A comparison of hospital administrative costs in eight nations: US costs exceed all others by far

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1586-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1327.

Abstract

A few studies have noted the outsize administrative costs of US hospitals, but no research has compared these costs across multiple nations with various types of health care systems. We assembled a team of international health policy experts to conduct just such a challenging analysis of hospital administrative costs across eight nations: Canada, England, Scotland, Wales, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States. We found that administrative costs accounted for 25.3 percent of total US hospital expenditures--a percentage that is increasing. Next highest were the Netherlands (19.8 percent) and England (15.5 percent), both of which are transitioning to market-oriented payment systems. Scotland and Canada, whose single-payer systems pay hospitals global operating budgets, with separate grants for capital, had the lowest administrative costs. Costs were intermediate in France and Germany (which bill per patient but pay separately for capital projects) and in Wales. Reducing US per capita spending for hospital administration to Scottish or Canadian levels would have saved more than $150 billion in 2011. This study suggests that the reduction of US administrative costs would best be accomplished through the use of a simpler and less market-oriented payment scheme.

Keywords: Cost of Health Care; Developed World < International/global health studies; Financing Health Care; Health Economics; Hospitals.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • England
  • France
  • Germany
  • Hospital Administration / economics*
  • Humans
  • Netherlands
  • Organizational Policy
  • Scotland
  • United States
  • Wales