The Future of Water Management in Central Asia

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2019) | Viewed by 67291

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Middle Eastern Studies and Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Box 201, Lund SE-22100, Sweden
Interests: water resources management in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Central Asia; environmental engineering; environmental impact assessment; soil and water conservation; hydrology; water resources management; watershed management; water resources engineering; integrated water resources management; flood modeling; water quality modeling; watershed hydrology; hydrological modeling; integrated lake/river basin management; storm water management; hydrologic and water resources modeling and simulation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Box 201, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
Interests: water; sanitation and hygiene (WASH); hygiene behavior in schools and healthcare facilities

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We encourage you to submit papers for an important Special Issue of Water, focused on the future of water management in Central Asia. Central Asia represents an important strategic geopolitical region. It has often been identified as a region close to potential conflict regarding water usage. For example, sharing of the water from the Syr Darya and the Amu Darya in the Aral Sea Basin has exposed a complex picture of water needs and potential political conflict. The rapid population increase together with climate change impacts are likely to further aggravate the near-future situation for water management in the region. Papers for this Special Issue should be forward-looking in the sense that we use contemporary knowledge together with water management tools to forecast how the future of water usage might look like in the region in response to future climate changes and how this will affect socioeconomic development. Case studies that consider aspects of water management in view of climate variability are suitable; however, they must substantively contribute to a broader understanding of this topic and allow for general management aspects regarding climate change effects.

Prof. Dr. Ronny Berndtsson
Dr. Kamshat Tussupova
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Central Asia
  • water management
  • water conflict
  • hydropolitics
  • climate change
  • socioeconomic development

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

5 pages, 166 KiB  
Editorial
The Future of Water Management in Central Asia
by Ronny Berndtsson and Kamshat Tussupova
Water 2020, 12(8), 2241; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082241 - 09 Aug 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3317
Abstract
Central Asia is an increasingly important strategic geopolitical region. During the latest decades, the region has often been identified as close to potential conflict regarding water usage. This includes the sharing of water from the Syr Darya and the Amu Darya in the [...] Read more.
Central Asia is an increasingly important strategic geopolitical region. During the latest decades, the region has often been identified as close to potential conflict regarding water usage. This includes the sharing of water from the Syr Darya and the Amu Darya in the Aral Sea Basin. The Aral Sea disaster has exposed a complex picture of water needs and potential political conflict. Rapid population increase together with climate change impacts are likely to further aggravate the short- and long-term future precarious situation for water management in the region. This Special Issue focuses on present and future water management issues in Central Asia in view of future climate changes and how these will affect socioeconomic development. Central Asia is, in general, water rich; however, exercising efficient and fair water management will be important in view of future population increase and climate change. At the same time, water and natural resource development is a cornerstone in all the Central Asian republics. Especially, water resources are, to a great extent, shared between all five republics. A common ground for water-sharing is, therefore, of utmost importance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

14 pages, 2305 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Precipitation Simulations in Central Asia by CMIP5 Climate Models
by Zhijie Ta, Yang Yu, Lingxiao Sun, Xi Chen, Guijin Mu and Ruide Yu
Water 2018, 10(11), 1516; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111516 - 25 Oct 2018
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 4426
Abstract
The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) provides data, which is widely used to assess global and regional climate change. In this study, we evaluated the ability of 37 global climate models (GCMs) of CMIP5 to simulate historical precipitation in Central Asia [...] Read more.
The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) provides data, which is widely used to assess global and regional climate change. In this study, we evaluated the ability of 37 global climate models (GCMs) of CMIP5 to simulate historical precipitation in Central Asia (CA). The relative root mean square error (RRMSE), spatial correlation coefficient, and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) were used as criteria for evaluation. The precipitation simulation results of GCMs were compared with the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) precipitation in 1986–2005. Most models show a variety of precipitation simulation capabilities both spatially and temporally, whereas the top six models were identified as having good performance in CA, including HadCM3, MIROC5, MPI-ESM-LR, MPI-ESM-P, CMCC-CM, and CMCC-CMS. As the GCMs have large uncertainties in the prediction of future precipitation, it is difficult to find the best model to predict future precipitation in CA. Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) results can give a good simulation of precipitation, and are superior to individual models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4443 KiB  
Article
Trading Natural Riparian Forests for Urban Shelterbelt Plantations—A Sustainability Assessment of the Kökyar Protection Forest in NW China
by Siegmund Missall, Abdulla Abliz, Ümüt Halik, Niels Thevs and Martin Welp
Water 2018, 10(3), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030343 - 20 Mar 2018
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6518
Abstract
Cities at the fringe of the Taklimakan desert in NW China are prone to dust and sand storms with serious consequences for human well-being. The Kökyar Protection Forest was established in the 1980s as an ecological engineering project with the intent of protecting [...] Read more.
Cities at the fringe of the Taklimakan desert in NW China are prone to dust and sand storms with serious consequences for human well-being. The Kökyar Protection Forest was established in the 1980s as an ecological engineering project with the intent of protecting the city of Aksu, NW China, from these impacts. It is designed as a combination of poplar shelterbelts and orchards, irrigated by river water from the Aksu River, the main tributary of the Tarim River. Prevalent literature describes it as an afforestation project for combatting desertification with manifold positive effects for the economic, social, and environmental dimension of sustainable development. This paper sets out to challenge these claims by a sustainability assessment in which the plantation is examined from a broader perspective, embedding it to the wider context of social and environmental problems in South Xinjiang. Methods comprise evapotranspiration calculations, interviews, a socioeconomic household survey, stakeholder dialogues, and literature research. Results affirm its economic sustainability, but see a mixed record for the social sphere. From the nature conservation point of view, it has to be classified as unsustainable because its high irrigation water consumption results in the downstream desiccation and desertification of natural riparian forests along the Tarim River, causing a forest loss in the downstream area twice the size of the forest gain in the upstream area. There is a trade-off between artificial shelterbelt plantations for urban ecosystem services on the one hand side, and natural riparian forests and their biodiversity on the other hand side. The paper recommends restricting agricultural extension, and using locally adapted less water consuming agroforestry schemes to protect urban dwellers from dust stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

3482 KiB  
Article
Tree Shelterbelts as an Element to Improve Water Resource Management in Central Asia
by Niels Thevs, Eva Strenge, Kumar Aliev, Maksat Eraaliev, Petra Lang, Azim Baibagysov and Jianchu Xu
Water 2017, 9(11), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110842 - 31 Oct 2017
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4804
Abstract
In Central Asia, agriculture, notably irrigated agriculture, is the largest water consumer. Currently, flood and furrow irrigation are the dominant irrigation methods in Central Asia, in particular in the post-Soviet countries. Against the background of current and increasing competition for water—e.g., through reduced [...] Read more.
In Central Asia, agriculture, notably irrigated agriculture, is the largest water consumer. Currently, flood and furrow irrigation are the dominant irrigation methods in Central Asia, in particular in the post-Soviet countries. Against the background of current and increasing competition for water—e.g., through reduced river runoffs in the course of climate change—water consumption of agriculture needs to be reduced. On the field plot level, improved irrigation technologies, like drip irrigation or plastic mulch, can reduce water consumption substantially. Alternatively, tree lines as wind breaks (shelterbelts) also can reduce crop water consumption, as shown by research from many drylands around the world. As previous research has concentrated on crop water consumption and not on tree water consumption, this paper brings the two together, in order to approach a more holistic picture, in how far shelterbelt systems, including the trees, may have the potential to save water or not. Crop water consumption was assessed through the Penman–Monteith approach for corn, wheat, potato, barley, and pear under open field conditions and under an assumed influence of a tree shelterbelt. Tree water consumption was investigated through sap flow measurements. Crop water consumption was reduced by 10–12% under influence of a shelterbelt compared to open field conditions. When water consumption of shelterbelts was added, a slight reduction of water consumption of the whole crop-shelterbelt system was found for corn, potato, and pear under the assumption 25 ha (500 × 500 m) field sizes. Under an assumption of 4 ha (200 × 200 m) field size, water consumption of the whole crop-shelterbelt system was higher for all crops investigated except for pear. The results suggest that shelterbelts may play a role in improving water resource management in Central Asia in the context of water demanding crops, like corn or cotton. In further research, other effects of shelterbelts, like increased crop yields and additional income from trees, need to be investigated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

2025 KiB  
Article
The Current Status and Future of Central Asia’s Fish and Fisheries: Confronting a Wicked Problem
by Norman A. Graham, Steven G. Pueppke and Talgat Uderbayev
Water 2017, 9(9), 701; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090701 - 14 Sep 2017
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 7737
Abstract
Central Asia’s arid lowland ecosystems are dependent on water that originates in nearby mountains and is carried by rivers to terminal lakes and freshwater seas with no outlets to the ocean. Fish traditionally thrived in these waterways, but they have become increasingly jeopardized [...] Read more.
Central Asia’s arid lowland ecosystems are dependent on water that originates in nearby mountains and is carried by rivers to terminal lakes and freshwater seas with no outlets to the ocean. Fish traditionally thrived in these waterways, but they have become increasingly jeopardized by water impoundment and diversion for energy and crop production. Fish capture in the five new Central Asian republics consequently entered a period of long decline, a trend that was accelerated by removal of the centralized controls imposed by the former Soviet Union. Production levels have recovered during the past decade, but only in some countries. A similar trend is evident with aquaculture, which reached its lowest production levels in 2003–2008 but now is partially recovering. In both cases, progress is most evident in water-deficient Uzbekistan. Fish capture in Kazakhstan’s Ili River ecosystem, including Kapchagay Reservoir and Lake Balkhash, is now dropping precipitously. Effects on the lake’s fisheries have been magnified by the disproportionate rates of disappearance of valuable carp and pike-perch. The interrelationships between water, energy, and food underlie these threats to Central Asia’s fish and define a classic “wicked problem” that must be addressed regionally with explicit attention given to fish as important components of the ecosystem. Recent developments, although not all positive, give reason for cautious optimism that the region’s fisheries and aquaculture industries can be stabilized. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

920 KiB  
Article
Impact of Institutional Change on Irrigation Management: A Case Study from Southern Uzbekistan
by Kakhramon Djumaboev, Ahmad Hamidov, Oyture Anarbekov, Zafar Gafurov and Kamshat Tussupova
Water 2017, 9(6), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060419 - 10 Jun 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 7423
Abstract
The rapidly growing population in Uzbekistan has put massive pressure on limited water resources, resulting in frequent water shortages. Irrigation is by far the major water use. Improving irrigation water use through the institutional change of establishing water consumer associations (WCAs) has been [...] Read more.
The rapidly growing population in Uzbekistan has put massive pressure on limited water resources, resulting in frequent water shortages. Irrigation is by far the major water use. Improving irrigation water use through the institutional change of establishing water consumer associations (WCAs) has been identified as a way to increase agricultural production and meet the food demand in the area. However, most WCAs are not fully able to organize collective action or generate sufficient funds to carry out their responsibilities. This study investigated the water-resource-related challenges faced by WCAs and local farmers in Kashkadarya Province in Uzbekistan, using semi-structured expert interviews and focus group discussions. The resulting data were analyzed using qualitative analysis software (Atlas.ti). The results indicated that outdated infrastructure, poor governance, and farmers’ non-payment of irrigation service fees hamper sustainable water management. Greater trust and communication within the WCAs would make an important contribution to effective collective action and to the long-term sustainability of local associations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

955 KiB  
Article
The Paradox of Water Management Projects in Central Asia: An Institutionalist Perspective
by Lioudmila Chatalova, Nodir Djanibekov, Taras Gagalyuk and Vladislav Valentinov
Water 2017, 9(4), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040300 - 24 Apr 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 6343
Abstract
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Central Asian countries have been faced with numerous development challenges in agriculture, especially those related to water use. Well-intentioned foreign donors and development agencies have stepped in to support local farmers, research centers, and public [...] Read more.
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Central Asian countries have been faced with numerous development challenges in agriculture, especially those related to water use. Well-intentioned foreign donors and development agencies have stepped in to support local farmers, research centers, and public authorities in devising innovative solutions. Yet, development aid projects have borne fruit only partially. Paradoxically, innovative and apparently useful technologies proposed by foreign donors have rarely and only partially succeeded in taking root in the local institutional contexts. To explain this paradox, this paper draws on the institutional approach which shows the possibility of technological innovations being encapsulated by dysfunctional institutions. Reviewing recent studies of water-related projects in Central Asia, the paper shows this encapsulation to be at the core of the development project failures pervasive both in the Soviet period and today. If the concept of encapsulation is valid, then the current development efforts can be made more effective by detecting and counteracting the structures of vested interest on the part of all the actors involved, such as foreign donors, public authorities, research centers and local farmers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1524 KiB  
Article
Could Changing Power Relationships Lead to Better Water Sharing in Central Asia?
by Aibek Zhupankhan, Kamshat Tussupova and Ronny Berndtsson
Water 2017, 9(2), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020139 - 20 Feb 2017
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 9738
Abstract
Even though Central Asia is water rich, water disputes have characterized the region after crumbling of the Soviet Union in 1991. The uneven spatial distribution and complex pattern of transboundary water sources with contrasting national water needs have created an intricate water dilemma. [...] Read more.
Even though Central Asia is water rich, water disputes have characterized the region after crumbling of the Soviet Union in 1991. The uneven spatial distribution and complex pattern of transboundary water sources with contrasting national water needs have created an intricate water dilemma. Increasing national water needs, water claims by surrounding countries, uncertainties in renewable water volumes, and effects of climate change will put further strain on the future water use in Central Asia. We argue that the present power distribution with three downstream hegemons (Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) and two upstream much poorer countries with less political influence (Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) is not likely to lead forward to a greater willingness to share water. We discuss this situation with the analogue Egypt-Sudan-Ethiopia in the Nile Basin. Thus, as in the case of Ethiopia in the Nile Basin, gradually economically stronger upstream countries Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan due to hydropower development are likely to eventually re-define the hydropolitical map of Central Asia. As in the case of the Nile Basin, a more even power balance between upstream and downstream countries may lead to an improved political structure for a much-needed better collaboration on water issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

3268 KiB  
Review
Essentials of Endorheic Basins and Lakes: A Review in the Context of Current and Future Water Resource Management and Mitigation Activities in Central Asia
by Vadim Yapiyev, Zhanay Sagintayev, Vassilis J. Inglezakis, Kanat Samarkhanov and Anne Verhoef
Water 2017, 9(10), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100798 - 21 Oct 2017
Cited by 64 | Viewed by 15815
Abstract
Endorheic basins (i.e., land-locked drainage networks) and their lakes can be highly sensitive to variations in climate and adverse anthropogenic activities, such as overexploitation of water resources. In this review paper, we provide a brief overview of one major endorheic basin on each [...] Read more.
Endorheic basins (i.e., land-locked drainage networks) and their lakes can be highly sensitive to variations in climate and adverse anthropogenic activities, such as overexploitation of water resources. In this review paper, we provide a brief overview of one major endorheic basin on each continent, plus a number of endorheic basins in Central Asia (CA), a region where a large proportion of the land area is within this type of basin. We summarize the effects of (changing) climate drivers and land surface–atmosphere feedbacks on the water balance. For the CA region, we also discuss key anthropogenic activities, related water management approaches and their complex relationship with political and policy issues. In CA a substantial increase in irrigated agriculture coupled with negative climate change impacts have disrupted the fragile water balance for many endorheic basins and their lakes. Transboundary integrated land and water management approaches must be developed to facilitate adequate climate change adaptation and possible mitigation of the adverse anthropogenic influence on endorheic basins in CA. Suitable climate adaptation, mitigation and efficient natural resource management technologies and methods are available, and are developing fast. A number of these are discussed in the paper, but these technologies alone are not sufficient to address pressing water resource issues in CA. Food–water–energy nexus analyses demonstrate that transboundary endorheic basin management requires transformational changes with involvement of all key stakeholders. Regional programs, supported by local governments and international donors, which incorporate advanced adaptation technologies, water resource research and management capacity development, are essential for successful climate change adaptation efforts in CA. However, there is a need for an accelerated uptake of such programs, with an emphasis on unification of approaches, as the pressures resulting from climate change and aggravated by human mismanagement of natural water resources leave very little time for hesitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Water Management in Central Asia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop