Abstract
The vital role of structured mentoring programs in a faculty member’s life is unquestionable; different approaches to designing such programs have been proposed in the health sciences education literature. Traditionally, these approaches have portrayed a dyad model, in which pairs of mentors and mentees are assigned to work together. However, in the last decade, the academic field has been advocating for multiple mentoring models, in which mentoring networks are pursued and composed of a set of multiple mentors who can assist an academic both personally and professionally throughout their careers and in a variety of career competencies. Still, there is a dearth of literature in health sciences education on how to go about identifying the right program model and designing it. In this chapter, we review the main characteristics of these two distinct approaches to developing mentoring programs, the dyad model and the multiple mentoring model, while proposing using a published checklist to guide the program design and implementation. We will illustrate these concepts with a case study based on our own experiences as directors of mentoring programs for health sciences educators. We hope that this chapter will help inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of faculty mentoring programs in health sciences education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blanco, M. A., & Qualters, D. M. (2020). Mutual mentoring: Effect on faculty career achievements and experiences. Medical Teacher, 42(7), 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1736535
de Janasz, S. C., & Sullivan, S. E. (2004). Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professional network. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 263–283.
Disch, J. D. (2018). Rethinking mentoring. Critical Care Medicine, 46(3), 437–441.
Geraci, S. A., & Thigpen, S. C. (2017). A review of mentoring in academic medicine. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 353(2), 151–157.
Kashiwagi, D. T., Varkey, P., & Cook, D. A. (2013). Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 88(7), 1029–1037.
Law, A. V., Bottenberg, M. M., Brozick, A. H., Currie, J. D., DiVall, M. V., Haines, S. T., Jolowsky, C., Koh-Knox, C. P., Leonard, G. A., Phelps, S. J., & Rao, D. (2014). A checklist for the development of faculty mentorship programs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 98.
Mathews, P. (2003). Academic monitoring: Enhancing the use of scarce resources. Educational Management and Administration, 31(3), 313–334.
McRae, M., & Zimmerman, K. M. (2019). Identifying components of success within health sciences-focused mentoring programs through a review of the literature. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(1), 6976.
Pololi, L., & Evans, A. T. (2015). Group peer mentoring: An answer to the faculty mentoring problem? A successful program at a large academic Department of Medicine. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 35(3), 192–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blanco, M., Huggett, K. (2021). Approaches to Designing Faculty Mentoring Programs in Medical Education. In: Fornari, A., Shah, D.T. (eds) Mentoring In Health Professions Education. IAMSE Manuals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86935-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86935-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86934-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86935-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)