“Nice White Meetings”
Unpacking Absurd Library Bureaucracy through a Critical Race Theory Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v6.34340Keywords:
Critical Race Theory, library bureaucracy, meeting culture, white supremacyAbstract
Although the issues of diversity and representation are often discussed within academic librarianship in Canada and the United States, the field has made little headway in being inclusive of the Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) who work within it. If academic libraries are to become truly authentic and inclusive spaces where BIPOC are central not only to shaping the values of a library but also to determining how those values are accomplished, we must examine the traditional ways in which libraries function. One of these traditions is a reliance on bureaucracy and its associated practices such as structured group work and meetings, which are presumed to be inherently neutral and rational ways of working. Critical examinations of bureaucracy within higher education reveal how its overadoption is absurdly at odds with the social justice–oriented missions of most libraries. Furthermore, not all who are involved in libraries are equally harmed through this overreliance on bureaucracy; this article employs Critical Race Theory to uncover the insidious and specific deleterious impacts bureaucracies can have on BIPOC library workers. The antithesis of a neutral system, bureaucracy instead functions to force assimilation into a system entrenched in whiteness.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Lalitha Nataraj, Holly Hampton, Talitha R. Matlin, Yvonne Nalani Meulemans
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to use and share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, as long as it is not used for commercial purposes. This license does not waive the author’s moral rights.
Authors may choose a different Creative Commons license that allows reuse and remixing of content (CC BY, CC BY-SA, or CC BY-NC-SA) by indicating their preference to the editors.