Exit State Route (SR) 316 Planning Study, Survey #2 The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) thanks you for taking the time to provide feedback on the State Route (SR) 316 Planning Study. Since mid-2022, the study team has been examining a 40-mile section of SR 316 from Interstate 85 (I-85) in Gwinnett County to SR 10 in Oconee County. The goal: to analyze and identify potential improvements to SR 316’s known concerns, which include high crash rates and congestion. As the study’s analysis concludes, the study team is putting forward several initial findings that best benefit safety and mobility along the corridor. This survey aims to gather your feedback on these initial findings to incorporate, to the greatest extent possible, into the study’s final recommendations to be prepared later this year. Please note that the study’s recommendations for improvements are in addition to the ongoing SR 316 reconstruction projects. Question Title * 1. What best describes your relationship with this section of SR 316, as shown on the map above? Resident in the area (Gwinnett, Barrow, or Oconee County) Business owner in the area (Gwinnett, Barrow, or Oconee County) Commuter (for work, school, recreation, etc.) Commercial vehicle operator Elected official Recreational driver Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. How often do you drive or travel along SR 316 anywhere between I-85 in Gwinnett County and SR 10 in Oconee County? Seven days a week Four to six days a week One to three days a week At least once a month Other (please explain) There are currently 12 crossings on SR 316 where an at-grade movement occurs that are not being addressed under the current SR 316 Reconstruction Projects. The SR 316 Planning Study has identified potential improvements for these 12 locations. The following intersection improvements have been considered at these locations. Please consider these improvements in answering the following questions. Question Title * 3. Based on its initial analysis results, the study team is proposing construction of interchanges at the locations identified on the map above and listed below: Williams Farm Drive Athens Perimeter Do you agree with this finding? Yes No Question Title * 4. What are your concerns, if any, with interchanges proposed at these locations? Question Title * 5. Based on its initial analysis results, the study team is proposing construction of grade separations at the locations identified on the map above and listed below: Drowning Creek Road Harry McCarty Road Do you agree with this finding? Yes No Question Title * 6. What are your concerns, if any, with grade separations proposed at these locations? Question Title * 7. Based on its initial analysis results, the study team is proposing construction of right-in, right-out at the locations identified on the map above and listed below: Harrison Mill Road Smith Cemetery Road Jackson Trail Road Wall Road McNutt Creek Road Do you agree with this finding? Yes No Question Title * 8. What are your concerns, if any, with right-in, right-out proposed at these locations? Question Title * 9. Based on its initial analysis results, the study team is proposing construction of traffic reroutes at the locations identified on the map above and listed below: Oak Valley Road Mars Hill Road Julian Drive Do you agree with this finding? Yes No Question Title * 10. What are your concerns, if any, with traffic reroutes proposed at this location? Question Title * 11. In addition to addressing the 12-remaining crossings with at-grade movements on SR 316, the study team has identified additional potential projects along the study corridor that would improve traffic safety and operations. The potential projects are at the following locations: A1 – Sugarloaf Parkway A2 – Harbins Road A3 – New interchange near Gwinnett County and Barrow County border to accommodate potential new development (Rowen) A4 – Carl-Bethlehem Road A5 – SR 81 A6 – SR 11 A7 – SR 53 A8 – SR 10/Monroe Highway A9 – Oconee Connector What are your concerns, if any, with these recommended improvements? Question Title * 12. What is the ZIP code of your home address? 30011 30017 30019 30042 30043 30045 30046 30047 30049 30052 30606 30620 30622 30656 30666 30680 Other (please specify) Question Title * 13. Which race/ethnicity best describes you? (Please choose only one.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian / Pacific Islander Black or African American Hispanic White / Caucasian Prefer not to answer Question Title * 14. What is your age? Under 18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 or older Prefer not to answer Question Title * 15. How did you hear about this survey? Briefing by the study team Study website Social media (e.g., Facebook, X) Email sent/forwarded to me Printed advertisement News media (e.g., newspaper, television) Prefer not to answer Other (please specify) GDOT thanks you for your participation in this survey for the SR 316 Planning Study. To learn more about the study and for updates, please visit https://transformingsr316-gdot.hub.arcgis.com/pages/sr316planningstudy Done