Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legal Decisions of Preadolescent and Adolescent Defendants: Predictors of Confessions, Pleas, Communication with Attorneys, and Appeals

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

While there is an increasing recognition that developmental differences may exist in legal decision-making, little research has examined this. This study examined the legal judgments of 152 defendants aged 11–17 (73 females, 79 males). Adolescents aged 15 and younger were more likely than older adolescents to confess and waive their right to counsel, and less likely to report that they would appeal their case or discuss disagreements with their attorneys. Also, while adolescents aged 15–17 were more likely to confess, plead guilty, and accept a plea bargain if they perceived that there was strong evidence against them, younger defendants’ legal decisions were not predicted by the strength of evidence. Importantly, defendants with poor legal abilities were more likely to waive legal protections, such as the right to counsel and to appeal. Defendants from below-average socioeconomic backgrounds were more likely to waive their interrogation rights, and defendants from ethnic minority groups were less likely to report that they would disclose information to their attorneys. The advice of attorneys, parents, and peers emerged as important predictors of plea decisions. None of the defendants reported that their parents advised them to assert the right to silence during police interrogation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitch, R., Higgins-Biss, K. L., & Biss, S. R. (1993). Young persons’ comprehension of waivers in criminal proceedings. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitch, R., Peterson-Badali, M., & Rohan, M. (1995). Young people’s understanding and assertion of their rights to silence and legal counsel. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association Juvenile Justice Center. (1995). A call for justice: An assessment of access to counsel and quality of representation in delinquency proceedings. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (2001). MacArthur competency assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W. S., & Soderling, S. F. (1981). Born to lose—waiver of fifth and sixth amendment rights by juvenile suspects. Clearinghouse Review, 15, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala, N. (1992). The Young Offenders Act: The legal structure. In R. R. Corrado, N. Bala, R. Linden, & M. LeBlanc (Eds.), Juvenile justice in Canada: A theoretical and analytical assessment. Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkely, R. A. (1998). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook of diagnosis and treatment (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Attorney-client trust among convicted criminal defendants: Preliminary examination of the Attorney-Client Trust Scale. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 69–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, K. (1978). Children in the court: A selected empirical review. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 1, 329–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (2003). Test review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In B. S. Plake, J. C. Impara, & R. A. Spies (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. C. (2000). Juveniles’ waiver of legal rights: Confessions, Miranda, and the right to counsel. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 105–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. B., & Douglas, A. C. (1970). A study of juvenile waiver. San Diego Law Review, 7, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (1995). Assessing competency to waive Miranda rights in defendants with mental retardation. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L. O., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. L. (2003). Juvenile offender’s Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Assessment, 10, 359–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. W., Biederman, H., Faraone, S. V., Ouellette, C. A., Penn, C., & Griffin, S. M. (1996). Toward a new psychometric definition of social disability in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 571– 578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles’ capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1997). The competence of adolescents as trial defendants. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1998). Instruments for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Pomicter, C. (1977). Interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of procedures, safeguards, and rights waiver. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Ring, M. (1979). Parents’ attitudes toward juveniles’ rights in interrogation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 333–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Bownes, I. (1992). The relationship between attribution of blame for criminal offences and the reasons why suspects confess during custodial interrogation. Journal of Forensic Science Society, 32, 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Petursson, H. (1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude, and personality? Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision-making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Department of Sociology, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. W., Rintelmann, J., Emslie, G. J., Lopez, M., & MacCabe, N. (2001). A revised anchored version of the BPRS-C for childhood psychiatric disorders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 11, 77–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221– 233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, T., & Bersoff, D. N. (1996). How many procedure safeguards does it take to get a psychiatrist to leave the lightbulb unchanged? A due process analysis of the MacArthur Treatment Competency Study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaczynski, P. A. (2001a). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision-making. Child Development, 72, 844–861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaczynski, P. A. (2001b). Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decisionmaking: implications for the normative-descriptive gap. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knitzer, J., & Sobie, M. (1984). Law guardians in New York state: A study of the legal representation of children. Albany: New York State Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachar, D., Randle, S. L., Harper, R. A., Scott-Gurnell, K. C., Lewis, K. R., Santos, C. W., et al. (2001). The brief psychiatric rating scale for children (BPRS-C): Validity and reliability of an anchored version. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 333– 340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, M., & Eysenck, S. (1990). Prediction of coherence in adolescence: Gender differences in social skills, personality, and family climate. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 510–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthys, W., Cuperus, J. M., & Van Engeland, H. (1999). Deficient social problem-solving in boys with ODD/CD, with ADHD, and with both disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 311–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, N. J. (1986). Plea bargaining by defendants: A decision theory approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

  • Melton, G. B. (1980). Children’s concepts of their rights. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 186– 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, S. G., & Halpern-Felscher, B. L. (2002). Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 10–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. O., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Gender differences in the social problem-solving performance of adolescents. Sex Roles, 16, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. (1996). How appropriate are appropriate adults? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7, 570–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Rutter, S. (1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Trust and understanding in the attorney-juvenile relationship. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 89–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson-Badali, M., & Abramovitch, R. (1992). Children’s knowledge of the legal system: Are they competent to instruct legal counsel? Canadian Journal of Criminology, 34, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson-Badali, M., & Abramovitch, R. (1993). Grade related changes in young people’s reasoning about plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson-Badali, M., Abramovitch, R., & Duda, J. (1997). Young children’s legal knowledge and reasoning ability. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson-Badali, M., Abramovitch, R., Koegel, C. J., & Ruck, M. D. (1999). Young people’s experience of the Canadian youth justice system: Interacting with police and legal counsel. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 455–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G., Pearson, R., & Gibb, R. (1996). Police interviewing and the use of appropriate adults. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7, 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., Eaves, D., & Webster, C. D. (1998). Fitness interview test (rev. ed.). Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

  • Ruback, R. B., & Vardaman, P. J. (1997). Decision making in delinquency cases: The role of race and juveniles’ admission/denial of the crime. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 47–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, J. (2003). Test review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In B. S. Plake, J. C. Impara, & R. A. Spies (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, L. E. (1981). Ignorance of the law among teenagers: Is it a barrier to the exertion of their rights as citizens? Adolescence, 16, 711–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. S., & Grisso, T. (1997). The evolution of adolescence: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice reform. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 137–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. W., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (1995). Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, R. L., Beardslee, W., Schultz, L., Krupa, M., & Podorefsky, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. Developmental Psychology, 22, 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1994). Alcohol and drug intoxication during police interrogation and the reasons why suspects confess to the police. Addiction, 89, 985–997.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). The psychological characteristics of ‘false confessors.’ A study among Icelandic inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakaki, C., Williams, E. C., Walker, S., Roberts, N., & Kotsopoulos, S. (1991). Pilot study of anxiety and depression in prepubertal children. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 332–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, G. M., & Moston, S. J. (1993). Attitudes and assumptions of police officers when questioning criminal suspects. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 18, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133–1143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J. L., Vincent, G. M., & Roesch, R. (in press). Assessing child and adolescent defendants’ adjudicative competency: Interrater reliability and factor structure of the Fitness Interview Test. Criminal Justice and Behavior.

  • Walker, S. (1971). The lawyer-child relationship: A statistical analysis. Duquesne Law Review, 9, 627–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G. A., McReynolds, L. S., Lucas, C. P., Fisher, P., & Santos, L. (2002). The voice DISC-IV with incarcerated male youths: Prevalence of disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 314–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). The Woodcock-Johnson III cognitive assessment battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundersitz, J., Naffine, N., & Gale, F. (1991). Production of guilt in the juvenile justice system: The pressures to “plead.” Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. (2002), c. 1.

  • Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2001). A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 81–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, P. A., Roesch, R., & Viljoen, J. L. (2001). The utility of the Fitness Interview Test for assessing fitness to stand trial. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 426–432.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

    Jodi L. Viljoen

  2. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Jessica Klaver & Ronald Roesch

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, P.O. Box 880308, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0308

    Jodi L. Viljoen

Authors
  1. Jodi L. Viljoen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Klaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronald Roesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jodi L. Viljoen.

About this article

Cite this article

Viljoen, J.L., Klaver, J. & Roesch, R. Legal Decisions of Preadolescent and Adolescent Defendants: Predictors of Confessions, Pleas, Communication with Attorneys, and Appeals. Law Hum Behav 29, 253–277 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation