<img alt="" src="https://secure.item0self.com/191308.png" style="display:none;">

Ransomware and sanctions: using Holistic Screening to ensure compliance

On March 14th, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) released a landmark report – “Countering Ransomware Financing” – that aims to equip the private and public sectors with insights to prevent financial crime related to ransomware attacks. On the back of that report, last week we described how blockchain analytics can assist in identifying and disrupting “chain-hopping” money laundering techniques that ransomware attackers use to try and hide the profits from their crimes.

This week, we take a look at another aspect of financial crime risk related to ransomware: the growing sanctions implications involving ransomware attackers and their support networks. 

It is critical that compliance teams at cryptoasset exchanges and financial institutions implement robust screening solutions and practices to ensure they can detect sanctions risks related to ransomware.  

Ransomware: the sanctions nexus

The link between ransomware and financial and economic sanctions first became apparent in May 2017 with the launch of the WannaCry ransomware attack, which infected hundreds of thousands of computers around the world, and inflicted billions of dollars worth of damages to impacted businesses and organizations. 

That breach was soon attributed to the Lazarus Group – a North Korean cybercrime gang – which has been using cybercrime as a way to generate funds for North Korea’s cash-starved regime. The US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) later sanctioned the Lazarus Group, prohibiting US persons from making or facilitating payments to the group. 

In November 2018, OFAC undertook a milestone action when it sanctioned two Iranian nationals the US accused of laundering Bitcoin on behalf of ransomware perpetrators. As part of that action, OFAC listed on its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) two Bitcoin addresses belonging to the Iranian money launderers. It was the first time OFAC had ever included crypto addresses on the SDN List, and sent a clear message that the US would seek to disrupt crypto activity that facilitated crimes such as ransomware.   

In October 2020, OFAC issued guidance entitled “Potential Sanctions Risks for Facilitating Ransomware Payments”, which it later updated in September 2021. The guidance aimed to clarify for the private sector and individuals the potential sanctions implications they could face when making or facilitating ransomware payments.  

The guidance clarified that it is forbidden for US persons to make or facilitate ransomware payments to sanctioned entities or individuals, or to ransomware campaigns undertaken by individuals in sanctioned jurisdictions. OFAC also warned that ransomware payments can result in a sanctions violation if those payments ultimately benefit a sanctioned person or jurisdiction, even if that connection is not apparent at the time the payment was made. 

As the scale of ransomware attacks grew across 2021 and into 2022, so too did OFAC’s response. Between September 2021 and April 2022, the agency sanctioned three cryptoasset exchanges registered in Eastern Europe – SUEX, Chatex, and Garantex – that it accused of laundering crypto on behalf of ransomware gangs. In April 2022, OFAC also sanctioned the Hydra darknet marketplace, which had played a critical role in facilitating activity on behalf of ransomware gangs and their affiliates before it was taken down by German law enforcement. 

In February 2023, OFAC undertook a coordinated, joint action alongside the UK’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) to target ransomware perpetrators. OFAC and the OFSI both sanctioned seven Russian nationals allegedly associated with the Trickbot malware, and who are also associated with the Conti and Ryuk ransomware campaigns. While neither OFAC nor OFSI included crypto addresses belonging to the individuals on their sanctions lists, at Elliptic we identified 53 addresses belonging to six of the seven sanctioned cybercriminals.  

Key red flags and risk indicators

As sanctions authorities like OFAC and the OFSI increasingly target ransomware gangs and their support networks, it is critical that compliance teams can identify related transactional typologies and red flags. Some key red flags include: 

  • direct transactions with the crypto wallets of sanctioned cybercriminals;

  • transactions sent through intermediary unhosted wallets that have significant exposure to sanctioned cybercriminals’ wallets; 

  • the use of “peeling chain” techniques to transfer funds through numerous intermediary wallets with the aim of breaking the connection back to the original source of funds;

  • transactions involving cryptoasset exchanges that have been sanctioned by OFAC for supporting ransomware gangs;

  • transactions involving cryptoasset exchanges in high-risk jurisdictions associated with ransomware, such as Russia and Iran;

  • transactions involving cryptoasset exchanges with weak or no AML/CFT controls;

  • the frequent use of anonymizing services – such as mixers and privacy wallets – known to facilitate transfers with ransomware attackers, such as the ChipMixer service recently dismantled by law enforcement;

  • transfers made through coinswapping services that allow users to swap Bitcoin for privacy-enhanced cryptoassets such as Monero; and
     
  • transfers made through one or several cross-chain or cross-asset services, which can be indicative of “chain-hopping” typologies of money laundering.  

Sanctions compliance with Holistic Screening

Detecting ransomware activity with a sanctions nexus requires having access to blockchain analytics solutions that can identify these and other indicators of risk. In particular, it is essential that compliance teams can identify instances where funds are swapped across assets and blockchains with the involvement of sanctioned actors. 

Elliptic’s unique Holistic Screening capabilities can enable the detection of these risks, ensuring that compliance teams can identify exposure to sanctioned entities among their customers’ transactions. Ransomware attackers may use services such as decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which allow them to swap assets seamlessly, and cross-chain bridges, which allow for the movement of funds across different blockchains, in order to obscure a sanctions nexus to their activity. 

To understand the importance of Holistic Screening in detecting sanctions risks related to ransomware, consider the following scenario: 

A cryptoasset exchange’s customer has withdrawn Bitcoin to a private wallet. When screening the private Bitcoin wallet using blockchain analytics that only enable a single-asset view of sanctions risks, the exchange determines that there are no risks associated with the transaction. This is illustrated in the image below. 

 

ransomware1

 

However, when using Elliptic’s unique Holistic Screening capabilities, we can go deeper.  

In this case, it turns out that the funds did not stop at the Bitcoin wallet, but rather, were transferred onwards and swapped for Ether at a cross-chain bridge service. Following the conversion to Ether, the funds were swapped again for the stablecoins Dai and Tether at a DEX. From there, the funds were sent to the OFAC-sanctioned cryptoasset exchange Garantex. This sequence of transfers is illustrated in the image below.

 

ransomware2

 

This is an increasingly common typology of money laundering deployed by ransomware attackers, which we highlighted in further detail in our briefing note on the Conti gang. With Elliptic’s Holistic Screening solutions, compliance teams can obtain insights into these activities seamlessly through a single screening, enabling them to respond to transactions efficiently and at scale, for example by closing or blocking accounts associated with sanctions-related activity.

 

ransomware3

This image from Elliptic Navigator shows the flow of funds from a ransomware attacker’s Ethereum address (the black circle on the left) and the subsequent trail after the funds were converted for DAI and Tether, before being deposited at Garantex, an OFAC-sanctioned exchange (represented by the green circle on the right).

 

Achieving scalable, efficient sanctions compliance

Identifying ransomware-related activity is an essential part of ensuring comprehensive compliance with sanctions requirements. 

Contact us to learn more about how Elliptic’s blockchain analytics solutions can enable you to meet your sanctions compliance obligations. 

Found this interesting? Share to your network.

Disclaimer

This blog is provided for general informational purposes only. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. No relationship is created with you, nor any duty of care assumed to you, when you use this blog. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining any legal, financial or any other form of professional advice from a suitably qualified and licensed advisor. The information on this blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.

Get the latest insights in your inbox