Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in Gatekeeper Beliefs Following ASIST and Relation to Subsequent Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Behaviors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines relations between suicide prevention gatekeeper beliefs and actual helping behaviors following participation in Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST). Participants (n = 434) completed measures examining suicide-related beliefs and behaviors using a naturalistic pre-post design. All beliefs demonstrated significant change from pre- to posttest. Regression analyses indicate that beliefs about perceived barriers to action and the controllability of suicide predicted identification of high-risk youth; perceived barriers to action were also negatively related to helping responses and referrals 6–9 months post training. Self-efficacy was not related to suicide prevention behaviors at follow-up. The importance of anchoring training curriculums and measurement to health behavior change theories is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control (pp. 11–39). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M. E., Miller, M., Barber, C., Miller, I., Sullivan, A. F., Camargo, C. A., Jr., Boudreaux, E. D., ED-SAFE Investigators. (2013). Lethal means restriction for suicide prevention: Beliefs and behaviors of emergency department providers. Depression and Anxiety, 30, 1013–1020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Botega, N. J., Silva, S. V., Reginato, D. G., Rapeli, C. B., Cais, C. F., Mauro, M. L., Stefanello, S., & Cecconi, J. P. (2007). Maintained attitudinal changes in nursing personnel after a brief training on suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37(2), 145–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 2020 Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online]. Retrieved March 20, 2022, from www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars

  • Chagnon, F., Houle, J., Marcoux, I., & Renaud, J. (2007). Control group study of an intervention training program for youth suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37(2), 135–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Condron, D. S., Garraza, L. G., Walrath, C. M., McKeon, R., Goldston, D. B., & Heilbron, N. S. (2014). Identifying and referring youths at risk for suicide following participation in school-based gatekeeper training. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 45(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. E., & Price, S. (2013). Exploring organisational influences on the implementation of gatekeeper training: A qualitative study of the applied suicide intervention skills training (ASIST) programme in Wales. Critical Public Health, 23(2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewell Foster, C. J., Burnside, A. N., Smith, P. K., Kramer, A. C., Wills, A., & King, C. A. (2016). Identification, response, and referral of suicidal youth following applied suicide intervention skills training. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(3), 297–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy Garraza, L., Kuiper, N., Goldston, D., McKeon, R., & Walrath, C. (2019). Long-term impact of the Garrett Lee Smith Youth Suicide Prevention Program on youth suicide mortality, 2006–2015. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(10), 1142–1147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, M. S., & Kramer, R. A. (2001). Youth suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31 (Supplement to I), 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, G., Clacy, A., Hermens, D. F., & Lagopoulos, J. (2021). The long-term efficacy of suicide prevention gatekeeper training: A systematic review. Archives of Suicide Research, 25(2), 177–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, M., Elias, B., Katz, L., & Belik, S.-L. (2009). Gatekeeper training as a preventative intervention for suicide: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(4), 260–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, D. P., Schut, L. J., Puddy, R. W., Williams, L., Stephens, R. L., McKeon, R., & Lubell, K. (2009). Tennessee lives count: Statewide gatekeeper training for youth suicide prevention. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(2), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, S. T., Walch, S. E., Bauer, K. N., & Glenn, A. D. (2017). Intention to enact and enactment of gatekeeper behaviors for suicide prevention: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Prevention Science, 18(6), 704–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, S. T., Smith, P. N., Marie, L., Fadoir, N. A., & Hudson, K. (2021). A pilot randomized controlled trial of the alliance project gatekeeper training for suicide prevention. Archives of Suicide Research, 25(4), 845–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LivingWorks. (2018). Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) information sheet. Retrieved July 1, 2022, from https://www.livingworks.net/asist.

  • Moore, J. T., Cigularov, K. P., Chen, P. Y., Martinez, J. M., & Hindman, J. (2011). The effects of situational obstacles and social support on suicide-prevention gatekeeper behaviors. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 32(5), 264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, R., Munson, M. R., & Le, C. (2019). Toward an experimental therapeutics approach in human services research. Psychiatric Services, 70, 1130–1137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, P. 2010 Review of the Applied Suicide Prevention Intervention Skills Training program (ASIST). Retrieved November 10, 2018, from https://www.suicideinfo.ca/resource/siecno-20100395

  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 94–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, K. A., Pyle, S. A., Dowd, D., & Sheehan, K. (2010). Attitudes and beliefs of adolescents and parents regarding adolescent suicide. Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 125(2), 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, J. A., Carey, R. N., Michie, S., Johnston, M., Edmondson, D., & Davidson, K. W. (2018). Using rigorous methods to advance behaviour change science. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 797–799.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. (2012). 2012 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action. Retrieved September 16, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK109917.

  • Walrath, C., Godoy Garraza, L., Reid, H., Goldston, D. B., & McKeon, R. (2015). Impact of the Garrett Lee Smith youth suicide prevention program on suicide mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 105(5), 986–993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. W. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: Experimental therapeutics in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Identifying mechanisms and moving the needle. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 51(3), 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., Inman, J., Cross, W., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Guo, J., & Pena, J. B. (2008). Randomized trial of a gatekeeper program for suicide prevention: 1-year impact on secondary school staff. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 104–115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration under Grant <5U79SM059190> .

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PS and CEF contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AB and CM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CM, KS, DM, SF, and CEF. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina S. Magness.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan (Ethics approval number: HUM0035883).

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magness, C.S., Stern, K., Burnside, A. et al. Changes in Gatekeeper Beliefs Following ASIST and Relation to Subsequent Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Behaviors. Community Ment Health J 59, 1013–1020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-01084-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-01084-9

Keywords

Navigation