An international systematic mapping review of fieldwork education in occupational therapy

Can J Occup Ther. 2015 Apr;82(2):106-18. doi: 10.1177/0008417414552187.

Abstract

Background: Owing to its importance in preparing occupational therapists, fieldwork education has generated numerous studies. These have not been collected and reviewed, leaving researchers without a map for growing a science of fieldwork education.

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically categorize the topics, research designs, methods, levels of impact, and themes that have and have not been addressed in fieldwork education scholarship.

Method: Guided by a systematic mapping review design, 124 articles, identified through database searches and inclusion coding, were studied. Data were collected using a data extraction instrument and analyzed using Microsoft Access queries.

Findings: Papers primarily addressed curriculum (n = 51) and students (n = 32). Conceptual/descriptive inquiry methods (n = 57) were predominant. Qualitative (n = 48) and quantitative methods (n = 49) were used equally. Research outcomes mainly targeted perceived participation in fieldwork. Recurring themes included student perceptions, external influences, and transition to practice.

Implications: Three recommendations were identified: strengthen procedures for studying singular fieldwork experiences, broaden rationales for studying fieldwork, and translate educational concepts for occupational therapy.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Curriculum
  • Education, Professional / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Models, Educational*
  • Occupational Therapy / education*
  • Preceptorship / organization & administration*
  • Research Design