Big Win for Millennium Pipeline: Big Loss for New York DEC

Millennium PipelineAttorney Thomas S. West
Founder and Managing Partner
The West Firm, PLLC

 

FERC just gave Millennium Pipeline a big win and blew New York State DEC out of the water with a much deserved put-down and precedent for other pipelines.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an important decision today in favor of Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“MPC”) that is sure to effect New York regulatory matters.  FERC determined that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) waived its authority to issue a water quality certificate under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).

Millennium Pipeline

CPV Valley Energy Center

The waiver is for MPC’s 7.8 mile 16-inch-diameter pipeline and related facilities intended to provide 127,200 dekatherms per day to Competitive Power Ventures’ controversial Valley Energy Center; a 680 MW natural gas-fueled combined cycle electric generating facility in the Town of Wawayanda, New York (NYISO Electric Zone G).  While MPC is still in need of a Notice to Proceed from FERC to continue with the project, FERC’s decision may clear the way for construction of the line.

FERC originally issued to MPC a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the project on November 9, 2016.  This Certificate, however, required MPC to obtain all authorizations required by federal law, or a waiver thereof, prior to commencing construction of the line.  This included the NYSDEC issued CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certificate.  MPC first applied to the NYSDEC for this certification on November 23, 2015.

According to FERC, the NYSDEC then had “a reasonable period of time (which shall not exceed one year) after receipt of (such) a request” (33 U.S.C. Section 1341(a)(1)) to make a decision and, in failing to do so, waived its authority on the matter.  In re Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C., Docket No. CP16-17-000, 160 FERC ¶ 61,065, pp. 4-5 (FERC Sept. 15, 2017).

The NYSDEC argued that it satisfied this requirement because it made a decision within one year of receipt of a “completed application,” but FERC rejected this argument, stating that the NYSDEC could have, at any time, simply denied the application prior to the deadline. In re Millennium Pipeline Company, L.L.C., Docket No. CP16-17-000, 160 FERC ¶ 61,065, at p. 8.

This is certainly an interesting development in light of the recent New York denials of pipeline infrastructure intended to satisfy present demands not only in New York but also throughout the New England region. In the future, though, the NYSDEC will most likely avoid this pitfall by making timely decisions.

Read the decision here. To learn more about West Firm attorneys, projects, and practice areas click here.

The West Firm is proud to represent the energy industry regarding controversial projects and issues.

Editor’s Note: Here’s the money paragraph from the FERC decision:

“[T]he starting point for interpreting a statute is the language of the statute itself.” Determining whether the plain meaning of the statutory text resolves the issue includes consideration of “the particular statutory language at issue, as well as the language and design of the statute as a whole.” Section 401 provides that water quality certification is waived when the certifying agency “fails or refuses to act on a request for certification, within a reasonable period of time (which shall not exceed one year) after receipt of such request.”18 Thus the term “receipt” specifies the triggering event. The dictionary definition of “receipt” is the act or process of receiving. Therefore, in this context, the plain meaning of “after receipt of the request” is the day the agency receives a certification application, as opposed to when the agency considers the application to be complete. Giving effect to the plain text of a statute, the one-year review period began November 23, 2015, the date that New York DEC received the application.

As this paragraph indicates, FERC didn’t buy DEC’s contention that it got to decide the start date for the one-year period buy playing “incomplete application” games. The implications for other New York State pipeline water quality certification requests are, as Tom suggests, very significant. Ironically, this may be exactly the decision Gov. Cuomo hoped for: he gets the case and fractivist street cred for opposing it.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Please share this post and get the word out everywhere!

4 thoughts on “Big Win for Millennium Pipeline: Big Loss for New York DEC

  1. Reasonable is an interesting word. How does it apply to the NY DEC and fractivists? Fractivists as we know are not reasonable and disdain those that are reasonable. Their views are extreme and non-negotiable. The NYDEC didn’t act reasonably with this specific permit and how can one explain their shenanigans with consitution pipeline permit which was rejected not just at the last possible second and when it seemed they were not available to answer questions or forthcoming about a specific reason for the permit delay, but this NY agency rejected the permit for consitution pipeline after knowing full well trees had been felled along the path in pa. Seriously what reasonable agency would do that?

  2. cuomo policy is lie cheat steal and delay to kill. Those Buffalo Billion corruption trials are still months away with glacial pace of NY legal system. I fervently hope he is snared in it as he so richly deserves.

  3. Pingback: Battle for the Pipelines – The Agency Strikes BackNatural Gas Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *