'urthermore, the increase in charcoal<br />

load has contributed to more energy input but with a lower percentage of<br />

heat loss due to the absorption by the the <strong>stove</strong>'s mass.<br />

InitiaZ weight of water<br />

Test condition: pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

charcoal weight = 300, 350, 450 gm.<br />

exhausted gap = 1 cm.<br />

Table 5.20 Test result of the effect of initial weight of water on HU and<br />

time to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Charcoal weight Water weight Time to boil HU<br />

(gm) (gm) (min) (%)<br />

1/5 4 300 2,300 17.0 26.3<br />

4 3,000 16.5 3001<br />

4 3,700 24.0 . .7<br />

1/5 4 350 2,300 14.0 27.6<br />

4 3,000 16.5 30.8<br />

4 3,700 21.0 30.5<br />

1/5 4 450 2,300 13.0 30.8<br />

4 3,000 16,8 32.2<br />

4 3,700 19.0 32.0<br />

117


36<br />

34 \"22<br />

34<br />

-<br />

\..<br />

0<br />

A<br />

TIME TO BOIL<br />

WATER WIGHT<br />

2,300 Sm<br />

3,000 gm<br />

32 a 3,700 gm 0<br />

S30 2<br />

28-L6<br />

26 1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

- 24<br />

0 o 0<br />

16<br />

SIII I I I<br />

242001<br />

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550<br />

Charcoal weight, gm<br />

Fig. 5.13 The effect of the initial weight of charcoal on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency and time to boil<br />

118<br />

600<br />

L4<br />

1


Results and Discussion<br />

The effect of initial water weight variation on the HU and time to boil<br />

was tested at three charcoal load levels. Test results from Table 5.20 shows<br />

that, in most cases, the efficiency increases slightly with the increase of<br />

initial water weight. The effect is considerably noticeable only when the<br />

water weight is increased from 2,300 gm to 3,000 gm, but after that point<br />

the efficiency seems to reach the peak regardless of chaxcoal load. The<br />

increased in time to boil is evident as the amount of water is increased.<br />

Theoretically, the amount of heat required to increase the temperature<br />

up to its boiling point is proportional to the amount of water. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

it is no surprise that time to boil increases from 17.0 to 24.0 minutes in<br />

the 300 gm charcoal loadfrom 14.3 to 21.0 minutes in the 350 gm charcoal,<br />

and from 13.0 to 19.0 minutes in the 450 gm charcoal load as the weight of<br />

water increases from 2,300 to 3,700 kg. As <strong>for</strong> the HU, since the geometrical<br />

structure of the <strong>stove</strong> has not changed, heat produced by co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of<br />

charcoal occurs at the same rate. There<strong>for</strong>e, the rate of heat transfer to<br />

the water is not varied by the amount of water. Consequently, the<br />

accumulation of energy by the water is unchanged. Even after the temperature<br />

of water reaches the boiling point, heat accepted by the water within half<br />

an hour of prolonged boiling is not different <strong>for</strong> all cases. The<br />

efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>, there<strong>for</strong>e, is not greatly effected by the change<br />

of the initial weight of water particularly when the charcoal load satisfies<br />

the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity as in the case of 350 and 450 gm.<br />

Pot size<br />

Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />

water weight 3,700 gm.<br />

Table 5,21 Test result of the effect of pot size on HU and time to boil,<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Pot size Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (min) (%)<br />

1/4 6 24 18.8 28.2<br />

5 28 16.4 28.5<br />

5 32 16.4 28.1<br />

1/E3 5 24 16.5 34.1<br />

3 28 15.0 34.1<br />

3 32 16.0 34.8<br />

119


Results and Discussion<br />

The size of the <strong>cooking</strong> containers does not affect the efficiency of<br />

the <strong>stove</strong>. As shown in Table 5.21, the HU values are nearly constant when<br />

the size of the pot varies without changing the amount of water. This is<br />

due to the fact that in changing the pot size, the geometrical structure<br />

has not changed significantly: the distance between the top glowing<br />

charcoal layer to the pot bottow will change only slightly;i.e., a larger<br />

pot sits higher on the stoVe'S pot rests but at the same time a larger pot has<br />

more heat absorbing surface at the bottom and side wall. However, one might<br />

expect more heat loss in the larger pot than in the smaller one, owing to a<br />

larger surface exposed to the surroundings but this may be offset by the<br />

greater water evaporating surface <strong>for</strong> the larger pot size, The effect of pot<br />

size on time to boil seems to be insignificant within the size range tested.<br />

Charcoal size<br />

Test condition: charcoal weight 400 gm.<br />

water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.22 Test result of the effect of charcoal size on HU and time to boil,<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Charcoal size Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (mill) (%)<br />

1/5 3 2.54 18.3 31.5<br />

3 10.16 18.3 31.6<br />

1/12 3 2,54 17.7 27.5<br />

3 10.16 22.3 28.0<br />

1/14 3 2.54 17.0 24.4<br />

3 10.16 23.7 23.8<br />

1/20 3 2.54 19.0 24.5<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

3 <strong>101</strong>6 23.7 25.5<br />

Table 5.22 indicates that the size of the charcoal has an insignificant<br />

effect on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency. Time to boil increases as the size of the<br />

charcoal increases: 17.7 to 22.3 minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/12, 17.0 to 23.7<br />

minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/1'#, and 19.0 to 23.7 minutes in <strong>stove</strong> No. 1/20. For<br />

<strong>stove</strong> No. 1/5, the time to boil does not change. This observation can be<br />

perhaps explained by the fact that the design of this <strong>stove</strong>, particularly<br />

120


the grate, is superior to others and ther<strong>for</strong>e can zompensate <strong>for</strong> charcoal<br />

size while the average design can not.<br />

The increase in time to boil could be attributed to the decrease in<br />

burning surface of the larger size pieces charcoal. During the heating up<br />

time, heat is released from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion faster when the charcoal size is<br />

small, and vice versa. There<strong>for</strong>e, the water needs a shorter time to boil<br />

with the small-size charcoal. However, a larger amount of charcoal is <strong>use</strong>d<br />

up during the heating-up process. When the experiment is in the boiling<br />

period, the rate of heat released from the small-size charcoal diminishus<br />

beca<strong>use</strong> a large portion of the charcoal was ised previously. The overall<br />

effect is that the efficiency is not significantly different between the<br />

two charcoal sizes investigated.<br />

Wind<br />

Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />

water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.23 Test result of the effect of wind on HU and time to boil<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Wind spped Time to boil HU<br />

m/min min rel. change % % rel. change %<br />

41 8 0 21.1 30.5<br />

1/5 1 3 80 18.0 -14.7 22.6 -26<br />

80 7 0 22.6 18.4<br />

1/12 2 3 80 23.3 + 5.7 18.4 -36<br />

1/17 50 6 0 20.0 32.3<br />

1.2 3 80 26 +30.0 21.9 -32<br />

113 6 0 27.2 23.5<br />

1/14 2.5 3 80 not boil + 15.6 -34<br />

1/20 102 6 0 30.3 24.9<br />

2 3 80 not boil + 16.6 -33<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The effect of wind was simulated by the <strong>use</strong> of an electric fan<br />

approximately 16 inches in diameter placed at the distance of about 2 m from<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> air inlet port. The wind speed was measured by a vane type<br />

anemometer located right in front of the air inlet port. The result from<br />

121


Table 5.23 shows that the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency drops drastically when subjected<br />

to the wind of 80 m/mn (or 4.8 km/hr). The drop in HU relative to original<br />

value (without the wind) ranges from 26 - 36%. Time to boil,except <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/5, increased as little as 6% of original value to 30% and even to<br />

infinity in the case of <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/14 and 1/20 where the water cannot be<br />

brought to the boil. It is interesting to note that <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/5 has<br />

less time to boil when subjected to wind and the least change in HU. The<br />

behivior of this <strong>stove</strong> can be simply explained by the better control of heat<br />

loss since its exhausted gap/area (1 cm/41 cm 2 ) is very narrow (Table 5.1).<br />

For those <strong>stove</strong>s with wider gaps and exhausted areas such as nu<strong>mb</strong>er 1/14 and<br />

1/20 (where the exhausted gaps/areas are 2.5 cm/113 cm 2 , and 2.0 cm/102 cm 2 ,<br />

respectively), the HU drops and time to boil increases considerably.<br />

Air relative humidity<br />

Test condition: charcoal weight = 400 gm.<br />

water weight = 3,700 gm.<br />

pot diameter = 24 cm.<br />

Table 5.24 Test result of the effect of air relative humidity on HU and time<br />

to boil.<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Humidity Time to boil HU<br />

(%) (min) (%)<br />

1/5 1 68 23.0 29.0<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

2 74 20.5 31.6<br />

1 76 21.0 31.6<br />

1 78 22.0 31.3<br />

1 80 19.0 30.6<br />

3 92 22.7 29.2<br />

The effect of air relative humidity on the HU and time to boil was<br />

investigated using tha test results that were previously recorded over a<br />

long period of time in which changes in humidity had actually occurred. The<br />

test results in Table 5.24 indicate that the HU and time to boil do not vary<br />

with the humidity.<br />

Air relative humidity presumably should influence the rate of water<br />

evaporation from the pot during boiling. For example, at low relative<br />

humidity the evaporation rate should be higher and vice versa. However,<br />

this has proved not to be the case. The plausible explanation is that at<br />

122


a very high vapor pressure of the boiling water, resulting from an intel<strong>use</strong><br />

heat generated by the glowing charcoal under the pot, more than enough energy<br />

potential is created to evaporate the weter from the pot.<br />

The change in air relative humidity, there<strong>for</strong>e, can have essentially no<br />

additionai effect on the evaporation rate.<br />

E. WOOD STOVE WITHOUT CHIMNEY<br />

In investigating the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, the<br />

variables are also classified in a similar way as in the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

They are divided into two groups--internal and external variables.<br />

Internal Variables<br />

In this section, the effect of internal variabaes are studied. These<br />

internal variables are <strong>stove</strong> gap, grate vs nongrate, grate hole area, and<br />

grate-to-pot distance.<br />

Stove gap/exhausted area<br />

Table 5.25 Test result of the effect of <strong>stove</strong> gap on HU and time to boil of<br />

the wood <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Gap exhausted Time to boil HU<br />

(cm) (min) (%)<br />

2/25R 5 1 12.6 28.92<br />

2/88 4 1 11.2 27.62<br />

2/lB 5 1.5 12.4 27.34<br />

2/13E 5 1.3 12.0 27.04<br />

2/24R 8 0.63 13.5 25.93<br />

2/5B 3 1.5 12.7 25.71<br />

2/22B 8 1.5 14.0 24.43<br />

2/4B 3 2.7 11.0 23.47<br />

2/23 6 1.8 14.5 23.20<br />

2/9B 8 2.0 12.0 22.76<br />

2/21N 3 3.0 16.0 21.63<br />

2/12S 3 2.0 14.0 21.01<br />

2/13S 3 1.6 14.0 20.99<br />

2/2S 3 2.0 13.0 20.80<br />

2/20S 3 2.0 14.7 20.69<br />

2/18S 3 2.0 13.7 20.28<br />

2/24S 3 1.5 14.3 20.19<br />

2/8S 3 1.5 17.3 18.13<br />

2/19S 3 2.5 14.3 17.75<br />

2/9S 3 3.0 17.3 14.48<br />

123


Results and Discussion<br />

As indicated with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the gap has an effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency. In the case of the wood <strong>stove</strong>, even when the mechanism of heat<br />

transfer is different, this effect is also observed. Fig. 5.14 is the<br />

plot of the HU values of wood <strong>stove</strong>s from various manufacturers against the<br />

gap heights. The scattering of points in the g~r is due to variations of<br />

<strong>stove</strong> geometry of different makes. Nevertheless, the trend can be deduced<br />

easily; as the gap height decreases, the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency increases.<br />

The increase of <strong>stove</strong> efficiency with the decrease of gap can be<br />

explained in the same line as that of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>. When the gap is<br />

large, heat is easily lost through the gap by the flame and exhaust gas<br />

convections. With the smaller gap the flame from burning firewood has a<br />

better contact with the pot side wall be<strong>for</strong>e exit to the atmosphere.<br />

Grate vs nongrate dsiw><br />

Table 5.26 Test result of the effect of grate on HU and time to boil of wood<br />

Stove.<br />

Stove No. of Base or grate-to-<br />

'a. tests pot-distance, cm<br />

2/5 4 14.0<br />

2/6 4 14.0<br />

2/7 3 14.0<br />

2/9 4 11.5<br />

2/10 3 12.0<br />

Average 13.1<br />

2/4 3 12.0<br />

2/13 3 14.5<br />

2/22 6 12.2<br />

2/23 6 12.2<br />

2/24 5 13.0<br />

Average 12.8<br />

Firewood<br />

<strong>use</strong>d, gm<br />

1,078<br />

1,394<br />

1,372<br />

1,266<br />

1,303<br />

1,283<br />

1,134<br />

1,192<br />

1,258<br />

1,143<br />

1,034<br />

1,152<br />

124<br />

Time to boil<br />

min<br />

17<br />

16.2<br />

18.7<br />

15.5<br />

15.3<br />

16.5<br />

14<br />

17<br />

13<br />

14.5<br />

16<br />

14.9<br />

HU<br />

%<br />

23.6<br />

14.6<br />

15.4<br />

19.5<br />

16.8<br />

17.9<br />

21.0<br />

20.2<br />

23.8<br />

23.2<br />

23.5<br />

22.3<br />

Remarks<br />

<strong>stove</strong><br />

group<br />

without<br />

grate<br />

<strong>stove</strong><br />

group<br />

with<br />

grate


Fig. 5.14 The effect of exhausted gap on efficiency of various wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

30<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 o0<br />

0<br />

20<br />

10 1 2 3 cm<br />

125<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Exhausted Gap


Results and Discussion<br />

Comparing the two designs of wood <strong>stove</strong> (with and without grate), the<br />

test results in Table 5.26 indicate that with comparable base or grate-topot<br />

distance the <strong>stove</strong> group with grate has a much better heat utilization<br />

efficiency on the average.' The absolute efficiency difference is 4.4%. The<br />

times to boil are 16.5 and 14.4 minutes <strong>for</strong> the group without and with grates<br />

respectively. This difference, however, is considered to be insignificant<br />

<strong>for</strong> practical <strong>use</strong>. The <strong>stove</strong> with grate consumes approximately 10% less<br />

fuel on the average than the group without grate.<br />

The reason <strong>for</strong> the better per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> with grate is that<br />

the primary air induced from underneath the grate contributes to a more<br />

complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of fuel than those <strong>stove</strong>s without grates where the air<br />

can enter the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er through the firewood feeding port only.<br />

The poorer co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of nongrate <strong>stove</strong>s can be easily observed by the end<br />

of the test since more unburned charcoal remains.<br />

Grate hoie area<br />

Table 5.27 Test result of the effect of grate hole area on wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Stove<br />

No.<br />

No. of<br />

test nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

Grate hole<br />

diameter<br />

(cm)<br />

area<br />

(sq cm)<br />

Time to boil<br />

min average %<br />

2/8B 4 90 1.5 159.0 11.2 27.68<br />

2/23 6 90 1.5 159.0 14.5 23.20<br />

2/lB 5 90 1.5 159.0 12.4 27.34<br />

2/13E 5 90 1.5 159.0 12.0 27.04<br />

2/22B 8 90 1.5 159.0 14.0 24.43<br />

2/1GI 7 90 1.5 159.0 12.4 25.97<br />

2/24R 8 90 1.5 159.0 13.5 25.93<br />

HU<br />

average<br />

2/25B 4 90 1.5 159.0 11.7 17.7 25.27 25.5<br />

2/8E 9 37 2.5 181.6 16.7 25.57<br />

2 /20A 10 37 2.5 181.6 15.9 23.56<br />

2/13B 8 37 2.5 181.6 12.0 14.9 22.76 24.0<br />

2/8GI 4 61 1.23 72.5 12.0 26.36<br />

2/IA 6 61 1.23 72.5 13.8 12.9 25.12 25.7<br />

126


Results and Discussion<br />

The effect of grate hole area on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency was studied by<br />

selecting <strong>stove</strong>s of different grate designs. Three sets of hole diameter<br />

and a varying nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes were investigated; they are: A, 2.5 cm<br />

diameter and 37 holes; B, 1.5 cm diameter and 90 holes; and C, 1.23 cm<br />

diameter and 61 holes. The respective grate hole areas of A, B, and C are<br />

181.6, 159.0, and 72.5 sq cm. The efficiencies of A, B, and C are shown<br />

in Table 5.27. Only a slight increase in the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency with the<br />

decrease in the total grate hole area was observed: the efficiency of A<br />

was 24.0%, B 25.5%, and C 25.74%.<br />

The above phenomenon can be explained in terms of radiative heat loss.<br />

Through the grate holes, radiative heat can easily pass to the ash cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

Consequently, a grate with a smaller total hole area improves the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong>. In addition, the secondary air is always available through<br />

the firewood feeding port; there<strong>for</strong>e, the reduction of primary air itilet<br />

area by almost 2/3 does not ca<strong>use</strong> the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance to change significantly.<br />

&rate-to-pot distance<br />

Table 5.28 Test result of the effect of grate-to-pot distance on <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Stove No. of Grate distance Time to boil HU<br />

No. tests (cm) min average (%) average<br />

2/Al 3 9 15.0 23.04<br />

2/AlA 4 9 14.5 24.48<br />

2/AlAl 3 9 15.0 25.70<br />

2/A2A 4 9 14.25 26.00<br />

2/A2 3 9 14.67 14.7 24.32 24.7<br />

2/Cl 5 10 14.6 25.10<br />

2/CIA 4 10 14.75 27.12<br />

2/D2A 4 10 15.25 25.20<br />

2/D2 3 10 14.66 25.34<br />

2/E2 3 10 16.0 25.00<br />

2/Fl 6 10 15.33 26.05<br />

2/lG 3 10 15.66 15.2 25.65 25.6<br />

2/A2 5 11 15.6 27.53<br />

2/A3A 4 11 18.0 26.82<br />

2/A4A 3 11 18.0 28.0<br />

2/A4 5 11 18.0 17.4 28.25 27.7<br />

2/C2 5 12 15.2 23.78<br />

2/C2A 4 12 14.5 25.87<br />

2/DI 3 12 13.67 25.00<br />

2/DIA 4 12 13.75 26.82<br />

2/F2 6 12 14.5 26.35<br />

2/F2A 3 12 14.33 14.3 26.80 25.8<br />

2/30B 6 13 21 19.11<br />

2/30A 3 15 18.33 l'.75<br />

2/30 3 16 28.67 15.67<br />

127


Results and Discussion<br />

The effect of the grate-to-pot distance on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />

shown in Table 5.27 and Fig. 5.15. As the distance increases from 9 cm to<br />

about 11.0 cm, the average efficiency increases from 24.7 to 27.7%. However,<br />

as the distance increases further, tile <strong>stove</strong> efficiency drops. This<br />

behavior is also observed with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

At the small grate-to-pot distance, it is likely that the glowing wood<br />

is too near to the gap, causing high convective heat loss through the gap.<br />

Moreover, with too small a distance, fUrewood pieces would tend to jam up<br />

the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er causing limited flame to come into contact with the<br />

pot bottom and insufficient temperature of the cha<strong>mb</strong>er itself to initiate<br />

off-gas co<strong>mb</strong>ustion with the incoming secondary air. When the distance<br />

increases, this loss reduces; the per<strong>for</strong>mance, hence, improves. However,<br />

at great distances the radiative heat which is intercepted by the pot drops<br />

more quickly than the decrease in heat loss through the gap, resulting in<br />

the poor per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

External Variables<br />

Only two external variables are studied: wind effect, and fuel feed<br />

rate.<br />

Wind effect<br />

Table 5.29 Test result of the effect of wind ol wood sto.'e per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Stove No. No. of tests Wind velocity Time to boil HU<br />

(km/hr) (min) (%)<br />

2/2S 3 normal 13.0 17.65<br />

2/2B 3 6.3 13.7 16.21<br />

2/21N 3 normal 16.0 21.63<br />

2/21W 3 6.0 14.7 17.03<br />

2/25C 8 normal 11.9 21.64<br />

2/25D 3 5.0 14.0 14.58<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

From Table 5.28, wind is found to have a strong effect on the efficiency<br />

of the wood <strong>stove</strong>, in one experiment, the HU values dropped from 21.63% to<br />

17.03%, when the wind is induced through the <strong>use</strong> of an electric fan. In<br />

another experiment, the IIUvalues decreased from 21.64 to 14.58%. All of<br />

128


Fig. 5.15 The effect of grate-to-pot distance on the heat utilization<br />

efficiency (HU) of wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

30<br />

0<br />

00<br />

20 0<br />

10tI I I I<br />

10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

00<br />

129<br />

0<br />

Grate-to-pot distance, cm


the experiments, including those with the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, indicate<br />

a similar effect when the <strong>stove</strong> is subjected to wind. The amount of drop<br />

in efficiency, however, depends on the design characteristics, particularly<br />

the exhausted gap and fuel feeding port size.<br />

The decline in per<strong>for</strong>mance is due to the increase of heat loss by<br />

flue gas and flame convection through the gap, and the oversupply of air to<br />

the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. If more air is supplied than required by the co<strong>mb</strong>usited<br />

woL., the heat-up of excess air will decrease the temperature of the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er. There<strong>for</strong>e, the warm excess air, which contains a large<br />

amount of thermal energywill be lost with the flue gas.<br />

FueZ feed rate<br />

Table 5.30 Test result of the effect of firewood feeding rate on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Stove No. No. of Average feeding rate Time to boil HU Remarks<br />

tests gm/min min %<br />

2/8E 3 21.5 13.8 24.8 grate-to­<br />

3 25.7 11.3 22.5 pot<br />

distance<br />

3 27.9 15.0 18.5 = 12 cm<br />

2/13A 3 31.6 11.4 23.5 <strong>for</strong> both<br />

tests<br />

3 38.8 9.7 21.9<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

2 42.0 9.4 20.9<br />

Unlike the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> where the fuel is loaded in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er at one time at the begining of ignition, the wood <strong>stove</strong> needs to be<br />

fed with firewood gradually and at a proper.distance to obtain the best<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion flame directed toward the pot bottom. The firewood feeding rate<br />

as shown in Table 5.29 indicates that this factor is quite sensitive to the<br />

efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>. A higher feed rate ca<strong>use</strong>s the drop in HU <strong>for</strong> both<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s evaluated. The time to boil shows a decreasing trend as the feed rate<br />

is increased (with one exception, <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> nu<strong>mb</strong>er 2/8E, where at the fastest<br />

rate of 27.9 gm/min the time to boil increases). This may be due to the clogged<br />

up co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er and firing since this <strong>stove</strong> has a small firewood feeding<br />

port and co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

130


The drop in HU with a faster firewood feeding rate can be recognized<br />

by two important phenomena; first, the rate of heat absoption by the pot<br />

is not directly proportional to the rate of heat released by the fuel,<br />

particu7iarly when the flame is <strong>for</strong>ced through the exhausted gap with poor<br />

contact with the pot side; secondly, the clogging-up effect of the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er when too much or too fast firewood is fed in ca<strong>use</strong>s the<br />

incomplete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of hot gas.<br />

131


Chapter 6<br />

Theoretical Analysis of Charcoal Stove


THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHARCOAL STOVE<br />

A. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE BUCKET STOVES<br />

As seen in the preceding sections, the effects of only a few factors on<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency were studied experimentally. These factors include the<br />

distance from grate to pot H, the grate hole area Ag, the gap height G, the<br />

wall thickness D, and the <strong>stove</strong> weight m s . Consequently to be of any <strong>use</strong>,<br />

any mathematical model of the <strong>stove</strong>s has to relate the efficiency to these<br />

factors. It is the purpose of this section to develop such a model.<br />

Prior to the development of the mathematical model, an understanding of<br />

the heat transfer mechanisms occuring in the <strong>stove</strong> is essential. These<br />

mechanisms are briefly described in this section. They are then related to<br />

the above factors. The model is subsequently developed; parameters in the<br />

model are evaluated by fitting the model to the experimental results shown<br />

in the previous sections. With the obtained values of the parameters, the<br />

model is <strong>use</strong>d to predict the change of efficiency due to variation of one of<br />

the factors.<br />

Mechanisms Occuring in the Stove<br />

A known amount of charcoal is loaded into the <strong>stove</strong> grate and ignited.<br />

Air flows in by natural convection through the inlet opening to accelerate<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion; this operation is continued until all the charcoal is burned.<br />

During the <strong>cooking</strong> operation, most of the heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is<br />

consumed to raise the temperature of the charcoal to its burning point; if<br />

the process is assumed adiabatic, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion temperature will vary<br />

depending on the geometrical structure of the <strong>stove</strong>, the supply of air, and<br />

the arrangement and the amount of charcoal loaded.<br />

Air is naturally drawn into the <strong>stove</strong> due to the difference in pressure<br />

from the outside to the inside. The flow rate of air is, hence, dependent<br />

on the pressure difference and also on the air inlet area.<br />

In the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, oxygen in the air oxidizes carbon in the<br />

charcoal, producing heat. The amount of heat produced varies with the<br />

condition of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion: if a large quantity of charcoal is loaded and the<br />

air supply is not sufficient, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is incomplete; on the other<br />

hand, if air is sufficiently supplied or oversupplied, the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is<br />

complete. The <strong>for</strong>mer condition yields less heat than the latter. However,<br />

oversupply of air tends to bring the <strong>stove</strong> temperature down. Consequently,<br />

heat produced by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion depends on the amount of charcoal and the<br />

flow rate of air.<br />

135


Heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion of charcoal diusipates by three modes:<br />

conduction, convection, and radiation (see Thomas, 1980). The conductive<br />

heat transfers through the wall of the <strong>stove</strong> and the wall of the pot. During<br />

the transient state some heat is stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material, resulting in<br />

an increase of the temperature. This amount of stored heat varies directly<br />

with the mass and the temperature increment from its initial value to the<br />

steady-state value. At the steady state, according to the Fourier law of<br />

heat conduction, heat, conducedt through the <strong>stove</strong> wall, varies inversely<br />

with the wall thickness and directly with the temperature gradietit across the<br />

wall.<br />

The air, after co<strong>mb</strong>ustion with the charcoal, has a low density due to<br />

the increase in ;emperature. As a consequence, the exhaust air, carrying<br />

some heat with it, rises and leaves the <strong>stove</strong> through the gaps between the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> and the pot. A portion of the heat is released to the pot by<br />

conduction when the exhaust air (or the flame) comes into contact with the<br />

pot bottom; the remainder,accompanying the exhaust air out of the <strong>stove</strong>, can<br />

be considered as a loss. The whole mechanism here is actually natural<br />

convection. The flow rate of the exhaust air, hence, depends on the gap area<br />

and the pressi're gradient.<br />

The third <strong>for</strong>m of heat transfer in the <strong>stove</strong> is radiation. It is the<br />

most important mode among the thrLe since, according to the Stefah-Boltzmann<br />

law, the radiative energy from a surface, having an absolute temperature<br />

higher than 0 0 K, varies with the temperature to power four. With the<br />

temperature of the charcoal or the flame much higher than the temperature of<br />

the pot, the net flux of radiative energy from the flame to the pot is<br />

enormous. However, the net energy flux intercepted by the pot bottom decreases<br />

as the distance between the flame and the pot increases. The change in the<br />

net flux due to the change in the distance is commonly explained by the<br />

concept of view factor, which is simply defined as the ratio of the radiation<br />

from one surface intercepted by another surface to the total radiation from<br />

the first surface. The pot bottom, as the second surface in this definition<br />

gains the radiative energy from the charcoal, which acts as the first surface,<br />

1 y the amount proportional to the view factor from the charcoal to the pot.<br />

If the radiation is envisaged as energy particles or photons propelled<br />

outward from the flame in a random manner, the chance that the photons will<br />

hit the pot bottom diminished when the distance increases and the view factor<br />

decreases. Consequently, the radiative energy gained by the pot decreases<br />

with increasing distance.<br />

The above view of the heat transfer mechanisms in the <strong>stove</strong> lays the<br />

basis of modelling. It will include all the essential characteristics of the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> studied in experiments: the grate hole area Ag, relating to the natural<br />

convection of inlet air; the <strong>stove</strong> mass weight M s , connected to the heat<br />

stored in the material of the <strong>stove</strong>; the gap height G, associated with the<br />

natural convection of t:,e exhaust air; the wall thickness D, related to the<br />

heat conduction; and th! distance from grate to pot H, pertaining to the<br />

radiation (see Fig. 6.1).<br />

136


Fig. 6.1 Structure of the ideal Biomass <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>:<br />

a - pot stand;<br />

b - exha<strong>use</strong> gap;<br />

c - grate to pot distance;<br />

d - co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er;<br />

e - grate;<br />

f - ash compartment;<br />

g - opening <strong>for</strong> inlet air;<br />

h - <strong>stove</strong> base;<br />

i - <strong>stove</strong> width.<br />

137


Mathematical Modelling<br />

Heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion dissipates, as previously explained, by<br />

conduction, natural convection, and radiation. Heat fluxes resulting from<br />

these modes of heat transfer may be estimated from some mathematical<br />

relations available in many standard textbooks concerning heat transfer.<br />

Examples are books by Bird et al.(1960), Thomas (1980), Bennett and Myers<br />

(1974).<br />

For conduction of heat through solid slab, heat flux can be calculated<br />

from the Fourier's law of heat conduction. If the slab has a thickness of D,<br />

the two surfaces at different temperature T 1 and T 2 (T 1 > T 2), and its<br />

thermal conductivity of k, heat flux qcond at steady state, according to the<br />

Fourier's law, can be expressed as:<br />

qcond = k(T 1 - T 2 )/D (1)<br />

In the process of natural convection, it has been known that this mode<br />

of heat transfer is strongly dependent on the value of Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er, which<br />

is proportional to the temperature difference. The analysis of natural<br />

convection of fluid between two parallel infinite plates at different<br />

temperatures, aligned with the gravitation direction, shows the velocity of<br />

the buoyant fluid to vary directly with the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er (Bird et al, 1960).<br />

Undoubtedly, the natural convection between two plates is quite different<br />

from what actually occurs in the <strong>stove</strong>. However, it exemplifies the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned<br />

fact that natural convection is a function of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

or, as a consequence, due to the definition of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er, a function<br />

of temperature difference, that is:<br />

Vconv = f(Gr) (2)<br />

in which vconv is the velocity of the buoyant gas and Gr is the Grashof<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er.<br />

Heat fluxes due to radiation between two isothermal surfaces 2, a is<br />

factors between the surfaces are known, can be calculated from<br />

qrad = oF 1 (r - Ti)<br />

2 (3)<br />

in which qrad is the radiative heat flux from surface 1 to surface 2, a is<br />

Stefan-Boltzmann constant, F 1 2 is the view factor from surface 1 to surface<br />

2, and T 1 and T 2 are the respective temperatures of surfaces 1 and 2.<br />

For radiation between two circular discs of equal diameter, the view<br />

factors between the two discs have been calculated analytically and plotted<br />

against the ratio of the diameter to the distance between the discs (Thomas,<br />

1980). If the diameter is unchanged, the view factor is approximately<br />

proportional to the inverse of the distance H:<br />

F 1 2 = 1/H (4)<br />

138


To simplify the modelling, the following assumptions are made:<br />

1. Flame temperature is constant (about 800*C).<br />

2. Time and fuel required to increase the temperature of the fuel bed<br />

from its initial value (i.e. a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature) to the final temperature<br />

at 800C are negligible.<br />

3. The rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is proportional to the air mass flow rate<br />

into the bed.<br />

4. Density of the <strong>stove</strong> material p, and heat capacity 4p, thermal<br />

conductivity k are constant.<br />

5. The wall thickness is uni<strong>for</strong>m.<br />

6. The diameter of the grate and the diameter of the pot are constant.<br />

7. Only part of the radiation is considered as <strong>use</strong>ful in heating, the<br />

other modes of heat transfer contribute to heat loss.<br />

Since the air flow into and out of the <strong>stove</strong> is by natural convection,<br />

the velocity of the air is a function of the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er. The relation<br />

between vconv and Gr in this situation can be obtained experimentally.<br />

However, no experiments with the purpose of procuring such relations have been<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med. In order that the modelling can proceed, the relationship has to<br />

be assumed. For simplicity, a linear relationship between the velocity of<br />

buoyant gas and the Grashof nu<strong>mb</strong>er is adopted:<br />

or<br />

Vconv = (constant) Gr (5)<br />

Vconv = (constant) (Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (6)<br />

in which Tflame and Ta<strong>mb</strong> are the respective temperatures of the flame and<br />

the surroundings.<br />

Due to assumption 1, that the flame temperature Tflame is ccnstant,<br />

Fig. 6 indicates that the velocity of the upflow gas is constant:<br />

Vconv = constant (7)<br />

For air inlet, the air has to pass the grate holes be<strong>for</strong>e it is<br />

consumed in the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion process. With constant air velocity, the volume<br />

flow rate is proportional to the grate hole area Ag. Consequently, the mass<br />

flow rate of the inlet air is also in proportion to the grate hole area.<br />

Assumption 3 and the argument in the previous paragraph give the<br />

consumption rate of charcoal in the following <strong>for</strong>m:<br />

- dm c/dt = aA (8)<br />

in which mc is the mass of charcoal, t is time, and a is a constant.<br />

139


Similarly, the volume flow rate of exhaust gas, which leaves the <strong>stove</strong><br />

through the gap, varies directly with the gap area. It was found later that<br />

the gap area changes in a linear fashion with the gap height G. Thus,<br />

volume flow rate, or, in other words, the mass flow rate of the exhaust gaL<br />

is proportional to the gap height G. Since the flame temperature is assumed<br />

constant, the heat loss due to this process then varies linearly with the<br />

gap height G. If Qconv is the rate of heat loss,<br />

in which B is a consti't.<br />

=<br />

Qconv BG (9)<br />

At the initial time the temperature of the <strong>stove</strong> material is the same<br />

as the a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature; the temperature increases to a certain value at<br />

steady state. The constancy of thermal conductivity indicated in assumption<br />

4 assures a linear temperature profile across the <strong>stove</strong> wall when the system<br />

is steady. Since the flame temperature is constant <strong>for</strong> any thickness of the<br />

wall, the temperature difference across it is also constant. Heat stored<br />

in the <strong>stove</strong> material can, hence, be calculated from the average temperature,<br />

which is unchanged <strong>for</strong> any <strong>stove</strong>. With the assumption of constant heat<br />

capacity, the total heat absorbed by the <strong>stove</strong> mass Qabs is proportional to<br />

the mass m. Dividing the total absorbed heat with the total heating time<br />

yields the rate of heat absorption Qabs:<br />

Qabs = Ems (10)<br />

in which c is a function of time and physical properties of <strong>stove</strong> material.<br />

For convenience, e is assumed constant.<br />

The rate of heat transferred through the wall by conduction Qcond is<br />

estimated from Eq (1):<br />

Qcond = kA(Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)/D (11)<br />

in which A is the total surface area of the <strong>stove</strong> wall.<br />

Since the density of the <strong>stove</strong> material is p, and the wall thickness<br />

is uni<strong>for</strong>m, the area A can be related to the mass and the thickness D:<br />

m s<br />

m s = pAD (12)<br />

Substitution of Eq (12) in Eq (11) gives<br />

or<br />

Qcond = k(Tflame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)ms/pD 2 (13)<br />

Qcond , 6ms/D 2<br />

in which 6 = k(TfJame - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)/P (15)<br />

Total heat generated by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is proportional to the rate of<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion if heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is constant: If Qco<strong>mb</strong> is the rate of heat<br />

generated, equation (8) gives<br />

140<br />

(14)


Qco<strong>mb</strong> , a*Aq<br />

in which a* is the product of a and the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion per mass of<br />

charcoal consumed.<br />

(16)<br />

Subtraction of conductive heat and convective heat from the total heat<br />

generated from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion would give the radiative heat:<br />

Qrad = a*A - OG - Em - 6m /D 2<br />

(17)<br />

in which Qrad is the rate of heat transfer by radiation.<br />

Not all the radiative heat is <strong>use</strong>d in boiling water. The amount of this<br />

heat varies with the view factor between the pot and the charcoal, which,<br />

according to Eq (4), is approximately in proportion to the inverse of the<br />

distance between the grate and the pot bottom H. If h is the rate of hea.<br />

supplied to the water,<br />

in which y is a constant.<br />

Qh = YQrad/H<br />

Substitution of equation (17) into equation (18) gives<br />

s<br />

(18)<br />

Qh = y(a*Ag - OG - Em - 6ms/D 2 )/H (19)<br />

s<br />

Fig. 19 will be <strong>use</strong>d as a means of estimating the heat in bringing the<br />

temperature of water from the initial state to the state of boiling, and<br />

in evaporating water.<br />

Period of heating water<br />

In this period, water is heated from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient temperature Ta<strong>mb</strong> to<br />

the boiling point Tboil. Since the <strong>cooking</strong> pot <strong>use</strong>d in this work is made of<br />

aluminium which has the property of good thermal conduction, the heat that<br />

is intercepted by the pot is partially transferred to heat the water and the<br />

remainder is lost through the pot surface. If k and QI are the rates of<br />

heat absorbed by water and heat loss respectively, then<br />

=<br />

Q1 Qw + QI<br />

Part of the heat that is absorbed by the water prior to its boiling is given by:<br />

Qw = mwocpwdTw/dt<br />

in which mo is the initial mass of water, cpw is the heat capacity of water,<br />

and Tw is the water temperature at time t. The heat loss through the pot<br />

surface is given by:<br />

(20)<br />

(21)<br />

Q = hS(Tw - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (22)<br />

in which h is the heat transfer coefficient, and S is the surface area of<br />

the pot.<br />

141


Substitution of Eqs (21) and (22) into Eq (20) give<br />

h = m.oCpwdTw/dt + hS(Tw - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) (23)<br />

The solution of this differential equation is<br />

Tw = BI/B 2 + (Ta<strong>mb</strong> - Bl/B 2) e-B2t (24)<br />

in which B 1 = (Qh - hSTa<strong>mb</strong>)/woCpw (25)<br />

B2 = hS/mwocpc,<br />

(26)<br />

Substitution Eqs (19), (25), and (26) into Eq (24), and then rearranging<br />

the result of substitution, one gets<br />

T = T a<strong>mb</strong> + y(* Ag - G - Rms - ms/D 2 ) (i e -B 2 t(<br />

hSH - (27)<br />

Eq (27) is <strong>use</strong>d to estimate the time required to increase the temperature<br />

of water from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient value to its boiling point.<br />

Period of boiling<br />

At boiling, the water molecules begin to move turbulently and become<br />

loosely bound. Eventually, some of the water molecules with enough kinetic<br />

energy will be able to escape from the water surface in the <strong>for</strong>m of vapor.<br />

If the rate of heat consumed in evaporating water is mvhfg, the overall energy<br />

balance is<br />

H (a*Ag - OG - em s - 6ms/D 2 ) - hS(Tboil Ta<strong>mb</strong>) = 4hfg (28)<br />

in which kv is the rate of evaporated water and hfg is the latent heat of<br />

vaporization.<br />

If t 2 is the total time <strong>use</strong>d in the experiment and t I is the time<br />

required in heating the water from its initial state to boiling, then the<br />

total heat consumed in boiling can be obtained by multiplying Eq (28) with<br />

t 2 - tl:<br />

[H (*Ag - - Em s - 6ms/D 2 ) - hS(Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)] (t 2 _ t 1 )<br />

= mvhfg(t 2 - t I ) (29)<br />

The results in parts A and B are <strong>use</strong>d to estimate the efficiency of<br />

the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Efficiency of <strong>stove</strong><br />

The heat utilization or the efficiency of the <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> n is<br />

defined as the ratio of the heat consumed in heating and boiling water to<br />

the total heat input into the system. Since the rate of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is not<br />

a function of the charcoal mass as seen in Eq (8), the efficiency q can be<br />

expressed as<br />

142


Qsens + khfg ( t2<br />

aA AH t 2<br />

l )<br />

- t<br />

in which AH is the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, and Qsens is the sensible heat of<br />

water in increasing the temperature from the a<strong>mb</strong>ient to the boiling point.<br />

The time required to increase the Lehiperature of water, in the experiment,<br />

is usually less than the time required to reach the boiling point.<br />

Although the difference between the heating time and the boiling time is<br />

not really insignificant, the sensible heat will be excluded from Eq (30).<br />

This action is done <strong>for</strong> two reasons: one, the mass of water is not taken as<br />

one of the variables in this work; two, including the sensible heat adds at<br />

least one more variable, which not only complicates the evaluation of<br />

parameter, but may also obscure the effect )f other variables. Furthermore,<br />

heat loss through the pot surface will be neglected in Eq (29).<br />

efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> becomes<br />

Hence, the<br />

Y(a*Ag - $G - ems 2<br />

- 6ms /D ) (t2 - t1 ) (31)<br />

aA HAH t2 Eq (31) can be simplified where the constants are lumped together:<br />

t2 - t t2 - t1 a t2 -t 1 ms t2 - t1 = a 2H _ a2 AHt a3 ms( A2Ht2 ) -a4 2 AH (32)<br />

in which a, = y (33)<br />

a 2<br />

a 3<br />

a 4<br />

(30)<br />

= y /aAH (34)<br />

= ye/aAH (35)<br />

= y6/aAH (36)<br />

Eq 32 is actually linear with respect to the parameters. This fact<br />

can facilitate the method of evaluating the parameters.<br />

B. EVALUATION OF PARAMETERS<br />

Since Eq 32 is linear, the least square method or the method of<br />

multiple linear regression would be appropriate in evaluating the parameters<br />

al, a2, a 3 , and a 4 . However, with either method, Eq 32 has to be rearranged<br />

into the standard <strong>for</strong>m:<br />

= alX 1 + a 2X 2 + a 3X 3 + a 4X 4<br />

in which X 1 = (t 2 - tl)/Ht 2 (38)<br />

x 2<br />

X 3<br />

(37)<br />

= X1G/Ag (39)<br />

= Xlms/Ag (40)<br />

= X 3/AgD 2 (41)<br />

143


The method of multiple linear regression, which can be found in many<br />

textbooks on Statistics (e.g. Walpole and Myers, 1972; Hoel, 1971), is<br />

adopted in this work. The input data of those physical factors described<br />

earlier are selected from the previous baseline survey which consists of<br />

thirty-six bucket-type <strong>stove</strong>s. All the calculations are done by an INTRA<br />

microcomputer; the program is written in BASIC. The correlation coefficient<br />

from the calculation vith boiling time of 30 minutes is found to be very<br />

small, indicating the fluctuation of the data. This fluctuation is believed<br />

to be due to the fact that the <strong>stove</strong>s, obtained from thirty-six different<br />

locations throughout the country, have variable properties and composition<br />

which violaces one of the assumptions.<br />

Another reason <strong>for</strong> poor fitting can be due to some of the assumptions<br />

<strong>use</strong>d in developing the model. For example, e, which is the function of time<br />

and physical porperties of the <strong>stove</strong>, may have a severe effect on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

behavior. This function is, however, difficult to obtain. The nu<strong>mb</strong>er of<br />

parameters in the model of the bucket <strong>stove</strong>, which is a complicated system,<br />

may not be sufficient; and some of the other effects such as the<br />

sensible heat excluded from the equation of efficiency may be required.<br />

But too many parameters obscure the effect of variables under investigation<br />

and can, in some situations, lessen the value of the model. Another violation<br />

of the assumptions is the nonuni<strong>for</strong>mity of the wall thickness; the Thai<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong> generally has its wall area thicker near the base than that near<br />

the top of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

An alternative approach <strong>for</strong> the application of the model is to group<br />

the <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar effects, such as a group that would give a<br />

correlation coefficient greater than 90%. This is done with the INTRA<br />

microcomputer, the grouping is carried out randomly. The result from this<br />

analysis shows that the maximum of fifteen <strong>stove</strong> co<strong>mb</strong>inations would<br />

compromise the requirement. One of such groups is shown in Table 1 <strong>for</strong> which<br />

the correlation coefficient is 94%; the values of al, a, a 3 , and a 4 are<br />

653.8 em, 5,717.01 cm 2 , 26.23 cm 2 /kg, and 5,282.13 cm / g, respectively.<br />

This group is LSed in the next step; i.e. studying the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

when one of the variables is changed while others are kept constant.<br />

C. MODEL APPLICATION<br />

The model developed in the preceding sections is kept as simple as<br />

possible; it requires minimum knowledge of the <strong>stove</strong> characteristics. In<br />

this section, the simulation of the model is carried out to investigate<br />

the effect of each variable on the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Prior to simulation, owing to the geometrical variation of the hand-made<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the Thai market, an ideal <strong>stove</strong> is required to represent the<br />

actual ones. The <strong>stove</strong> is simply idealized as being enclosed by two<br />

coaxial truncated cones as illustrated in Fig. 6.2; the <strong>stove</strong> thickness<br />

(i.e. the distance between the cones) is assumed uni<strong>for</strong>m. When the concept<br />

of similar triangles is applied to the ideal <strong>stove</strong> (see Annex 3),the<br />

following relationships are obtained:<br />

144


%<br />

I' i I<br />

1i1<br />

- I I<br />

/ , :I' '1<br />

k- 'pe-<br />

I,<br />

Fig. 6.2 Geometry of the ideal <strong>stove</strong>: the dimension of the outer<br />

and the inner cones are respectively sy<strong>mb</strong>olized by<br />

capital and small letters.


m= 12 (Dt g) d3) - - d3)) (Ae + A 1 )D] (42)<br />

Dt = dt + 2D (43)<br />

D(dt - dg)<br />

Db = db + D - H (44)<br />

Dg = dg + 2D (45)<br />

in which Dt, dt are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

at the pot stand,<br />

Db, db are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

at the bottom,<br />

Dg, dg are the respective outside and inside diameters of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

at the grate position,<br />

Ae is the gap area,<br />

Al is the area of opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air.<br />

There are seven variables that completely fix the geometry of the <strong>stove</strong>;<br />

they are: the three inside diameters dt, dg, and db; the wall thickness D;<br />

the grate-to-pot distance G; the gap area Ae; and the area of the opening <strong>for</strong><br />

the inlet air A 1 (the dimensions of D, H, Ae and Ai are shown in Fig. 61.).<br />

Among these seven varibles, A e and Ai are not the variables in the model.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, they have to be related to other variables. Fig. 6.3 and 6.4<br />

illustrate the relationship between the air inlet area Ai and the grate hole<br />

area Ag, and between the gap area A e and the gap height G, respectively.<br />

When straight lines are drawn through these points, it is found that<br />

Ai = 0.82 Ag and Ae = 48 G. Substitution of these relationships in Eq (42)<br />

givesm = [2D D (D3 - dt) - (Db - 2<br />

d)} - (48G + 0.8 Ag)D]<br />

12(D t - Dg) P b b9 (46)<br />

The efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> in Eq (32) also depends on the time tl<br />

required to heat the water to the boiling point. From Eq (27), the estimation<br />

of t 1 can be achieved if B 2 is known. This implies the necessity of<br />

evaluating B 2 . There are two ways that the value of B 2 caa be estimated: one<br />

way is to employ the relation in Eq (26), and the other is to utilize the<br />

available experimental data. The first method requires the values of the<br />

heat transfer coefficient h and the heat transfer area S; both values have<br />

to be estimated. To avoid such approximation of h and S, and in order to<br />

fully utilize the experimental results, the second method is chosen.<br />

Substituting t and Tw in Eq (27) by tI and Tboil, and then rearranging<br />

it, one gets:<br />

1<br />

(Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>) hSH<br />

t T2 [B y(a*Ag - 8G - ems - 2 ) ]<br />

(47)<br />

146


150­<br />

100<br />

50<br />

4+<br />

w +<br />

+<br />

+ + +e<br />

+<br />

0 5b 16o iA<br />

Grate hole area, cm 2<br />

Fig. 6.3 Relationship between the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> inlet air<br />

and the grate hole area.<br />

147


2001<br />

160"<br />

N<br />

U) 80-12<br />

0<br />

Fig. 6.4<br />

0~5 .0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.o<br />

Gap height, cm.<br />

Relationship between exhaust area and gap height.<br />

148


With the relationships in Eq,(33) to (36) and the fact that a* = aAH,<br />

Eq (47) can be expressed as:<br />

x = (I = e-B 2 tl)/p (48)<br />

in which x = H/(alAg - a 2G - a 3m s - a 4ms/D 2 ) (49)<br />

p = (Tboil - Ta<strong>mb</strong>)hS/a AH (50)<br />

Eq.(48) indicates that x increases from zero to 1/p as t, increases<br />

from zero to infinity. With the values of al, a a3, and a4 obtained in<br />

the section of parameter evaluation, x can be calculated <strong>for</strong> each pot in<br />

Table 6.1 and then plotted against the heating time tI . An exponential curve<br />

is drawn through the points as shown in Fig. 6.5; it appears to approach<br />

-<br />

the value of x = 3.5 x 10 4 when t, approaches infinity. Hence, 1/p equals<br />

3.5 x 10 - 4 . B2 , evaluated at t, of 1$ minutes, is found to have the value<br />

of 0.07; this value, according to Eq.(26), implies that in the heating<br />

period, energy stored in the water is much greater than heat lost through<br />

the pot surface. Since the time to heat water is usually less than the<br />

boiling time, energy <strong>use</strong>d in heating would be less than energy <strong>use</strong>d in<br />

boiling. Consequently, the loss of heat through the pot surface, in the<br />

period of boiling, is much smaller than the energy consumed in evaporating<br />

water. Neglecting the heat loss in deriving the equation of efficiency is,<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e, approved and acceptable.<br />

To estimate the mass of <strong>stove</strong> by Eq. (46), the density of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

material, which is fired clay, is required. But, as the <strong>stove</strong>s tested in<br />

this work come from various places in Thailand, each <strong>stove</strong> would have been<br />

subject to particular and different treatment during the process of<br />

manufacture. This, of course, would ca<strong>use</strong> a variation of density. Moreover,<br />

the <strong>stove</strong>s, after being tested, are still in good condition, so they are<br />

kept <strong>for</strong> further <strong>use</strong>. The density of the <strong>stove</strong> material, necessarily, has to<br />

be estimated from other clay products of similar make such as bricks. It is<br />

found that bricks have densities ranging from 103 to 128 lb/ft 3 (Perry and<br />

Chilton, 1973). As an illustration of model simulation, the density of the<br />

3 - 3 3<br />

<strong>stove</strong> material is taken to be 110 lb/ft or equivalent 1.76 x 10 kg/cm .<br />

The following dimensions are chosen to represent the standard<br />

dimensions of the <strong>stove</strong>: H = 10 cm, D = 5 cm, G = 1.8 cm, d = 15 cm,<br />

dt = 20 cm, db = 10 cm, and A = 80 cm 2 . These values are In the range of<br />

the dimensions of the <strong>stove</strong>s Investigated in the present work. The <strong>stove</strong><br />

with this standard structure has the efficiency of 28.73% when boiling is<br />

kept <strong>for</strong> 30 minutes, the mass of 10 kg and the time to boil of 19.9 minutes.<br />

With the above standard values of geometrical dimensions, and the values2 of the parameters previously obtained (i.e., a = 653.8 cm, a2 = 5,717.01 cm<br />

1<br />

a3 = 36.23 cm 2 /kg, a4 = 5,282.13 cm 5 /kg, and B2 = 0.07), the simulation is<br />

carried out to study the effect of each variable on the efficiency, the mass<br />

of the s'ove, and the time to boil.<br />

149


Table 6.1 Group of <strong>stove</strong>s that have similar behavior<br />

Stove<br />

No.<br />

Time to Grate-to Grate hole<br />

Boil Pot Distance area<br />

Gap<br />

Height<br />

Stvoe<br />

Weight<br />

Wall Efficiency<br />

Thickness<br />

(min) (cm) (cm2) (cm) (kg) (cm) (%)<br />

2 21.7 12 112 2 12.2 6.3 24.96<br />

3 22.3 12 112 1.8 8.7 3.9 25.7<br />

4 18.8 12.2 112 1.5 12.8 6.3 28.19<br />

6 18 12 69 1 8.6 6 28.83<br />

8 27 9 48 1.5 8.1 4.5 24.07<br />

12 22.6 9 65 2 7.2 4.8 29.02<br />

15 24.6 9 65 2 10 6 27.21<br />

19 23.8 11 94 2.5 10.5 6.8 23.94<br />

22 23.3 11 85 0.7 9.5 3.3 28.11<br />

28 20.1 10 74 2.3 12.2 4.5 25.1<br />

29 20 11.5 74 2 13.2 6 25.85<br />

31 16.7 12 94 0.5 11.8 6 32.39<br />

33 18.3 12 94 0.5 6.7 3.3 30.51<br />

35 20 10 70 1.9 10 4 27.7<br />

36 17 9.7 57 0.9 8 4.5 33.35<br />

150


6.<br />

5.<br />

X X O-4 4.<br />

V.x O­ 4 3.<br />

2­<br />

1.<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Time, min.<br />

Fig. 6.5 Relationship between variable X, defined in Equation (49),<br />

and time to boil.<br />

X ....Experimental data; solid line ..... fitted curve.<br />

151


Effect of the grate-to-pot distance Y<br />

When the distance between the grate and the pot increasei, the model<br />

predictsa rapid drop of efficiency, increases of <strong>stove</strong> material and time to<br />

boil Fig. 6.6. As previously mentioned, the decrease in efficiency (curve n)<br />

when H increases, can be explained with the concept of view factor. As<br />

H increase the view factor decreaEas, causing the reduction of radiative<br />

heat being intercepted by the pot from the fiame; most of the heat is lost<br />

when the charcoal is very far from the pnt. Since the rate of heat supplied<br />

to the water in the pot is reduced due to the increase of H, the water in the<br />

pot will require a longer time to reach the state of boiling (curve tl).<br />

Geometrically, nny increp nf the diqtance between the grate and the<br />

pot, while keeping other characteristics unchanged, results in a comparatively<br />

larger increase in the total height of the <strong>stove</strong>. This implies a bigger<br />

size of <strong>stove</strong>; consequently, more <strong>stove</strong> material is required as predicted by<br />

the model (curve ms). The increase of the mass also affects the efficiency<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong>: more energy would be accumulated as heat in the <strong>stove</strong> material<br />

when the mass increases. Moreover, with the constant wall thickness, it<br />

means larger heat transfer area <strong>for</strong> the conduction; hence, more heat is lost<br />

to the environment. This effect, in addition to the effect of the reduction<br />

of view factor, further lessens the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Fig. 6 gives another impression that the model is improper at low values<br />

of H where the efficiency appears very high. However, such a condition is<br />

not likely to happen in practice, since a low H implicates a small co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er, which, if too small, cannot hold sufficient charcoal to run the<br />

test. Hence, reality will set the limitation of the model.<br />

Eff2ct of the <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness D<br />

As illustrated in Fig. 7, an increase of wall thickness, up to a certain<br />

value, tends to improve the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve T). Further<br />

increase in the thickness ca<strong>use</strong>s a slight reduction of the efficiency. Heat<br />

loss due to conduction across the wall is high in the <strong>stove</strong> with thin walls.<br />

Increasing the thickness hinders the conductive heat transfer, but, at the<br />

same time, promotes the loss of energy to be stored in the wall material.<br />

These two phenomena work simultaneously and antagonistically. The initial<br />

increase in wall thickness in Fig. 1.7 indicates the reduction of conduction<br />

is greater than the increase in energy stored in the material. As the<br />

thickness is increased, the relative rate of heat conduction is lower than<br />

the rate of energy being accumulated, resulting in the drop in efficiency.<br />

The choice of wall thickness not only helps improve the <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance, but it will also help in savi'ig raw material which, in this case,<br />

is clay. The increase in wall thickness r:eans more clay is required in<br />

making the <strong>stove</strong> (curve ms). An increase of the wall thickness from 2 to<br />

10 cm ca<strong>use</strong>s the mass of the <strong>stove</strong> to increase from 5 kg to more than 45 kg:<br />

an increase of wall thickness by 5 times induces an increase of the mass<br />

by about 10 times. I the wall thickness is kept at 6 cm instead of at<br />

10 cm, two <strong>stove</strong>s can be manufactured instead of one. Moreover, the two<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s with the thickness of 6 cm have higher efficiency of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

than the one <strong>stove</strong> with the thickness of 10 cm.<br />

152


40- 16 100-<br />

m I<br />

30 12 55 -- /0<br />

0 8 45<br />

0- 4- 25-­<br />

4 60 12 14<br />

Height from grate to pot, cm.<br />

Fig. 6.6 Model prediction of the effect of grate-to-pot distance<br />

on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms)<br />

to boil , and<br />

(t8).<br />

time<br />

153


5j 50 - 30"<br />

40- 40<br />

S<br />

'.44<br />

25<br />

30 20­<br />

'<br />

20 'n 20-<br />

10510<br />

1 10<br />

].<br />

"<br />

/°3<br />

iss I<br />

"<br />

IIII<br />

2 4 6 8<br />

Wall thickness, cm.<br />

I<br />

t<br />

s<br />

10 12 14<br />

the effect of wall thickness on<br />

Fig. 6.7 Model prediction of<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms ), and time<br />

to boil (t1 ).<br />

154


Curve t 1 shows the change of time as the thickness of the wall changes.<br />

The increase of the thickness from 1 to 4 cm reduces the time to boil from<br />

36 to 20 minutes. A slight increase of time to boil is seen when the wall<br />

thickness is larger than 6 cm. This behavior can be explained by the<br />

concept of antagonism between the heat conduction across the wall and the<br />

heat accumulated in the wall material as described be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />

Effect of the inside diameter of <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom db<br />

As the inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom db increases, the<br />

model predicts only a slight increase in efficiency, a slight decrease in<br />

time to boil, and a reduction of <strong>stove</strong> mass (see Fig. 6.8). Geometrically,<br />

the change of only db will mainly affect the ashing compartment without having<br />

any effect on the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, which is the major part of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

supplying heat to the water. An increase in db reduces the ashing cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

and, consequently, the <strong>stove</strong> mass. When db increases from 7 to 15 cm, the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> weight decreases from 15.9 to 14.3 kg (curve ms) - about 1% decrease<br />

in mass. The change of efficiency in this case is, conclusively, ca<strong>use</strong>d by<br />

the change in the amount of energy stored in the mass of <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Although the increase in the inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom<br />

lessens the raw material, the choice should depend on the structural strength<br />

and the area of the opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air.<br />

Effect of inside dicaneter of the <strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand dt<br />

The model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of the <strong>stove</strong> at<br />

the stand dt on the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, the mass of <strong>stove</strong>, and the time<br />

required to increase the water temperature to its boiling point is illustrated<br />

in Fig. 6.9. When the inside diameter at the pot stand is slightly greater<br />

than the grate diameter (d = 15 cm), the efficiency is low (curve n), the<br />

mass of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve m) and the time to boil (curve tl) are high; at<br />

this value of dt, the distance between the bottom and the grate is very large,<br />

resulting in high requirement <strong>for</strong> raw material and, as a consequence high<br />

accumulation of energy in the <strong>stove</strong> material. The high loss of energy from<br />

the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion due to the <strong>stove</strong> material ca<strong>use</strong>s the reduction of energy<br />

supplied to the <strong>stove</strong>; hence, the time required to boil is high. The increase<br />

in dt will reduce the distance between the grate and the bottom, which<br />

simultaneously reduces the <strong>stove</strong> material. Consequently, less energy is<br />

stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material and the time required to boil is less.<br />

Effect of Gap Height G<br />

The model prediction in Fig. 6.10 indicates that as the gap height G<br />

increases, the efficiency n (curve n) decreases linearly at first and more<br />

rapidly at a later stage. The decrease of efficiency implies the increasing<br />

loss of energy carried out by exhaust gases due to the process of free<br />

convection. The larger the gap height, the larger the gap area, and the<br />

greater the loss of energy through convection. However, this loss is<br />

counteracted by the loss of energy accumulated in the mass of the <strong>stove</strong>, which<br />

decreases linearly wit' the increase of 6 (curve ms). The rate of change of<br />

155


16" 32­<br />

• 30- ".s<br />

20- t<br />

5<br />

o-<br />

0<br />

-<br />

0<br />

15- A 28c;"<br />

.<br />

-<br />

­<br />

. . .<br />

o 0 0 T -426<br />

141 21<br />

II I I I<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16<br />

I-iside diameter of <strong>stove</strong> at the bottom, cm.<br />

Fig. 6.8 Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of<br />

<strong>stove</strong> at the bottom on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency(q), <strong>stove</strong><br />

mass (ms), and time to boil (tl).<br />

156


50<br />

50 _<br />

40 40 -<br />

30­<br />

*d30 0 30- '\%<br />

4 Ca<br />

g~ 2 20 22o­<br />

1<br />

10 10 14-<br />

,10 1<br />

Fig. 6.9<br />

--<br />

1. ]<br />

S<br />

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30<br />

Top diameter, cm.<br />

Model prediction of the effect of inside diameter of<br />

<strong>stove</strong> at the pot stand on the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (r),<br />

<strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to boil (t 1).<br />

157


60<br />

50<br />

1(<br />

50- . 40<br />

30-<br />

o 1> .<br />

"<br />

u<br />

20<br />

20" 1<br />

14 -- 1<br />

II<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

Gap height, cm.<br />

Fig. 6.10 Model prediction of the effect of gap height on the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to<br />

boil (tI).<br />

158


these losses is relatively constant at small G; but at large G, the natural<br />

convection becomes dominant and ca<strong>use</strong>s the rapid drop of the efficiency.<br />

Since loss of energy increases when G is inacreasing, the time to boil under<br />

these conditions will increase with G (curve tl).<br />

Effect of grate diameter 4i<br />

Fig. 6.11 illustrates the effect of grate diameter on the <strong>stove</strong><br />

efficiency, <strong>stove</strong> mass, and time to boil. At the grate diameter of 10 cm,<br />

the effic 4 .ency is about 32% which is approximately 3% greater than the<br />

efficienc of the standard <strong>stove</strong>; the efficiency drops slowly from 32% to<br />

28.7% when the grate diameter increases from 10 to 15 cm (curve n). As d<br />

is greater than 15 cm, the efficiency rapidly diminishes to 20% at dg =1 cm.<br />

The change in efficiency can be explained in relation to the change in<br />

mass (curve ms). When the value of dg is 10 cm, the <strong>stove</strong> mass is small,<br />

about 18 kg. At this value of dg the volume of the ashing compartment is very<br />

small, and in effect it represents a <strong>stove</strong> without an ashing compartment.<br />

This results in the fresh surrounding air coming into direct contact with the<br />

flame. The efficiency is <strong>improved</strong> not only by good-co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, but also by<br />

the reduction of energy stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material. Providing the area of<br />

the opening <strong>for</strong> the inlet air has no effect on the air supply to the flame,<br />

an increase in grate diameter will increase the size of the ashing cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

and consequently, the <strong>stove</strong> mass is increased. Energy accumulated in the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> material increases. Moreover, the increase in material ca<strong>use</strong>s the<br />

increase in heat transfer area, which promotes heat loss due to conduction<br />

through the wall. These effects reduce the efficiency of the <strong>stove</strong> and at<br />

the same time increase the time to boil (curve ts).<br />

Effect of rvau;c i avea Aa<br />

The grate hole area,according to the assumption in modelling, controls<br />

the rate of air supply to the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. An increase in grate hole area<br />

thus improves the air supply which results in better co<strong>mb</strong>ustion and, as<br />

consequence, good per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong> (curve q in Fig. 6.12). The <strong>stove</strong><br />

mass decreases as Ag increases. This reduces the energy stored in the <strong>stove</strong><br />

material (curve ms). Due to good heat supply to water, the time to boil<br />

decreases (curve tl).<br />

It should be noted that the grate hole area cannot be increased without<br />

limit. The grate diameter, and the strength of the grate are factors that<br />

will constrain the grate hole area. Since the diameter of the grate of<br />

standard <strong>stove</strong> is 15 cm, the maximum area provided by the grate is about<br />

176 cm 2 ; the value of Ag greater than 176 cm 2 would be impractical. If the<br />

strength of the grate is considered, the grate hole area will be much less<br />

2<br />

than 176 cm .<br />

The comparative study, illustrated in this simulation, is based on the<br />

assumption that the flow rate of air depends only on the total area of grate<br />

holes; this, of course, implies that Ag increases beca<strong>use</strong> of the increase in<br />

the nu<strong>mb</strong>er of grate holes without altering the hole diameter. If the hole<br />

159


40- 40- 401<br />

30 _<br />

•<br />

S2CL 0 20-<br />

30 3 0:<br />

0 .8<br />

2Q_<br />

I1<br />

S<br />

IuI<br />

6<br />

Iu<br />

8 10 12<br />

Grate diameter, cm.<br />

t -<br />

-<br />

/<br />

/'<br />

14<br />

Iu<br />

19 2d<br />

Fig. 6.11 Model prediction of the effect of grate diameter on<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> efficiency (n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time<br />

to boil (t 1).<br />

160


16­<br />

40-50<br />

E30/20"-\<br />

40<br />

14-220 t<br />

I I I I1<br />

60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />

2<br />

Grate hole area, cm<br />

Fig. 6.12 Model prediction of the effect of grate hole area on the<br />

efficiency(n), <strong>stove</strong> mass (ms), and time to boil (t 1).<br />

161


diameter changes, the resistance of the hole to the air flow will be affected;<br />

the parameter in Eq (8), there<strong>for</strong>e, has different values at different hole<br />

diameters. This point should be noted in comparing any <strong>stove</strong> efficiency.<br />

D. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION<br />

Many assumptions have been introduced in developing the model and the<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong> in this section. These assumptions are proposed to simplify the<br />

mathematical complexity and to relate major factors that are studied<br />

experimentally. As a consequence, the model prediction deviates from<br />

observation under some experimental condltions. This preliminary model, in<br />

the future, will be modified to provide a more detailed eyplanation.<br />

The process of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is very complex; the composition of the<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion products and the heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion are strongly affected by the<br />

amount of air supplied to the <strong>stove</strong>. In the model, it is assumed that heat<br />

of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion and the composition of the exhaust gas are not changed--regardless<br />

of any variation in air supply. This assumptioa is valid only when co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

is complete. Such complete co<strong>mb</strong>ustion, however, in achieved only if sufficient<br />

air is provided to the <strong>stove</strong>. If air is undersupplied (which is ca<strong>use</strong>d by a<br />

small total grate hole area) heat of co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is reduced and efficiency is<br />

also reduced. But if the grate hole area is too large, the air to<br />

oversupplied. Although the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is complete <strong>for</strong> this condition, a large<br />

amount of energy generated by the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is lost in increasing the<br />

temperature of the excess air. Consequently, a drop of efficiency is expected.<br />

As the model does not account <strong>for</strong> this effect, the predicted efficiency keeps<br />

on increasing with the grate hole area. A detailed study of the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

mechanism in relation to the grate hole area is necessary <strong>for</strong> any modifications<br />

of the model.<br />

In modelling the <strong>stove</strong>, the effect of the grate diameter on the view<br />

factor has been neglected. It has already been mentioned that the view factor<br />

between two circular discs with equal diameters varies with both the diameter<br />

and the distance between the discs. Since radiation is the major energy<br />

supply <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong>, the inclusion of the grate diameter into the equation <strong>for</strong><br />

view factor estimation might stress the importance of the grate diameter on<br />

the efficiency.<br />

Another point that needs to be considered in improving the model is the<br />

energy required to increase the water temperature to its boiling point. The<br />

present model assumes that the time to boil is small and hence not much<br />

energy would be utilized in this process. However, the model predicts that<br />

the time to boil in some cases is large, indicating that a massive amount of<br />

energy has been consumed. For example, if the time to boil and the boiling<br />

time are 20 and 30 minutes, respectively, providing that the rate of heat<br />

supply from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion is constant and heat loss is small, then the<br />

ratio of heat <strong>use</strong>d in heating up water and in boiling is 2 to 3. With a<br />

long time to boil, it is important to include heat consumed in increasing<br />

the water temperature when efficiency is being calculated.<br />

162


Although the present model is based on many assumptions, it can shed<br />

light on theunderstanding of interactions among the <strong>stove</strong> characteristics<br />

that influence <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. This model should give some basic idea<br />

of how the <strong>stove</strong> would per<strong>for</strong>m. For example, the model predicts that the<br />

grate-to-pot distance, which contributes the major part of efficiency,<br />

strongly affects the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the <strong>stove</strong>. If it is large, the<br />

efficiency decreases, but if it is small, the <strong>stove</strong> will per<strong>for</strong>m better.<br />

However, result from the experiment show that this is not exactly true: the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance becomes poor when the grate-to-pot distance is smaller than a<br />

certain value. This is mainly due to radiative loss through the gaps.<br />

The thickness of the <strong>stove</strong> wall also strongly affects <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

If the wall is too thick, the efficiency is reduced. The same effect is<br />

predicted if the wall is too thin. The <strong>stove</strong> will exhibit the best<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance at a particular value of thickness.<br />

With a large grate hole area, the <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ms better than<br />

that with a small grate hole area. This is due to the assumption that<br />

air flows into the <strong>stove</strong> at constant velocity; hence, the volume or mass<br />

flow rate of air is proportional to the grate hole area. The model, however,<br />

neglects to take into account the insulation effect of the grate. A<br />

large grate hole area implies a high loss of radiative heat from the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er to the ash cha<strong>mb</strong>er. As a consequence, a <strong>stove</strong> with a<br />

grate hole area larger than a certain value could per<strong>for</strong>m poorly. The<br />

insulation effect of the grate should be considered in the model improvement.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The model, although based on many assumptions, can give us an understanding<br />

of the interactions of <strong>stove</strong> geometry on the per<strong>for</strong>mance. The<br />

dependence of <strong>stove</strong> efficiency on the grate-to-pot distance can be explained<br />

in terms of radiative heat obtained by the pot. Increasing gap height<br />

ca<strong>use</strong>s a poor <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance, indicated by the model as the result of<br />

high convective heat loss through the gap. Conductive heat loss, predicted<br />

by the model, is severe in the case of insufficient thickness of the <strong>stove</strong><br />

wall; the <strong>stove</strong> would per<strong>for</strong>m better if wall thickness is increased. However,<br />

if the wall is too thick, the model indicates that a large amount of<br />

heat is stored in the <strong>stove</strong> material, resulting in a drop in <strong>stove</strong> efficienc).<br />

As already discussed, the model can be modified to yield better predictions.<br />

The modifications should be per<strong>for</strong>med according to the recommendations<br />

in the previous section.<br />

163


Chapter 7<br />

Stove Models Developed


STOVE MODELS DEVELOPED<br />

This chapter presents the results of improvement of five generic types<br />

of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Based on commercial <strong>stove</strong> testing and analysis of results, experience<br />

gained during <strong>stove</strong> collections, <strong>stove</strong> construction and.modifications in the<br />

laboratory, and numerous contacts with <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers, the<br />

general requirement <strong>for</strong> the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> concept, particularly<br />

within Thailand, can be stated as follows:<br />

a) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall be designed to accommodate as many<br />

various sizes and shapes of pots and pans as possible.<br />

b) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall reduce the time duration of <strong>cooking</strong><br />

or at least keep it constant. No <strong>stove</strong> with prolonged <strong>cooking</strong> time can be<br />

accepted, no matter how fuel efficient it may be.<br />

c) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall be made to have longer service life<br />

or durability.<br />

d) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>'s portability, and construction with a single<br />

pothole, are desirable components.<br />

e) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> shall consume less fuel or at least equal<br />

amounts to the existing good models.<br />

Z) That the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> operation shall be conducted with ease and<br />

safety, including the <strong>stove</strong>'s ignition, frequency of attendance, heat output<br />

control, refueling and fire extinguishing.<br />

Development then strictly followed such requirements. The design, testing<br />

and production of <strong>improved</strong> prototypes have yielded hardwares whose features<br />

and per<strong>for</strong>mances are presented in following sections.<br />

A. IMPROVED STOVE'S TERMINOLOGY<br />

In previous chapters, numerous discussions were made in reference to<br />

various <strong>stove</strong> terms. In order to avoid misunderstanding and to promote<br />

future <strong>stove</strong> development and standardization, drawings illustrating<br />

terminology are presented in Fig. 7.1 to 7.5. The five types are the charcoal<br />

<strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong> without chimney, wood <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />

without chimney, and rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney. All <strong>stove</strong>s, however, are<br />

of the single pothole type as desired by most Thai <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

167


Pot Diameter<br />

r------28 cm.<br />

.. ..... / Bucket Handle<br />

S-<br />

- Pot Rest<br />

Firing Cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

- Stove Body<br />

-Grate<br />

Refractory Lining<br />

4-' Insulator<br />

Primary Air Inlet And<br />

Ash Removal Port<br />

Gulvanized Bucket<br />

Bucket Support Ring<br />

Figure 7.1 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> showing<br />

various parts'of the construction and terminology.<br />

168


Pot Diameter<br />

-2.4 cm.<br />

4-28 cm.<br />

.Lifting Handle<br />

Exhausted Gap - Pot Rest<br />

.4-Insulator<br />

--- Refractory Lining<br />

4.-- Stove Body<br />

! --- Firewood, Feeding Port<br />

- - Grate<br />

Primary Air Inlet<br />

And Ash Removal Port<br />

-Galvanized Bucket<br />

Figure 7.2 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

showing parts of the construction and terminology.<br />

169


Adjustable Air<br />

Valvet"<br />

e Chimney<br />

40<br />

Horse sho-,<br />

Contro <<br />

Pot #24 cm.<br />

Stove Body<br />

Refractory Lining<br />

Aape bSmoke Cap<br />

Wood Fuel<br />

Grate<br />

Primary Air Inlet Port<br />

Figure 7.3 Drawing of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype<br />

showing the construction and terminology.<br />

170


000 0000<br />

000 C<br />

00o<br />

0 0 0 L<br />

-- -24<br />

Pot Diameter<br />

cm.<br />

_Pot Rest<br />

_<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Exhaust Flue Outlet<br />

Refractory Lining<br />

Rice Husk Filled Cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

Stove Body<br />

Insulator<br />

Rice husk Flow Gap<br />

Tripod Base<br />

Air Inlet Hole<br />

Wooden Leg<br />

Outer Cone Metal Sheet<br />

-- _ - Ash Removal Port<br />

Figure 7.4 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />

showing the construction and terminology.<br />

171


o N<br />

0N<br />

Chimney<br />

Rice Husk $<br />

44 4JoD 0 Refractor<br />

Rice Husk<br />

Tray ' ' '.<br />

I Restricte Flu Exi<br />

Iron Grate co<strong>mb</strong>ustion ,<br />

' ",.Cha<strong>mb</strong>er'."<br />

Ash Removal Port A4.404 .lJ ' Lifting<br />

o . Hole<br />

Concrete Body ' ,".' -. . , , .<br />

. -...... .... ...... . . .. 1<br />

Figure 7.5 Drawing of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />

showing the construction and terminology.<br />

172<br />

N


B. IMPROVED CHARCOAL STOVE MODEL RFD-1<br />

The physical dimensions and characteristics of the latest <strong>improved</strong><br />

charcoal <strong>stove</strong> called "RFD-l" can be described as follows:<br />

a) Stove weight, fired-clay body only 5.9 kg.<br />

fully fabricated (with bucket included) 10.1 kg.<br />

b) Stove height (no bucket) 25.0 cm.<br />

c) Top diameter (no bucket), outside 30.0 cm.<br />

inside 26.5 cm.<br />

d) Bottom diameter (no bucket), outside 19.0 cm.<br />

inside 16.0 cm.<br />

e) Vertical height from grate top to <strong>stove</strong> rim 15.0 cm.<br />

f) Vertical height of the pot rest portion 6.5 cm.<br />

g) Pots accommodation, pot diameter 16-32 cm.<br />

h) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity after refractory lining,<br />

normal full charcoal load 1,240 cm.,<br />

extra charcoal load <strong>for</strong> large <strong>cooking</strong> 2,000 cm?<br />

i) Grate, diameter 17.5 cm.<br />

thickness 4.0 cm.<br />

weight 0.7 kg.<br />

hole diameter (taper up) 1.2-1.4 cm.<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of hole 61<br />

hole area 94 cm<br />

hole area/grate area 39 %<br />

j) Average thickness of inside refractory lining 1.0 cm.<br />

k) Exhausted gap (<strong>for</strong> flue gas outlet) 1.0 cm.<br />

1) Air inlet port, 5 x 11 cm. 55 cm<br />

m) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness (including insulation<br />

and bucket 5.2 cmi<br />

n) Bucket weight 1.1 kg.<br />

The relationship of physical characteristics to external variables such<br />

as pot size, charcoal load, pot position relative to the top rim is shown<br />

in Table 7.1.<br />

173


Table 7.1 Physical characteristics of RFD-l charcoal <strong>stove</strong> relating to<br />

external variables<br />

Pot 0 Grate-to-pot Charcoal Charcoal top Exhausted Pot position<br />

cm distance, cm loadl gm layer-to-pot area, cm2 relative to the<br />

distance, cm <strong>stove</strong> rim, cm<br />

16 7 250 2 43.5 -7.0<br />

18 7.5 310 2 45.7 -6.3<br />

20 9 390 3 48.0 -5.5<br />

22 10 440 3 52.0 -4.3<br />

24 11 480 3 58.5 -3.2<br />

26 12 550 3 62.0 -2.2<br />

28 13 690 3 67.5 -1.0<br />

30 14 740 4 75.5 +0.6<br />

32 15 770 5 75.5 +1.0<br />

* the load based on high density mangrove charcoal prepared to the average<br />

size of 5 cm in length and 2 cm in cross-sectional width.<br />

Test results of developed charcoal <strong>stove</strong> (RFD-I) are shown in Table 7.2.<br />

Table 7.2 Average test results of RFD-l charcoal <strong>stove</strong> under different <strong>use</strong><br />

conditions*<br />

Pot 0 No. of Charcoal Initial Charcoal Average Time to<br />

cm test load, g water remained burning rate boil HU %<br />

wt gm gm gm/min<br />

16 3 130 1,180 16.7 2.4 17 21.6<br />

20 6 240 2,190 34.0 4.2 19.5 25.4<br />

24 3 400 3,700 50.0 7.4 17.3 32.1<br />

28 3 640 5,920 90.0 10.6 22 34.2<br />

32 3 800 7,400 93.3 12.6 26 30.2<br />

* In this test, the ratio of charcoal load to initial water weight was kept<br />

constant at 1:9.25 based on standard tests where 400 gm of charcoal and<br />

3,700 gn of water were <strong>use</strong>d. The water occupies approx. 3/4 of the pot<br />

capacity. Test durations are 30 minutes plus time to boil, all starting<br />

from a cold <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

174


From Table 7.2 the heat utilization efficiency is lowest when a very<br />

small load of charcoal (130 gm) is <strong>use</strong>d. This should be expected beca<strong>use</strong><br />

a large percentage of heat from charcoal input is absorbed by the <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

but even with such a small charcoal fuel, 1.18 liters of water can be brought<br />

to boil in 17 minutes. The HU begins to peak when operating the <strong>stove</strong> at<br />

400-640 gm charcoal, with a 24 - 28 cm pot diameter, and the amount of water<br />

between 3,700 - 5,900 gm. This particular range of operation represents<br />

the conditions <strong>use</strong>d in <strong>cooking</strong> by most rural Thai families. Time to boil<br />

achieved by this <strong>stove</strong> based on standard comparison tests (pot #24, water<br />

3,700 gm, charcoal 400 gm) is 17.3 minutes which is equal to the best topline<br />

model in the market, as previously shown in Table 5.6. In those tests,<br />

the time to boil of existing commercial bucket <strong>stove</strong>s ranged from 16.7 - 32.0<br />

minutes and averaged 22.8 minutes.<br />

Regarding the <strong>stove</strong> durability, the RFD-l <strong>improved</strong> model is considered<br />

superior to all commercial models since the fired clay body is made of<br />

refractory material which can withstand thermal shock without cracking much<br />

better than commeicial models. For details of <strong>improved</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong><br />

production please refer to Chapter 8.<br />

Recalling the six criteria of <strong>use</strong>r's requirements stated earlier, it<br />

can be concluded with a high degree of confidence that the RFD-l <strong>improved</strong><br />

model has met all those requirements.<br />

Fig. 7.6 and 1.7 are photo-illustrations of the sample <strong>stove</strong> made from<br />

actual production by a group of retrained local <strong>stove</strong> makers in Roi-et Province.<br />

C. IMPROVED NON-CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE MODEL RFD-2<br />

This nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, model RFD-2, has the designed purpose of<br />

overcoming weaknesses in physical features of commercia] wood bucket <strong>stove</strong>s,<br />

particularly its too wide exhausted gap, too small co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, too<br />

restricted firewood feeding port, and poor <strong>stove</strong> rim design to fit pots and<br />

pans properly. Besides, the <strong>improved</strong> design is intended to replace the<br />

three-stone <strong>stove</strong>s which are ranked second in popularity among rural Thai<br />

<strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

After a long process of attempting to make a dual purpose <strong>stove</strong> both<br />

<strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood, test results have indicated that such a <strong>stove</strong><br />

would greatly compromise on charcoal fuel <strong>use</strong>d and would make the operation<br />

more difficult when using firewood. This conclusion, there<strong>for</strong>e, has led to<br />

the development of a separate wood burning <strong>stove</strong> and charcoal burning<br />

<strong>stove</strong>.<br />

The <strong>improved</strong> nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-2 was previously<br />

illustrated in Fig. 7.2. Its physical dimensions and characteristics can<br />

be described as follows:<br />

175


(a)<br />

Figure 7.6. Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-l"showing (a) fixeoor<br />

and (c) inside of<br />

resistant body,(b) with grate and<br />

fabricated <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Prov o s IF<br />

(b)<br />

(c)


(a)<br />

Figure 7.7 Improved charcoal <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-l"showing (a) <strong>stove</strong><br />

external ready <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>, (b) and (c) sectional views showing<br />

different pai s of construction.<br />

178<br />

(b)<br />

(c)


a) Stove weight, fired clay budy only 6.9 kg.<br />

fully fabricated 9.8 kg.<br />

b) Stove height 23.5 cm.<br />

c) Top diameter, outside 28.0 cm.<br />

inside 24.0 cm.<br />

d) Bottom diameter, outside 25.0 cm.<br />

inside 21.0 cm.<br />

e) Vertical height from grate top to <strong>stove</strong> rim 13.5 cm.<br />

f) Pots accommodation, pot diameter 18-32 cm.<br />

g) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity 3,040 cm<br />

h) Grate, diameter 21.0 cm.<br />

thickness 3.0 cm.<br />

weight 0.9 cm.<br />

hole diameter 1.6 cm.<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 37<br />

hole area 60 cmi<br />

hole area/grate area 21 %<br />

i) Exhausted gap (<strong>for</strong> smoke outlet) 1.0 cm.<br />

j) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness, body only 2.0 cm.<br />

with insulation and bucket 5.3 cm.<br />

k) Primary air inlet port (4 x 12.5 cm) 50 cm<br />

1) Firewood feeding port (9 x 12.5 cm) 100 cmi<br />

Test of the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the RFD-2 <strong>stove</strong> conducted in the laboratory<br />

(based on standard testing method as described in Chapter 4) are as shown<br />

in Table 7.3.<br />

Table 7.3 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-2<br />

with bucket.<br />

Test Firewood Charcoal produced Average fuel Time to boil<br />

run <strong>use</strong>d, at end of test, burning rate mHU%<br />

no. gm gm gm/mmn<br />

515 820 20 18.2 15 27.4<br />

516 810 20 18.0 15 28.8<br />

517 750 20 17.4 15 28.1<br />

601 780 30 17.0 16 28.7<br />

604 790 25 18.4 13 28.9<br />

606 740 30 18.1 11 30.4<br />

average 781.7 24.0 17.9 14.2 28.7<br />

179


From the above Table, the heat utilization efficiency of RFD-2 is<br />

considered high when compared with all commercial model test results<br />

(previously presented in Table 5.7 and in Fig. 5.3 where the HU ranged from<br />

14.2 - 25.9% and averaged 19.8%). The time to boil of the RFD-2 seems to<br />

fluctuate somewhat; the average feeding rate <strong>for</strong> each run is almost the same<br />

(17 - 18 gm/min). This reflects the intrinsic characteristic of wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

where duplications of actual feeding are difficult. At any rate, the<br />

average time to boil of 14.2 min <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> is very satisfactory when<br />

considering the burning rate figure. The RFD-2 consumed firewood only 17.9<br />

gm/min while that of commercial models ranged from 22.6 - 35.4 gm/min and<br />

averaged 28.4 gm/min (See Table 5.7). This means that the RFD-2 model would<br />

save approximately 59% of firewood over those commercial models on the<br />

average, while maintaining the same average time to boil (14 minutes).<br />

Figs. 7.8 and 7.9 show the RFD-2 <strong>stove</strong> from the actual production by a<br />

group of retrained local <strong>stove</strong> makers in Roi-et Province. Since the heat<br />

released from burning wood inside the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er is not so intense<br />

as in the case of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>, the RFD-2 model can be produced either<br />

with or without a bucket and insulation restraint outside. This option shall<br />

be decided by consumers according to their ability to pay, preference <strong>for</strong><br />

a neat appearance, together with ease of cleaning. The per<strong>for</strong>mance of RFD-2<br />

of both options is the same within 45 min of operation under the standard<br />

test.<br />

D. IMPROVED CHIMNEYED WOOD STOVE<br />

The second type of wood <strong>stove</strong> developed is the chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

However, only three commercial models exist with one pothole as discussed<br />

in Chapter 5 and illustrated in Annex IlI. Even though the <strong>stove</strong> is not<br />

popular and finds very limited <strong>use</strong> in rural Thailand, it could compete<br />

with the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> in certain applications if it could be developed to<br />

attain the efficiency level of up to 20 - 25%. Recalling that heat<br />

utilization efficiency (HU) of the <strong>improved</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong> is 32% and the<br />

maximum efficiency in conversion of wood to charcoal is 60% (see report of<br />

charcoal improvement component), the absolute efficiency of the charcoal<br />

<strong>stove</strong> as calculated directly from wood raw material, there<strong>for</strong>e, is equal to<br />

19.2%.<br />

The development of the one pothole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has faced<br />

problems; namely, a) fitting of various sizes of pots and pans is not<br />

possible b) directing the flame toward the pots' bottom and around their<br />

side walI is very difficult. Too much draft and improper baffling will<br />

direct most of the flame toward the flue gas exit hole. On the other hand,<br />

too week a draft and too restricted a baffliLig will ca<strong>use</strong> the smoke to come<br />

out from the firewood feeding port.<br />

A compromise was made on the above problems. Designs and various<br />

modifications were then made and tested. The prototype selected is shcwn in<br />

Fig. 7.3 and 7.10. Physical dimensions and characteristics are as follows:<br />

180


(a)<br />

Figure 7.8 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-2"<br />

(a) fire-resistant body with grate (b) fabricated model<br />

without bucket and (c) Sectional view showing parts of<br />

construction.<br />

181<br />

(b)<br />

(c)


Figure 7.9 Improved nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> model"RFD-2"showing :<br />

.(a) and (b) fire resistant <strong>stove</strong> fabricated model with<br />

bucket (c) sectional view showing parts of construction.<br />

182<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)


-II<br />

Figure 7.10 Prototype of developed chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

showing different parts of construction.<br />

183


a) Stove weight 7.9 kg.<br />

b) Stove height 23 cm.<br />

c) Pot hole diameter (fit best only one size) 24 cm.<br />

d) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity 4,400 cm!<br />

e) Grate, diameter 23 cm.<br />

hole diameter 2 cm.<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 38<br />

hole area 60 cm?<br />

f) Grate-to-pot distance (pot #24) 13.5 cm.<br />

g) Average <strong>stove</strong> wall thickness 3.5 cm.<br />

h) Primary air port 50 cm<br />

i) Firewood feeding port (8 x 15 cm.) 120 cm<br />

j) Flue gas outlet hole (4 x 10 cm.) 44 cm<br />

k) Baffle, half-ringed length 30 cm.<br />

flue gas trough, height x width 3 x 1.5 cm.<br />

1) Chimney, diameter 10 cm.<br />

height 2.2 m.<br />

m) Adjustable external damper at lower end of chimney below the flue<br />

gas exit hole level.<br />

Test results of an <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> prototype are shown<br />

in Table 7.4.<br />

Table 7.4 Per<strong>for</strong>mance of the prototype <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Firewood Rnn.burning Charcoal produced Average rate,H% fuel Time to boil<br />

Run no. <strong>use</strong>, gm at end of test, gm gm/min min<br />

494 1,025 25 20.1 21 19.6<br />

495 970 40 19.4 20 18.5<br />

496 950 20 18.6 21 18.5<br />

499 1,080 20 21.6 20 19.0<br />

503 1,130 20 21.3 23 17.3<br />

505 1,110 30 21.8 21 21.8<br />

average 1,044 25.8 20.6 21 19.1<br />

Prev2Qo opjz<br />

185


Test results from Table 7.4 indicate that 11Uincreased by approximately<br />

4.6% over the average existing models shown in Table 5.8, (that is, from 14.5<br />

to 19.1%). Time to boil increased from 17.7 to 21 minutes on the average.<br />

The major contribution of this prototype is that the firewood <strong>use</strong> is<br />

considerably less than the commercial models; i.e. 1,044 gm versus 1,583 gm<br />

or 34% less on the average.<br />

Since the original aim was to raise the efficiency of this chimneyed<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong> to 20 - 25% while maintaining at least the same time to boil, this<br />

prototype <strong>stove</strong> still has not met with requirements. There<strong>for</strong>e, this <strong>stove</strong><br />

should receive more improvement in the future be<strong>for</strong>e trial promotion or<br />

commission of the production.<br />

E. IMPROVED NON-CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE<br />

The nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> from Khao-I-Dang refugee camp (also called<br />

the "Meechai <strong>stove</strong>") is quite unique in its design and operating efficiency.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, only a little improvement and modification need to be done.<br />

Possible modifications include the material of construction, air inlet hole<br />

size and nu<strong>mb</strong>er, the inner cylinder height and exhausted flue gas area, and<br />

the outer cone insulation. The final design has the following features:<br />

a) Outer cone, mild steel gauge 0.70 mm.<br />

upper diameter 45 cm.<br />

lower diameter 10 cm.<br />

cone angle 60 deg.<br />

vertical height 30.5 cm.<br />

b) Air inlet hole, diameter 0.9 cm.<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of holes 274<br />

c) Inner cylinder, diameter 21 cm.<br />

height 19 cm.<br />

exhausted area 3(3 x 13 cm) 117 cm?<br />

d) Fuel flow, gap 2 cm.<br />

gap area 163 cm?<br />

f) Outer cone insulation thickness 0.5 cm.<br />

This <strong>improved</strong> model has the heat utilization efficiency of 19 - 20% and<br />

a time to boil of 11 - 13 minutes under standard tests. Rice husk <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong><br />

one test (approximately 40 - 45 min operation) is 1.7 - 1.8 kg at 10 - 13%<br />

moisture content. The insulation of the outside cone with rice husk ash-clay<br />

mixture, eyen though offering only 1 - 2% increase in HU over the uninsulated<br />

one, has greatly helped in keeping the cone metal from repeated extreme heat<br />

exposure and rust. In so doing, however, the flow friction (the husk on<br />

clay mixture surface) is also increased. To correct it, the rice husk<br />

ash-clay mixture insulating surface must be made as smooth as possible to<br />

avoid rice husk sticking at the flow gap. Future development to smooth this<br />

186


surface should be tried, particularly with cheap glazing material such as a<br />

salt solution. The operation of this <strong>stove</strong> is only suitable <strong>for</strong> a wellventilated<br />

area such as around the yard. A container to receive hot rice<br />

husk ash from the ash port is necessary. In case of windy conditions, the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> will not operate well unless a shield is improvised.<br />

Fig. 7.11 shows part of construction and operation of this <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

F. IMPROVED CHIMNEYED RICE HUSK STOVE MODEL "RFD-3"<br />

The design of the RFD-3 chimneyed rice husk (and other residues of<br />

similar <strong>for</strong>m) <strong>stove</strong> has the purpose of correcting the following weaknesses of<br />

commercial models: a) <strong>stove</strong> and chimney cracking beca<strong>use</strong> of an intense heat<br />

and flame generated in both cement and fired-clay constructions, b) poor<br />

conversion efficiency due to lack of baffling, too large flue gas exit hole<br />

and too far a distance from co<strong>mb</strong>ustion zone to the pot bottom, c) too large<br />

a pot hole diameter so that the common family pot size (#22 - 36) cannot be<br />

<strong>use</strong>d, d) weight of models (most are too heavy to be moved by two persons),<br />

and e) frequency of fire attendance during operations of some fuel efficient<br />

models.<br />

The development of the RFD-3 model has resulted in the design of physical<br />

structures and characteristics as follows:<br />

a) Stove weight, <strong>stove</strong> body only 68 kg.<br />

with insulation 75 kg.<br />

b) Stove height 33 cm.<br />

c) Pot hole diameter, no insulation 28 cm.<br />

d) Pot accommodation 22-32 cm.<br />

(only one size of pot has to be decided by <strong>use</strong>rs prior<br />

to insulation lining of the <strong>stove</strong>)<br />

e) Firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity, no insulation 14,800 cm?<br />

with insulation <strong>for</strong> 24 cm pot 10,000 cm?<br />

f) Iron grate, slope 43 deg.<br />

rod diameter 6 mm.<br />

finished length 36 cm.<br />

g) Air inlet area 450 cm<br />

h) Ash removal port 60 cm<br />

i) Flue gas exit hole uninsulated 50 cm<br />

insulated 32 cm<br />

j) Base to pot distance <strong>for</strong> pot #24 19 cm.<br />

187


a b<br />

PrviOUS Paz 189<br />

c<br />

Figure 7.11<br />

Nonchimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />

"Improved Meechai" model showing: a)<br />

an insulated outsidc -one sitting on<br />

the steel ring with three wooden legs,<br />

the inside cylinder with three<br />

exhausted gaps <strong>for</strong> flue yas exit, and<br />

the ash removal port at bottom of the<br />

cone, b) the <strong>stove</strong>'s top view be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

flue loading and c) the <strong>stove</strong> during<br />

operation.


k) Average insulation thickness 1.2 cm.<br />

1) Chimney, inside diameter 10 cm.<br />

total height 220-240 cm.<br />

length of refractory bottom portion 50 cm.<br />

Tests of the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the RFD-3 model (based on the standard method<br />

previously described) are as shown in Table 7.5.<br />

Table 7.5 Test results of <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> model RFD-3<br />

Rice husk Average burning Time to boil HU % Remarks<br />

<strong>use</strong>, gm rate, gm/min min<br />

142 2,830 61.5 16 10.0 Operated at the<br />

143 2,930 65.1 15 10.5 chimney height<br />

146 3,300 68.8 18 9.4 of 220 cm.<br />

151 3,310 66.2 20 11.6<br />

152 3,330 62.8 23 10.7<br />

average 3,140 64.9 18.4 10.4<br />

From Table 7.5 the heat utilization efficiency of the RFD-3 reached an<br />

average of 10.4%. This increase was quite considerable when compared with<br />

the original commercial models in Table 5.9 (where HU was only 4.2 - 7.1%).<br />

The time to boil <strong>for</strong> commercial <strong>stove</strong>s without any modifications ranged from<br />

18.5 - 27.0 minutes and averaged 22.4 minutes. The RFD-3 per<strong>for</strong>mance in this<br />

respect (average 18.4 min) is quite satisfactory. The fuel consumption of<br />

the commercial models ranging from 65.6 - 160.7 gm/min (with a mean of<br />

108.0 gm/min) was considerably higher than the RFD-3 <strong>stove</strong> which consumes<br />

only 64.9 gm/min.<br />

Regarding the <strong>stove</strong> cracking problem, the inside insulation lining using<br />

an inexpensive rice husk ash-clay mixture has proven to be very effective<br />

and also serves the purpose of fitting a particular size of pot to the <strong>stove</strong><br />

well. This insulation application (including some repairs later) should be<br />

done by <strong>use</strong>rs, however.<br />

The reception of the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> in certain areas of<br />

Central and Northeastern Thailand is, at present, quite good though still<br />

not as popular as charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s. Based on trial promotions, many<br />

groups of village people seem to accept the RFD-3 readily and claim that<br />

its construction cost of 200 baht (excluding the chimney) is much cheaper<br />

than the price of commercial models.<br />

Fig. 7.12 shows the RFD-3 <strong>improved</strong> chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> from actual<br />

production by one rice husk <strong>stove</strong> manufacturer at Rangsit, Phatumtani Province.<br />

. .. . " 191


P9 0<br />

Figure 7.12<br />

re.,o s<br />

a b<br />

Improved rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with chimney, the "RFD-3" model:<br />

a) an example of installation during a demonstration with<br />

inside insulation <strong>for</strong> 24 cm pot diameter, two portions of<br />

chimney, a refractory at bottom and an ordinary drain pipe<br />

at top; b) cement cast body with uninsulated firing cha<strong>mb</strong>er,<br />

flue gas exit hole and tunnel, sloping iron-grate and ash<br />

removal port under; c) side view with sleeves and hole to<br />

reduce its weight.<br />

193


Chapter 8<br />

Improved Stove Designs and Production<br />

i 7(


IMPROVED STOVE DESIGNS AND PRODUCTION<br />

The design and construction of a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> are critical. Factors<br />

that influence <strong>stove</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance must be fully recognized. In producing a<br />

<strong>stove</strong>, there<strong>for</strong>e, the technical drawings, the construction instructions and<br />

the methods <strong>for</strong> mass production should be closely followed.<br />

A. TECHNICAL DRAWINGS OF IMPROVED STOVES<br />

Figs. 8.1 - 8.4 are the drawings of the 4 <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models<br />

developed within the framework of this study. They are the charcoal bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong>, the non-Thimney wood <strong>stove</strong>, the non-chimney rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, and the<br />

chimney rice husk .tove.<br />

B. CONSTRUCTION 7NSTRUCTIONS<br />

In producing efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (which will be <strong>use</strong>d daily <strong>for</strong> at<br />

least 1,000 hours a year) long-term service and durability must be taken into<br />

account. In order to construct such a <strong>stove</strong>, the clay body must be chosen<br />

carefully, <strong>for</strong>med properly and dried and fired under the correct conditions.<br />

Further, the grate, the bucket, and the insulation must be fabricated and put<br />

together correctly. And, finally, the <strong>stove</strong> must be inspected <strong>for</strong> quality<br />

control at various stages in its production.<br />

Clay Material <strong>for</strong> Pottery Lined Stoves<br />

A refractory clay body must be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production since<br />

the operating temperature (particularly of the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>) can reach<br />

1,000 - 1,200 0 C. The project investigated a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of clay bodies and found<br />

a refractory clay body very suitable <strong>for</strong> charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong> production<br />

in the Panomprai district, province of Roi-et. Local artisans have been<br />

using this kind of clay <strong>for</strong> limited wood <strong>stove</strong> production <strong>for</strong> at least one<br />

generation. The dark brown sedimentary clay from the central lowlands that<br />

is widely <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery production is un<strong>for</strong>tunately not<br />

refractory. A <strong>stove</strong> made from this kind of material will normally crack<br />

the first or second time it is <strong>use</strong>d beca<strong>use</strong> of thermal shock. Further<br />

operation will ca<strong>use</strong> further degradation. Refractory clay bodies require<br />

a high alumina content as well as some amount of iron oxide to facilitate<br />

a lower firing temperature. Silica, a major component of the clay body that<br />

gives strength to the final fired-product, must also be present in the proper<br />

proportion to the alumina & iron oxide. Weight loss after firing indicates<br />

the presence of organic or humus matter in the clay body. (The humus matter<br />

creates the porosity necessary in the final product thac improves the <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />

insulating properties and makes it light weight.) However, too much organic<br />

matter will greatly reduce plasticity and the handling strength of the wet<br />

19b


clay during <strong>for</strong>ming. Table 8.1 shows compositions and fire-resistant<br />

properties of some local clay materials <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery<br />

manufacturing.<br />

Clay Preparation<br />

Since the project mainly <strong>use</strong>d clay <strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> production from<br />

the source at Roi-et, the following discussion covers only this clay type;<br />

however, tie in<strong>for</strong>mation is applicable to the preparation of clay <strong>for</strong> making<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s in other situations, given that a properly refractory clay body has<br />

been found.<br />

The dried clay raw material was soaked with water in a pit and left<br />

standing fo. at least 12 hours. After 12 hutirs the wet clay was separated<br />

into two parts (2 and J). Two-thirds would be <strong>use</strong>d later as a main mix.<br />

One-third was further mixed with an equal volume of fresh rice husk and hand<br />

<strong>for</strong>med into biscuits. After air drying, these biscuits were open fired with<br />

fuelwood <strong>for</strong> 6-12 hours until all pieces were evenly baked. The baked<br />

biscuits were pounded into small granules (with the bigger size not more than<br />

1 mm in diameter). The prepared substance (or so-called "caking powder") was<br />

added to the main mix (two-thirds of the original clay) previously set aside.<br />

These two components were then mixed as thoroughly as possible with enough<br />

water added to ensure that the wet clay mixture would retain its shape during<br />

<strong>for</strong>ming and/or throwing.<br />

Forming the Stove from Wet Clay<br />

In practice, <strong>for</strong>ming a <strong>stove</strong> from clay is carried out using three<br />

different methods as follows:<br />

Using of potter'L wheel and external mold<br />

Using a potter's wheel with an external mold is the most popular method<br />

<strong>use</strong>d in bucket <strong>stove</strong> making, particularly in !Xntral Thailand in areas such<br />

as Rajaburi, Nakorn Pathom, Pathumthani, and Chachoengsao. The clay is quite<br />

soft and can be <strong>for</strong>med easily on the potter's wheel with an external mold<br />

acting as a restraint shell. This method, at present, gives the highest<br />

production rate but yields poor accuracy of the critical inside dimensions<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is not a suitable method <strong>for</strong> <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong><br />

production.<br />

Using of wooden spatter and hand foming<br />

The wooden spatter and hand <strong>for</strong>ming method is still practiced by Panomprai<br />

<strong>stove</strong> makers. By hand, the potters <strong>for</strong>m the hard clay into the ihape of.the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> desired. Thereafter, a wooden spatter is <strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> beating around the<br />

outer surface to ensure final integrity and strength. This method is<br />

considered a very poor method <strong>for</strong> commercial Troduction since the production<br />

rate is low and there is poor control of the <strong>stove</strong>'s dimensions.<br />

198


Table 8.1<br />

Compositions and fired resistant property of some local clay materials <strong>use</strong>d<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> and pottery productions<br />

Clay source and/or Major clay composition % Fire resistance<br />

mixture Loss on SiO 2 Al203 Fe203 Others 0C<br />

ignition<br />

1. Pano,,prai Roi-et, an original 9.8 61.5 24.5 2.4 1.8 1632<br />

raw material sample<br />

2. Panomprai Roi-et. a final 8.6 61.7 23.8 2.6 3.3 1621<br />

mixture sample prior to<br />

throwing<br />

3. Banmor Mahasarakarm, a river 6.2 77.4 11.9 2.0 2.5 1501<br />

bed sample<br />

4. Pakred Nondhaburi, a dark 8.9 59.0 19.2 6.9 6.0 na<br />

brown central lowland sample<br />

5. Pakplee Prachinburi. a white 12.3 56.1 25.9 3.0 2.7 na<br />

clay or kaolin sample<br />

Source: Clay samples no. 1-3 wece analyzed and tested by Department of Science Service, Ministry of<br />

Science Technology and Energy.<br />

Data on compositions of clay samples no. 4 and 5 were obtained from Industrial Service<br />

Division, Department of Industrial Promotion, Ministry of Industry.


Using the internal mold in cooperation with a potter's'wheel and spatter<br />

Using an internal mold, a potter's wheel and spatter was a method<br />

developed by project personnel as a co<strong>mb</strong>ined technique to improve the above<br />

two methods and control the <strong>stove</strong>'s internal dimensions, integrity, and<br />

provide a reasonable production rate. A detailed production process is<br />

shown in the following photographs (Figs. 8.5 - 8.8). After the Pranomprai<br />

<strong>stove</strong> makers were trained briefly in this production method, the production<br />

rate, precision and <strong>stove</strong> quality greatly <strong>improved</strong>. Using this technique<br />

more than 3,500 charccal and wood pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s were produced in<br />

three months (<strong>for</strong> the project's initial dissemination) employing four molds<br />

and eight workers from four families.<br />

Stove Drying<br />

Stoves newly <strong>for</strong>med from wet clay require shaded air drying <strong>for</strong> several<br />

days (approximately 3 - 5 days in the dry season and 10 - 12 days in the<br />

rainy season). During this drying stage, the clay <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong>m will shrink.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, care should be taken to ensure uni<strong>for</strong>m and gradual drying to avoid<br />

<strong>stove</strong> distortion and/or cracking. When the clay <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong>m has become<br />

"leather hard" it can be placed in the sun <strong>for</strong> a final i - 2 days of drying.<br />

Stove Firing<br />

After <strong>stove</strong>s have been properly dried in both stages, a quality check<br />

must be per<strong>for</strong>med. Stoves with severe defects such as cracking, distortion,<br />

and dimension discrepancies (due to excessive shrinkage) will be rejected.<br />

(The clay can be re-wet <strong>for</strong> r6jse as raw material in another batch.) Firing<br />

of <strong>stove</strong>s is carried out in an old-fashioned manner. Local <strong>stove</strong> makers<br />

employ an open-firing technique. Open-firing requires that a level ground<br />

area of 8 - 10 sq meters be laid with dried rice straw approximaterly 3 - 4 cm<br />

thick. Dried firewood sticks (approximately diameter 3 - 4 cm) are placed<br />

horizontally as the first layer on the straw bed. Then the second layer of<br />

firewood (slightly larger in size, approximately 5 - 10 cm) is horizontally<br />

stacked on top, with the length perpendicular to each other. Altogether,<br />

3 - 5 layers of firewood are required to make the pile approximately 40 cm<br />

high. The amount of firewood required <strong>for</strong> this size of a pile is 700-800 kg<br />

(at 12 - 15% wood moisture content). This pile will accommodate 100 <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

per firing.<br />

Stoves to be fired are carefully placed on the firewood pile as close<br />

to each other as nossible in one single layer. The rice straw around the<br />

pile is then ignite.- After the first layer of firewood starts catching<br />

fire, the operator will throw rice straw on top and around the pile, As the<br />

straw keeps on burning it will release heat and provide insulation to the<br />

top and sides of the <strong>stove</strong> pile. The firewood inside will continue burning<br />

<strong>for</strong> approximately 2 - 4 hours. Then the pile will be left alone <strong>for</strong> self<br />

curing and cooling <strong>for</strong> 12 - 15 hours more. Stoves are normally unloaded<br />

from the pile the following day.<br />

200


Figure T.ec ica) aing of te Io<br />

U-<br />

L sJr4LY4:4<br />

S---..I<br />

K'~~~S<br />

I iiI . . . . .<br />

-A i~IT<br />

,/' U,.,, ': 1 -'"... r _ . . 2-<br />

0<br />

'- - -....... -­ 4<br />

Figure 8.1 Technical Drawing of the Improved Charcoal Stove


\Ix FL 1 '1-,<br />

4LI7I7f-4771<br />

* . --<br />

SegK SODY VaW) A '4t ­<br />

.<br />

0 •<br />

000 0<br />

00u0t 4444<br />

I *­<br />

I--..'-4--<br />

... .<br />

- iwF-bi<br />

GRA'rE S'"I<br />

8.2 1 ISO 11fm11S<br />

Figure 8.2 Technical Drawing of the Improved Wood Stove


-a0G 0----* - -­<br />

&.<br />

-------- , -.<br />

_ _ _ _/<br />

- . I I,<br />

-itl<br />

lioi i1<br />

*,.1<br />

Figure 8.3 Technical Drawing of Improved Rice Husk Non-chimney Stove<br />

RK FOeS1 .- Th oo<br />

.en-


41<br />

. ..<br />

1Iihrn:tR,-', -<br />

K,, --gnu4<br />

. . eI<br />

,1,4 i__O/ -<br />

Figure 8.4 Technical Drawing of Improved Rice Husk Stove with Chimney


Figure 8.5 Preparation of biscuits and firing to be later <strong>use</strong>d<br />

<strong>for</strong> clay mixture.<br />

Figure 8.6 Production of charcoal <strong>stove</strong> on the potter's wheel<br />

using the internal mold.<br />

205


Figure 8.7 Disasse<strong>mb</strong>ling of the internal mold from a newly made<br />

charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Figure 8.8 Improved charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s after finished<br />

firing and ready <strong>for</strong> further fabrication.<br />

206<br />

k.


Stove's Quality Inspection<br />

Even when firing is carried out by experienced local <strong>stove</strong> makers, some<br />

defects may occur due to non-uni<strong>for</strong>m heat and cooling at certain spots in<br />

the pile. The final inspection will reject the <strong>stove</strong>s that are underfired,<br />

cracked and distorted. Normally, however, our results show a rejection of<br />

less than 7%.<br />

Stove's Grate Making<br />

Pottery liner <strong>stove</strong>s, as well as charcoal wood <strong>stove</strong>s, need grates <strong>for</strong><br />

efficient co<strong>mb</strong>ustion. However, the design <strong>for</strong> each is slightly different.<br />

See their detailed dimensions in Figs. 8.1, 8.2, 8.9. The clay composition <strong>use</strong>d<br />

<strong>for</strong> making the grate is different from the clay mixture <strong>use</strong>d to make the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> body. The rice husk ash content is higher in the grate body to reduce<br />

shrinkage during production and to enable the grate to withstand high thermal<br />

stress during <strong>use</strong>.<br />

The normal composition of a thick charcoal grate is approximately 2-parts<br />

clay to 3-parts refined white rice husk ash by volume. The grate is hand<strong>for</strong>med<br />

in a ringed-mold and hand-punched by a tapered tube with the help of<br />

a hole template. After air drying <strong>for</strong> approximately 15 days, this type of<br />

grate need not be fired since it becomes cured during <strong>use</strong> and has enough<br />

initial strength to withstand a charcoal load.<br />

A wood <strong>stove</strong> grate, on the other hand, is thinner and larger in diameter.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, prior to <strong>use</strong>, it must be fired first to become strong. In<br />

addition, a wood <strong>stove</strong> grate is made with a rougher clay body 1-part clay<br />

body and 3 parts black rice husk ash (which has not been refined and/or<br />

sieved).<br />

Stove Bucket Making<br />

Long term servicability and heat conservation within the <strong>stove</strong> rely<br />

heavily on the outside bucket. A good bucket is designed to fit the <strong>stove</strong><br />

properly, so that the gap <strong>for</strong> packing the insulation between the <strong>stove</strong> and<br />

the bucket is 1.5-2.0 cm around the tapered wall. The bucket height will be<br />

0.5 cm shorter than that of the <strong>stove</strong> to facilitate insulation filling and<br />

sealing with cement. A standard galvanized iron sheet of 0.3 mm gauge is<br />

considered the suitable size <strong>for</strong> the prototype <strong>stove</strong>. This material can<br />

withstand the alkalinity of rice husk ash insulating material reasonably<br />

weli; it can withstand external rusting due to moisture and other factors.<br />

A handle is an essential part of the bucket and must be able to withstand<br />

the normal <strong>stove</strong> weight of 10 - 12 kg in long-term service. A good quality<br />

bucket can be ordered in quantity (and there<strong>for</strong>e at less cost) from a water<br />

bucket manufacturing plant.<br />

207


35-40 MM<br />

Figure 8.9 Grate hole design <strong>for</strong> charcoal <strong>stove</strong> hole<br />

6<br />

170<br />

diameter 1.3 cm.,with 61 holes in 5 shells<br />

around the center hole.<br />

208


Stove Fabrication<br />

Essentially, pottery lined <strong>stove</strong>s (wood and charcoal) consist of four<br />

separate components as follows:<br />

" The fired clay body;<br />

" The grate;<br />

* The bucket; and<br />

* The refractory and insulation linings.<br />

The composition of material <strong>for</strong> the interior refractory lining is 5 - 6<br />

parts common rice husk ash and one-part clay. That <strong>for</strong> exterior insulation<br />

lining is 12-parts ash and 1-part clay. Both must be thoroughly mixed.<br />

The fabrication is completed by first pouring the insulati.ca mix into<br />

the bucket bottom (about 1.5 cm). The <strong>stove</strong> body is then positioned inside<br />

the bucket. More insulation mix is added to the gap and then is tightly<br />

packed inside the gap between the <strong>stove</strong> body and the bucket. The <strong>stove</strong>'s<br />

top rim and the edge around the air inlet door are then sealed off-by cement<br />

mortar (3 parts fine sand and 1 part Portland cement). The grate is then<br />

positioned and fixed with refractory mix inside the <strong>stove</strong> body in such a way<br />

that the bottom edge of the grate is in line with the upper rim of the air<br />

inlet door. Finally, the refractory mix is lined around the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

approximately 1 cm thick to seql the edge between the grate and the <strong>stove</strong><br />

body. The whole <strong>stove</strong> is thun aiL-dried <strong>for</strong> at least 24 hours be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>use</strong> to<br />

avoid cracking of the refractory lining.<br />

C. A MASS PRODUCTION SCHEME TO MAKE CHARCOAL AND<br />

WOOD STOVES USING THE HYDRAULIC PRESS<br />

In the section on "Forming the Stove From Wet Clay" three <strong>for</strong>ming methods<br />

were discussed. However, these methods cannot meet the <strong>stove</strong> production<br />

criteria of high production rate, precision of internal and external <strong>stove</strong><br />

dimensions, and high uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong>ming pressure of hard clay to withstand high<br />

thermal stresses. In order to meet all three requirements, it is envisaged<br />

that a hydraulic press with an internal mold and an external mold would<br />

provide a better method <strong>for</strong> long-term commercial production. The need <strong>for</strong><br />

this kind of simple equipment <strong>for</strong> local production cannot be overemphasized<br />

if the "<strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion program" hopes to see the quick replacement<br />

of 5 - 6 million poor charcoal and wood <strong>stove</strong>s throughout rural Thailand.<br />

The prototype of such a hydraulic press in <strong>for</strong>ming the clay bucket<br />

(includif.g molds) has been designed and individual parts have been made.<br />

Fabrication and testing of this machine are underway at the present tf-e.<br />

It is hoped that this device will work out well and out-per<strong>for</strong>m those <strong>stove</strong><br />

manufacturing techniques presently employed in Thailand. A detailed sketch<br />

of the hydraulic press <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> molding is shown in Fig. 8.10.<br />

209


20<br />

Figure 8.10 100-ton Hydraulic Automatic Press-<br />

Machine <strong>for</strong> Charcoal and Wood Stove. SCALE 1-5<br />

210<br />

B.SRISOM<br />

JANUARY 84


Chapter 9<br />

Improved Stove Promotion


IMPROVED STOVE PROMOTION<br />

Laboratory research and development df highly efficient <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong><br />

<strong>stove</strong>s were carried out <strong>for</strong> approximately 2 years. As a result, four types<br />

of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s were proposed <strong>for</strong> trial promotion. They<br />

were the: charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the wood <strong>stove</strong> without a chimney, and the<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong> with and without a ch:nney. The four <strong>improved</strong> types gave<br />

satisfactory per<strong>for</strong>mance. Tneir absolute efficiencies increased approximately<br />

5 - 7% on the average. Furthermore, per<strong>for</strong>mance tests on durability (long<br />

service life), ease of opetation (easy to start up the fire and continuously<br />

give high heat output with equal or little attendance), accommodation of<br />

various pot sizes (one <strong>stove</strong> fits pot diameter from 16 to 32 cm), and<br />

portability (light weight) were satisfactory. Only the wood <strong>stove</strong> with a<br />

chimney requires further improvement of efficiency and to accommodate a<br />

variety of pot s:izes.<br />

Any problems that arise during <strong>stove</strong> development can usually be solved<br />

in the 'aboratory. However, problems dealing with the introduction of the<br />

newly developed <strong>stove</strong>s to <strong>use</strong>rs need to be solved in the field. Stove<br />

promotion is a most important project task. The work involved in research<br />

and development will have been wasted if <strong>improved</strong> models are not accepted<br />

by <strong>use</strong>rs. Hence,the promotion of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is one of the main<br />

concerns of this project.<br />

This chapter presents some activities and field work involved in<br />

introducing <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s to rural families.<br />

A. OVERALL TARGET OF STOVE PROMOTION<br />

The population of Thailand is approximately 50 million. The avcrage<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er persons in a family is 6 persons. Approximately 80% of Thai families<br />

live in rural areas. Thus, there are roughly 6 million <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

<strong>use</strong>d by rural families. This presumes that each family has only one <strong>cooking</strong><br />

scove. (In fact, a large nu<strong>mb</strong>er of rural families have 2 - 3 <strong>stove</strong>s in their<br />

possession). The main problem of promotion then becomes how to get all of the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s replaced within a certain time frame. If Thailand were to replace<br />

all 6 million Inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s within say, 5 years, approximately 1.25<br />

million <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s must be produced. The activity involved in<br />

producing this many <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is tremendous. It is not possible <strong>for</strong><br />

a government agency to carry on such a heavy task alone. Stove manufacturers<br />

throughout the country must be involved in the production process. However,<br />

to begin this implementation program, the government must initiate and<br />

stimulate <strong>stove</strong> promotion activities so that <strong>stove</strong> replacement time will be<br />

shortened.<br />

This project had only 6 months to begin the campaign. Stove promotion<br />

and training schedules have been established. There are two projects under<br />

the same component leader: Charcoal Improvement and Stove Improvement.<br />

, ... . . 2 13


There<strong>for</strong>e, both projects have been co<strong>mb</strong>ined into one promotional campaign.<br />

Each promotion activity generally takes 5 - 10 days. Improved <strong>stove</strong>s are<br />

introduced during the first 1 - 2 days and charcoal production is demonstrated<br />

during the remaining time. The subjects present in the promotion activity<br />

depend on the level of education and the capability of participants. For<br />

representatives of government agencies and rural development associations,<br />

promotion activity elaborates both theoretical and practical details (since<br />

this group is more knowledgeable and is directly responsible <strong>for</strong> carrying out<br />

this development program in rural areas). Another group of participants<br />

consists of people who live in the villages. Hence, the promotion activity<br />

is less technical, and emphasizes only the practical, specific features of<br />

good <strong>stove</strong>s and their proper care. A prepared time-schedule <strong>for</strong> promotion<br />

activities is presented below:<br />

1. The first trial promotion of the charcoal and <strong>stove</strong> improvement projects.<br />

Place: Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />

Development<br />

Muang District, Mahasarakarm,.Northeastern<br />

Date: 9 - 16 Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 1983<br />

2. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>-the<br />

first official training course <strong>for</strong> government and rural development<br />

agencies.<br />

Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />

Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />

Date: 9 - 20 January 1984<br />

3. Improved production of charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />

rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers and officials of the<br />

Mobile Military Development Unit.<br />

Place: Mobile Military Development Unit #32<br />

Pannanikorm District, Sakolnakorn, Northeastern<br />

Date: 1 - 11 February 1984<br />

4. Improved ?roductionof charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />

rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />

Place: Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />

Development<br />

Muang District, Pitsanulok, Northern<br />

Date: 5 - 9 March 1984<br />

5. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

to rural families--the second official training course <strong>for</strong> Government<br />

and Rural Development agencies.<br />

Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />

Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />

Date: 13 - 23 March 1984<br />

214


6. Improved produntion of charcoal and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

to rural families--a trainig course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />

Place: Khao Hin Sorn<br />

Educational Development Center,<br />

(under H.M. the King's direction)<br />

Panomsarakarm District, Chachoengsoa<br />

Date: 16 - 20 April 1984<br />

7. Improved production of charcoa:. and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to<br />

rural families--a training course <strong>for</strong> villagers.<br />

Place: Ban Thatoom Secondary School<br />

Muang District, Maharasakarm, Northeastern<br />

Date: 30 April - 4 May 1984<br />

8. Technology of charcoal production and introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

to rural families--the third official training course <strong>for</strong> the Mobile<br />

Military Development Unit.<br />

Place: Charcoal Research Center<br />

Muang District, Saraburi, Central<br />

Date: 14 - 25 May 1984<br />

9. Improved production of charcoal and introduction<br />

to<br />

of<br />

rural<br />

developed<br />

families--a<br />

<strong>stove</strong><br />

training course at the Mobile Military Development<br />

Unit.<br />

Place: Mobile Military Development Unit #22<br />

Poa District, Nan, Northern<br />

Date: 3 - 10 June 1984<br />

To achieve this project goal, it must be<br />

of<br />

emphasized<br />

newly developed<br />

that the<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s<br />

promotion<br />

is not just to distribute<br />

variety<br />

the <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

of aspects<br />

to <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

must<br />

A<br />

be considered. For<br />

fabrication,<br />

example, <strong>stove</strong><br />

repair<br />

production,<br />

and maintenance,<br />

<strong>stove</strong><br />

and criteria<br />

from<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

the<br />

selection<br />

markets<br />

of<br />

should<br />

good<br />

be<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s<br />

included in promotional<br />

of this field<br />

workshops.<br />

work is,<br />

The<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

intention<br />

to educate <strong>use</strong>rs on<br />

well.<br />

the above<br />

In fact,<br />

subjects<br />

trainees<br />

as<br />

are required to participate<br />

They<br />

in<br />

install<br />

<strong>stove</strong> fabrication.<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> grate, prepare insulating<br />

refractory<br />

materials,<br />

part,<br />

line the<br />

fill<br />

inside<br />

the <strong>stove</strong> bucket with insulation<br />

rim. Overall<br />

and seal<br />

promotional<br />

the <strong>stove</strong><br />

activities are summarized in the subsequent section.<br />

B. CREATION OF PUBLIC AWARENESS<br />

In order to distribute 1.25 million <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s to rural families<br />

throughout the country (in additioi, to promotional activities carried out<br />

by this project), the government must step in to initiate various kinds of<br />

campaigns such as press conferences, radio interviews, distribution of<br />

leaflets and posters, etc.<br />

The first introduction of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s (and related subjects) to the<br />

public was conducted by the National Energy Authority on 3 - 4 August 1983.<br />

Cooperating closely with the Stove Improvement Project, the meeting included<br />

215


a seminar, demonstration, and exhibition of <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s. The participants<br />

consisted of representatives from government institutions such as universities,<br />

the Agricultural Department, the Rural Development Department, the Welfare<br />

and the private sector such as<br />

Department, the Ministry of Education, etc.,<br />

the Population and Social Development Assoication, VITA company, Appropriate<br />

Technology Association, and a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers, etc. The purpose<br />

of this campaign was to bring together the researchers, <strong>use</strong>rs, and<br />

manufacturers to join in a panel discussion in order to share points of view<br />

on several aspects of the project such as standard methods of <strong>stove</strong> testing,<br />

special features of highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s, experience in <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing,<br />

marketing, and quality control.<br />

Another promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t was the press conference on newly dereloped<br />

<strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s which was held in February 1984 at the Ministry of<br />

Science and Technology. Representatives from radio and television stations<br />

the meeting.<br />

and representatives from various newspapers were invited to<br />

a <strong>use</strong>r's guide on <strong>stove</strong> maintenance<br />

Leaflets, posters, T-shirts as well as<br />

and repairs were distributed.<br />

It should be emphasized that the work involved in promoting <strong>improved</strong><br />

<strong>stove</strong>s to <strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers is extensive and should be continued with<br />

the support of various government agencies.<br />

C. INTRODUCTION/TRAINING ON EFFICIENT STOVES<br />

<strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> local rural develoment<br />

The introduction/training on<br />

officials, school teachers, village leaders, etc. has been carried out<br />

The training<br />

following the program described in section A of this chapter.<br />

activities include:<br />

1. Instruction on the five proposed types of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s on the<br />

fundamentals of <strong>stove</strong> design and construction (see Fig. 9.1);<br />

2. Efficiency test comparison between the developed <strong>stove</strong>s and the currently<br />

marketed <strong>stove</strong>s (see Fig. 9.2);<br />

3. Demonstration and trainee participation in installing the grate into the<br />

<strong>stove</strong> body, lining refractory material around the co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er, and<br />

placing the insulating materials between the bucket and the <strong>stove</strong> body, etc.<br />

(see Fig. 9.3)/ and<br />

4. Distribution of the finished <strong>stove</strong>s (fabricated by traii. ;s)to those<br />

who have participated in building their own selected <strong>stove</strong>s (see Fig. 9.4).<br />

The training activities are discussed in the following section.<br />

216


Table 9.1 Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial staves in<br />

Mahasarakarm<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> Chimneyed rice husk Nonchimneyed rice husk<br />

developed comm. I comm. 2 developed comm. developed developed<br />

(pranomprai)<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,520 1,490 3,800 3,070<br />

Half time to boil (64'C), min 9 14 17 7 9 9 14<br />

Time to boil, min 17 27 27 12 14 29 22<br />

Water evaporated, gin 810 420 450 1,310 1,210 1,400 1,160<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 60 40 40 25;5701 45;330 550 1,050<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gmn 340 360 360 950 1,160 3,250 2,020<br />

Efficiency, % 31.01 20.59 21.27 24.90 19.90 9.60 13.67<br />

Note: 1. Charcoal remaining; wood remaining


The First Promotion Trial <strong>for</strong> the Charcoal and Stove Improvement<br />

Projects, 9 - 16 Dece<strong>mb</strong>er 1984, Muang District, Mahasarakarm<br />

The purpose of this trial was to provide the trainers with experience<br />

in <strong>stove</strong> promotion training. There were 35 trainees, they included:<br />

5 Officers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center <strong>for</strong> Rural<br />

Development<br />

2 Officers from Lhe NEA Training Center<br />

4 Promotors and researcherl<br />

4 District agriculture offirs<br />

2 Sub-district development officers<br />

15 Village leaders<br />

2 Primary school teachers<br />

1 Public health reporter<br />

The training program consisted of the four activities described at the<br />

beginning of this section. The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong><br />

charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, the <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> and the commercial<br />

ones are shown in Table 9.1.<br />

Thirty-two questionnaires were distributed to the trainees after the end<br />

of the program. The results are summarized below.<br />

Within this district in Mahasarakarm, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> was the<br />

most popular <strong>stove</strong> type. The non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>, the chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>, the non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>, and the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />

were less popular--in that order. 93% of the trainees said they knew more<br />

about the specific features of the highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s as well as criteria<br />

<strong>for</strong> selecting good <strong>stove</strong>s after the training. 56% of the trainees increased<br />

their knowledge of building and designing good <strong>stove</strong>s. 84% of the trainees<br />

felt they had a better understanding of <strong>stove</strong> care and maintenance. However,<br />

only 50% of the trainees said they could transfer this training to others.<br />

Responding to length of training, 66% said the timing was convenient and the<br />

length of training was adequate. Other comments were personal that additional<br />

training on the method of making the.developed <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong> was needed; more<br />

promotion and distribution of <strong>stove</strong> samples to other villages, more training<br />

should be offered to other private and government agencies as well as to<br />

interested outsiders; and there was a request <strong>for</strong> construction blueprints of<br />

the five developed <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 9 ­ 20 January 1984<br />

The <strong>stove</strong> promotion workshop in Saraburi was the first official training<br />

course and the opening of the Charcoal Research Center. The ceremony was<br />

witnessed by the following representatives:<br />

1 Representative from the National Energy Administration<br />

4 Chief engineers and officers from USAID office, Thailand<br />

2 Representatives from Food and Agriculture Organization, Asia and Pacific<br />

Region<br />

218


2 Representatives from the Forestry Department<br />

1 Representative from Kasetsart University<br />

1 Chief of a biogas development project<br />

1 Chief of a renewable energy project, from the support office<br />

2 Representatives from the Regional Forestry Office, Saraburi<br />

1 Representative from the Provincial Forest Office, Saraburi<br />

The trainees consist of:<br />

5 NEA officers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />

2 Training officers from the National Security High Command<br />

4 Field officers from the Community Development Department<br />

2 Field officers from the Family Planning and Population Development<br />

Association<br />

2 Field officers from the Land Development Department<br />

The <strong>for</strong>mal training program was carried out as outlined in the beginning<br />

of this section. The charcoal <strong>stove</strong> comparison was per<strong>for</strong>med and the results<br />

are shown in Table 9.2.<br />

Since this training program was devoted mainly to charcoal production,<br />

<strong>stove</strong> promotion was only minimally presented to participants. Only the <strong>stove</strong><br />

charcoal <strong>stove</strong> comparison was demonstrated. See Table 9.2.<br />

No <strong>stove</strong> questionnaires were distributed<br />

Table 9.2<br />

Comparison Test <strong>for</strong> Efficiency<br />

between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />

Condition Charcoal Stove<br />

Developed Rangsit Cholburi Boobparam<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 400<br />

Half time to boil (64*C), min 11 12 13 14<br />

Time to boil, min 17 24 27 31<br />

Water evaporated, gm 790 450 410 400<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 40 35 45 35<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 365 355 365<br />

Efficiency, % 29.16 21.40 20.48 19.73<br />

'219


Stove Promotion in Sakolnakorn on 1 - 11 February 1984<br />

The participants consisted of:<br />

17 Training personnel from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />

5 Officers from the District Development Section<br />

1 Teacher from the Nonroau school<br />

3 Village leaders<br />

19 Villagers<br />

The training program was conducted as previously described. The results<br />

of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison between the developed models and the commercial <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

are shown in Table 9.3.<br />

The results were obtained from 45 questionnaires, From analysis of the<br />

questionnaire responses, the following can be concluded.<br />

Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s made up 68% of all <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d by the trainees<br />

at home. Within this region, 56% of rural families <strong>use</strong>d the non-chimneyed<br />

type. 88% of the trainees believed that they had learned more about the<br />

criteria <strong>for</strong> selection of good <strong>stove</strong>s by the end.of the training. 94% of the<br />

trainees <strong>improved</strong> their knowledge on proper care and maintenance of <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

All participants (100%) agreed that the developed <strong>stove</strong>s per<strong>for</strong>med better<br />

than the commercial ones.<br />

33% of the trainees preferred the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, 32% preferred<br />

the non-chimnened wood <strong>stove</strong>, 19% preferred the non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>,<br />

and 16% preferred the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

At the end of trainiL.g, each participant received a <strong>stove</strong>. The<br />

nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong>s distributed: 43 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 27 non-chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, 4 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, and 15 chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Out of the total nu<strong>mb</strong>er of <strong>stove</strong> distributed, 45 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to villagers,<br />

2 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to a youth group from Moungkai village, and 42 <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

were given to the Mobile Military Development Unit.<br />

Stove Promotion in Pitsanulok, 5 - 9 March 1984<br />

The Pitsanulok training was held at the Regional Energy and Technology<br />

Center. There were 33 participants involved; they are:<br />

5 Officers and workers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />

4 Lecturers from the Educational College and teachers from the primary<br />

school<br />

9 Sub-district senior personnel and assistants, village assistants and<br />

leaders of village committees<br />

14 Farmers and people from the region<br />

The results of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> model and<br />

the commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.4.<br />

220


Table 9.3<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Sakolnakorn<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> Chimneyed rice husk<br />

developed commercial developed commercial 1 commercial 2 commercial 3 developed<br />

Charcoal wt, gm 400 400 1,100 1,050 2,275 1,240 2,800<br />

Time to boil, min 22 -1 14 15 22 31 19<br />

Water evaporated,<br />

gm 640 110 1,240 1,140 950 600 1,440<br />

Fuel remaining,<br />

gm 45 25 40;2302 25;0 265;170 50;365 300<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 355 375 870 1,050 2,105 865 2,500<br />

Efficiency, % 29.2 14.7 12.7<br />

Note: i. not boil (windy on the test day)<br />

2. charcoal remaining; wood remaining


The results of training are summarized below. The basic in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on the type of <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>use</strong>d among the trainee's families revealed that 75%<br />

had: charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 8% had non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s ana 17% had<br />

chimneyed and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s. 97% of the trainees chose<br />

the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong> as their preferred model. 38% chose the non-chimneyed<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong> as their second preference. All trainees gained confidence in<br />

their knowledge of how to select good <strong>stove</strong>. 50% of the participants were<br />

in favor of the present desing and the other 50% preferred the new design.<br />

All trainees agreed that they better understood <strong>stove</strong> care and maintenance.<br />

This training was highly successful. The trainees showed great interest<br />

and cooperated well during fabrication and discussion. At the end of each<br />

day, trainees gathered around the training site and discussed the problems<br />

that had arisen during the day. All 71 participants received a developed<br />

<strong>stove</strong>.<br />

Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 13 - 23 March 1984<br />

The March 1984 workshop was the second official training course at the<br />

Charcoal Research Center in Saraburi.<br />

A total of 11 persons from various government agencies and private<br />

associations participated in the <strong>stove</strong> promotion program. These included:<br />

3 Training officers from Military Central Security<br />

2 Workers from the Family Planning and Population Development Association<br />

4 Workers from Community Development Department<br />

1 Worker from the Land Development <strong>for</strong> Agriculture Division<br />

1 Worker from the Thai-German Center, Welfare Department, Lopburi<br />

The training course was carried out according to the program previously<br />

mentioned. The <strong>stove</strong> comparison <strong>for</strong> efficiency is shown in Table 9.5.<br />

Evoluation of this training from the responses on the returned<br />

questionnaires can be summarized as follows: 82% of the participants <strong>use</strong>d<br />

charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 18% <strong>use</strong>d gas <strong>stove</strong>s. All trainees (100%) said<br />

they had a better underscanding of the criteria <strong>for</strong> selecting a good <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

82% of the trainees (moderately) believed that they could transfer their<br />

<strong>stove</strong> knowledge to rural people.<br />

Stove Promotion in Chachoengsoa on 16 - 20 April 1984<br />

The training in Chachoengsop was set up at thu Khao Hin Sorn Educational<br />

Development Center under His Majesty the King's direction in Panomsarakarm<br />

district, Chachoengsoa Province. There were 36 participants; they included:<br />

6 Agricultural workers from th2 Land Development Division, Khao Hin Sorn<br />

Development Center<br />

2 Field officers from the Community Development Department, Khao Hin Sorn<br />

Development Center<br />

222


3 Field officers from the Forest Nursery Plant Center, Forestry Division<br />

9 Students from the Rachaburi Agricultural Institute, Rachaburi<br />

16 Villagers from Khao Hin Sorn region and nearby<br />

The results of comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> model and commercial<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.6.<br />

At the end of the training program, 34 questionnaires were distributed<br />

to participants. The results are presented below.<br />

The charcoal bucket was the most popular types of <strong>stove</strong>. 71% of the<br />

participants chose it as their preference. The other choices were non-chimneyed<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong>--18%, non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>--5%, chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>-­<br />

3%, and chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>--3%.<br />

All participants (100%) agreed that their knowledge about selecting highly<br />

efficient <strong>stove</strong>s had increased significantly. 977 -tated that their<br />

undersvanding of <strong>stove</strong> <strong>use</strong>, care, and maintenance .J also increased;41% of<br />

the participants have confidence in their ability to transfer their <strong>stove</strong><br />

knowledge to others. In addition, many participants requested more elaborate<br />

details <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> making.<br />

At the end of training, 24 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 9 non-chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s, and 4 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s were given to participants.<br />

Another 18 <strong>stove</strong>s were donated to the Land Development Center, the Forest<br />

Nursery Center and representative students from the Agricultural Institute<br />

<strong>for</strong> future u in <strong>stove</strong> promotion activities.<br />

Stove Promotion in Mahasarakarm on 30 April - 4 May 1984<br />

56 people participated in this training:<br />

2 Teachers from Ban Thatoom school<br />

1 Teachers from Ban Dotangarm school<br />

1 Teacher from Ban Napangdonhi<br />

2 Offi ers from the Regional Energy and Technology Center<br />

3 Village leaders<br />

1 Assistant village leader<br />

44 Villagers<br />

2 Observers from the External Educational Center<br />

The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s and the<br />

commercial ones are presented in Table 9.7.<br />

From the responses on the questionnaires, it was determined that 67% of<br />

the participants <strong>use</strong>d charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 29% <strong>use</strong>d non-chimneyed wood<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s at home. 73% preferred charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s while 21% preferred<br />

non-chimneyed woo.k <strong>stove</strong>s. 97% of the participants believed that their<br />

knowledge in selecting good <strong>stove</strong>s had increased, as had their ability to<br />

repair and maintain <strong>stove</strong>s in good condition. 50% believed that they<br />

could transfer this knowledge to other people. There were also many requests<br />

<strong>for</strong> complete instructions on how to make the <strong>stove</strong> <strong>for</strong> one's own <strong>use</strong>--starting<br />

223


from nothing. The training course only lets each participant place a<br />

pre-shaped and fired <strong>stove</strong> body into a bucket. He then places the geate,<br />

lines it with the refractory material, and fills it with insulating materials.<br />

This request is similar to other previous training course. However, the metilod<br />

of making <strong>stove</strong> body is rather complicated, time-consuming, and requires high<br />

skill; hence, this function needs to be per<strong>for</strong>med by <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers.<br />

Instead it was suggested that the participants take the <strong>stove</strong> samples to <strong>stove</strong><br />

manufacturers in their villages <strong>for</strong> trial production.<br />

There were altogether 137 <strong>stove</strong>s distributed at the end of training. 56<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s were given to participants, 81 <strong>stove</strong>s were given to Ban Thatoom school.<br />

The distributtA <strong>stove</strong>s included 80 charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>s, 50 non-chimneyed<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong>s, 5 non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s, and 2 chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Stove Promotion in Saraburi on 14 - 25 May 1984<br />

The May 1984 training took place at the Charcoal Research Center in<br />

Saraburi. There were 19 participants; they included:<br />

3 Military officers from the Central Security Division<br />

5 High-ranking military officers from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />

6 Noncommissioned officers from the Mobile Military Development Unit<br />

5 Participants from the Regional and Voluntary Self-defense Association<br />

The results of the <strong>stove</strong> comparison are shown in Table 9.8.<br />

Questionnaire evaluation showed that 88% of the participants <strong>use</strong>d charcoal<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong>s and 6% <strong>use</strong>d gas <strong>stove</strong>s at home. Their increased ability to<br />

identity and seiect highly efficient <strong>stove</strong>s was reported to be 94%. The ability<br />

of participants to transfer this training knowledge to other people was 50%,<br />

and the trainer's capability of interpretating and monitoring the <strong>stove</strong><br />

training course was 72%.<br />

At the end of the training program, participants received 19 newly<br />

developed charcoal <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

Improved Stove Promotion in Nan on 2 - 8 June, 1984<br />

This prnram was the last training course of the project. The training<br />

was coordinated by Colonel Dusit Menapothi, Chief of Training division, Central<br />

Security High Command and Special Colonel Padej Anwong, Commander of the<br />

Military Mobile Development Unit #22, Nan. There were 54 participants. They<br />

included:<br />

2 Training officers from the Military Mobile Development Unit #21, Uttaradit<br />

20 Training officers from the Military Mobile Development Unit #22, Nan<br />

4 Field officers from the Battalion Cavalry , Nan<br />

3 Workers from the external Education Center, Nan<br />

4 Noncommissioned officers<br />

21 Villagers<br />

224


Table 9.4<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Pitsanulok<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commerical<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 - -<br />

Time to boil, min 241 (17) _2 24 11 13<br />

Water evaporated, gm * 720 460 540 1,340 1,240<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 30 20 25 20 15<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 370 380 375 890 1,160<br />

Efficiency, % 29.5 22.1 24.5 26.8 19.1<br />

Note: 1. The value is somewhat higher due to trainees' lack of skill in lighting the fuel. The same test<br />

was repeated on the next day and a new time to boil was quoted in the parenthesis.<br />

2. Not boiling.


01<br />

Table 9.5<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Developed Commercial Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 - ­ _<br />

Time to boil, min 19 23 20 27 18<br />

Water evaporated, gm 610 510 1,310 1,210 1,000<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 40 30 50 55 25<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 370 1,030 1,170 1,020<br />

Efficiency, % 28.4 24.5 23.8 19.7 19.2


Table 9.6<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Chachoengsoa<br />

Condition Charcoal Stove Nonchimneyed Wood Stove<br />

Developed Commercial Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400<br />

Time to boil, min 17 32 17 16 15<br />

Water evaporated, gm 620 410 1,130 1,100 1,250<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 40 45 55 50 50<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 355 820 920 1,210<br />

, Efficiency, % 26.33 21.64 24.86 21.75 18.0<br />

* Very windy condition during the test day<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-


Table 9.7<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Mahasarakarm<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,390 1,410 1,570<br />

Time to boil, min 24 26 _1 14 19 19<br />

Water evaporated, gm 560 480 60 1,260 960 1,140<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 65 65 110 505 720 635<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 335 335 290 885 690 935<br />

Efficiency, % 31.14 28.79 22.15 25.06 23.97 21.28


The results of the comparison between the <strong>improved</strong> models and the<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s are shown in Table 9.9.<br />

54 questionnaires were returned. The. result are summarized below.<br />

The most popular type of <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>r trainees was the charcoal<br />

bucket <strong>stove</strong>; <strong>use</strong>d them at home 68%. The next popular type was the nonchimneyed<br />

wood <strong>stove</strong> accounting <strong>for</strong> 29%, and the chfmneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong><br />

3% ccounting <strong>for</strong> all participants received a <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

At the end of the training, 54 developed <strong>stove</strong>s were distributed.<br />

D. INTRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE STOVE<br />

TO HOUSEHOLD USERS<br />

The trial promotion and training course in <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s should<br />

include free distribution of <strong>stove</strong> samples to rural villagers under the<br />

condition that the promotors follow up and record the results. Thus, any<br />

problems that may arise during the application of the new models can be<br />

addressed and improvements made. Free distribution of sample <strong>stove</strong>s must be<br />

supported by the government, particularly in the trial promotion and monotoring<br />

phases.<br />

E. ORGANIZATION OF STOVE MANUFACTURERS TO PRODUCE<br />

IMPROVED DESIGN STOVES<br />

Introduction to manufacturers of the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s is a very difficult<br />

task beca<strong>use</strong> of iack of concern and cooperation among local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers.<br />

These problems are believed to exist beca<strong>use</strong> they:<br />

* Have little credibility with the government agency;<br />

w Believe that the <strong>stove</strong>s they are making are best (due to lack of<br />

scientific knowledge);<br />

* Believe that the <strong>stove</strong> making profession is doomed beca<strong>use</strong> of strong<br />

competition from gas <strong>stove</strong>s and their LPG fuel government subsidies.<br />

a Believe that Thailand is running out of wood and charcoal. Many state<br />

that riiey will give up <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing when there is no more wood.<br />

Hence, government agencies should focus on educating local <strong>stove</strong><br />

manufacturers to better understand Thailand's precious, indigenous and<br />

reproducible source of unargy--wood--and t)y providing them with guidance and<br />

<strong>use</strong>ful scientific knowledge on <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> technology. This can be<br />

achieved by the following government ef<strong>for</strong>ts:<br />

1. Publication and distribution of documents describing the important<br />

features of good <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

229


D<br />

Table 9.8<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commerical <strong>stove</strong>s in Saraburi<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Nonchimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400 1,670 1,710 1,500<br />

Time to boil, min 20 21 26 14 22 i6<br />

Water evaporated, gm 360 345 360. 950 710 1,020<br />

Fuel remaining, gm 40 55 40 40;7201 55;1,000 35;480<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 730 550 440 1,360 920 1,260<br />

Efficiency, Z 30.32 27.50 23.52 26.23 28.33<br />

Note: 1. charcoal remaining #; wood remaining<br />

22.83


Table 9.9<br />

Comparison test <strong>for</strong> efficiency between developed and commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in Nan<br />

Condition Charcoal <strong>stove</strong> Non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong><br />

Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2 Developed Commercial 1 Commercial 2<br />

Fuel wt, gm 400 400 400<br />

1<br />

1,440 1,460 1,440<br />

Time to boil, min -<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Water evaporated, gm 600 410 - 1,280 1,060 1,020<br />

Fuel remaining, gin 40 35 - 40;300 60;190 50;215<br />

Fuel <strong>use</strong>, gm 360 365 - 1,140 1,410 1,225<br />

Efficiency, % 27.7 22.6 - 20.7 14.9 16.6<br />

Note: 1. not recorded<br />

2. charcoal remaining; wood remaining


2. Methods of selecting <strong>stove</strong> materials such as fire resistant clay,<br />

insulating material, etc. and how to improve such materials.<br />

3. Government development and provision of the <strong>stove</strong> mold <strong>for</strong> mass<br />

production of the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

4. Government advertising campaigns to boost sales and marketing of the new<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

5. Providing awards and incentives to cooperative manufacturers. Stove<br />

competitions and awards to manufacturers producing the most efficient<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s are highly recommended. Stoves that pass a standard test <strong>for</strong><br />

efficiency and ruggedness should be given a government guarantee<br />

certificate. This will give the <strong>use</strong>rs confidence enough to buy and<br />

motivate manufacturers to produce good <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

232


Figure 9.1 Introduction of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to participants<br />

Figure 9.2 Stove contest <strong>for</strong> efficiency comparison between<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s and developed models<br />

233


Figure 9.3 Trainee participation in installing <strong>stove</strong>'s parts<br />

Figure 9.4 Distribution of developed <strong>stove</strong>s to all participants<br />

234


Chapter 10<br />

Conclusions


CONCLUSIONS<br />

As a result of the implementation of the Improved Biomass Cooking Stove<br />

Component, many activities and achievements took place. Accomplishments can<br />

be described as follows:<br />

1. As a part of institution strengthening, the component has succeeded in<br />

establishing a <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong> testing laboratory at the Forest Products<br />

Research Division, Royal Forest Department, Through project f.,nding, the<br />

laboratory was equipped with invaluable, basic test instruments and<br />

facilities--including a microcomputer system <strong>for</strong> future applications.<br />

2. Long-term training of project personnel to increase their future<br />

capabilities was minimum beca<strong>use</strong> time was short (30 months) and they were<br />

needed on site to carry outi.project tasks. There<strong>for</strong>e, all technical personnel<br />

were indispensable <strong>for</strong> project implementation. They could not be spared <strong>for</strong><br />

long term training.<br />

3. The component has produced five generic types of <strong>improved</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s:<br />

namely, the charcoal bucket <strong>stove</strong>, wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys, and<br />

rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys. The absolute heat utilization <strong>for</strong><br />

charcoal and both types of wood <strong>stove</strong>s increased up to 7% over that of the<br />

average commercial models. Further, an increase of 5 and 3% was achieved<br />

with rice husk <strong>stove</strong>s with and without chimneys respectively. In terms of<br />

comparative efficiency increases, the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> reached a 26% increase<br />

over the average commercial models, while <strong>for</strong> wood <strong>stove</strong>s with and without<br />

chimneys they were 58 and 35% respectively. The increase <strong>for</strong> the rice husk<br />

<strong>stove</strong> with chimney was 100%, or double the efficiency of the average<br />

commercial models. The rice husk <strong>stove</strong> without chimney had the least<br />

increase--15 - 16%.<br />

4. The investigation conducted on existing commercial <strong>stove</strong>s revealed that<br />

fuel efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s <strong>for</strong> charcoal, wood, or rice husk are rare. The<br />

laboratory tests have led to the identification of the <strong>stove</strong>s' critical<br />

physical parameters. They consist of <strong>stove</strong> weight; exhausted gap/area;<br />

co<strong>mb</strong>ustion cha<strong>mb</strong>er capacity; rim design <strong>for</strong> proper fit of variously-si7ed<br />

pots and pans; grate-to-pot distance; grate parameters such as hole area, hole<br />

size and distribution, and thickness; height of chimney, and flue gas baffle<br />

(<strong>for</strong> chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>s). Other strong factors also influencing <strong>stove</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance are external variables--fuel load or fuel feeding rate, amount of<br />

water to be boiled, and the wind factor. The in<strong>for</strong>mation obtained was later<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>for</strong> redesigning the <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> models.<br />

5. Good quality clay material suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>stove</strong> manufacturing has been<br />

identified and a production technique has also been developed <strong>for</strong> small-scale<br />

and home industries. Local <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers in one district of Roi-et<br />

Province were trained without any difficulty in this technique of <strong>stove</strong><br />

production. Improved <strong>stove</strong>s, particularly charcoal and nonchimney wood models,<br />

are heat refractory and can withstand thermal shock much better than present<br />

237


commercial ones. In addition, the application of the internal mold has<br />

greatly <strong>improved</strong> the precision necessary to control the critical internal<br />

dimensions. This metnod was found to be superior to the traditional one<br />

using an external mold which hardly controlled the internal dimensions.<br />

6. The production cost of the <strong>improved</strong> models as described in (2) above<br />

presently is approximately 2.5 times more than the cost of the poorer quality<br />

commercial models. However, when compared with top quality charcoal bucket<br />

<strong>stove</strong>s sold in the market, the <strong>improved</strong> models' cost is 25 - 30% lower,<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, in long-term commercial production, the <strong>improved</strong> models will be<br />

competitive when production increases and more <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s reach the<br />

market.<br />

7. So far, nine <strong>improved</strong> <strong>stove</strong> promotion and training programs have been<br />

carried out among villagers at various places around the country. The<br />

reception <strong>for</strong> the charcoal bucket and the non-chimney wood <strong>stove</strong>s was very<br />

good, while the good reception of the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong> was limited<br />

to a few localities where only rice husk is available. The chimneyed wood<br />

and non-chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> are of less interest to rural <strong>use</strong>rs than the<br />

c&arcoal bucket and the non-ehimneyed wood and the rice husk chimneyed <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

It is believed that with good follbw-up and promotional ef<strong>for</strong>t, some of the<br />

<strong>improved</strong> developed models will witastand harsh <strong>use</strong> and serve <strong>use</strong>rs well in<br />

rural kitchens. However, these long-term results are yet to be seen.<br />

8. Beca<strong>use</strong> of time constraints, the project had a limited time to approach<br />

manufacturers on a large scile. However, among a few large manufacturers in<br />

the Central area, the response to the idea of mass production of the<br />

developed models was not enthusiastic. This lack of enthusiasm is perhaps<br />

a result of <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers being accustomed to the production of their<br />

rough products and being reluctant to manufacture <strong>stove</strong>s with which they have<br />

little or no experience. Moreover, they probably want to see the market <strong>for</strong><br />

high quality, efficient <strong>stove</strong>s develop first be<strong>for</strong>e committing their resources<br />

to their production. There<strong>for</strong>e, more time and more education are needed <strong>for</strong><br />

them to change their attitude and adapt their production techniques.<br />

238


Chapter 11<br />

Recommendations


RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

On the basis of the overall work of this project, some recommendations<br />

are presented below:<br />

1. Beca<strong>use</strong> <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion involve the social customs and<br />

habits of millions of people in Thailand and around the world, it is highly<br />

recommended that <strong>stove</strong> research and development be carried on to further<br />

improve present designs and find more alternatives <strong>for</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

2. Stove development should ,mphasize each generic type of <strong>stove</strong>; namely,<br />

charcoal, wood with and without chimney, and agriresidue <strong>stove</strong>s with and<br />

without chimney so that <strong>use</strong>rs have choices.<br />

3. Stove research and development must not only emFhasize the good<br />

conversion efficiency, but it must also facilitate ease of <strong>use</strong> and other<br />

<strong>cooking</strong> functions, without causing undue change in people's <strong>cooking</strong> habits.<br />

4. Stove promotion is a most difficult activity. It will take a groat<br />

deal of time and resources. There<strong>for</strong>e, continuous ef<strong>for</strong>t must be made <strong>for</strong><br />

at least five years with reasonable financial and human resource support in<br />

order to see a real impact among 6 million rural <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

5. In Thailand there are quite a few researchers and interest groups working<br />

on <strong>stove</strong> development and promotion. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, all lack guidelines and<br />

coordination. For national <strong>stove</strong> programs to be directed toward this common<br />

goal, leading government agencies are needed to provide close coordination.<br />

6. During the course of <strong>stove</strong> development, many contacts were made with<br />

experienced <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. It was found that, regardless of their<br />

long experience, their basic understanding of good <strong>stove</strong> configuration, design<br />

and its per<strong>for</strong>mance was very much lacking. This problem was also manifested<br />

in the presence of a large majority -I poor quality and less efficient<br />

commercial <strong>stove</strong>s in the market. 'nere<strong>for</strong>e, it is strongly recommended that<br />

concerned government agencies take an initiative toward arranging <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

training programs <strong>for</strong> the promotion of the essential, scientific knowledge<br />

required among <strong>stove</strong> manufacturers. Incentives or approaches such as offering<br />

a certificate and/or reward to manufacLurers of efficient <strong>stove</strong>s would be<br />

a highly motivating factor.<br />

7. The lack of understanding among <strong>use</strong>rs on the criteria <strong>for</strong> selection and<br />

<strong>use</strong> of efficient <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s was also evident. There<strong>for</strong>e, the concerned<br />

government agency should establish a long-range,adequately funded educational<br />

campaign program <strong>for</strong> efficient <strong>stove</strong>s--particularly through primary and<br />

secondary school systems.<br />

8. The cost of <strong>improved</strong> design <strong>stove</strong> production is still high. If simple<br />

hydraulic molding can be developed and employed at the village level,<br />

production costs can be greatly reduced. Under these conditions <strong>stove</strong><br />

dimensions wil be more precise and the production rate will be increased<br />

significantly.<br />

241<br />

7~


9. Selection of clay raw material and improvement of the clay mixture and<br />

firing to attain a product with fire resistant charicteristics (particularly,<br />

the charcoal <strong>stove</strong> body) are essential to a <strong>stove</strong>'s long service life. The<br />

weight of the <strong>stove</strong> also needs further reduction (to achieve peak per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

with even lower charcoal loads).<br />

10. The <strong>improved</strong> non-chimneyed.wood <strong>stove</strong> is quite efficient <strong>for</strong> the present<br />

developed model. IL can conveniently be <strong>use</strong>d to replace three-rock <strong>stove</strong>s.<br />

However, the same problems exist in its mass production techniques as exist<br />

<strong>for</strong> the charcoal <strong>stove</strong>.<br />

11. Smoke in the kitchen is a problem inherent in non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

including the three-stone and open fire. Research should be carried out in<br />

Thailand to determine whether smoke from undeveloped and even developed <strong>stove</strong>s<br />

(which noticeably gives less smoke over the undeveloped ones), has any<br />

significant effect on long-term health of <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

12. Up to the present time, the one hole chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong> has attained<br />

an efficiency up to only 18-19%. In addition, there are problems fitting<br />

pots and pans to this <strong>stove</strong>. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is recommended that development<br />

on this type of <strong>stove</strong> be continued in order to improve both heat utilization<br />

efficiency and comparability with various pots and panb. Moreover, the <strong>stove</strong><br />

material (as in the case of the non-chimneyed wood <strong>stove</strong>s and the charcoal<br />

<strong>stove</strong>) should also be investigated.<br />

13. Even though, at present, the chimneyed rice husk <strong>stove</strong> is still not<br />

popularly <strong>use</strong>d in Thailand, the chance <strong>for</strong> this <strong>stove</strong> to become popular in<br />

certain regions is high. This is beca<strong>use</strong> it can <strong>use</strong> granulated fuels other<br />

than rice husk (such as sawdust, peanut shell, seed waste, <strong>ho<strong>use</strong>hold</strong> <strong>biomass</strong><br />

scraps, etc). There are several further improvements that need consideration.<br />

These include the improvement of the <strong>stove</strong>'s configuration to fit various<br />

pots and pans and reduction of its weight so that sometimes it can be moved<br />

around the ho<strong>use</strong> (yard) when needed. For two people to carry the <strong>stove</strong>, the<br />

weight should not exceed 50 kg.<br />

14. The experience gained from the <strong>stove</strong> promotional campaigns among rural<br />

<strong>use</strong>rs, even in its short duration, strongly indicated that the-! is a good<br />

chance of success in replacing relatively inefficient <strong>stove</strong>s ax..ng 6 million<br />

rural Thai families with efficient <strong>stove</strong>s. It is, there<strong>for</strong>e, recommended that<br />

the government support a nationwide efficient <strong>stove</strong>-promotional campaign <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>use</strong>rs and manufacturers as soon as possible.<br />

15. Since better <strong>biomass</strong> <strong>cooking</strong> <strong>stove</strong>s, in part, mean better living<br />

<strong>for</strong> millions of rural families around the world, the idea of<br />

continuous development to attain even better per<strong>for</strong>mance than the present<br />

developed models should be the challenging subject among applied research<br />

scientists and cuncerned institutions.<br />

242


ANNEX I<br />

Commercial Charcoal Bucket Stove Investigated


A !<br />

wI 1/2<br />

245<br />

Stove No. 1/2 (Charcoal & wood)<br />

Name Heng Siem Lee<br />

Pot hole diameter 19, 23 cm<br />

Weight 12.2 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />

2<br />

Exhaust area 96 cm<br />

2<br />

Grate hole area 112 cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 21.7 min<br />

HU 24.96 %


m J Jt(AIl<br />

~~~~~7<br />

- ,': W. . .. .- ...... 1<br />

ZZ<br />

246<br />

S, yoe No. /3 (Non insulated)<br />

Name Ifeng Siem Lee<br />

[lot hole diameter 19,24<br />

We I It 8.7 kq<br />

xhaust gap ].8CHI<br />

Exhaust area " cr-"<br />

Grate hole area 112 CI112<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cjn<br />

Time to boil 22.3 min<br />

625.70<br />

CI


Stove No. 1/4<br />

Name Rungsit<br />

Pot hole diameter 19,23.5 cm<br />

Weight 12.8 kg<br />

,xhaust gap 1.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 76 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 112 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />

F'uel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm 3<br />

4 Time to boil 18.8 mil<br />

I7 28.19<br />

247


~-iII -mm<br />

MT<br />

5 11nT.I Stove No. 1/5 (Stainless bucket)<br />

- Name~i Rung Sit<br />

248<br />

Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />

Weiqhlt 9.3 kg<br />

ExIl.lst oap 1.0 cm<br />

( Ia',t.L<br />

.,41<br />

. I e ar ,s;l<br />

80<br />

2<br />

Cm<br />

("1112<br />

r;ate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1575 cni 3<br />

Time to boil 21.1 min<br />

H4 30.53 %


15 ,2 1/5 2<br />

Stove No. 1/5<br />

Name Rungsit<br />

Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />

Weight 9.3 kg<br />

V Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />

249<br />

Exhaust area 41 cm 2<br />

2<br />

Grate hole area 80 cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er sine 1575 cm 3<br />

Tine to l,n il 21.1 n i.n<br />

flU 30,53 %


1 /6<br />

.......... AL .<br />

6ir#rfv<br />

.7 Stove No. 1/6<br />

250<br />

Name Rungsit<br />

Pot hole diameter 20,0 cm<br />

Weight 8.6 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />

Exhaust area 41 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 69 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.36<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2065 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 18.0 min<br />

H 28.83 %


,". f u<br />

251<br />

5<br />

Stove No. 1/7<br />

Name Ayudthya<br />

Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust gap<br />

Exhaust area<br />

Grate hole area<br />

Grate: grate hole area<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Time to boil<br />

21 cm<br />

6.4 kg<br />

2 cm<br />

63 "m2<br />

66 cm 2<br />

1:0.23<br />

-4<br />

1931 cm 3<br />

28 min<br />

2 5 .6 1%


1/8<br />

,%, .,;,M-_ Stove No. 1/<br />

252<br />

Name unknown<br />

Pot hole diameter 18 cm<br />

Weight 8.1 kq<br />

Exhaust gip 1.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 70 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 48 c2n<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.2<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1832 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 27 min<br />

IlU .<br />

24.07


, - .- , ..<br />

Stove No. ]/9<br />

Name Chachernrsat<br />

lot hole dianeter 23 cm<br />

Weiqht 8.7 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 3 cm<br />

Exhiust area 66 cm 2<br />

Gr~ite hole qrea 94 cm 2<br />

Grt.e: grate hole area 1:0.28<br />

Ftel chai<strong>mb</strong>er size 3232 cm 3<br />

Tire to boil 23 mill<br />

'7 H28.42 %<br />

253


1/10jrf<br />

i,~<br />

-m •<br />

-W<br />

7 Stove No. 1/10<br />

254<br />

Name unknown<br />

Pot hole diameter 21 cm<br />

weight 4.2 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />

Exhaust area 80 cm 2<br />

2<br />

Grate hole area 54 cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.21<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 31.7 min<br />

HU 26.54 %


Stove No. 1/11<br />

Name unknown<br />

Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />

Weight 4.2 kg<br />

iExhaust gap 2 Cin<br />

255<br />

lIxi ,;astrea 80 111<br />

2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.21<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 22.3 min<br />

HtU 26.52 %


A<br />

Stove No. 1/12<br />

Name Booppararm<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 CM<br />

Weight 7.2 kg<br />

N Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />

256<br />

Exhaust area 8c cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 65 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.22<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2856 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 22.6 min<br />

flu HU29.02 %


--- 2 -r- :- .... ..... .<br />

1 kStove No. 1/13<br />

Name Samyakphicharg<br />

$ Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

257<br />

Weight 10.7 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.6 cm<br />

Exhaust area 74 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 76 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.28<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2390 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 23.9 min<br />

HU 26.12 %


258<br />

Stove No. 1/14<br />

Name Booppararm<br />

Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />

Weight 19 kg<br />

Echaust gap 2.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 113 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 65 cm2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3464 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 27.2 in<br />

HU23.53<br />

flu %


low<br />

Stove No. 1/15<br />

1 ! Name Banglion&<br />

259<br />

PoL hole diameter 20 cm<br />

Weiqht 10.0 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />

Exhiius area 108 cm 2<br />

(:riLe hole grea 65 cm 2<br />

o(Irite: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />

Iuf cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2865 Cm 3<br />

927.21<br />

'nto)boil 24.26 mi


260<br />

11M<br />

Stove NO. 1/16<br />

Name Ayudthya<br />

Pot hole diameter 21 cm<br />

Weight 6.6 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.0 cm<br />

Exhaust area 45 cm2<br />

Grate hole area 59 cm2<br />

Gr,-te: grate hole area 1:0.2<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>e ie 268cm3<br />

Time to boi.1 27.2 rain<br />

HIU 27.45 %


1/17<br />

261<br />

Stove No. 1/17<br />

Name Cholburi<br />

Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />

Weight 5.9 kg<br />

E*:xhaust gap<br />

Lxhtu'L area<br />

rate nole .area<br />

(;rate: grate<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

Time to boil<br />

Hu<br />

hole<br />

size<br />

1.2<br />

50<br />

54<br />

area 1:0.31<br />

2013<br />

20<br />

32.30<br />

cm<br />

Cm 2<br />

C1m<br />

2<br />

cm 3<br />

mir<br />

%


262<br />

W.1<br />

Stove No. 1/18<br />

Name Cholburi<br />

Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

l:xhausL t ap<br />

Exhaus t area<br />

Grate iole area<br />

Grate: grate hole area<br />

Fuel<br />

Time<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

to boil<br />

21 ci<br />

7.2<br />

2<br />

96<br />

68<br />

1:0.25<br />

size 3202<br />

23.6<br />

IHU 26.85<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

cm 2<br />

cm 2<br />

cm<br />

mill


4 ,4<br />

Stove No. 1/19<br />

Name Samrong<br />

Pot hole diameter 18 cm<br />

Weight 10.5 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 105<br />

2<br />

cm<br />

4, 1I (;rate hole area 94 CHI 2<br />

263<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.5<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3X42 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 23.8 min<br />

flU 23.94 %


4 0<br />

4.4 1,<br />

V fe<br />

14Stove No. 1/20<br />

264<br />

Name Cholburi<br />

Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust gap<br />

Exhaust area<br />

Grate hole area<br />

(;rate: grate hole<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Time to boil<br />

23<br />

10.2<br />

2<br />

102<br />

94<br />

area 1:0.30<br />

2516<br />

30.3<br />

cm<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

c mn<br />

C1 2<br />

cmn 3<br />

mill<br />

flflu 24.49 %


'265<br />

265<br />

Stove No. 1/21<br />

toe DaNo. 1/2<br />

Pot hole diameter 22.5 cm<br />

Weight 11.1 kg<br />

Ixhtus t caj 3 cm<br />

I.xhaust area 107 cm 2<br />

(Grcate hole grea 68 cm 2<br />

Grite: grate hole area 1:0.22<br />

uel clia<strong>mb</strong>er size 2414 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 32.7 min<br />

HU "<br />

24.13 %


266<br />

Stove No. 1/22<br />

Name Barnponge<br />

Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />

Weight 9.5 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 0.7 cm<br />

Exhaust area 38 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 85 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.29<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3155 cm,<br />

Time to boi.] 23.3 min<br />

flu 28.11 %


J/23i tr LJ UV<br />

Stove No. 1/23 (non insulated)<br />

Name Heng Siem Lee<br />

Pot hole diameter 16,20 cm<br />

W; Weight 7.2 kg<br />

267<br />

: ull,-I St: qap 1 On<br />

Ix'hwA t o4trea 41 cmI2<br />

GtL, ti hole area 80 (:l 2<br />

(;rate: grate hole area 1:0.45<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 1575 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 215 min<br />

IU 29.17 %


A Name Cholburi<br />

268<br />

Stove No. 1/24 (Charcoal & wood)<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

Weight 13.8 kg<br />

Exhaust (lilt) 2.2 cm<br />

1.xh.iust aroa 112 cm 2<br />

Grate hole a rea 77 1i1 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3815 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 22.7 min<br />

flU 25.9 %


269<br />

Stove No. 1/25 Charcoal & wood)<br />

. Name .le~ Sie-m Lpe modified<br />

Pot. hole diameter 19,23 cm<br />

We I 13.2 kg<br />

.Xhmat yap cm<br />

2<br />

Exhast area 96 cm<br />

(;rate hole area 112 cmI 2 a<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />

1-'uel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2426 cm<br />

,ime to boil 11.8 min<br />

lu 26.59


i %<br />

I'<br />

g<br />

b<br />

", -Grate:<br />

S'<br />

:: ­ i"Fuel<br />

Stove No. 1/26<br />

Name Darnkwian<br />

, Pot hole diameter<br />

270<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust1%";I<br />

gal<br />

Exhaust area<br />

Grate hole area<br />

grate hole area<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Grte<br />

oth grt ol o~ ra<br />

(non insulated)<br />

23<br />

66k<br />

1.5m<br />

90<br />

752m<br />

1:0.24<br />

270 0<br />

23 l24<br />

cm<br />

cm2 a<br />

cmm


L- A<br />

97ttv<br />

Stove No. 1/28<br />

YName Sa Sua<br />

A'M<br />

Pot hole diameter 23 cm<br />

Weight 12.2 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2.3 cm<br />

2<br />

Exhaust area 131 cm<br />

04at", +1Grate hole area 74 cm 2<br />

1 Q I,!IGrate:<br />

grate hole areal:0.24<br />

271<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4261 cm<br />

Time to hoti] 20.1 mi<br />

IU 25.10


272<br />

Stove No. 1/29<br />

Name Sa Sua, modified<br />

Pot hole diameter 19 cm.<br />

Weight 13.2 kg.<br />

Exhaust gap 2 cm.<br />

Exhaust area 85 cm. 2<br />

Grate hole area 74 cm. 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.33<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 3414 cm.<br />

Time to boil 20 min.<br />

HU 28.85


,:,1/30 So N<br />

Name Nakornchaisee<br />

Pot hole diameter 2(J,24 cm<br />

Weight 18 kq<br />

\Exhaust qap 1.5 cm<br />

... area 72 dir 2<br />

rs<br />

t;ra to he Ie area 111 cm 2<br />

(Grate: grate hole area 1:0.46<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2992 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 16.9 min<br />

.......... fu 24.25 %<br />

273


01.<br />

rr<br />

274<br />

Stove No. 1/31<br />

Name nakornchaisee<br />

Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust gap<br />

Exhaust area•<br />

(;rate hole area<br />

Grate: grate hole<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Time to boil<br />

SliU<br />

area<br />

17,20<br />

11.8<br />

o.5<br />

20<br />

94<br />

1:0.44<br />

9')50<br />

16.7<br />

32.3q<br />

cm<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

C1112<br />

c1,12<br />

Cmn3<br />

rmin


~I<br />

Stove No. 1/32<br />

Name NAkornchaisee<br />

Pot hole diameter 20,24 cm<br />

Weiqht 8.2 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2 cm<br />

2<br />

Exhaust area 102 cm<br />

Grate hole area 131 cm 2<br />

* (;rate: grate hole areal:O.46<br />

275<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2992 cm<br />

Time to boil 17.6 mill<br />

IfU 24.61 %


:%: 'S tove No. 1/33<br />

P, Name Nakornchaisee<br />

276<br />

[Pot hole diaueter 17,20 cm<br />

We iqht 6.7 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 0.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 20 Cm 2<br />

Grate hole grea 94 cmn!l<br />

irat.e: grate hole area 1:0.41<br />

'utelcha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2550 cm.<br />

2u6 to bol 18.3 ii<br />

jIG 30.51


wnI 1/34<br />

SlU<br />

277<br />

Stove No. 1/34<br />

Name Bang Sue<br />

Pot hole diameter 30 cm<br />

Weight<br />

10.4<br />

Exhaust gqap 1.8 cm<br />

Exhaust area 103<br />

2<br />

cm<br />

Grate hole area 68<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.27<br />

luel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

2829<br />

kg<br />

2 "<br />

cm<br />

3<br />

Cm<br />

'Tillie to ho i 21.2 inin<br />

26.07


I Stove No. 1/35<br />

'Name Bang Sue<br />

278<br />

U-<br />

Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />

Weight 8 kg<br />

Exhaust qap 1.7 cm<br />

2<br />

Exhaust area 82 cm<br />

Grate hole area 54 ctll.<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.27<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2176 cm3<br />

Time to boil 19.8 min<br />

IlU 27.22<br />

I1AJ


!Y'IfJ u I/36<br />

•.<br />

279<br />

.;Iw<br />

.~ ~..... .i ..... .<br />

Stove No. 1/36<br />

Name Bang Sue<br />

IPot hole diameter<br />

weiht<br />

Ilxhaust<br />

Exhaust<br />

gap<br />

area<br />

15<br />

6.5<br />

56<br />

1.5<br />

cm<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 44 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

area 1:0.31<br />

1568 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 20.8 min<br />

Il u 30.67 %


37mm<br />

I-<br />

-iQj<br />

il O<br />

.0 280<br />

"<br />

280<br />

Stove No. 1/37<br />

Name Booppararm<br />

Pot hole di ameter 15 cm<br />

Weiht<br />

Exhaust gal)<br />

Exhaust area<br />

Grate hole area<br />

Grate: grate hole area<br />

,uel<br />

Time<br />

1.U<br />

cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

to boil<br />

6.5<br />

0.7<br />

30<br />

25<br />

1:0.14<br />

1140<br />

26<br />

28.07<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

cm 2<br />

cm 2<br />

cm3<br />

rni1


.,<br />

281<br />

1/3 1i/31 1<br />

1 , ,<br />

Stoveinc'd1/38<br />

Name? unknown<br />

[loat hole<br />

weiqht<br />

Li:xhaust gap<br />

xhaust area<br />

(SaLe hole grA<br />

diameter 19,22<br />

grate hole<br />

1.*Iim-l cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

10<br />

1.9<br />

12,cm<br />

70<br />

area 1:0.35<br />

2000<br />

cm<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

2<br />

cm 2<br />

cm 1<br />

TL to boil 20 rain<br />

Ilu<br />

27.7


1/39<br />

.... ,Stove No. 1/39<br />

*cm<br />

-,,. Name Cholburi Dab.modified<br />

.4 ' Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

22.5<br />

8<br />

cm.<br />

kg.<br />

' Exhaust gap0. cm<br />

6 J "6. xhaust area 47 c~<br />

282<br />

Grate hole area 57 cm./<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0. 2 8<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 2800 cm. 3<br />

Time to boil 17 min.<br />

HU 33.35 %


ANNEX II<br />

Commercial and User Built Wood Stove<br />

Without Chimney Investigated


Stove No. 2/1<br />

Name Roi-et (Original)<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

Weight 5.9 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.3 cm<br />

Exhaust area 25.3 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area - cm 2<br />

Grate: -trate hole area -<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7600 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 12 min<br />

flu 17.59 %<br />

285


Stove No. 2/2<br />

Name Thick dome, clay<br />

7A<br />

Pot hole diameter 23 cm<br />

Weight 11.8 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2.1 cm<br />

Lx h,ust- area 18.2 (:m 2<br />

raL' hole arca - c= 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area -<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5800 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 14 min<br />

fHU 19.25 %<br />

286


n n " 21,.3 1 r;.: i ii .. . -...<br />

Stove No. 2/3<br />

Name Thick horse shoe, clay<br />

Pot hole diameter 25 cm<br />

Weight 13.2 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.9 cm<br />

Exhaust area 86.7 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area - cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area -<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6870 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 13.7 rain<br />

HU 19.08 %<br />

287


Stove No. 2/4<br />

Name Morn Pakred, modified<br />

Pot hole diameter 27 cm<br />

Weight 2.5 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 2.6 cm<br />

Exhaust area 90.7 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 160.9<br />

2<br />

cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7440<br />

3<br />

cm<br />

Time to boil 14 min<br />

fu 20.94 %<br />

288


Stove No. 2/5<br />

Name Morn Pakred,<br />

Pot hole diameter<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust gap<br />

.twti;L i ea<br />

(Cl. .. hole ,reii<br />

Grate: grate hole<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

Time to boil<br />

Ifu<br />

2/ ifIliIjln/<br />

289<br />

small<br />

area -<br />

18 cm<br />

12 kg<br />

5.0 CM<br />

210 (Ml2<br />

2<br />

CII1<br />

3600 cm 3<br />

17 min<br />

23.27 %


Stove No. 2/6<br />

Name Tripod<br />

Pot hole diameter - cm<br />

Weight 0.7 kg<br />

Exhaust gap - cm<br />

Exhaust area - cm 2<br />

Grate hole area - cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area -<br />

Fuel chamher size - cm 1<br />

T ime to h) i 1 16.2 rain<br />

flu 1.4.2<br />

290


Stove N''. 2/7<br />

Name Morn Pakied, largo<br />

PoL hole diameter cm<br />

Weiqht 3.3 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 5.4 cm<br />

Exhaust area 222.6 cm 2<br />

2<br />

Grate hole grea - cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area ­<br />

L.u1 chi<strong>mb</strong>er size 7440 cin 3<br />

T ime to boil 18.7 1 in<br />

iU 15.39<br />

291


Stove No. 2/8<br />

II-<br />

Name Modified Roi-et, clay<br />

Pot hole diaweter 22 cm<br />

Weight 6.6 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1 tm<br />

lxI,iu.L aera<br />

Crate holetare,<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />

2<br />

55.5 cm<br />

2<br />

99.6 Cni<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4560 Cm 3<br />

Time to boil 15 min<br />

ftU 20.92<br />

292


Stove No. 2/9<br />

Name Horse shoe,<br />

Pou hol.e diameter<br />

Weight<br />

Exhaust gap<br />

Exhaust area<br />

Grate hole area<br />

Grate: grate hole<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

clay<br />

25 cm<br />

8.1<br />

2.5<br />

197.1<br />

area -<br />

-<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

cm 2<br />

cm 2<br />

6380 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 15.5 min<br />

flU 19.48<br />

293


2/10 Mlletu"41<br />

1"i 0 i0 w<br />

Stove No. 10<br />

Name Thin horse shoe, clay<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

Weight 7.4 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 3.6 cm<br />

Exhaust area 77.6 CM 2<br />

Grate hole area ­ cm7<br />

Grate: grate hole area -<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4560 cm3<br />

Time to boil 15.3 min<br />

IfU 16.77 %<br />

294


Stove No. 2/13<br />

Name Dome, clay<br />

Pot hole diameter 24 cm<br />

Weight 15 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.3 cm<br />

Exhaust area 62.4 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 160.9 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5400 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 17 min<br />

flu<br />

295<br />

20.2


7j<br />

:.~~ ~~21 m It/6 :++ ,..<br />

Stove No. 2/16<br />

Name Pot shaped, clay<br />

Pot hole diawiioeer 22 cm<br />

Weicjht 10.3 kq<br />

Exhaust gap 1.8 cm<br />

2<br />

Exhaust area 86.4 cm<br />

Grate hole area - cm2<br />

Grate: grate hole area<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 7030 cm<br />

Time to boil 16.7 min<br />

flu 14.37 %<br />

296


12/222 l-j~lbS<br />

Stove No. 2/22<br />

211,<br />

Name Dome with cap, clay<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

Weight 11.3 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 1.5 cm<br />

Exhaust area 73.1 cm 2<br />

Grate hole grea 160.9 cm 2<br />

GraLe: grate hole area 1:0.34<br />

lue cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6840 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 14 min<br />

IIU 24.4 %<br />

297


Mi<br />

Stove No. 2/23<br />

Name Modified Roi-et, clay<br />

Pot hole diameter 22 cm<br />

Weight 14 kg<br />

E~xhaust q(q) 1.8 cm<br />

kxhIust ar a 86.6 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 160.9 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hcle area 1:0.34<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4950 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 14.5 mill<br />

IIU 23.2 %<br />

298


IA<br />

*:!2/24 irnitzrn<br />

Stove No. 2/24<br />

Name Cylinder, steel<br />

Pot hole diameter 17 cm<br />

Weight 3.7 kg<br />

Exhaust gap 0.6 cm<br />

Exhaust area<br />

32.2<br />

cm<br />

2<br />

Grate hole area 99.6 cm<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.23<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size<br />

2040<br />

2<br />

3<br />

cm<br />

Time to boil 13.5 min<br />

HU 25.93 %<br />

299


ANNEX III<br />

Commercial Wood Stove with Chimney Investigated


.L<br />

,Stove No. 2/11<br />

Name Saengpen, Narn<br />

Pot hole diameter 19 cm<br />

Weight 24.8 kg<br />

Exhaust gap - cm<br />

Exhaust area 72.3 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 72.3 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.19<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 5190 cm 3<br />

Time to boil 20 min<br />

HU 13.88 %<br />

S..303


304<br />

Stove No. 2/12<br />

Name Samrong, Samutprakarn<br />

Pot hole diameter 20 cm<br />

Weight 24.8 kg<br />

Exhaust gap - cm<br />

Exhaust area 23.6 cm 2<br />

Grate hole area 65.4 cm 2<br />

Grate: grate hole area 1:0.20<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 4400 u,3<br />

Time to boil 19.5 min<br />

flu 1UI].99 %


7."<br />

305<br />

•<br />

Stove No.<br />

2/15<br />

Name Ban Pong, Rajaburi<br />

Pot hole diameter 29.0<br />

69.5<br />

Weight 695<br />

Exhaust gap-<br />

Exhaust area<br />

(;rate hole grea<br />

23.8<br />

94.3<br />

cm<br />

kg<br />

cm<br />

cm 2<br />

cm 2<br />

GraLc: grate hole area 1:0.20<br />

l-'uelcha<strong>mb</strong>et size 5890 cm 3<br />

Tree to bo' 16.7 min<br />

IU 11.01


ANNEX IV<br />

Commercial Rice Husk Stove with Chimney Investigated


309<br />

VC,'<br />

Stove No. 3/2<br />

Name Ngo Gew Ha<br />

Pot hole diameter 32.0 cm.<br />

Weight 85.0 kg.<br />

2<br />

Flue gas outlet area 78.0 cm<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 19,000 cm<br />

Chimney height 240 cm<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cmHU 5.48%,TTB 20.0 mi


Stove No. 3/4A<br />

Name Thai charoen<br />

_VI Pot hole diameter 33.0 cm.<br />

Weight 96.7 kg.<br />

Flue gaIs outlet area 47 cm 2<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 16,400 cm 3<br />

Chimney height 240 cm.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,IIU 6.24%,TTB 23 min.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, $ 30 cm,HU 9.26%,TTB 24.3 min.<br />

310


Stove No. 3/4B<br />

Name Thai Charoen<br />

Pot hole diameter 30.0 cm.<br />

Weight 95.5 kg.<br />

2<br />

Flue gas outlet area 95 cm<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 12,600 cma<br />

Chimney height 240 cm.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 0 30 cm,HU 8.53%,TTB 28.3 min<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 0 24 cm,HU 7.23%,TTB 25 min.<br />

311


Stove No. 3/5<br />

Name Banglane<br />

Pot hole diameter 30.0 cm.<br />

Weight 95.5 kg.<br />

, , Flue gas outlet area 113.0 cm 2<br />

312<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 19,100 cm 3<br />

Chimney height 230 cm<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 30 cm,HU II.14%,TTB 20.3 min.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,HU 4.24%,TTB 28.5 min.


(o5 ~Flue %<br />

Stove No. 3/6<br />

Name Sayan<br />

Pot hole diameter 27 cm.<br />

Weight 65.0 kg.<br />

gas outlet area<br />

2<br />

28.0 cm<br />

3<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 6,200 cm<br />

Chimney height 240 cm.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 24 cm,HU 7.13%,TTB 27.0 min.<br />

313


314<br />

Stove No. GC2<br />

Name Sooksunt<br />

* ,<br />

Pot hole diameter 28 cm.<br />

Weight 62 kg.<br />

Flue gas outlet area 71.0 cm 2<br />

Fuel cha<strong>mb</strong>er size 10,600 cm 3<br />

Chimney height 160 cm.<br />

Pot <strong>use</strong>d, 6 24 cm,HU 9.23%,TTB 21.7 min.


ANNEX V<br />

List of Staff <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement Component


ANNEX 3<br />

List of Staff and Personnel <strong>for</strong> Stove Improvement Component<br />

1. Dr. Aroon Chomcharn<br />

2. Mr. Arkom Vejsupasuk<br />

3. Mr. Songdham Jaikwang<br />

4. Ms. Malee Rungsrisawadh<br />

5. Mr. Piroj Uttarapong<br />

6. Ms. Pojanee Jongjitirat<br />

7. Mr. Banyat Srisom<br />

8. Ms. Nongluck Thong-in<br />

9. Mr. Wattanapong Woottha<br />

10. Ms. Sudarat Ngamkajohnwiwat<br />

11. Mr. Pratya Kanapoosed<br />

12. Ms. Kevalee Musikapong<br />

13. Mrs. Kunthon Santudkarn<br />

14. Mrs. Lek Ninmanee<br />

15. Mrs. Hame Krisangsri<br />

317<br />

Component leader, RFD<br />

Assistant comp. leader, RFD<br />

Project officer, RFD<br />

Project officer, RFD<br />

Project consultant, Kasetsart Univ.<br />

Project consultant, King Mongkut's<br />

Institute of Technology<br />

Project consultant, Temp. employee<br />

Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />

Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />

Piojcct researcher, Temp. employee<br />

Project researcher, Temp. employee<br />

Project coordinator, Temp. employee<br />

Supporting service, RFD<br />

Stove fabricator, RFD<br />

Stove fabricator, RFD


REFERENCES<br />

'',<br />

"1"'":'J':" '. 'IIi . : . .j\


REFERENCES<br />

Bennett, C., Myers, J.E., Moment'm, Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw Hill<br />

International Book Co., Singapore, 2nd ed., 1974.<br />

Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomena, Wiley<br />

International Edition, New York, London, John Wiley and Sons, Tn-., 1960.<br />

Bronowski, J., The Ascent of Man, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1973.<br />

Bumroong, T., Economical Stove, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong> Education,<br />

Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology, Ministry of<br />

Education, Bangkok, pp. 61 - 65, 1981.<br />

Catlyn, A., Joseph, S., and Shanahan, Y., Testing of the Zip Stove,<br />

Intermediate Technology Development Group, Stoves Project, Technical Notes<br />

No. 3, 1983.<br />

Chomcharn, A. et. al., Energy from Wood (5): Test <strong>for</strong> Efficiency of Fuel<br />

and Bucket Stove, Forestry Meeting Annual Report, Forest Products Research<br />

Division, pp. -29 - 254, 1981.<br />

Cook<strong>stove</strong> Bulleting, Priyagni: A New Stove from CPRI, Tata Energy<br />

Documentation and In<strong>for</strong>mation Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, pp. 4 - 5, 1984.<br />

Cook<strong>stove</strong> Handbook, Pilot edition, Tata Energy Research Institute Documentation<br />

Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, 1982.<br />

Deeammart, L., Economical Stove, A Report on Stove Testing and Evaluation<br />

Using Agriresidue, Military Research and Development Center, Supreme Command<br />

Headquarter, pp. 61 - 63, 1981.<br />

Dunn, P. et al., Traditional Thai Cooker, Energy from Biomass: 2nd E.C.<br />

Conference, pp. 748 - 752, 1982.<br />

Forestry Statistics 1982, Forest Statistics Section, Planning Division,<br />

Royal Forest Department, p. 9.<br />

Foley, G. and Moss, P., Improved Cooking Stove in Developing Countries,<br />

Earthscan, Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Programme, Technical Report No. 2, ITED,<br />

London, 1983.<br />

Gupta, C.L., Usha, K., Energy Vol. 5, pp. 1213 - 1222, 1980.<br />

Hoel, P.G., Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Wiley International<br />

Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, London, Sydney, Toronto,<br />

4th ed., 1971.<br />

Joseph, S., Stove Testing, ITDG, 1979.<br />

321 ''


Joseph, S., Shanahan, Y., Trussell, J., and Bialy, J., Compendiwn of Tested<br />

Stove Designs, ITDG Stoves Programme <strong>for</strong> the UN Food and Agricultural<br />

Organization, 1980.<br />

Kaufman, M., From Lorena to a Mountain of F,"' , A case study oi Yayasan Dian<br />

Desa's fuel efficient <strong>stove</strong> program 1978 - 1983.<br />

De Lepelaire, G., Prasad, K.K., and Verhart, P., A Wood Stove Compendiiun,<br />

Prepared <strong>for</strong> the Terhnical Panel of Fuelwood and Charcoal, UNERG, Nairobi,<br />

1981.<br />

Madon, G., L. DIOP and E. Lagandre, Leo Consommatione de Co<strong>mb</strong>ustibles<br />

Domestiques au Senegal Sur Foyers Traditionnels et sour Foyers Areliorees,<br />

CERER, University of Dakpr and USAID, Undated.<br />

Meechai: Economical Stove, Papers from Family Planning and Public Development<br />

Association, 8 Sukhumvit Rd., BKK 11, undated.<br />

Noi, P., EconomicaZ Stove and Charcoal Fuel, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong><br />

Education, Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology,<br />

linistry of Education, Bangkok, pp. 115 - 129, 1981.<br />

Omar, K.J., Chula-Need <strong>for</strong> Improvement, Dept., of Chemical Engineering,<br />

BUET, Dacca, Bangladesh, Undated.<br />

Openshaw, K., A Comparison of Metal and Clay Charcoal Cooking Stoves,<br />

Division of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Veterinary,<br />

Science, University of Dar es Salaam, Morongoro, undated.<br />

Osuwasn S. and Booyakiat, K., Study of Varic-bles Affecting Charcoal Stove<br />

Efficiency, Journal of Chemical Engineering Food and Fuel Technology,<br />

pp. 5 - 95, Bangkok, 1982.<br />

Perry, R.H., Chilton, C.H., Chemical Engineers' Handbook, McGraw Hill C-.,<br />

5th ed., 1973.<br />

Ponnoum, S., Wongopalert, A., Arnold, J., Jr., Stove Experiments and Cooking<br />

Observations, Meat Systems Inc., Thai Group, February, 1982.<br />

Prasad, K.K. , ;orwel Per<strong>for</strong> iaen [oots on Open Firec and the Family Cooker,<br />

Woodburning Stove Group, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical<br />

Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven and TNO, Apeldoorn,<br />

Netherlands, 1980.<br />

Prasad, K.K., A §tud U on the Perfo2vwaicc of 'iso14etalovcs , Woodburning<br />

Stove Group, Technical University of Eindhoven and TNO, Apeldoorn,<br />

Netherlands, 1981.<br />

Prasad, K.K., S'ome Studleo on Open Fires, Shielded (0i HadeaO':" Stoves,<br />

the Woodburning Stove Group, Eindhoven University of Technology and TNO,<br />

Apedoorn, Netherlands, 1981.<br />

322


Sherman, M. and Srisom, B. et al., Thailand National Renewable Energy Project,<br />

Interim Report of 1982, Activity Stove Improvement Component, 1983.<br />

Singer, H., Report to the Government of Indonesia on Improvement of Fuelwood<br />

Cooking Stoves and Economy in Fueloood Constaption, Report No. 1315, FAO,<br />

Rome, 1961.<br />

Sooksant, S., Economical Stove <strong>for</strong> Rural Village, Appropriate Technology <strong>for</strong><br />

Education, Institute of Educational Promotion <strong>for</strong> Science and Technology,<br />

Ministry of Education, Bangkok, pp. 71 - 89, 1981.<br />

Suwat, T. and Paitoon, M., Cooking Stove Using Agriresidues as Fuel,<br />

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Songkhla University, undated.<br />

Tata Energy Research Institute, Documentation Center, Bo<strong>mb</strong>ay, 1979.<br />

Thomas, L.C., Fundcientalsof Heat Transfer, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood<br />

Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, 1980.<br />

Vita News, Report from Upper Vol-,,, New Direction in Wood Stoves,<br />

pp. 8 - 9, 1984.<br />

Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.H., P2,obability and Statistics <strong>for</strong> Engineers and<br />

Scientists, McMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, Collier McMillan<br />

Publishers, London, 1972.<br />

323

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!