Improve Your Play With Robots
JDonn's
Teaching Session - Summary
On Sunday, March 31, we held a free teaching session on BBO,
focused on how to do well when playing with robots (GIB). Teacher
extraordinaire
was American expert and top robot player JDonn (Joshua Donn), who
presented a few example hands then answered questions from the
audience. In case you missed the lesson, here's a summary.
JDonn's tips on how to do well
when playing with robots:
Most of the time just try to play normal bridge well. Make
good bids, count the hands and don't get weird unless you know why you
are doing it.
Always keep in mind that in "best hand" tournaments, where
no one can have more HCP than you, you should use this info to count
the hands.
If you bid 1♠ p 2♠ p p p, and you hold 12 points, you
know
neither opponent has more than 12 points. So if one opponent has shown
up with 11 points and you have a queen left to guess, you know his
partner has it for sure!
If you have 10 or 11 points, you know no one else has
more
than you so
the points will be evenly split between the two partnerships. For
example, if you have 10 then you know everyone has exactly 10. Use this
info:
if opps end up in 3NT, you can consider doubling
them, because you know they most likely
overbid
if your partner opens, keep the bidding low
- there is no need to make a
limit raise even if that's what your hand is technically worth.
Always remember to find out the meaning of partner's bids,
and of your
bids before you make them. You can do that by passing the mouse pointer
over the bid.
Generally you can trust GIB's description of the bids, but
here is a specific instance where it is untrue and you can take
advantage. When you have a slow auction toward game with both sides
bidding, and you want to double GIB at the end, sometimes if you mouse
over the double it says "takeout". That may talk you out of doubling
since you don't want partner to pull it. But if both sides have been
bidding and they got to game
slowly, your partner will rarely pull it in that particular situation.
Now I will explain my most profitable secret in ACBL and
55% tournaments. This is the one way in which I vary my play greatly
from real life.And
that
is, open 1NT every
chance you get.
I recommend opening 1NT with 14 points always, even
though
it's 15-17. There are a number of reasons.
One is that the opponents are very bad at bidding over
that. For example they often bid 2♠ showing spades and a minor with a 4
card spade suit and 6 or 7 card minor, and play in a dumb fit.
Another main reason for opening 1NT every time you have
14
is the opponents will think you have 15. This can often lead them to
misdefend.
It's also good to open 1NT with a wide variety of
shapes.
I would do it any time I'm balanced with a 6 card
minor.
5 card major,
no problem.
2425, sure!
Remember, if GIB thinks you can't have a
certain shape you will gain from doing this when he misdefends. And
usually 3NT is the first contract anyway so you break
even at worst.
Q: Playing
with a human partner, if we have a fit and I want
to go to slam, I will cue bid instead of using RKCB when I have a suit
with two fast losers. GIB doesn€™t seem to handle these
auctions well. Do you just ask for key cards anyway, or is
there some other way to handle this? A: I
recommend two different strategies rather than cuebidding:
One is taking a chance on the suit with 2 fast losers
and
bidding keycard blackwood anyway
The other is make a "fake cuebid" in your weak suit
and
just go to slam anyway. If partner has it controlled then there is no
harm, and if he doesn't you may steal a slam!
Q: Have
you been successful in handling
routine reverse auctions with bots, which seem to hate taking a
preference back to a minor? For example, what's your plan in
first seat holding x AKxx AKQxxx xx? A: Reverse
auctions are tricky with humans and with robots. If I hold that hand
and the auction starts 1♦
p 1♠ p I
will reverse. The main reason is I want to find our heart fit if we
have it My third bid will surely be 3♦.
That is just normal
bridge, nothing special about the robots.
In general after reversing, just make sure you mouse over
partner's and your own bids like I mentioned before so you know if
partner is signing off or making a forcing bid.
Q: If
you always open 1NT even on 14, and end up in contracts
different from others, don't you run a high risk of being different and
then a bottom for no reason? Whereas for someone at the expert level,
even if you end up in the same contract as you have a reasonable
expectation of beating them anyway.
(For expert level)? A: That's
a very fair point. It's true that even though I get
a lot of tops by doing this, I also get some bottoms. But I believe so
strongly that it's a big winning strategy
that I accept that. Another thing to remember is these tournaments are
just 12
boards long so you need a big score to win them since they have high
variance. If it was 100 boards long or even just 30 I would probably
try to play 100% sound bridge and depend on my ability to win. But in
12 boards someone or two will get lucky and have a
65 or 70% or even high game most of the time. If you want to win them
you need a big score, so I
don't mind a strategy that is focused on tops at the risk of bottoms.
Q: From Leo LaSota (one of
our top players): Open NT
aggressively (all 14s, some 13s). Do you accept game if partner then
invites? (I do as I score up a lot of 14 opposite 8 3NTs). A: I
usually don't accept the invitation if I have less than
even a minimum. If I make 9 tricks with 14 and 8 I will probably score
very well anyway. I know Leo is more aggressive about this than I am,
he is
a great declarer and that works for him, but this is what works for me
and what I think would work better for most people.
Q:
In your first article about playing with bots, you were negative about
opening preempts. Are you still, and what about preemptive overcalls? A: I
don't remember saying that, but if robot opens 2 or 3 he is much more
wide ranging and it's a
bit more of a guess but I still recommend being aggressive. He
sometimes has a very good hand.
Q: On
55% tourneys, some bidding gets to different leads. Is
it better approach to bid a fast or slow game? (Give info to opps or
not?) A: I
just try to play normally, and follow my advice of
opening 1NT a lot. I am not someone who particularly minds giving away
information if I think it will help me reach my best contract, but if I
don't then I won't :)
Q: With
18-19 do you open 2NT? (ie extend the 1NT logic) A: I am
not as aggressive about opening 2NT as I am 1NT for a
few reasons
One is that a major gain from opening 1NT so much is
that
GIB is bad at bidding over it defensively. That is not a factor after
2NT.
Also when I'm stronger my side is more likely to have a
slam available, so I want to investigate it rather than do something
"random". It's a more reasonable strategy in a robot race tournament
where time is so important.
Q: When
defending NT contracts and Bot is on
lead, he inevitably leads from a short suit. By the time I figure out
what he has, it's too late. Any hints on how to defend more
effectively, besides counting, with the bots? A: Opening
leads are probably GIB's weakest point. It's true
he leads from short suits a lot. All I can tell you is try to count the
hand and defend
well. Don't rely on signals if you can help it since GIB is bad with
signalling.
Q: From
Leo LaSota:
Do you pickup on any "tells" from the robots by the tempo
of bidding or playing a card? (Personally, I frequently know
what my partner's second bid will be after 1NT-P-2♣-P-any response by
me - P based on delay before they bid again.) A: GIB
certainly used to have big tells. I think they have gone away and I
don't believe they exist
any more. I have confirmed that with Fred as well. I think it's the
kind of thing where if you think it
exists you will be convinced you saw it. Rain: What
were the tells? JDonn: They
were tempo issues, GIB used to be very slow with a
choice of bids or plays, very fast with a singleton. But that has gone
away as far as I'm concerned.
Q: How
do you handle transfers when opening 1NT with
singleton major? A: I
just accept the transfer and hope for the best.
Certainly I regret when that happens. If I make another bid GIB might
think I'm "superaccepting"
and that will lead to a disaster. Plus maybe he has 6, or maybe his
next bid is 3NT, so it
doesn't have to be bad. But I'm more comfortable if I must open 1NT
with a
singleton having it in a minor rather than a major.
Q: Does
GIB always cover honor/split honor? I noticed they
used to but no longer seem to. ie, how far can you trust GIB's
signaling/play ? A: I
pretty much ignore GIB's signals. As for covering honors
he definitely still does that, and splits. So you can certainly take
advantage of GIB's tendencies.
Q: How
can this disaster be avoided?
A: Sometimes
GIB doesn't bid enough after a Blackwood answer,
stopping in 5 missing one keycard for example. On that hand the best I
could recommend is jumping to slam
when GIB bids blackwood. It's true you could miss 7♣ that way but there
is no good answer. And even if you can make 7♣ your GIB was probably
just
going to sign off in 6.
Q: Playing
robots appear to be a different game than bridge (ie
the knowledge about having the best hand). So why would one play
them? Is it to practice counting (HCP, distribution)? A: Even
though there are difference with live bridge it's
still a great game that uses most of the same skills. Just like rubber
bridge, duplicate bridge, IMPs and
matchpoints, all have differences, they are all still bridge, unique in
their own ways. I also usually know what to expect from GIB, unlike a
human partner. I think it's fun but only do it if it's fun for you.
Q: In
an auction where you have found a minor suit fit and
want to play game, if you jump from 3 to 5, GIB frequently bids 6 with
no reasonable value. How do you get to 5, without taking risk of GIB
bidding 6? A: Good
question, this goes to my point about mousing over
the bids. If you see that bidding 5 shows a lot more points than you
have, don't do it! You can consider bidding 4 of the minor, or bidding
some
other suit. Perhaps bidding Blackwood if you think you can stop. But
even passing is better than bidding 5 if that will
show so many points that partner will bid 6 and go down.